Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use conda instead of mamba by default #70

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Nov 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the --conda-frontend argument options for pin-conda-envs and update-conda-envs commands to include conda as the default choice.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Maintained consistent error handling for missing --tag or --branch during the deploy-workflow command.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the command-line argument parser within the snakedeploy/client.py file. Specifically, the --conda-frontend argument for the pin-conda-envs and update-conda-envs subcommands has been modified. The available choices for this argument have been updated to prioritize "conda" as the default option, replacing the previous default of "mamba." The overall structure and functionality of the command-line interface remain unchanged, ensuring consistent error handling and command execution.

Changes

File Change Summary
snakedeploy/client.py Updated --conda-frontend argument in pin-conda-envs and update-conda-envs subcommands:
From: choices=["mamba", "conda"], default="mamba"
To: choices=["conda", "mamba"], default="conda"

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant Snakedeploy

    User->>CLI: Execute pin-conda-envs with --conda-frontend
    CLI->>Snakedeploy: Process command with specified frontend
    Snakedeploy-->>CLI: Return success or error
    CLI-->>User: Display result
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant Snakedeploy

    User->>CLI: Execute update-conda-envs with --conda-frontend
    CLI->>Snakedeploy: Process command with specified frontend
    Snakedeploy-->>CLI: Return success or error
    CLI-->>User: Display result
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
snakedeploy/client.py (1)

Line range hint 179-183: Fix inconsistent default frontend in update-conda-envs.

While pin-conda-envs has been updated to use conda as the default frontend, update-conda-envs still shows mamba as the default. This inconsistency should be fixed to align with the PR's objective.

Apply this diff to maintain consistency:

     update_conda_envs.add_argument(
         "--conda-frontend",
-        choices=["mamba", "conda"],
-        default="mamba",
-        help="Conda frontend to use (default: mamba).",
+        choices=["conda", "mamba"],
+        default="conda",
+        help="Conda frontend to use (default: conda).",
     )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2833cee and 5cf9763.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakedeploy/client.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
snakedeploy/client.py (1)

Pattern **/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.

Comment on lines +132 to +134
choices=["conda", "mamba"],
default="conda",
help="Conda frontend to use (default: conda).",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent default frontend settings need to be aligned

The codebase has inconsistent default frontend settings:

  • pin-conda-envs subcommand uses "conda" as default
  • update-conda-envs subcommand still uses "mamba" as default

This inconsistency should be addressed to maintain a uniform default frontend across all commands.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Verify impact on existing workflows.

The changes correctly implement the switch to conda as the default frontend while maintaining backwards compatibility by keeping mamba as an option.

Let's verify if there are any hardcoded references to the default frontend in tests or documentation:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any hardcoded references to mamba or conda as the default frontend
rg -i "default.*(?:mamba|conda)" --type md --type rst --type py

Length of output: 315


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of the second occurrence of mamba as default
rg -B 5 -A 5 'default="mamba"' snakedeploy/client.py

Length of output: 417

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant