[HOLD] [$250] [Search v1] Refactor RHP flow to contain navigation within itself

[luacmartins]

Problem

We introduced reports in the RHP in this PR, however, interacting with other navigation actions, e.g. clicking on a task, makes the task open in the main pane which is jarring and unexpected.

Coming from #40570 (review), we need to update App to handle RHP navigation within the RHP. That means handling navigation events for mentions, rooms, any links, IOUs, images, etc

Solution

Let's discuss

cc @WojtekBoman @adamgrzybowski @Kicu this is not a priority now, but it's a polish item we'll need to work on once the core issues have been implemented.

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01a6d3b7c07ca93531
• Upwork Job ID: 1790718951241498624
• Last Price Increase: 2024-05-15

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @rushatgabhane

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @anmurali (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

@anmurali, @luacmartins Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

[luacmartins]

Moving this to weekly for now while we work on the MVP for search.

[luacmartins]

Still no updates here as we're focusing on the other v1.2 items at the moment.

[trjExpensify]

Going to move it into the summer along with the v1.2 items!

[melvin-bot]

@anmurali @luacmartins this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!

[melvin-bot]

@anmurali, @luacmartins Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

[adamgrzybowski]

Hi guys! Two things I want to mention:

UX Perspective:
I wonder if putting all possible central panel flows into RHP gives value to the user. For people using desktops web version we will be using only a small part of the screen.
Don't you think displaying all these screens in two different contexts could also be confusing to the users?

Technical Perspective:
I spent a few minutes trying to think how time consuming the implementation might be, and I believe it will become quite complex. Some pitfalls:

• We would need to replace all links sent in chat to reflect the RHP versions of these pages if we want them to navigate in RHP. It may be confusing for the user to press /r/123123 and see search/all/view/123123
• On the central panel we have logic and optimizations to handle the same screen opened several times with different parameters (report screens). We don’t have that in RHP.
• As usual, we would have to take a closer look at the browser history. It is easy to mess it up.

I suspect there may be plenty of similar problems.
I would advise to reserve some time for a research how difficult this will be first.

So the final questions are:

• are we aware of the cost of implementation?
• is there really a value in this?
• is cost/value ratio satisfying enough to focus on this now.

@Kicu found a good example on GitHub where if are on you a project view you can quickly look into the PR using RHP, but any further navigation will open on full screen.

cc: @WojtekBoman

web.mov

[luacmartins]

cc @trjExpensify @JmillsExpensify @shawnborton for opinions on the comment above

[JmillsExpensify]

@anmurali I hope you don't mind that I take this issue over in conjunction with the on-going search implementation.

[rushatgabhane]

not overdue

[WojtekBoman]

Hi! Today I started investigating how we can implement RHP flow in the Search module and I've found one case that I'd like to discuss. I'm wondering if we can just continue navigating in RHP when we navigate to the /r/:reportID path and we are on the report page displayed in RHP. But in this solution, we'll also remain in RHP when we click on the deeplink in the format /r/:reportID . Is this behaviour ok for you? @Expensify/design @JmillsExpensify @trjExpensify

Screen.Recording.2024-05-27.at.17.10.08.mov

[shawnborton]

I think that would be okay for me, but just curious how you navigated to a #room in the RHP in the first place? Was that linked from an expense or expense report somehow?

[trjExpensify]

Yeah, same. 👍

[adamgrzybowski]

Hi! What is the status of this task? Do we have a clear idea what we want to implement? We have some capacity to work on it.

cc: @luacmartins @shawnborton @trjExpensify

[luacmartins]

No updates yet. I think we'll have to start a broader discussion on this pattern before we can work on solutions.

[JmillsExpensify]

Yeah, still a weekly sounds right to me.

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @JmillsExpensify, @luacmartins, @rushatgabhane eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

[melvin-bot]

@JmillsExpensify, @luacmartins, @rushatgabhane, this Monthly task hasn't been acted upon in 6 weeks; closing.

If you disagree, feel encouraged to reopen it -- but pick your least important issue to close instead.

[luacmartins]

I'm closing this issue in favor of #52939, since we picked up this initiative again with a PS statement