-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Constraint solving for function overloading #203
Conversation
Note: normally, even for draft PRs, we try to maintain a state where all the tests are green. For test cases that currently don't work, we still use the corresponding |
31b364e
to
d40c9b7
Compare
lhs.lbtsc.foreach { | ||
case (tsc, i) => | ||
tsc.filterUB(i, rhs) | ||
if (tsc.constraints.isEmpty) reportError() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should probably raise a proper error here, which should refer to the failing TSC.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TODO:
- update
getVarsPol
- update
Constrained
class with ew field to use for TSCs - update App typer case to do the TSC introduction there (and not in constraint solver)
No description provided.