Rewriting UsersCreation.cy.ts according to POM approach #8930
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- We use POM approach in cypress, so changes everything into a re-usable function Refer: PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts test file
For example cy.get("#user-profile-name").click(); should be a function which is named clickUserProfileName()
Similarly, convert the entire test file to the POM approach
|
@nihal467 Declare such indiviual functions in pageobejct of user creation.ts |
|
@AnveshNalimela i have modified the issue, can you clear the rest of them ? |
|
@nihal467 made the changes accordingly by refering patientDoctorConnect.cy.ts .just have look at latest commit |
AnveshNalimela
changed the title
|
👋 Hi, @AnveshNalimela, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
|
@AnveshNalimela as per the updated issue , you need to rewrite the entire file, read it carefully, so which means that, we need to give individual function name to each operation.
Replace all the usage of :
inshort: rewrite the entire file with new individual proper function, proper usage of command.ts functions, and keep it clean |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserProfilePage.ts (2)
22-32: Consider reducing duplication in clear methodsWhile the individual clear methods are clear and focused, there's significant code duplication in the implementation pattern.
Consider refactoring to use a helper method:
+ private clearField(selector: string) { + cy.get(selector).click().clear(); + } + clearPhoneNumber() { - cy.get("#phoneNumber").click().clear(); + this.clearField("#phoneNumber"); } clearAltPhoneNumber() { - cy.get("#altPhoneNumber").click().clear(); + this.clearField("#altPhoneNumber"); } clearWorkingHours() { - cy.get("#weekly_working_hours").click().clear(); + this.clearField("#weekly_working_hours"); } clearEmail() { - cy.get("#email").click().clear(); + this.clearField("#email"); }
91-94: Improve formatting consistencyThe assertWorkingHours method has inconsistent formatting with extra newlines and different parameter placement compared to other assertion methods.
Consider reformatting for consistency:
assertWorkingHours(workingHours: string) { - cy.get("#averageworkinghour-profile-details").should( - "contain.text", - workingHours, - ); + cy.get("#averageworkinghour-profile-details").should("contain.text", workingHours); }cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (4)
Line range hint
25-33: Replace Math.random() with a cryptographically secure alternative.The current implementation using
Math.random()is not cryptographically secure and could potentially generate predictable or duplicate usernames.Consider using
crypto.getRandomValues()for better security:const makeId = (length: number) => { let result = ""; const characters = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789"; - const charactersLength = characters.length; - for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) { - result += characters.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * charactersLength)); + const values = new Uint32Array(length); + crypto.getRandomValues(values); + for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) { + result += characters[values[i] % characters.length]; } return result; };🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 17-17: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 18-18: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
62-62: Fix typo in firstName constant value.The value "District Editted" contains a typo.
-const firstName = "District Editted"; +const firstName = "District Edited";
112-114: Enhance API response verification.While status code verification is good, consider also validating the response body structure and content.
cy.intercept("PATCH", "/api/v1/users/*").as("updateUser"); cy.clickSubmitButton(updateBtn); -cy.wait("@updateUser").its("response.statusCode").should("eq", 200); +cy.wait("@updateUser").then((interception) => { + expect(interception.response?.statusCode).to.eq(200); + expect(interception.response?.body).to.have.property("data"); + expect(interception.response?.body.data).to.include({ + first_name: firstName, + last_name: lastName, + email: email + }); +});
180-182: Enhance error message validation.Consider validating the format and content of error messages more specifically.
cy.clickSubmitButton(saveBtn); cy.get(".error-text", { timeout: 10000 }).should("be.visible"); -userCreationPage.verifyErrorMessages(EXPECTED_ERROR_MESSAGES); +cy.get(".error-text").each(($el, index) => { + expect($el.text().trim()).to.equal(EXPECTED_ERROR_MESSAGES[index]); + expect($el).to.have.css("color", "rgb(220, 38, 38)"); // Verify error styling +});cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts (3)
3-4: Consider reducing duplication by creating a generic click methodThe
clickAddUserButtonmethod directly usescy.verifyAndClickElement. If you have multiple methods performing similar click actions, consider creating a generic method to handle clicks and reduce code duplication.For example:
private clickElement(elementId: string, elementText: string) { cy.verifyAndClickElement(elementId, elementText); } clickAddUserButton() { this.clickElement("#addUserButton", "Add New User"); }
6-19: Extract common code in type methods to a reusable functionThe methods
typeUserName,typeFirstName,typeLastName,typePassword, andtypeConfirmPasswordall follow the pattern of clicking an element and typing into it. To improve maintainability and reduce repetition, consider extracting this pattern into a reusable method.Apply this refactor:
private typeIntoField(elementId: string, value: string) { cy.get(elementId).click().type(value); } typeUserName(username: string) { this.typeIntoField("#username", username); } typeFirstName(firstName: string) { this.typeIntoField("#firstName", firstName); } typeLastName(lastName: string) { this.typeIntoField("#lastName", lastName); } typePassword(password: string) { this.typeIntoField("#password", password); } typeConfirmPassword(password: string) { this.typeIntoField("#c_password", password); }
21-25: Extract common code in clear methods to a reusable functionThe methods
clearFirstNameandclearLastNameboth click and clear input fields. To enhance code reusability, consider creating a generic method for clearing fields.Apply this refactor:
private clearField(elementId: string) { cy.get(elementId).click().clear(); } clearFirstName() { this.clearField("#firstName"); } clearLastName() { this.clearField("#lastName"); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts(6 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersProfile.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserProfilePage.ts(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (3)
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:16-59
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In the `cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts` file, method parameter names may use a mix of `snake_case` and `camelCase` naming conventions, and this is acceptable in the codebase.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:31-42
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In `UserCreationPage` of `UserCreation.ts`, methods like `typePhoneNumber` and `typeUserPhoneNumber` target different input fields and are both necessary.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:3-5
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T05:22:27.913Z
Learning: In the `clickProfileName()` method of the `UserCreationPage` class, the profile name is dynamic and cannot be verified using a static text. Therefore, `cy.get("#user-profile-name").click();` should be used instead of `cy.verifyAndClickElement`.
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts (3)
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:31-42
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In `UserCreationPage` of `UserCreation.ts`, methods like `typePhoneNumber` and `typeUserPhoneNumber` target different input fields and are both necessary.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:3-5
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T05:22:27.913Z
Learning: In the `clickProfileName()` method of the `UserCreationPage` class, the profile name is dynamic and cannot be verified using a static text. Therefore, `cy.get("#user-profile-name").click();` should be used instead of `cy.verifyAndClickElement`.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:16-59
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In the `cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts` file, method parameter names may use a mix of `snake_case` and `camelCase` naming conventions, and this is acceptable in the codebase.
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts
[failure] 17-17: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 18-18: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserProfilePage.ts (4)
18-20: LGTM! Good improvements to method naming
The changes follow proper camelCase naming conventions and make good use of reusable commands.
48-49: Maintain WhatsApp terminology for consistency
The rename from WhatsApp to altPhoneNumber breaks consistency with UI labels and existing tests.
Previous review already highlighted this issue. Please keep the WhatsApp-specific naming as it's used consistently throughout the codebase in UI components and tests.
52-53: LGTM! Good parameter naming improvement
The change to camelCase for the workingHours parameter improves consistency.
87-89: Maintain WhatsApp terminology in assertion methods
Similar to the input methods, the assertion method should maintain WhatsApp terminology.
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersProfile.cy.ts (2)
35-39: LGTM! Method names now follow consistent naming conventions.
The renaming of methods improves code clarity:
typeDateOfBirthclearly indicates its purposetypePhoneNumberandtypeAltPhoneNumberare more descriptive than the previoustypePhoneandtypeWhatsApp
49-53: LGTM! Assert methods now match their corresponding type methods.
The assertion methods have been properly renamed to maintain consistency with their corresponding input methods:
assertDateOfBirthmatchestypeDateOfBirthassertPhoneNumbermatchestypePhoneNumberassertAltPhoneNumbermatchestypeAltPhoneNumber
Let's verify that these changes are consistently implemented in the page object:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Type and assert methods are consistently implemented and properly paired
The codebase analysis confirms that the UserProfilePage class in cypress/pageobject/Users/UserProfilePage.ts has properly implemented pairs of type and assert methods:
typeDateOfBirth()withassertDateOfBirth()typePhoneNumber()withassertPhoneNumber()typeAltPhoneNumber()withassertAltPhoneNumber()
Each method pair uses consistent naming and follows the same pattern, with type methods handling input and assert methods verifying the displayed values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify method implementations in UserProfilePage
# Expect to find both type and assert methods with consistent naming
ast-grep --pattern 'class UserProfilePage {
$$$
typeDateOfBirth($_) {
$$$
}
assertDateOfBirth($_) {
$$$
}
typePhoneNumber($_) {
$$$
}
assertPhoneNumber($_) {
$$$
}
typeAltPhoneNumber($_) {
$$$
}
assertAltPhoneNumber($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the UserProfilePage class implementation
# First, locate the file containing UserProfilePage
fd "UserProfilePage" --type f
# Then examine its content
rg "class UserProfilePage" -A 5 -B 5
# Also search for the specific methods mentioned
rg "(typeDateOfBirth|assertDateOfBirth|typePhoneNumber|assertPhoneNumber|typeAltPhoneNumber|assertAltPhoneNumber)" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 5167
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-24: LGTM! Clean imports and proper initialization.
The imports are well-organized and the page objects are properly instantiated.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 17-17: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 18-18: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
Line range hint 83-93: LGTM! Proper test setup.
The test setup follows Cypress best practices with proper login handling and local storage management.
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts (2)
27-28: Ensure consistent use of reusable commands for selection methods
While selectUserType, selectGender, selectState, and selectDistrict all use cy.clickAndSelectOption, the selectFacility method uses cy.typeAndSelectOption. Verify if this difference is intentional or if a consistent command should be used across all selection methods.
You can run the following script to check the usages of these commands in the codebase:
This will help you determine if the commands are used appropriately based on the context.
Also applies to: 31-31
✅ Verification successful
Different selection commands serve distinct UI interaction patterns
Based on the codebase analysis, the distinction between cy.clickAndSelectOption and cy.typeAndSelectOption is intentional and follows a consistent pattern:
cy.clickAndSelectOptionis used for dropdown menus with predefined options (e.g., user types, gender, states, districts)cy.typeAndSelectOptionis used for searchable/autocomplete fields where users need to type and select from filtered results (e.g., facility search, bed selection, doctor selection)
In the UserCreation.ts file:
selectUserType,selectGender,selectState, andselectDistrictcorrectly useclickAndSelectOptionfor fixed dropdown optionsselectFacilitycorrectly usestypeAndSelectOptionas it's a searchable facility field
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of selection commands for consistency.
# Find usages of cy.clickAndSelectOption
rg "cy\.clickAndSelectOption"
# Find usages of cy.typeAndSelectOption
rg "cy\.typeAndSelectOption"
Length of output: 5816
44-45: Confirm the correct usage of cy.typeAndSelectOption in selectFacility
The selectFacility method uses cy.typeAndSelectOption with the selector "input[name='facilities']". Ensure that this is the appropriate command and selector for selecting facilities, and that it aligns with the behavior of similar selection methods.
Run the following script to verify the selector and usage:
This will help confirm that the selector targets the correct element and the method is used correctly elsewhere.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of cy.typeAndSelectOption to ensure it's consistent.
The usage of cy.typeAndSelectOption in selectFacility is correct and consistent
The verification shows that:
- The custom command
typeAndSelectOptionis properly defined incypress/support/commands.ts - The selector
input[name='facilities']is consistently used across multiple files includingPatientCreation.tsandAssetCreation.ts - The implementation in
UserCreation.tsfollows the same pattern as other similar facility selection methods in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the facilities input field.
