Use main branch of ably-cocoa
#81
Conversation
See justification in code (I’m running into the described issue when trying to switch our ably-cooca dependency to use `main` instead of a tag).
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lawrence-forooghian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
lawrence-forooghian
force-pushed
the
use-main-ably-cocoa
branch
from
c20327a to
57e09b6
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift (1)
3-7: Overall approval with recommendation for comprehensive thread safety reviewThe changes consistently simplify the extension declarations across
ARTRealtime,ARTRealtimeChannels, andARTRealtimeChannel. This improves code readability and maintainability. However, the removal of@retroactive @unchecked Sendableannotations necessitates a thorough review of thread safety across the entire codebase.I recommend conducting a comprehensive thread safety review:
- Analyze all concurrent usage of these classes.
- Ensure proper synchronization mechanisms are in place where needed.
- Consider adding explicit
Sendableconformance if these types are intended to be used across isolation domains.- Update documentation to reflect any changes in thread safety guarantees.
This will help maintain the robustness of the codebase while benefiting from the simplified declarations.
AblyChat.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved (1)
9-10: Suggestion: Add a comment explaining the temporary changeConsider adding a comment in the
Package.swiftfile or project documentation explaining why this temporary change to themainbranch was necessary. This will help other developers understand the context and remember to revert this change when it's no longer needed.Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift (2)
65-68: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO comment.The addition of the
requestmethod to theMockRealtimeclass is correct and aligns with theRealtimeClientProtocol. The use offatalErroris appropriate for unimplemented mock methods in testing scenarios.Consider adding a TODO comment to indicate that this method might need implementation in the future:
func request(_: String, path _: String, params _: [String: String]?, body _: Any?, headers _: [String: String]?, callback _: @escaping ARTHTTPPaginatedCallback) throws { + // TODO: Implement this method if needed for specific test scenarios fatalError("Not implemented") }This comment will help developers understand that the method might require implementation for certain test cases in the future.
Line range hint
1-68: Consider using a mocking framework for future improvements.The current implementation of
MockRealtimeis straightforward and serves its purpose. However, as mentioned in the comment referencing issue #5, there might be plans to improve the mocking approach in the future.For future improvements, consider using a mocking framework like Swift Mock Generator or Mockingbird. These frameworks can help:
- Reduce boilerplate code
- Provide more flexible and powerful mocking capabilities
- Improve test readability and maintainability
When implementing this change, you may want to:
- Evaluate different mocking frameworks and choose one that best fits your project's needs.
- Gradually replace the current mock implementations with framework-generated mocks.
- Update the testing documentation to reflect the new mocking approach.
This suggestion aligns with the TODO mentioned in the class comment and could significantly improve the testing infrastructure of the project.
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift (2)
47-49: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO comment.The addition of the
propertiesproperty is consistent with theRealtimeChannelProtocoland follows the pattern used for other properties in this mock class.Consider adding a TODO comment to remind developers to implement this property in the future:
var properties: ARTChannelProperties { + // TODO: Implement this property when needed for testing fatalError("Not implemented") }
219-221: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO comment.The addition of the
requestmethod is consistent with theRealtimeClientProtocoland follows the pattern used for other methods in this mock class. Thethrowskeyword is correctly included, which is important for proper error handling.Consider adding a TODO comment to remind developers to implement this method in the future:
func request(_: String, path _: String, params _: [String: String]?, body _: Any?, headers _: [String: String]?, callback _: @escaping ARTHTTPPaginatedCallback) throws { + // TODO: Implement this method when needed for testing fatalError("Not implemented") }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- AblyChat.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift (2 hunks)
- Package.resolved (1 hunks)
- Package.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/BuildTool/BuildTool.swift (3 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRealtimeChannel.swift (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
Package.swift (1)
Learnt from: umair-ably PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#45 File: Package.swift:23-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:50:49.353Z Learning: In the Ably Chat Swift project, it's acceptable to use a branch-based dependency ('branch: "main"') for the 'ably-cocoa' package because the team owns that SDK and the code isn't going into production soon.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift (3)
7-7: Approve simplification, but verify impact on thread safety.The simplification of the extension declaration is consistent with the previous changes. However, removing
@retroactive @unchecked Sendablemight affect thread safety guarantees.Please run the following script to check for any usage of
ARTRealtimeChannelin concurrent contexts:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for concurrent usage of ARTRealtimeChannel # Test: Search for concurrent usage of ARTRealtimeChannel rg --type swift -e "ARTRealtimeChannel" -C 5 | rg -e "async|await|Task|DispatchQueue"If any concurrent usage is found, please ensure that proper synchronization mechanisms are in place.
