Fixed Flaky test in the user advance filters #9385
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nihal467 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
ea30aff
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://41dd8ff6.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://flaky-test.care-fe.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-424: Consider implementing retry-ability for flaky operationsThe test suite contains multiple operations that could be flaky due to timing issues, network latency, or state management:
- Form submissions
- Notifications
- Dropdown selections
- Tab switches
Consider implementing custom Cypress commands with built-in retries for these operations:
// commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('submitFormWithRetry', { prevSubject: true, }, (subject, options = {}) => { return cy.wrap(subject).click().should(() => { // Add assertions to verify form submission completed }); }); Cypress.Commands.add('selectDropdownOptionWithRetry', { prevSubject: true, }, (subject, option) => { return cy.wrap(subject).click().should(() => { // Add assertions to verify option selection }); });Then update the test cases to use these commands:
- manageUserPage.clickSubmit(); + manageUserPage.getSubmitButton().submitFormWithRetry(); - manageUserPage.selectSkillFromDropdown(linkedskill); + manageUserPage.getSkillDropdown().selectDropdownOptionWithRetry(linkedskill);
Line range hint
30-39: Consider implementing proper test isolationThe current test suite uses
saveLocalStorageandrestoreLocalStorageto maintain state between tests, which could lead to flaky tests if the state becomes corrupted.Consider implementing proper test isolation:
beforeEach(() => { // Reset application state cy.task('db:reset'); // Setup test data for each test cy.task('db:seed', testData); // Login fresh for each test loginPage.loginByRole("districtAdmin"); // Navigate to starting point cy.visit("/users"); cy.viewport(1280, 720); cy.clearLocalStorage(/filters--.+/); });
Line range hint
1-424: Consider architectural improvements for better test maintainabilityWhile not directly related to the flaky test fix, consider these improvements:
- Move test data to fixtures
- Enhance page object implementation
- Create custom commands for common operations
Example implementation:
// fixtures/users.json { "nurse": { "username": "dummynurse4", "password": "Coronasafe@123", "role": "nurse" } } // support/commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('setupTestUser', (fixture) => { cy.fixture(fixture).then((userData) => { // Setup user cy.task('db:seed', userData); }); }); // Page object enhancement class ManageUserPage { private selectors = { submitButton: '[data-cy=submit]', // ... other selectors }; // Chainable methods getSubmitButton() { return cy.get(this.selectors.submitButton); } }
| @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ describe("Manage User", () => { | |||
| const firstNameUserSkill = "Dev"; | |||
| const lastNameUserSkill = "Doctor"; | |||
| const usernameforworkinghour = "devdistrictadmin"; | |||
| const nurseUsername = "dummynurse1"; | |||
| const nurseUsername = "dummynurse4"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Test user "dummynurse4" is not properly configured in the test environment
The test data configuration in userConfig.ts only defines "dummynurse1" and "dummynurse2" as valid test users with proper credentials. The change to "dummynurse4" will cause test failures as this user:
- Is not defined in the user configuration
- Has no login credentials set up
- Is not accessible through the
loginByRoleutility
To fix this:
- Either revert back to using "dummynurse1" which is properly configured
- Or add "dummynurse4" configuration to
cypress/pageobject/utils/userConfig.ts:
nurse4: { username: "dummynurse4", password: "Coronasafe@123" }🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test data setup for the new nurse user
The change from "dummynurse1" to "dummynurse4" assumes that the new test user exists with the correct permissions and initial state. This could be the root cause of the flaky tests if the test data is not consistently set up.
Let's verify the test data setup:
To prevent flaky tests, consider:
- Adding explicit test data setup in a
beforehook - Implementing proper test isolation
- Adding data cleanup in
afterhook
Example setup:
before(() => {
// Setup test data
cy.task('db:seed', {
user: {
username: 'dummynurse4',
role: 'nurse',
// ... other required fields
}
});
// Login and save state
loginPage.loginByRole("districtAdmin");
cy.saveLocalStorage();
});
after(() => {
// Cleanup test data
cy.task('db:cleanup', ['dummynurse4']);
});Let me gather more information about the test setup by examining the content of the UsersManage.cy.ts file and related test utilities.
Let me check the test configuration and login utilities to understand how test users are managed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test data setup related to dummynurse4
# Check for test data setup files
echo "Searching for test data setup files..."
fd -e json -e ts -e js --full-path "fixtures|seeds|setup" | grep -i "nurse"
# Check for user creation or setup code
echo "Searching for user creation or setup code..."
rg -l "dummynurse4" --type ts --type js
# Check for any cleanup or teardown code
echo "Searching for cleanup/teardown code..."
rg -l "afterEach|afterAll|after\(" --type ts
Length of output: 1953
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of UsersManage.cy.ts for test setup
echo "Content of UsersManage.cy.ts:"
rg -B5 -A5 "dummynurse4" cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts
# Look for any beforeEach/before hooks in the file
echo -e "\nTest setup hooks in UsersManage.cy.ts:"
rg "before\(" cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts
# Check for any test data setup utilities
echo -e "\nSearching for test data setup utilities:"
rg -l "createUser|setupTestData|seedUser" --type ts
# Check for any nurse-related fixtures or constants
echo -e "\nSearching for nurse-related test data:"
rg "dummynurse[0-9]" --type ts
Length of output: 1616
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of userConfig.ts
echo "Content of userConfig.ts:"
cat cypress/pageobject/utils/userConfig.ts
# Check the login implementation
echo -e "\nLogin implementation:"
cat cypress/pageobject/Login/LoginPage.ts
# Check for any global test setup in support files
echo -e "\nChecking support files:"
fd -e ts -p "support" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 12229
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
flaky-test
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 05m 38s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Mohammed Nihal |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
153
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit