Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document MySQL and MariaDB don't store roles with same manner #584

Conversation

laurent-indermuehle
Copy link
Collaborator

SUMMARY

To prevent confusion like in #579, I propose to add this code comment.

ISSUE TYPE
  • Docs Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME

module_util: user

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (fd0b191) 76.66% compared to head (8397367) 74.77%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #584      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.66%   74.77%   -1.90%     
==========================================
  Files          28       18      -10     
  Lines        2447     2319     -128     
  Branches      603      583      -20     
==========================================
- Hits         1876     1734     -142     
- Misses        388      405      +17     
+ Partials      183      180       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 74.16% <ø> (ø)
sanity ?
units ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
plugins/module_utils/user.py 85.56% <ø> (-0.41%) ⬇️

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Andersson007 Andersson007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@laurent-indermuehle looks great, thanks!

@Andersson007
Copy link
Collaborator

when you merge, please try to backport it to stable-2 only (the module didn't exit in 1..)

@laurent-indermuehle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @Andersson007 for the follow up and suggesting to add this comment to the code. I'll try for stable-2.

@laurent-indermuehle laurent-indermuehle merged commit 0dbedf5 into ansible-collections:main Oct 26, 2023
39 of 40 checks passed
@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Oct 26, 2023

Backport to stable-2: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/stable-2/0dbedf57cb988c3a5c3444f79d2da996e101edf1/pr-584

Backported as #585

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants