-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Migration from 16.x to 17.x (latest version) #185
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,26 +1,22 @@ | ||
package com.mparticle.kits | ||
|
||
import android.content.Context | ||
import com.mparticle.kits.KitIntegration.CommerceListener | ||
import com.urbanairship.Autopilot | ||
import com.urbanairship.UAirship | ||
import android.content.Intent | ||
import com.urbanairship.analytics.InstallReceiver | ||
import com.urbanairship.push.PushMessage | ||
import com.urbanairship.push.PushProviderBridge | ||
import java.lang.Exception | ||
import com.mparticle.MPEvent | ||
import com.urbanairship.analytics.CustomEvent | ||
import com.mparticle.commerce.CommerceEvent | ||
import java.util.LinkedList | ||
import com.mparticle.MParticle.IdentityType | ||
import com.mparticle.commerce.CommerceEvent | ||
import com.mparticle.commerce.Product | ||
import com.mparticle.kits.KitIntegration.CommerceListener | ||
import com.urbanairship.Autopilot | ||
import com.urbanairship.UAirship | ||
import com.urbanairship.analytics.CustomEvent | ||
import com.urbanairship.analytics.InstallReceiver | ||
import com.urbanairship.analytics.RetailEventTemplate | ||
import com.urbanairship.json.JsonValue | ||
import java.util.HashSet | ||
import com.urbanairship.push.PushMessage | ||
import com.urbanairship.push.PushProviderBridge | ||
import java.math.BigDecimal | ||
import java.util.ArrayList | ||
import java.util.HashMap | ||
import java.util.LinkedList | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* mParticle-Urban Airship Kit integration | ||
|
@@ -193,7 +189,7 @@ class UrbanAirshipKit : KitIntegration(), KitIntegration.PushListener, KitIntegr | |
.apply() | ||
} | ||
if (identityType == configuration?.userIdField) { | ||
UAirship.shared().namedUser.id = identity | ||
UAirship.shared().contact.identify(identity) // Previously setting namedUser but now is immutable | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -205,8 +201,8 @@ class UrbanAirshipKit : KitIntegration(), KitIntegration.PushListener, KitIntegr | |
.removeIdentifier(airshipId) | ||
.apply() | ||
} | ||
if (identityType == configuration?.userIdField) { | ||
UAirship.shared().namedUser.id = null | ||
if (identityType == configuration?.userIdField && UAirship.shared().contact.namedUserId != null) { | ||
UAirship.shared().contact.reset() // Previously setting namedUser to null but now is immutable | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is basically the same thing as setting it null if the user is only managed through the SDK, but its possible that if the was set to a user server side this would now reset that association. I think it would be safer to only reset it if its not set through the SDK:
|
||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is being used