Updated Test Details page form UI #9138
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve enhancements to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/components/ui/separator.tsx (1)
6-26: Add JSDoc documentation and consider accessibility improvements.While the implementation is solid, consider these enhancements:
- Add JSDoc documentation to describe the component and its props
- Consider handling non-decorative cases with proper ARIA attributes
Add documentation and improve accessibility with this diff:
+/** + * A visual separator component that can be either horizontal or vertical. + * @param className - Additional classes to apply to the separator + * @param orientation - The orientation of the separator ('horizontal' | 'vertical') + * @param decorative - Whether the separator is purely decorative + */ const Separator = React.forwardRef< React.ElementRef<typeof SeparatorPrimitive.Root>, React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof SeparatorPrimitive.Root> >( ( { className, orientation = "horizontal", decorative = true, ...props }, ref, ) => ( <SeparatorPrimitive.Root ref={ref} decorative={decorative} + aria-orientation={orientation} + role={decorative ? "none" : "separator"} orientation={orientation} className={cn( "shrink-0 bg-gray-200 dark:bg-gray-800", orientation === "horizontal" ? "h-[1px] w-full" : "h-full w-[1px]", className, )} {...props} /> ), );src/components/ui/badge.tsx (1)
6-26: Consider adjusting warning variant hover state for better contrast.While the badge variants are well-defined with good semantic meaning and dark mode support, the warning variant's hover state (
hover:bg-yellow-500) might not provide sufficient contrast with the text color in light mode.Consider this adjustment:
warning: - "border-transparent bg-yellow-400 text-gray-900 shadow hover:bg-yellow-500 dark:bg-yellow-400 dark:text-gray-900 dark:hover:bg-yellow-500", + "border-transparent bg-yellow-400 text-gray-900 shadow hover:bg-yellow-400/80 dark:bg-yellow-400 dark:text-gray-900 dark:hover:bg-yellow-400/80",src/components/ui/card.tsx (2)
5-18: Consider enhancing accessibility with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes.While the implementation is solid, consider these improvements for better accessibility:
const Card = React.forwardRef< HTMLDivElement, React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( - <div + <article ref={ref} className={cn( "rounded-xl border border-gray-200 bg-white text-gray-950 shadow dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 dark:text-gray-50", className, )} + role="article" + aria-label="Content card" {...props} - /> + /> ));
1-83: Well-structured compound component system.The card component system follows the compound component pattern effectively, providing a flexible and maintainable solution for the Sample Test Details page UI update. The consistent implementation of forwarded refs and className handling makes these components highly reusable.
Consider documenting usage examples in comments or creating a Storybook story to showcase different card compositions and variants.
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (2)
292-308: Consider enhancing accessibility of status indicatorsThe new card header layout effectively organizes status and result information. However, consider adding ARIA labels for screen readers.
- <Badge variant="outline" className="font-semibold"> + <Badge variant="outline" className="font-semibold" aria-label={`Status: ${sampleDetails?.status}`}> {sampleDetails?.status} </Badge> - <Badge variant="secondary" className="font-semibold"> + <Badge variant="secondary" className="font-semibold" aria-label={`Result: ${sampleDetails?.result}`}> {sampleDetails?.result} </Badge>
450-473: Clean up redundant whitespace charactersThe layout and spacing using Separator components is good, but there are unnecessary whitespace characters in the JSX that should be removed for cleaner code.
- {" "} {sampleDetails.patient_travel_history}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ui/badge.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/card.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/separator.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/components/ui/separator.tsx (3)
1-4: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with explicit imports and follow TypeScript best practices.
27-29: LGTM! Proper component naming and export.
The display name is correctly set for debugging purposes, and the export follows best practices.
1-29: Verify integration with Sample Test Details page.
Since this component is part of the UI improvements mentioned in issue #9120, let's verify its integration.
✅ Verification successful
Separator component is properly integrated and used
The verification shows that:
- The Separator component is correctly imported from the UI components
- It's being used appropriately in SampleDetails.tsx to create visual separation between different sections
- The component is used with default styling without any conflicting overrides
- The implementation aligns with the UI improvements mentioned in the PR objectives
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Separator component usage in Sample Test Details page
# Check for Separator component usage
rg -l "Separator" "src/components/Patient/"
# Check for proper imports
rg "from.*separator" "src/components/Patient/"
Length of output: 225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual usage of Separator in SampleDetails.tsx
rg -A 5 "Separator" "src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx"
# Check if there are any styling conflicts or overrides
rg "className.*Separator" "src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx"
# Check the overall structure of SampleDetails component
ast-grep --pattern 'export function SampleDetails() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1070
src/components/ui/badge.tsx (4)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured, using named imports where appropriate and following React best practices.
28-30: LGTM! Well-typed interface definition.
The interface properly extends HTML div attributes and variant props, providing good type safety.
38-38: LGTM! Clean exports.
Appropriate exports of both the component and variants for maximum flexibility.
1-38: Verify Badge component integration in Sample Test Details page.
The component looks well-implemented, but let's verify its integration with the Sample Test Details page to ensure it meets the UI update requirements from issue #9120.
✅ Verification successful
Badge component is properly integrated in Sample Test Details page
The Badge component is correctly imported and extensively used throughout the Sample Test Details page with appropriate variants:
- Status display using
variant="outline" - Result display using
variant="secondary" - Multiple data fields using
variant="secondary"for consistent styling
The implementation aligns well with the UI update requirements, showing proper integration for displaying various sample test information in a visually consistent manner.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Badge component usage in Sample Test Details page
# Expected: Badge component is properly imported and used in the Sample Test Details page
# Check for Badge component imports
echo "Checking Badge component imports..."
rg -l "import.*Badge.*from.*badge" src/
# Check for Badge component usage
echo "Checking Badge component usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Badge $$$' src/
Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine how the Badge component is used in SampleDetails.tsx
echo "Checking Badge usage in SampleDetails.tsx..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Badge" src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx
# Also check the specific variant being used
echo "Checking Badge variant usage..."
ast-grep --pattern '<Badge variant="$_" $$$>' src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx
Length of output: 8897
src/components/ui/card.tsx (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.
The imports are well-organized and include only the necessary dependencies.
76-83: LGTM! Well-organized exports.
The named exports are cleanly organized and follow a logical order.
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (1)
6-8: LGTM: New UI component imports align with redesign goals
The addition of Badge, Card, and Separator components provides the necessary building blocks for the improved UI layout.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
vite.config.mts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
vite.config.mts (1)
170-173: Verify potential duplicate dependencies
The addition of @radix-ui/react-separator to optimizeDeps.include is correct. However, let's verify it's not already included via getPluginDependencies() to avoid duplication.
✅ Verification successful
No duplicate dependency found - configuration is correct
Based on the verification:
@radix-ui/react-separatoris not present in the main package.json dependencies- The
getPluginDependencies()function scans theappsdirectory for plugin dependencies, but the directory doesn't exist in this repository - The dependency is correctly added to both
optimizeDeps.includeandexternalconfigurations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if @radix-ui/react-separator is already included in plugin dependencies
# Search for @radix-ui/react-separator in package.json files under apps directory
fd package.json apps -x jq -r '.dependencies | select(."@radix-ui/react-separator" != null) | "@radix-ui/react-separator"'
Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the repository structure to locate package.json files
fd package.json
# Then examine the getPluginDependencies function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function getPluginDependencies() {
$$$
}'
# Also search for any direct references to this dependency
rg "@radix-ui/react-separator" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of package.json for dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies'
# And examine the getPluginDependencies function content
rg -A 10 "function getPluginDependencies"
Length of output: 2078
|
👋 Hi, @modamaan, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
|
@modamaan check through the coderabbit suggestion , fix the issues with the PR, and once the PR is ready for review Tag me |
modamaan
force-pushed
the
issues/9120/TestDetailsPage-edit
branch
from
448d7bb to
df00093
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/ui/separator.tsx (1)
1-3: Consider enhancing the Separator component with accessibility and customization options.While the current implementation works, here are some suggested improvements:
- Use semantic HTML with proper ARIA attributes
- Add TypeScript props interface for customization
- Include component documentation
Consider this implementation:
-export default function Separator() { - return <div className="border-t border-gray-300 my-4"></div>; +interface SeparatorProps { + className?: string; + orientation?: 'horizontal' | 'vertical'; +} + +/** + * A visual separator component used to divide content sections + * @param props.className - Additional CSS classes to apply + * @param props.orientation - Direction of the separator (horizontal/vertical) + */ +export default function Separator({ + className = '', + orientation = 'horizontal' +}: SeparatorProps) { + return ( + <hr + role="separator" + aria-orientation={orientation} + className={`border-gray-300 my-4 ${className}`} + /> + ); +}Key improvements:
- Uses semantic
<hr>element instead of<div>- Adds proper ARIA attributes for accessibility
- Includes TypeScript props interface for type safety
- Allows customization through props
- Adds JSDoc documentation
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (4)
293-308: Enhance accessibility of the status sectionWhile the layout is well-structured, consider these accessibility improvements:
- Add an aria-label to the status section
- Ensure status badges have sufficient color contrast
- Consider adding aria-current for the current status
- <CardHeader className="space-y-4"> + <CardHeader className="space-y-4" aria-label="Sample Status Information"> <div className="flex flex-col sm:flex-row justify-between items-start sm:items-center gap-4"> <div className="space-y-1 flex gap-2 items-center"> <div className="text-sm text-muted-foreground">Status:</div> - <Badge variant="outline" className="font-semibold"> + <Badge + variant="outline" + className="font-semibold" + aria-current="true"> {sampleDetails?.status} </Badge> </div>
310-340: Extract repeated date formatting logicThe date formatting logic is duplicated across multiple fields. Consider extracting it into a reusable component.
+ const FormattedDate = ({ date, fallback = "-" }) => ( + <div className="font-medium"> + {date ? formatDateTime(date) : fallback} + </div> + ); // Usage: - <div className="font-medium"> - {sampleDetails?.date_of_result - ? formatDateTime(sampleDetails.date_of_result) - : "-"} - </div> + <FormattedDate date={sampleDetails?.date_of_result} />
341-350: Add text wrapping for long doctor namesLong doctor names might overflow their container. Consider adding text wrapping utilities.
- <div className="font-medium"> + <div className="font-medium break-words"> {startCase(camelCase(sampleDetails.doctor_name))} </div>
464-471: Remove unnecessary whitespace in string interpolationThe extra whitespace characters in the JSX are unnecessary.
<div className="font-medium"> - {" "} {startCase(camelCase(sampleDetails.sample_type))} </div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ui/separator.tsx(1 hunks)vite.config.mts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- vite.config.mts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (3)
6-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The new UI component imports are properly structured and aligned with the component's needs.
351-462: Previous review comment about extracting badge patterns is still applicable
The grid section contains repeated badge patterns that should be extracted into a reusable component.
292-473: Overall UI improvements look great!
The changes successfully enhance the Sample Test Details page UI with:
- Better organized layout using new UI components
- Proper responsive design implementation
- Consistent styling patterns
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/ui/card.tsx (3)
5-18: Consider making heading level configurableWhile using semantic HTML (h2) is good for accessibility, forcing all cards to be h2 elements might not be appropriate in all contexts. Consider making the heading level configurable to maintain proper document outline.
const Card = React.forwardRef< - HTMLHeadingElement, + HTMLElement, - React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLHeadingElement> + React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLElement> & { + as?: 'h1' | 'h2' | 'h3' | 'h4' | 'h5' | 'h6' | 'div' + } ->(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( +>(({ className, as: Component = 'div', ...props }, ref) => ( - <h2 + <Component ref={ref} className={cn( "rounded-xl border border-gray-200 bg-white text-gray-950 shadow dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 dark:text-gray-50", className, )} {...props} /> ));
44-54: Enhance accessibility attributesConsider adding ARIA attributes to improve screen reader experience.
const CardDescription = React.forwardRef< HTMLDivElement, React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( <div ref={ref} + role="contentinfo" + aria-label="Card description" className={cn("text-sm text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400", className)} {...props} /> ));
64-74: Add semantic role for better accessibilityConsider adding a role attribute to clarify the footer's purpose to assistive technologies.
const CardFooter = React.forwardRef< HTMLDivElement, React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( <div ref={ref} + role="contentinfo" className={cn("flex items-center p-6 pt-0", className)} {...props} /> ));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ui/card.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/ui/card.tsx (3)
20-30: LGTM!
The CardHeader component is well-implemented with proper flex layout and spacing.
32-42: Previous semantic HTML suggestion still applies
The previous review comment about using semantic HTML elements for the CardTitle is still valid.
56-62: LGTM!
The CardContent component is well-implemented with appropriate padding adjustments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/ui/card.tsx (2)
5-18: Add semantic role for better accessibility.The Card component should have a semantic role to improve accessibility.
<div ref={ref} className={cn( "rounded-xl border border-gray-200 bg-white text-gray-950 shadow dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 dark:text-gray-50", className, )} + role="article" {...props} />
45-55: Use semantic paragraph element.Consider using a
<p>element instead of a<div>for better semantics, as this component represents descriptive text.const CardDescription = React.forwardRef< - HTMLDivElement, + HTMLParagraphElement, - React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> + React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLParagraphElement> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( - <div + <p ref={ref} className={cn("text-sm text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400", className)} {...props} - /> + /> ));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/ui/card.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/ui/card.tsx (6)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.
The imports are appropriate and well-organized.
20-30: LGTM! Well-structured header component.
The component has appropriate flex layout and spacing.
57-63: LGTM! Clean content wrapper implementation.
The component has appropriate padding and structure.
65-75: LGTM! Well-structured footer component.
The component has appropriate flex layout and spacing.
77-84: LGTM! Clean and organized exports.
All components are properly exported.
1-84: Verify component usage in Sample Test Details page.
Let's verify that these card components are being used correctly in the Sample Test Details page.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the usage of Card components in the Sample Test Details page specifically.
Card components are properly used in Sample Test Details page
The verification shows that the Card components are being used correctly in the Sample Test Details page:
- Card components are properly imported from "@/components/ui/card"
- Proper usage of Card, CardHeader, and CardContent components with appropriate className props
- Correct nesting structure is maintained (CardHeader and CardContent within Card)
- Semantic HTML structure is preserved with proper spacing and layout classes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of Card components in Sample Test Details page
# Find files that import Card components
rg -l "import.*from.*['\"]@/components/ui/card['\"]"
# Check the actual usage of Card components
rg -A 5 "(<Card|<CardHeader|<CardTitle|<CardDescription|<CardContent|<CardFooter)"
Length of output: 10178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of SampleDetails.tsx to verify proper component usage
cat src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx
Length of output: 19005
|
👋 Hi, @modamaan, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/ui/card.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-18: Ensure consistent code formatting.The static analysis tools indicate formatting inconsistencies throughout the file. Consider running Prettier to automatically fix these issues.
-import * as React from "react" +import * as React from "react"; -import { cn } from "@/lib/utils" +import { cn } from "@/lib/utils"; // ... rest of the changes🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 13-13: Insert
,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 17-17: Insert
;(prettier/prettier)
[error] 18-18: Insert
;(prettier/prettier)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 13-13:
Insert,
[failure] 17-17:
Insert;
[failure] 18-18:
Insert;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/ui/card.tsx(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/ui/card.tsx
[error] 1-1: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Insert ,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 17-17: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 18-18: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-42: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 53-53: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 74-74: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 76-76: Replace ·Card,·CardHeader,·CardFooter,·CardTitle,·CardDescription,·CardContent·} with ⏎··Card,⏎··CardHeader,⏎··CardFooter,⏎··CardTitle,⏎··CardDescription,⏎··CardContent,⏎};
(prettier/prettier)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/components/ui/card.tsx
[failure] 1-1:
Insert ;
[failure] 3-3:
Insert ;
[failure] 13-13:
Insert ,
[failure] 17-17:
Insert ;
[failure] 18-18:
Insert ;
[failure] 29-29:
Insert ;
[failure] 30-30:
Insert ;
[failure] 41-41:
Insert ;
[failure] 42-42:
Insert ;
[failure] 53-53:
Insert ;
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/ui/card.tsx (2)
32-41:
Revert to semantic HTML for better accessibility.
Changing CardTitle from HTMLHeadingElement to HTMLDivElement removes semantic meaning and reduces accessibility. Screen readers and SEO tools rely on proper heading elements to understand content structure.
const CardTitle = React.forwardRef<
- HTMLDivElement,
+ HTMLHeadingElement,
- React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>
+ React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLHeadingElement>
>(({ className, ...props }, ref) => (
- <div
+ <h2
ref={ref}
className={cn("font-semibold leading-none tracking-tight", className)}
{...props}
- />
+ />
))Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 41-41: Insert ;
(prettier/prettier)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 41-41:
Insert ;
76-76: Verify component usage in Sample Test Details page.
Since these components are being used in the Sample Test Details page UI update, please ensure that the heading hierarchy and semantic structure are maintained appropriately.
✅ Verification successful
Heading hierarchy and semantic structure are properly maintained
The verification shows that:
- In ShiftDetails.tsx, CardTitle is used appropriately within a Card/CardHeader structure for the referral letter title, with proper semantic h3/h4 headings for content sections
- In SampleDetails.tsx, the Card components are used to group related content with proper semantic structure, using h4 headings for different sections
- The heading levels are consistent and follow a logical hierarchy in both components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how these components are used in the Sample Test Details page
# and verify heading hierarchy
# Find files that import these components
rg -l "import.*(?:Card|CardTitle|CardDescription).*from.*card" --type tsx
# Check heading hierarchy in those files
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = () => {
$$$
<CardTitle $$$>$$$</CardTitle>
$$$
}'
Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with .ts and .tsx extensions explicitly and use a more flexible search
rg -l "import.*from.*['\"].*card['\"]" -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
# Also search for CardTitle usage patterns
rg "<CardTitle" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -A 2
Length of output: 448
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete component structure in both files
rg -A 10 -B 10 "<Card" src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx src/components/Shifting/ShiftDetails.tsx
# Also check if there are any other heading elements nearby
rg "<h[1-6]|aria-level" src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx src/components/Shifting/ShiftDetails.tsx
Length of output: 8304
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 76-76: Replace ·Card,·CardHeader,·CardFooter,·CardTitle,·CardDescription,·CardContent·} with ⏎··Card,⏎··CardHeader,⏎··CardFooter,⏎··CardTitle,⏎··CardDescription,⏎··CardContent,⏎};
(prettier/prettier)
|
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (1)
327-337: Remove unnecessary whitespace in Badge componentsThe Badge components contain unnecessary whitespace characters that should be removed for cleaner code.
- <Badge variant="outline" className="font-semibold"> - {sampleDetails?.status} - </Badge> + <Badge variant="outline" className="font-semibold">{sampleDetails?.status}</Badge> - <Badge variant="secondary" className="font-semibold"> - {sampleDetails?.result} - </Badge> + <Badge variant="secondary" className="font-semibold">{sampleDetails?.result}</Badge>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (1)
366-378:
Fix duplicate date display for test and result dates
Both "Tested on" and "Result on" sections are using date_of_result. This appears incorrect as testing and result dates could be different.
- {sampleDetails?.date_of_result
+ {sampleDetails?.date_of_test
? formatDateTime(sampleDetails.date_of_result)
: "-"}
{sampleDetails?.date_of_result
? formatDateTime(sampleDetails.date_of_result)
: "-"}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
@modamaan Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
older
updated
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation