[ECO-4977] Fix broadcast to others #42
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce two new utility functions, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
sacOO7
force-pushed
the
fix/broadcast-to-others
branch
from
1c73608 to
1d69777
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/channel/ably/utils.ts (2)
36-41: LGTM! Consider adding type annotations for improved type safety.The
toTextfunction is well-implemented, handling both browser and non-browser environments correctly. It's a good addition to the utility functions.Consider adding a return type annotation to the function for improved type safety:
-export const toText = (base64: string) => { +export const toText = (base64: string): string => {
43-48: LGTM! Consider adding type annotations for improved type safety.The
toBase64function is well-implemented, handling both browser and non-browser environments correctly. It's a good complement to thetoTextfunction.Consider adding a return type annotation to the function for improved type safety:
-export const toBase64 = (text: string) => { +export const toBase64 = (text: string): string => {src/connector/ably-connector.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-139: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe modifications to the
AblyConnectorclass, particularly thesocketIdmethod, represent a significant change in functionality. While these changes provide more comprehensive connection information, they also introduce potential breaking changes that could affect existing implementations.Key points:
- The
socketIdmethod now returns a Base64 encoded JSON string instead of a simple connection key.- This change provides more information but may break existing code that relies on the previous format.
- The method name
socketIdno longer accurately describes its functionality.Recommendations:
- Consider implementing a backwards-compatible solution, such as adding a parameter to switch between old and new behavior.
- Rename the
socketIdmethod to better reflect its new functionality (e.g.,getEncodedConnectionInfo).- Update documentation to clearly explain the new behavior and provide migration guidelines.
- Add deprecation warnings for the old behavior to encourage users to migrate to the new format.
- Consider bumping the major version number of the library to signal a breaking change.
To implement these changes safely:
- Create a new method with the updated functionality.
- Deprecate the old
socketIdmethod, but maintain its current behavior.- In the next major version release, update
socketIdto use the new behavior and remove the deprecated method.This approach allows for a smoother transition and gives users time to update their implementations.
src/echo.ts (1)
120-121: Approved: Informative comment addition for Ably integrationThe added comment provides valuable information about the
socketIdmethod's behavior specifically for the Ably service. This enhances the documentation and helps developers working with Ably integration.Consider adding a brief explanation of how this differs from other services, or if this behavior is unique to Ably. This could further improve the documentation's clarity. For example:
/** * Get the Socket ID for the connection. - * For ably, returns base64 encoded json with keys {connectionKey, clientId} + * For Ably, returns a base64 encoded JSON object with keys {connectionKey, clientId}. + * For other services, typically returns a simple string identifier. */tests/ably/ably-user-login.test.ts (2)
73-73: LGTM! Consider adding a clarifying comment.The change from "guest channels" to "public channels" in the test description is appropriate and consistent with the previous update. The test logic remains valid for its purpose.
To improve clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the distinction between public and private channels in the context of this test. For example:
test('user logs in with previous (public) channels', async () => { + // This test verifies the behavior when a user logs in while already subscribed to public channels, + // which don't require authentication, unlike private channels. let connectionStates : Array<any>= [] let publicChannelStates : Array<any>= []
Line range hint
1-191: Consider updating related documentation.The terminology change from "guest channels" to "public channels" in the test descriptions is consistent and appropriate. To maintain consistency across the project:
- Ensure that any related documentation (e.g., README, API docs) is updated to reflect this terminology change.
- Verify that the actual implementation uses the term "public channels" consistently.
- If there are any comments in the code referring to "guest channels", update those as well.
This will help maintain clarity and consistency throughout the codebase and documentation.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- src/channel/ably/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/connector/ably-connector.ts (2 hunks)
- src/echo.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/ably/ably-user-login.test.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/ably/ably-user-rest-publishing.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/ably/setup/mock-auth-server.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/ably/setup/utils.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
tests/ably/ably-user-rest-publishing.test.ts
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Boolean' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'boolean' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 33-33: Don't use 'Boolean' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'boolean' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Additional comments not posted (10)
tests/ably/setup/utils.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Improved import statement formattingThe removal of the space between
httpRequestAsyncand the closing curly brace improves code consistency and aligns with common style guides.
1-2: Summary: Improved code organization and consistencyThe changes in this file focus on reorganizing the
toBase64function and improving import statement formatting. These modifications enhance code reusability and maintain a consistent coding style. The core functionality of the utility functions remains intact, and the changes align with best practices in TypeScript/JavaScript development.
2-2: LGTM: Improved code organizationThe
toBase64function has been moved to a shared utility file and is now being re-exported. This change promotes code reuse and better organization of utility functions.To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please verify that all modules using
toBase64from this file still work correctly. Run the following script to check its usage:If any usages are found, please ensure they are still functioning as expected after this change.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Impacted Usages Found
The
toBase64function has been successfully re-exported fromtests/ably/setup/utils.ts. No existing imports oftoBase64from this file were found, ensuring that this change does not affect existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of toBase64 function across the codebase # Search for imports of toBase64 from the current file echo "Checking imports of toBase64 from tests/ably/setup/utils.ts:" rg --type typescript "import.*toBase64.*from.*['\"].*tests/ably/setup/utils['\"]" # Search for direct usage of toBase64 function echo "Checking direct usage of toBase64 function:" rg --type typescript "toBase64\("Length of output: 421
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of toBase64 function across the codebase # Search for imports of toBase64 from the current file echo "Checking imports of toBase64 from tests/ably/setup/utils.ts:" rg "import.*toBase64.*from.*['\"].*tests/ably/setup/utils['\"]" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Search for direct usage of toBase64 function echo "Checking direct usage of toBase64 function:" rg "toBase64\(" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 559
src/channel/ably/utils.ts (2)
36-48: Great job on improving code modularity and maintainability!The addition of
toTextandtoBase64functions enhances the overall structure of the utility module. These functions abstract away environment-specific implementations, making the code more maintainable and easier to understand. The use oftoTextin the existingparseJwtfunction demonstrates the immediate value of these new utilities.
36-48: Please clarify how these changes relate to fixing broadcast to others.The new
toTextandtoBase64functions are well-implemented and improve the code structure. However, it's not immediately clear how these changes relate to the PR objective of fixing broadcast to others. Could you provide some context on how these utility functions contribute to addressing the broadcasting issue mentioned in the PR title?src/connector/ably-connector.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM: New import fortoBase64functionThe import of the
toBase64function from the utils file is appropriate and follows good code organization practices.src/echo.ts (1)
Line range hint
33-57: Verify Ably connector implementation for broadcasting issuesGiven that the PR objectives mention fixing broadcast to others and reference an Ably-related issue, it's important to ensure that the Ably connector is correctly implemented and uses socket IDs appropriately.
Please review the
AblyConnectorimplementation (which is not visible in this file) to ensure it correctly handles broadcasting, especially in the context of the socket ID format mentioned in the new comment. You may want to verify:
- How the socket ID is used in the Ably connector for broadcasting.
- If there are any Ably-specific considerations for broadcasting to others that need to be addressed.
Here's a script to help locate the Ably connector implementation:
This will help identify if there are any issues in the Ably connector related to broadcasting and socket ID usage.
Verification successful
AblyConnector's socketId usage verified
The
AblyConnectorimplementation insrc/connector/ably-connector.tsincludes thesocketIdmethod. No issues were found with its usage in broadcasting functions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the AblyConnector implementation echo "Searching for AblyConnector implementation:" rg -p "class AblyConnector" --type typescript # Search for uses of socketId in the Ably connector echo "\nSearching for socketId usage in AblyConnector:" rg -p "socketId" --type typescript | rg "AblyConnector"Length of output: 375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the AblyConnector implementation using the shorthand for typescript echo "Searching for AblyConnector implementation:" rg -t typescript "class AblyConnector" # Search for uses of socketId in the AblyConnector echo "\nSearching for socketId usage in AblyConnector:" rg -t typescript "socketId" | rg "AblyConnector"Length of output: 361
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the AblyConnector implementation by targeting .ts files echo "Searching for AblyConnector implementation in .ts files:" rg "class AblyConnector" --glob "*.ts" # Search for uses of socketId in the AblyConnector within .ts files echo "\nSearching for socketId usage in AblyConnector within .ts files:" rg "socketId" --glob "*.ts" | rg "AblyConnector"Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for socketId usage within ably-connector.ts echo "Searching for socketId usage in src/connector/ably-connector.ts:" rg "socketId" src/connector/ably-connector.ts # Additionally, search for any socket-related identifiers within AblyConnector echo "\nSearching for socket-related identifiers in AblyConnector:" rg "socket" src/connector/ably-connector.tsLength of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all invocations of the socketId() method within AblyConnector echo "Searching for socketId() method calls within AblyConnector:" rg "socketId\(\)" src/connector/ably-connector.ts # Search for broadcasting-related functions or methods that use socketId echo "\nSearching for broadcasting functions that utilize socketId:" rg "broadcast" --glob "*.ts" | rg "socketId"Length of output: 507
tests/ably/ably-user-login.test.ts (1)
42-42: LGTM! Terminology update is consistent.The change from "guest channels" to "public channels" in the test description is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. The test logic remains valid for its purpose.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if similar terminology updates are needed elsewhere:
Verification successful
Terminology update verified successfully.
No remaining instances of "guest channels" found in TypeScript files. The terminology update from "guest channels" to "public channels" is fully consistent across the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining instances of "guest channels" in the codebase rg --type typescript "guest channels"Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining instances of "guest channels" in TypeScript files rg "guest channels" --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 35
tests/ably/setup/mock-auth-server.ts (1)
40-46: Verify correct handling ofsocketIdinbroadcastToOthersIn the
broadcastToOthersmethod, thesocketIdis decoded and parsed, and the resulting object is merged intoprotoMsg. Please ensure that this approach correctly excludes the specified client from receiving its own messages. According to Ably's messaging patterns, to exclude a client from receiving its own messages, you might need to use theEchoMessagesor set theexcludedConnectionIdsin the message extras. Confirm that the current implementation aligns with Ably's best practices for client exclusion.tests/ably/ably-user-rest-publishing.test.ts (1)
1-167: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverageThe test suite is well-organized and effectively covers both guest and logged-in user scenarios. The use of asynchronous functions and
waitForExpectensures that tests handle asynchronous operations reliably.Tools
Biome
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Boolean' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'boolean' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 33-33: Don't use 'Boolean' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'boolean' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Yes, I am also planning to test current branch in the chat repo. before merging into main. |
[ECO-4995] Fix base64 url encoding/decoding
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/channel/ably/utils.ts (1)
36-51: LGTM: Well-implemented base64 URL decoding functionThe
fromBase64UrlEncodedfunction is correctly implemented to handle base64 URL decoding in both browser and non-browser environments. It properly handles padding and character replacements.Consider adding a type annotation for the return value:
export const fromBase64UrlEncoded = (base64: string): string => { // ... (existing implementation) };This would improve type safety and make the function's contract more explicit.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/channel/ably/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- src/connector/ably-connector.ts (2 hunks)
- src/echo.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/connector/ably-connector.ts
- src/echo.ts
🧰 Additional context used
GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/channel/ably/utils.ts
[failure] 66-66: Polynomial regular expression used on uncontrolled data
This regular expression that depends on library input may run slow on strings with many repetitions of '='.
🔇 Additional comments not posted (3)
src/channel/ably/utils.ts (3)
15-15: LGTM: Improved JWT parsing with base64 URL decodingThe changes to use
fromBase64UrlEncodedinstead oftoTextfor decoding the JWT header and payload are appropriate. This modification ensures proper handling of base64 URL encoded data in JWT tokens.Also applies to: 19-19
Line range hint
1-66: Summary: Improved JWT token handling with robust base64 URL encoding/decodingThe changes in this file successfully address the issue related to broadcasting functionality within the Laravel Echo framework. The modifications to the
parseJwtfunction and the addition offromBase64UrlEncodedandtoBase64UrlEncodedfunctions provide a more robust and standardized way of handling JWT tokens.These improvements align well with the PR objectives and should resolve the issues mentioned in the Ably Laravel Broadcaster repository (issue laravel#48). The changes are well-implemented, follow best practices, and maintain compatibility with both browser and non-browser environments.
Consider adding unit tests for the new
fromBase64UrlEncodedandtoBase64UrlEncodedfunctions to ensure their correctness and prevent potential regressions in the future.To ensure that these changes don't introduce any unintended side effects, it would be beneficial to run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of the old 'toText' function # Test: Search for any remaining usage of 'toText' function rg --type typescript 'toText\('This will help confirm that all instances of the old
toTextfunction have been replaced with the newfromBase64UrlEncodedfunction throughout the codebase.🧰 Tools
GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 66-66: Polynomial regular expression used on uncontrolled data
This regular expression that depends on library input may run slow on strings with many repetitions of '='.
53-66: LGTM: Well-implemented base64 URL encoding functionThe
toBase64UrlEncodedfunction is correctly implemented to handle base64 URL encoding in both browser and non-browser environments. It properly handles character replacements for URL-safe encoding.Consider adding a type annotation for the return value:
export const toBase64UrlEncoded = (text: string): string => { // ... (existing implementation) };This would improve type safety and make the function's contract more explicit.
Regarding the static analysis hint about a potential performance issue with the regular expression on line 66:
The regular expression
/=+$/is used to remove trailing equal signs, which is a common and safe practice in base64 URL encoding. It doesn't pose a significant performance risk as it's only applied to the encoded output, which has a predictable format and length.✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Regular expression usage in
toBase64UrlEncodedis appropriateThe
toBase64UrlEncodedfunction correctly implements base64 URL encoding for both browser and non-browser environments. The regular expression/=+$/used to remove trailing equal signs is a standard and efficient approach for this purpose, operating on controlled and predictable data.No performance issues are identified with the current implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the regular expression in toBase64UrlEncoded function # Test: Check if the regular expression is used on controlled data rg --type typescript -A 5 'toBase64UrlEncoded'Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected shell script to verify the usage of the regular expression in toBase64UrlEncoded function # Using rg to search in .ts files for 'toBase64UrlEncoded' function rg 'toBase64UrlEncoded' --glob '*.ts' -A 5Length of output: 1077
🧰 Tools
GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 66-66: Polynomial regular expression used on uncontrolled data
This regular expression that depends on library input may run slow on strings with many repetitions of '='.
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved. |
|
@coderabbitai suggest me a string that encodes into base64 string and encoded string has characters + and _. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @sacOO7, in standard Base64 encoding, the character set includes Here's how the const toBase64UrlEncoded = (text: string) => {
const base64 = Buffer.from(text).toString('base64');
const base64UrlEncoded = base64
.replace(/\+/g, '-')
.replace(/\//g, '_')
.replace(/=/g, '');
return base64UrlEncoded;
};Given this implementation, it's unlikely to get an encoded string that contains both Would you like me to review the encoding functions further or help troubleshoot this issue? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/ably/utils.test.ts (3)
33-37: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases.The test case for
toBase64UrlEncodedis well-structured and checks the basic functionality. However, to ensure comprehensive coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- An empty string
- A string with special characters (e.g., emojis, non-ASCII characters)
- A string that would typically result in padding characters ('=') in standard Base64 encoding
Here's an example of additional test cases:
test('should handle edge cases in Base64UrlEncoded', () => { expect(toBase64UrlEncoded('')).toBe(''); expect(toBase64UrlEncoded('Hello, 世界! 🌍')).toBe('SGVsbG8sIOS4lueVjCEg8J-MjQ'); expect(toBase64UrlEncoded('a')).toBe('YQ'); // Would be 'YQ==' in standard Base64 });
39-43: LGTM! Consider renaming a variable and adding more test cases.The test case for
fromBase64UrlEncodedis well-structured and checks the basic functionality. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Rename the
normalTextvariable toencodedTextfor clarity.- Add more test cases to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Here's an example of the changes and additional test cases:
test('should decode Base64UrlEncoded string into text', () => { const encodedText = "bGFyYXZlbC1lY2hvIGNvZGViYXNlIGlzIG9mIGJlc3QgcXVhbGl0eSwgcGVyaW9kIQ" const decodedText = fromBase64UrlEncoded(encodedText); expect(decodedText).toBe('laravel-echo codebase is of best quality, period!') }); test('should handle edge cases in fromBase64UrlEncoded', () => { expect(fromBase64UrlEncoded('')).toBe(''); expect(fromBase64UrlEncoded('SGVsbG8sIOS4lueVjCEg8J-MjQ')).toBe('Hello, 世界! 🌍'); expect(fromBase64UrlEncoded('YQ')).toBe('a'); // No padding in Base64Url });These additional tests will help ensure the function works correctly with empty strings, non-ASCII characters, and strings that would typically have padding in standard Base64 encoding.
