Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chunked: ignore ErrLayerUnknown when creating cache #2119

Merged

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

ignore the error if the layer is being deleted while we are processing it without a lock on the store.

ignore the error if the layer is being deleted while we are processing
it without a lock on the store.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 30, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cgwalters
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
(though always useful to know: did this come from a real world bug report? were you reading the code for other reasons?)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 30, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 603ff90 into containers:main Sep 30, 2024
19 checks passed
@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

/lgtm (though always useful to know: did this come from a real world bug report? were you reading the code for other reasons?)

the flake was reported here: containers/podman#24091 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants