Fixed the date format in the user details page #9409
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the introduction of a new import statement for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)package.json (2)
The Cypress version has been downgraded from ^13.16.1 to ^13.16.0. While this is a minor version change, it's unusual to downgrade dependencies without a compelling reason. Let's verify the changes between these versions and any potential issues: Consider:
Let's ensure this version doesn't introduce any security vulnerabilities. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the Cypress version changes to better understand the context. Let me check one more thing to see if this was actually a downgrade or an upgrade. Cypress version 13.16.0 has no known security vulnerabilities Based on the verification:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories for Cypress
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "cypress") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 340 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the git history for the Cypress version change
git log -p package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "cypress"
# Also check the current package-lock.json for the resolved version
cat package-lock.json | jq '.packages["node_modules/cypress"]' 2>/dev/null || echo "No package-lock.json found"
Length of output: 1626 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get the previous version from git history
git log -1 --before="1 month ago" -p package.json | grep "cypress"
# Also check the changelog or releases for any security-related information
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/cypress-io/cypress/releases/tags/v13.16.0" | jq -r '.body'
Length of output: 165 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
51601c7
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://0975a90b.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://dateformat-userpage.care-fe.pages.dev |
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
dateformat-userpage
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 05m 43s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Mohammed Nihal |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
154
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-507: Consider refactoring test file for better maintainabilityWhile the tests are comprehensive and well-structured, consider the following improvements:
- Move test data to fixtures to avoid hardcoding
- Split the test suite into smaller, focused files (e.g., basic-info.spec.ts, professional-info.spec.ts)
- Consider using before/after hooks for test data setup and cleanup
Example structure:
+ // cypress/fixtures/test-users.json + { + "nurse": { + "username": "dummynurse1", + "basicInfo": { + "firstName": "Devo", + "lastName": "Districto", + "dateOfBirth": "11/08/1999", + "gender": "Female" + } + } + } + // cypress/e2e/users_spec/basic-info.spec.ts + import testUsers from '../../fixtures/test-users.json' + + describe("User Basic Information", () => { + const { nurse } = testUsers; + + beforeEach(() => { + // Setup code + }); + + it("edit a nurse user's basic information", () => { + // Test code using nurse.basicInfo + }); + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (1)
69-69: Verify date format consistency across the application
The date format change from "8/11/1999" to "11/08/1999" aligns with the PR objective. However, let's ensure this format is consistently applied.
Run the following script to check for other date format occurrences that might need updating:
✅ Verification successful
Date formats are consistently using MM/DD/YYYY pattern
Based on the search results, all date formats in the test files follow the same MM/DD/YYYY pattern:
- UsersManage.cy.ts: "11/08/1999"
- UsersCreation.cy.ts: "01/01/1998"
- UsersProfile.cy.ts: "01/01/1999"
- AssetCreation.ts: "01/09/2023"
The change from "8/11/1999" to "11/08/1999" maintains consistency with this pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for date format patterns in test files to ensure consistency
# Look for DD/MM/YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY patterns in test files
echo "Searching for date patterns in test files..."
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' '\d{1,2}/\d{1,2}/\d{4}' cypress/
echo "Searching for date format related test assertions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'expect($$$).to$$$(/\d{1,2}\/\d{1,2}\/\d{4}/)'
Length of output: 700
|
@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores