-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
faq 29720608
Billy Charlton edited this page Sep 5, 2018
·
2 revisions
by Kai Nagel on 2015-06-18 17:19:15.238
Proxying for Michal Maciejewski:
One postdoc from DTU (Denmark) was asking about the stochasticity -- he wants to directly include stochastic definition of travel times into his optimization problem. Should he run different days to get different values, or maybe 1 day with different random seeds?
by Kai Nagel on 2015-06-18 17:25:43.228
Nothing systematic available, unfortunately. Two approaches seem to make sense:
(1) run same day/iteration with different random seeds. Effect will _only_ be the stochasticity of the mobsim, which currently is fairly small (flow is accumulated deterministically, but priority at intersections is (still?) stochastic)
(2) run different days/iterations. I would say that this is best done with innovation switched off, and with SelectExpBetaPlanStrategy (and not ChangeXxx, which we normally recommend; "Select" makes a new full logit draw in every iterations; Change... only changes _some_ of the plans.).
Also the scoring should be switched off. Probably easiest achieved by switching the learning rate to zero.
Both things should be tested; if done right, the plans should not change over the iterations except for the "selected" attributes.
This should have more stochasticity than (1), based on variations in plans choice between days/draws. It might look like this has more variation than using ChangeXxx, but in the end it should not, the only difference is correlations: ChangeXxx is correlated from one iteration to the next, SelectXxx is not.
You are viewing an archive of the previous MATSim Q&A site. The real site is now at https://matsim.org/faq