fix: Fix LLMEvaluator serialization

[shadeMe]

Related Issues

• fixes Serialization issues with LLMEvaluator and child classes #7768

Proposed Changes:

The inputs init parameter of the LLMEvaluator component accepts a list of tuples containing an input name and its corresponding type. Previously, we were saving this parameter as-is - problematic due to the serialization code supporting neither raw tuples nor raw types. This PR fixes the above issue by converting the tuples to lists and the correctly serializing the types.

How did you test it?

Unit tests

Checklist

• I have read the contributors guidelines and the code of conduct
• I have updated the related issue with new insights and changes
• I added unit tests and updated the docstrings
• I've used one of the conventional commit types for my PR title: fix:, feat:, build:, chore:, ci:, docs:, style:, refactor:, perf:, test:.
• I documented my code
• I ran pre-commit hooks and fixed any issue

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9401492718

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.003%) to 89.738%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
components/evaluators/llm_evaluator.py	2	95.5%

Totals
Change from base Build 9400937231:	0.003%
Covered Lines:	6777
Relevant Lines:	7552

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9401458578

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.003%) to 89.738%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
components/evaluators/llm_evaluator.py	2	95.5%

Totals
Change from base Build 9400937231:	0.003%
Covered Lines:	6777
Relevant Lines:	7552

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9401565701

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.003%) to 89.738%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
components/evaluators/llm_evaluator.py	2	95.5%

Totals
Change from base Build 9400937231:	0.003%
Covered Lines:	6777
Relevant Lines:	7552

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9415331669

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.003%) to 89.753%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
components/evaluators/llm_evaluator.py	2	95.5%

Totals
Change from base Build 9415009179:	0.003%
Covered Lines:	6823
Relevant Lines:	7602

---

💛 - Coveralls