Line range hint
1-44: Consider grouping related tests for improved organization.The overall structure of the test file is good, with related tests grouped together. To further improve readability and maintainability, consider using
describeblocks to group related tests. This can make it easier to understand the purpose of each group of tests and to add new tests in the future.Here's an example of how you could restructure the tests:
import { fromBase64UrlEncoded, parseJwt, toBase64UrlEncoded, toTokenDetails } from '../../src/channel/ably/utils'; describe('Utils', () => { describe('JWT handling', () => { test('should parse JWT properly', () => { // Existing JWT parsing test }); test('should convert to tokenDetails', () => { // Existing token details conversion test }); }); describe('Base64 URL encoding/decoding', () => { test('should encode text into Base64UrlEncoded string', () => { // Existing encoding test }); test('should decode Base64UrlEncoded string into text', () => { // Existing decoding test }); // Add the suggested additional tests here }); });This structure makes it clear which tests are related to JWT handling and which are related to Base64 URL encoding/decoding, making the file easier to navigate and maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/channel/ably/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/ably/utils.test.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/channel/ably/utils.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/ably/utils.test.ts (3)
35-45: LGTM! Comprehensive test for Base64 URL encoding.The test covers both normal and edge cases effectively. The expected outputs are correct for Base64 URL encoding, and the comment about padding is accurate and informative.
Consider adding a test case with characters that differ between standard Base64 and Base64 URL encoding, such as:
expect(toBase64UrlEncoded('Hello+World/123')).toBe('SGVsbG8rV29ybGQvMTIz');This would explicitly verify that '+' and '/' are not replaced, ensuring the function truly implements Base64 URL encoding.
47-56: LGTM! Comprehensive test for Base64 URL decoding.The test covers both normal and edge cases effectively. The expected outputs are correct for Base64 URL decoding, and the comment about padding is accurate and informative.
Similar to the encoding test, consider adding a test case that explicitly verifies the handling of '-' and '_' characters in Base64 URL encoded strings:
expect(fromBase64UrlEncoded('SGVsbG8tV29ybGRfMTIz')).toBe('Hello+World/123');This would ensure that the function correctly handles the Base64 URL specific characters.
1-57: Summary: Improved test coverage and organization for utility functionsThe changes in this file significantly enhance the test suite for the Ably channel utility functions:
- JWT handling tests have been reorganized into a dedicated describe block, improving code structure.
- New tests for Base64 URL encoding and decoding functions have been added, which are likely crucial for the broadcasting functionality fix mentioned in the PR objectives.
- The overall test coverage has improved, with a good balance of normal and edge cases.
These changes contribute to the robustness of the codebase and align well with the PR's goal of fixing broadcasting issues. The new Base64 URL encoding/decoding functions and their tests suggest that these utilities play a role in addressing the broadcasting functionality mentioned in the related issue (laravel#48) in the Ably Laravel Broadcaster repository.
As the project evolves, consider implementing a more systematic approach to test data generation, such as using property-based testing libraries like fast-check or js-verify. This could help discover edge cases that might be missed with manual test case selection.
🧰 Tools
Gitleaks
7-7: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
26-26: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/ably/utils.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
Gitleaks
tests/ably/utils.test.ts
7-7: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
26-26: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/ably/utils.test.ts (1)
1-32: LGTM! Improved test organization and new utility functions.The reorganization of JWT handling tests into a dedicated describe block enhances code structure and readability. The import of new Base64 URL encoding/decoding functions is correctly added.
Regarding the static analysis hints about JWT tokens:
- These are example tokens used for testing purposes and do not pose a real security risk in this context.
- However, it's a good practice to use obviously fake data in tests to avoid any confusion.
To ensure these are indeed test tokens, let's verify their structure:
If this command returns matches, it confirms these are indeed test tokens with a header containing obvious test data (
"kid":"abcd").✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Improved test organization and new utility functions.
The reorganization of JWT handling tests into a dedicated describe block enhances code structure and readability. The import of new Base64 URL encoding/decoding functions is correctly added.
Regarding the static analysis hints about JWT tokens:
- These are example tokens used for testing purposes and do not pose a real security risk in this context.
- The verification confirms that the tokens contain obvious test data (
"kid":"abcd"), ensuring they are safely used within tests.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify JWT tokens used in tests are fake # Test: Check if the tokens contain obvious test data rg 'eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6ImFiY2QifQ' tests/ably/utils.test.tsLength of output: 712
🧰 Tools
Gitleaks
7-7: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
26-26: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/ably/utils.test.ts (3)
34-37: Approved: Good addition of error handling test.The new test case for handling invalid JWT input improves the robustness of the
parseJwtfunction. This is a valuable addition to ensure proper error handling.Consider using a more specific error message in the
parseJwtfunction, such as 'Invalid JWT format', instead of the generic 'Unexpected token'. This would make the error more descriptive and easier to debug.
41-52: Approved: Comprehensive test case for Base64 URL encoding.The test case for
toBase64UrlEncodedcovers a good range of scenarios, including important edge cases such as empty string, Unicode characters, special characters, and short inputs. This comprehensive approach helps ensure the robustness of the encoding function.Consider adding a test case for a very long input string to ensure the function handles large inputs correctly. For example:
const longInput = 'a'.repeat(1000); expect(toBase64UrlEncoded(longInput)).toBe('a'.repeat(1332) + 'AA');This would help verify that the function performs well with larger inputs.
54-65: Approved: Comprehensive test case for Base64 URL decoding.The test case for
fromBase64UrlEncodedmirrors the encoding test, covering a good range of scenarios including important edge cases. This approach ensures the robustness of the decoding function and maintains consistency with the encoding tests.For consistency with the suggestion for the encoding test, consider adding a test case for decoding a very long input string:
const longEncodedInput = 'a'.repeat(1332) + 'AA'; expect(fromBase64UrlEncoded(longEncodedInput)).toBe('a'.repeat(1000));This would help verify that the function performs well with larger inputs and maintains symmetry with the encoding function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/ably/utils.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
Gitleaks
tests/ably/utils.test.ts
7-7: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
26-26: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/ably/utils.test.ts (3)
1-4: LGTM: Improved test organization and new utility functions.The import statement now includes the new Base64 URL encoding/decoding functions, and the test structure has been reorganized to group related tests. This improves the overall organization and readability of the test suite.
40-40: LGTM: New test suite for Base64 URL encoding/decoding.The addition of a dedicated describe block for Base64 URL encoding/decoding tests is a good practice. It improves the organization of the test suite and clearly separates these tests from the JWT-related tests.
1-65: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements to the test suite.The changes made to this file significantly enhance the test coverage and organization of the utility functions. The addition of Base64 URL encoding/decoding tests and the improved error handling for JWT parsing contribute to a more robust test suite. The suggestions provided are minor and aimed at further improving the comprehensiveness of the tests.
Great job on these improvements!
🧰 Tools
Gitleaks
7-7: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
26-26: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved. |
Related to ably/laravel-broadcaster#48
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
fromBase64UrlEncodedandtoBase64UrlEncodedfunctions for encoding and decoding Base64 URL strings.socketIdmethod to return a Base64 encoded JSON object with connection details.Bug Fixes
socketIdmethod in the Echo class.Tests
toBase64UrlEncodedandfromBase64UrlEncoded.toBase64UrlEncoded.