Further NPM CLI issue adjustments

[sschuberth]

Please have a look at the individual commit messages for the details.

The second commits is just a proposal, I'm fine to also drop it again.

[fviernau]

LGTM, I prefer to have another approval as I'm not certain about using "NPM CLI" as Issue.source. Maybe @mnonnenmacher ?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (32e0072) 67.16% compared to head (36e397d) 67.16%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 36e397d differs from pull request most recent head e9e2cd5. Consider uploading reports for the commit e9e2cd5 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #8193   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     67.16%   67.16%           
  Complexity     2049     2049           
=========================================
  Files           357      357           
  Lines         17158    17158           
  Branches       2461     2461           
=========================================
  Hits          11525    11525           
  Misses         4611     4611           
  Partials       1022     1022           

Flag	Coverage Δ
funTest-docker	66.25% <ø> (ø)
funTest-non-docker	33.96% <ø> (ø)
test	36.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mnonnenmacher]

LGTM, I prefer to have another approval as I'm not certain about using "NPM CLI" as Issue.source. Maybe @mnonnenmacher ?

I thought about this and am not sure if I like the approach. The reason is that for a user who does not know the background it's not clear why some issues use "NPM" and others "NPM CLI" as source. Also, if you want to filter NPM issues (e.g. in the workbench) you now have potentially two different values for the source to filter by.
Another approach would be to prefix the messages with an explanation, that would not require any background knowledge, for example "The NPM CLI reported the following warning during dependency resolution: ...".

[sschuberth]

I thought about this and am not sure if I like the approach.

Ok, let me just drop the second commit then to simplify the decision making here.