5-5: Approve simplification, but verify impact on thread safety.The simplification of the extension declaration is consistent with the previous change. However, removing
@retroactive @unchecked Sendablemight affect thread safety guarantees.Please run the following script to check for any usage of
ARTRealtimeChannelsin concurrent contexts:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for concurrent usage of ARTRealtimeChannels # Test: Search for concurrent usage of ARTRealtimeChannels rg --type swift -e "ARTRealtimeChannels" -C 5 | rg -e "async|await|Task|DispatchQueue"If any concurrent usage is found, please ensure that proper synchronization mechanisms are in place.
3-3: Approve simplification, but verify impact on thread safety.The simplification of the extension declaration is good. However, removing
@retroactive @unchecked Sendablemight affect thread safety guarantees.Please run the following script to check for any
Sendablerelated warnings or errors in the codebase:If any warnings or errors are found, please address them to ensure thread safety is maintained.
Package.swift (1)
23-24: Temporary switch to 'main' branch noted. Consider tracking this change.The change from a version-based to a branch-based dependency for 'ably-cocoa' is noted. This aligns with the previously learned practice in this project, as mentioned by umair-ably in PR #45. However, please consider the following points:
- The TODO comment indicates this is a temporary change. Ensure that issue Switch back to using a tag of ably-cocoa #80 is being tracked to revert this change when appropriate.
- Using the 'main' branch may introduce instability if it's not consistently stable. Be aware of potential risks in your development and testing processes.
- This change might make build reproduction more challenging, as the 'main' branch can change frequently.
To ensure this change is properly tracked, let's check if the referenced issue exists and is being monitored:
Would you like me to set up a reminder or create a new issue to track the reversion of this temporary change?
✅ Verification successful
Issue #80 Confirmed and Being Tracked
The referenced issue #80 exists and is currently open, ensuring that the temporary switch to the 'main' branch for the 'ably-cocoa' dependency is being properly tracked for future reversion.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and status of the issue mentioned in the TODO comment # Test: Check if the issue exists and its current status gh issue view 80 --json title,state,urlLength of output: 172
Package.resolved (2)
2-2: LGTM:originHashupdate is expected.The change in
originHashis a natural consequence of updating the package dependencies. This modification is automatically managed by the Swift Package Manager and doesn't require any specific action.
9-10: Approved: Switching tomainbranch as intended, but consider risks.The changes align with the PR objectives to temporarily switch the
ably-cocoadependency to themainbranch. This modification allows you to use the latest changes from theably-cocoarepository.However, please be aware of the following considerations:
- Using the
mainbranch instead of a specific version can introduce instability, as it may include breaking changes or untested features.- Ensure this is indeed a temporary measure, as stated in the PR objectives.
To ensure this change is intentional and temporary, please run the following script:
Would you like assistance in creating a tracking issue to ensure this change is reverted to a stable version in the future?
Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRealtimeChannel.swift (1)
57-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider implementing a basic version of the
propertiespropertyThe addition of the
propertiesproperty is noted. However, leaving it unimplemented might cause issues in tests that rely on this property.Consider implementing a basic version of this property for testing purposes. For example:
var properties: ARTChannelProperties { let properties = ARTChannelProperties() // Set some default values if needed return properties }Also, it's recommended to update any tests that might be affected by this change to ensure they handle the new property correctly.
To identify potential impacts, let's search for usages of
MockRealtimeChannel:Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift (1)
Line range hint
1-221: Overall, the changes look good and improve the mock implementation.The additions to the
MockRealtimeandChannelclasses enhance their alignment with the protocols they implement. The consistent use offatalErrorfor unimplemented methods maintains the existing pattern in the mock.To further improve maintainability, consider adding TODO comments to the newly added property and method, as suggested in the previous comments. This will help future developers understand which parts of the mock still need implementation when used for testing.
Sources/BuildTool/BuildTool.swift (2)
99-99: Addition ofmalformedPackageLockfileenhances error handlingThe introduction of
case malformedPackageLockfileto theErrorenum improves the robustness of the error handling by accounting for malformed package lockfiles.
160-163: Efficient use ofwithThrowingTaskGroupin concurrent data loadingThe use of
withThrowingTaskGroupto concurrently load data from multiple lockfile paths is efficient and appropriate for asynchronous tasks.
This allows us to make use of the Swift concurrency enhancements that have been added on `main`, and to identify any further concurrency enhancements that still need to be made (in response to any new concurrency errors that we get as we continue to develop the Chat SDK).
lawrence-forooghian
force-pushed
the
use-main-ably-cocoa
branch
from
57e09b6 to
7b3c97f
Compare
Temporarily use
maininstead of a tag. See commit messages for more details.Summary by CodeRabbit
ably-cocoa, now tracking themainbranch.MockRealtimeandMockRealtimeChannelclasses to enhance real-time functionality.