-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump emf version to match the content of 2024.3 #3293
Conversation
nice, can you please check
|
the swt bot change does not work for me. the versions oomph pulls for me is 4.0.0 |
it also looks like a transitive reexport of guice got lost somewhere. see failed build |
hmm |
But javax.inject doesn't seem to be there anymore
|
Test Results 6 461 files + 6 461 6 461 suites +6 461 3h 25m 25s ⏱️ + 3h 25m 25s Results for commit 881c922. ± Comparison against base commit 4fb59cc. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
werent we using com.google.inject.Provider everywhere to circumvent the jaxax jakartax problem? |
regenerating langs fails for me everywhere witjh likely due to our wild mix of p2 and maven |
can reproduce the compile error but still have no clue what causes it
|
one suspicious diff in classpath is /Users/dietrich/.m2/repository/.cache/tycho/org.eclipse.m2e.maven.runtime-3.9.900.20240824-1409.jar/jars/org.eclipse.sisu.inject-0.9.0.M3.jar: i dont see that one on main maybe something with the m2e changes? |
but i have no idea why this is there at all @HannesWell do you have an idea? |
wait. why do have have org.eclipse.xtext.util/build.properties:additional.bundles = org.eclipse.m2e.maven.runtime |
I seem to understand that's the new additional bundle, maybe due to the change in bump versions that reads the dev bom? |
Maybe tycho sips add. Bundles into downstream classpathes too |
Removing the additional helped locally. Reverting the manifest changes not |
I don't understand: what's solved and what's not? |
Reverting the two manifest changes regarding M2e still compile error |
I’ll move BumpVersions to its own bundle |
Recently there haven't been any change in the embedded Maven-runtime in m2e: Or do you mean why Sisu is included in the runtime? Sorry if I don't get the question right. |
yes was wondering about sisu |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
193cfb1
to
798408e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Done. Build is certainly making more progress now. I had to bump log4j to 1.2.26 because 1.2.25 disappeared |
How do you regenerate them? |
go through the list and calling the workflows from eclipse. https://github.com/eclipse-xtext/xtext/blob/main/dev-doc/RegenerateLanguages.md |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
hi, what is the status on the open points? |
On this branch, I can regenerate languages. Of course I've plenty changes since almost all files get a new copyright header |
|
Ok, a single script doesn't work because the workflows are sensitive to global registry content. |
so maybe a launch group similar to the one in ref projects.maybe with wait on each |
Yes, I'm looking into that.
2024-03 |
Yes, it is. Some files have not been regenerated yet in 2024 |
maybe we can do it in a follow up then if there is no significant other change |
Yes, we surely can do that |
otherwise what is open besides |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Zarnekow <[email protected]>
Made adjustments accordingly and I think we are good to go now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
thx @szarnekow |
No description provided.