Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: skip infoview breaking test on major version bump #459

Open
wants to merge 31 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joneugster
Copy link
Contributor

@joneugster joneugster commented Jun 3, 2024

@joneugster
Copy link
Contributor Author

joneugster commented Jun 3, 2024

@mhuisi said:
It should be possible to run the tests on Windows.

It looks like the Windows CI is indeed able to execute the test as is. But maybe it uses WSL and the general user doesn't?

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash

PUBLISHED_VERSION="$(npm view @leanprover/infoview-api version --no-workspaces)"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this supposed to be the infoview-api version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no it's supposed to be @leanprover/infoview, my bad!


PUBLISHED_VERSION="$(npm view @leanprover/infoview-api version --no-workspaces)"
NEW_VERSION="$(sed -n 's/^\s*"version":\s*"\(.*\)",\s*/\1/p' ./package.json)"
PUBLISHED_MAJOR="$(cut -d '.' -f 1 <<< $PUBLISHED_VERSION)"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the first component of the semantic version is 0, then the major version is the second component of the semantic version. This will yield a major version of 0 for 0.7.0, but it should be 7.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thouht semantic versioning is usually Major-Minor-Patch. is your scheme ...-Major-Minor, i.e would it be fine to always check the first two terms?

Can fix that tomorrow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants