Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add engine pull support for tensorrt-llm #765

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

louis-jan
Copy link
Contributor

@louis-jan louis-jan commented Jun 24, 2024

Describe Your Changes

  • This PR enables support for the TensorRT-LLM engine. When users pull any TensorRT-LLM model, it would also pull the TensorRT-LLM engine files.
Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 16 49 45 Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 18 20 11

Fixes Issues

  • Closes #
  • Closes #

Self Checklist

  • Added relevant comments, esp in complex areas
  • Updated docs (for bug fixes / features)
  • Created issues for follow-up changes or refactoring needed

@louis-jan louis-jan requested a review from hiento09 June 24, 2024 13:53
@louis-jan louis-jan force-pushed the feat/support-tensorrt-engine branch from 6b86e10 to ba6cb15 Compare June 24, 2024 14:36
@louis-jan louis-jan marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2024 14:50
@louis-jan louis-jan force-pushed the feat/support-tensorrt-engine branch from 668b816 to 0aa0dd8 Compare June 24, 2024 14:51
@louis-jan louis-jan force-pushed the feat/support-tensorrt-engine branch 3 times, most recently from 8c86e2a to 32b716e Compare June 25, 2024 11:18
@louis-jan louis-jan force-pushed the feat/support-tensorrt-engine branch from 32b716e to 87546bb Compare June 25, 2024 11:21
@louis-jan louis-jan merged commit ec21dae into dev Jun 25, 2024
1 check passed
@louis-jan louis-jan deleted the feat/support-tensorrt-engine branch June 25, 2024 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants