Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[radar-output] Allow config of scan intervals (needed for e2e testing) #305

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

pvannierop
Copy link
Collaborator

See title

@pvannierop pvannierop requested a review from keyvaann December 18, 2024 09:08
@pvannierop pvannierop self-assigned this Dec 18, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Great PR! Please pay attention to the following items before merging:

Files matching charts/*/values.yaml:

  • Is the PR adding a new container? Please reviewer, add it to the models (internal process)
  • Is the PR adding a new parameter? Please, ensure it’s documented in the README.md

This is an automatically generated QA checklist based on modified files.

@pvannierop pvannierop force-pushed the feature/output-restructure-delays branch 2 times, most recently from 2f31e99 to 0e1e89e Compare December 18, 2024 09:13
@@ -43,6 +43,13 @@ data:
{{- if .azure.readTimeout }}
readTimeout: {{ .azure.readTimeout | int }}
{{- end }}
index:
{{- if .index.fullSyncInterval }}
Copy link
Collaborator

@keyvaann keyvaann Dec 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why the if statement if we already have a default value for this?
If both ifs are off, then the chart will be invalid since there will be an empty index: key.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I removed the if statements

@pvannierop pvannierop force-pushed the feature/output-restructure-delays branch from 0e1e89e to 2a87d6c Compare December 18, 2024 13:39
@pvannierop pvannierop requested a review from keyvaann December 18, 2024 13:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@keyvaann keyvaann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pvannierop pvannierop merged commit 022d28d into main Dec 19, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants