-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor populateVelocities #14
Conversation
@adolfo-rt this pull request would be a good place to add a unit test (#8) :) |
- Hide async spinner requirements of the approach planner to its implementation. - Don't swallow unexpected exceptions. Let the message show on program termination. - Bonus: Reduce header dependencies of approach planner.
@adolfo-rt please also squash the commits to avoid needlessly cluttering the commit log |
Done |
Looks like some other refactoring broke this. |
Not that I don't want to do it, but there is no prevision for writing tests in the coming weeks. I was hoping to do this in April or so. My current set of patches to play_motion will need at least a whole week of test writing, maybe more. The What broke exactly? |
I'll rebase this PR and fix the conflicts. It is just about code moving around and patches not applying properly. |
- Don't swallow unexpected exceptions. Let the message show on program termination. - Hide async spinner requirements of the approach planner to its implementation.
That merge will probably be a painful one. |
Rebased, built, passed the unit tests. Merging. |
Also added documentation and removed the node greeting log statement ( 😿 )