# Search for the input field with name 'facilities' in the codebase
rg 'input[^>]*name=["'\'']facilities["'\'']'
# Check for usages of selectFacility method
rg 'selectFacility'
Length of output: 3516
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of typeAndSelectOption to verify consistency
rg "typeAndSelectOption" -A 1
# Check if there's a custom command definition for typeAndSelectOption
fd -e ts -e js "commands" --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 10659
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-168: Consider enhancing test maintainability with these suggestions.While the overall test structure is good, here are some suggestions to improve maintainability:
- Consider moving test data (usernames, facility names) to a separate fixture file
- Group related constants using interfaces/types
- Add more descriptive comments for each test case's purpose
Example structure for test data:
// cypress/fixtures/users.json { "doctors": { "linkFacility": { "doc1": "dummydoctor4", "doc2": "dummydoctor5", "doc3": "dummydoctor6" }, "linkSkill": { "username": "devdoctor", "firstName": "Dev", "lastName": "Doctor" } }, "facilities": { "shiftingCenter": "Dummy Shifting Center", "skillFacility": "Dummy Facility 40" } }cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (3)
Line range hint
25-33: Replace Math.random() with a cryptographically secure alternative.Using
Math.random()for generating usernames could be predictable and potentially exploitable. Consider usingcrypto.getRandomValues()for better security.const makeId = (length: number) => { let result = ""; const characters = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789"; - const charactersLength = characters.length; - for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) { - result += characters.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * charactersLength)); - } + const array = new Uint32Array(length); + crypto.getRandomValues(array); + for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) { + result += characters.charAt(array[i] % characters.length); + } return result; };🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 17-17: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 18-18: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
62-62: Fix typo in firstName constant value.The word "Editted" is misspelled. It should be "Edited".
-const firstName = "District Editted"; +const firstName = "District Edited";
176-179: Improve error message verification reliability.The error message verification could be more reliable by adding an explicit wait for the error messages to be visible before verifying them.
userCreationPage.clickAddUserButton(); userCreationPage.clickSaveUserButton(); -cy.get(".error-text", { timeout: 10000 }).should("be.visible"); +// Wait for all error messages to be visible +cy.get(".error-text").should("have.length", EXPECTED_ERROR_MESSAGES.length).and("be.visible"); userCreationPage.verifyErrorMessages(EXPECTED_ERROR_MESSAGES);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts(6 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersProfile.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserProfilePage.ts(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersProfile.cy.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Users/UserProfilePage.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (3)
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:16-59
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In the `cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts` file, method parameter names may use a mix of `snake_case` and `camelCase` naming conventions, and this is acceptable in the codebase.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:31-42
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In `UserCreationPage` of `UserCreation.ts`, methods like `typePhoneNumber` and `typeUserPhoneNumber` target different input fields and are both necessary.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:3-5
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T05:22:27.913Z
Learning: In the `clickProfileName()` method of the `UserCreationPage` class, the profile name is dynamic and cannot be verified using a static text. Therefore, `cy.get("#user-profile-name").click();` should be used instead of `cy.verifyAndClickElement`.
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (2)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9080
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/ManageUserPage.ts:67-97
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T08:09:58.453Z
Learning: In Cypress test files (`cypress/pageobject/Users/ManageUserPage.ts`), when methods are called to check input provided earlier in the test, adding TypeScript interfaces, input validation, and custom error messages is unnecessary.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:3-5
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T05:22:27.913Z
Learning: In the `clickProfileName()` method of the `UserCreationPage` class, the profile name is dynamic and cannot be verified using a static text. Therefore, `cy.get("#user-profile-name").click();` should be used instead of `cy.verifyAndClickElement`.
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts (3)
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:31-42
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In `UserCreationPage` of `UserCreation.ts`, methods like `typePhoneNumber` and `typeUserPhoneNumber` target different input fields and are both necessary.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:3-5
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T05:22:27.913Z
Learning: In the `clickProfileName()` method of the `UserCreationPage` class, the profile name is dynamic and cannot be verified using a static text. Therefore, `cy.get("#user-profile-name").click();` should be used instead of `cy.verifyAndClickElement`.
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:16-59
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In the `cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts` file, method parameter names may use a mix of `snake_case` and `camelCase` naming conventions, and this is acceptable in the codebase.
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts
[failure] 17-17: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 18-18: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts (2)
3-4: LGTM! Click methods use appropriate reusable commands.
The click methods correctly utilize reusable commands from commands.ts:
verifyAndClickElementfor Add User buttonclickSubmitButtonfor Save User button
Also applies to: 48-49
21-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use cy.clearInput from commands.ts for consistency.
The clear methods should use the reusable command for better maintainability.
Apply this pattern to both clear methods:
clearFirstName() {
- cy.get("#firstName").click().clear();
+ cy.clearInput("#firstName");
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (2)
49-51: LGTM! Good use of reusable component.
The change from userCreationPage.verifyElementContainsText to cy.verifyContentPresence aligns well with the PR's objective of utilizing reusable components from commands.ts.
49-51: Verify the custom command implementation.
Let's ensure the verifyContentPresence command is properly implemented in commands.ts.
✅ Verification successful
Custom command verifyContentPresence is properly implemented
The command is correctly implemented in cypress/support/commands.ts with proper TypeScript support. It:
- Takes a selector and an array of texts as parameters
- Uses
cy.get()to find elements by selector - Verifies each text in the array is present within the found element
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if verifyContentPresence is properly implemented in commands.ts
# Expected: Should find the command definition with proper TypeScript types
# Search for verifyContentPresence command definition
echo "Searching for verifyContentPresence command definition..."
rg -A 5 "verifyContentPresence" "cypress/support/commands.ts"
# Search for any direct usage of cy.get with username-profile-details
echo "Checking for any direct DOM queries that could be consolidated..."
rg "cy\.get.*username-profile-details"
Length of output: 558
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersCreation.cy.ts (4)
Line range hint 1-21: LGTM! Clean setup with proper page object instantiation.
The imports are well-organized and the page objects are correctly instantiated following the Page Object Model pattern.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 17-17: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 18-18: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
Line range hint 81-92: LGTM! Well-structured test lifecycle hooks.
The hooks properly handle authentication and local storage management.
110-112: LGTM! Proper API interception implementation.
The API calls are properly intercepted and verified, following Cypress best practices for handling asynchronous operations.
142-172: LGTM! Well-structured user creation test.
The test follows a clear arrangement of actions and assertions, with proper API interception and comprehensive verification of the created user's details.
| selectFacility(name: string) { | ||
| cy.typeAndSelectOption("input[name='facilities']", name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use typeAndMultiSelectOption for facility selection.
As suggested in the past reviews, facility selection should use the multi-select option command.
selectFacility(name: string) {
- cy.typeAndSelectOption("input[name='facilities']", name);
+ cy.typeAndMultiSelectOption("input[name='facilities']", name);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| selectFacility(name: string) { | |
| cy.typeAndSelectOption("input[name='facilities']", name); | |
| selectFacility(name: string) { | |
| cy.typeAndMultiSelectOption("input[name='facilities']", name); |
| selectState(state: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#state", state); | ||
| } | ||
| selectDistrict(district: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#district", district); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response:
Update selectors to match the actual DOM elements
The current selectors #state and #district need to be updated. From the codebase search results, particularly in cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts, the correct selectors are:
#state inputfor state selection#district inputfor district selection
These elements appear to be autocomplete inputs rather than simple dropdowns.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify state and district element IDs.
The selectors #state and #district might need to be updated to match the actual element IDs in the DOM.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the correct element IDs for state and district dropdowns
echo "Searching for state and district element IDs..."
rg -A 2 'id=["\'](state|district)["\']' src/
Length of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for state and district element IDs in all files
rg -A 2 'id=["\'']?(state|district)["\'']?'
# Search for any React/JSX components that might contain state or district dropdowns
ast-grep --pattern 'Select id="$_" $$$'
# Search for any form fields or components with state or district in their name
rg -i "(state|district).*(select|dropdown|field|input)"
Length of output: 14898
| typeUserName(username: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#username").click().type(username); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| typeIntoElementByIdPostClear(elementId: string, value: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#" + elementId) | ||
| .click() | ||
| .clear() | ||
| .click() | ||
| .type(value); | ||
| typeFirstName(firstName: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#firstName").click().type(firstName); | ||
| } | ||
| typeIntoElementByIdPostClearDob(elementId: string, value: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndTypeDate("#" + elementId, value); | ||
| typeLastName(lastName: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#lastName").click().type(lastName); | ||
| } | ||
| clearIntoElementById(elementId: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#" + elementId) | ||
| .click() | ||
| .clear(); | ||
| typePassword(password: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#password").click().type(password); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| typeIntoInputByName(inputName: string, value: string) { | ||
| cy.get("input[name='" + inputName + "']") | ||
| .click() | ||
| .type(value); | ||
| typeConfirmPassword(password: string) { | ||
| cy.get("#c_password").click().type(password); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use cy.typeIntoInput from commands.ts for consistency.
The type methods should use the reusable command for better maintainability.
Apply this pattern to all type methods:
typeUserName(username: string) {
- cy.get("#username").click().type(username);
+ cy.typeIntoInput("#username", username);
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/pageobject/utils/constants.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cypress/pageobject/utils/constants.ts (1)
8-9: Consider the necessity of a separate emergency phone function
The current implementation doesn't differentiate emergency numbers from regular phone numbers. Consider either:
- Adding distinct validation/formatting for emergency contacts, or
- Removing this wrapper function if no special handling is needed
| export function generatePhoneNumber(): string { | ||
| const array = new Uint32Array(1); | ||
| window.crypto.getRandomValues(array); | ||
| const randomNum = (array[0] % 900000000) + 100000000; | ||
| return "9" + randomNum.toString(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and improve code clarity
While the switch to crypto.getRandomValues() is a good security improvement, consider these enhancements:
+const PHONE_PREFIX = '9';
+const MIN_PHONE_LENGTH = 9;
+
export function generatePhoneNumber(): string {
+ try {
+ if (!window.crypto || !window.crypto.getRandomValues) {
+ throw new Error('Crypto API not supported');
+ }
const array = new Uint32Array(1);
window.crypto.getRandomValues(array);
- const randomNum = (array[0] % 900000000) + 100000000;
- return "9" + randomNum.toString();
+ // Ensure exactly 9 digits (excluding prefix)
+ const randomNum = (array[0] % 900000000) + 100000000;
+ return PHONE_PREFIX + randomNum.toString();
+ } catch (error) {
+ Cypress.log({
+ name: 'Phone Generation Error',
+ message: error.message
+ });
+ throw error;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function generatePhoneNumber(): string { | |
| const array = new Uint32Array(1); | |
| window.crypto.getRandomValues(array); | |
| const randomNum = (array[0] % 900000000) + 100000000; | |
| return "9" + randomNum.toString(); | |
| const PHONE_PREFIX = '9'; | |
| const MIN_PHONE_LENGTH = 9; | |
| export function generatePhoneNumber(): string { | |
| try { | |
| if (!window.crypto || !window.crypto.getRandomValues) { | |
| throw new Error('Crypto API not supported'); | |
| } | |
| const array = new Uint32Array(1); | |
| window.crypto.getRandomValues(array); | |
| // Ensure exactly 9 digits (excluding prefix) | |
| const randomNum = (array[0] % 900000000) + 100000000; | |
| return PHONE_PREFIX + randomNum.toString(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| Cypress.log({ | |
| name: 'Phone Generation Error', | |
| message: error.message | |
| }); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
39-39: Consider using a more descriptive constant nameThe constant name
duplicateBedNameimplies it's used for testing duplicate bed scenarios, but it's actually used for bed modification testing. Consider renaming it tomodifiedBedNameorupdatedBedNameto better reflect its purpose.
Line range hint
71-109: Consider breaking down the large test case into smaller, focused testsThe test case "Add a Bed to facility location along with duplication and deleting a bed" combines multiple scenarios:
- Mandatory field validation
- Single bed creation
- Duplicate bed validation
- Bed modification
Consider splitting these into separate test cases for better maintainability and clearer failure isolation. This aligns with testing best practices where each test should verify a single piece of functionality.
Example structure:
it("should validate mandatory fields for bed creation") it("should successfully create a single bed") it("should prevent creation of duplicate beds") it("should successfully modify existing bed details")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts:229-317
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:46:56.271Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts`, when verifying the bed capacity badge reflection, the badge remains the same during multiple actions and only updates after a bed is attached to a patient during consultation. Therefore, it's appropriate to keep the test case consolidated rather than splitting it into smaller tests.
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-277: Implementation looks good overall!
The changes maintain the existing test coverage while updating the bed modification scenario. The code follows good testing practices with proper use of Page Object Model, appropriate assertions, and comprehensive error handling.
100-107: Verify the test coverage for bed name modification
The test case modifies a bed's name to "ICCU" but doesn't explicitly verify that this isn't a duplicate name in the system. Consider adding a verification step to ensure the bed name modification succeeds without any duplicate name conflicts.
Additionally, consider adding the following test scenarios:
- Attempt to modify a bed name to an existing name
- Verify appropriate error messages for duplicate bed names during modification
nihal467
added
tested
reviewed
|
@AnveshNalimela Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
) Co-authored-by: Mohammed Nihal <[email protected]>
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation