chore: small quick freeze modal adaptions

[theborakompanioni]

This PR tries to enhance the phrasing in the Quick Freeze and Payment Confirm modal on the Send page.
Distinction is done between "Eligible UTXOs" (for non-sweeps) and "Selected UTXOs" (for sweeps).
Please let me know what you think - feedback is desperately needed!
Also, if you have better versions of the texts and phrases in mind - please post them here as comment or as change suggestion! 🙏

Quick Freeze Confirm Modal

• Visually adjust the "confirmations" block
• Title from "Select UTXOs to be considered" to just "Select UTXOs"
• Phrase "The following UTXOs are considered in the transaction. " to one of the following

    "subtitle_zero": "Please select one or more UTXOs for possible inclusion in the transaction.",
    "subtitle_one": "The selected UTXO is eligible for inclusion in the transaction.",
    "subtitle_other": "The selected UTXOs are eligible for inclusion in the transaction.",

• Phrase "Every unselected UTXO will be frozen and can be unfrozen later on." to "Unselected UTXOs will be frozen and can be unfrozen later anytime."

Payment Confirm Modal

• Non-sweep sends with more than one UTXO use label "Considered UTXOs" "Eligible UTXOs"
  • With description "One or more of the following UTXOs will be included in the transaction: "
• Sweeps or non-sweep sends with single UTXOs use label "Selected UTXOs"
  • With description:
    • Either "The following UTXO will be included in the transaction: " (single UTXO)
    • Or "The following UTXOs will be included in the transaction: " (multple UTXOs)

📸 Screenshots (already outdated)

---

[theborakompanioni]

ping @editwentyone

[MarnixCroes]

cACK

nit, maybe this one can adapt to single or plural too?

[MarnixCroes]

I see the matching with the subtitle_other, but it reads a bit weird imo "is eligible for inclusion" as it will for sure be included,
maybe something like The selected UTXO will be used in the transaction.

[theborakompanioni]

I open to any suggestion. However, doesn't

The selected UTXO will be used in the transaction.

sound more like it will "definitely used" in the transaction than the other phrase ("eligible for inclusion")?

[theborakompanioni]

Ahh.. okay. Now I think I get what you mean. If only one UTXO is selected, it will of course be included, yes?
Good point! I am not sure if the phrasing should change so "suddenly" when a user ticks some boxes in this component as it is just for quickly freezing/unfreezing..

I think @editwentyone might have good inputs to this also.

[editwentyone]

@MarnixCroes I can't tell right now what is the best way, I would try to avoid the switching during selecting. lets see when we keep it like this first and then we can adjust it in another PR if needed

[theborakompanioni]

@MarnixCroes Okay for you if it is merged the way it is currently?
I think it the context of "quickly freezing/unfreezing UTXOs", phrasing it this way is "okay".

[theborakompanioni]

Hey @MarnixCroes - if it is okay for you, I'll merge this soon.

[MarnixCroes]

sorry I missed this.
yes sure it's ok

[theborakompanioni]

cACK

nit, maybe this one can adapt to single or plural too?

Yep! Done! Thank you 🙏