Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add TCB->TDB flag for EQUAD created from TNEQUAD #1857

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

dlakaplan
Copy link
Contributor

Also add explicit printing of which parameters cause TCB->TDB conversion to fail

@dlakaplan dlakaplan added the awaiting review This PR needs someone to review it so it can be merged label Nov 6, 2024
@dlakaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abhisrkckl : this is very minor

@dlakaplan dlakaplan added the minor A minor PR that doesn't need a lot of thought label Nov 6, 2024
@abhisrkckl
Copy link
Contributor

This looks good to me. Shall I merge this?

Comment on lines 13 to 15
* When TCB->TDB conversion info is missing, will print parameter name
### Fixed
* When EQUAD is created from TNEQ, has proper TCB->TDB conversion info
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bullet points are indicated with "-", not "*"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@dlakaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

This looks good to me. Shall I merge this?

I think you can, although I didn't search exhaustively to see if any other parameters were missing the scaling info.

@abhisrkckl abhisrkckl merged commit 6eebdcb into nanograv:master Nov 12, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting review This PR needs someone to review it so it can be merged minor A minor PR that doesn't need a lot of thought
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants