Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bookdown conversion #1

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 22, 2019
Merged

Bookdown conversion #1

merged 17 commits into from
Aug 22, 2019

Conversation

gsrohde
Copy link
Contributor

@gsrohde gsrohde commented Aug 21, 2019

Added need files, deleted unneeded ones, and fixed some things in markdown files (mostly links) to work with bookdown.

@robkooper This needs a .travis.yml file.

@dlebauer The image in the SQL queries chapter is out of date in spite of the assertion in paragraph two that "the tables below are stable." The second and third links on the "PEcAn R Package" page are broken, and I didn't know exactly what they should be.

gsrohde added 17 commits August 16, 2019 16:41
…wn R

project.  Modified .gitignore accordingly.

Modified r_dplyr_package.md so R code is not evaluated.  Removed soon-to-be
outdated deployment location information from README.md.
…erences to

figures to work with bookdown.  Normalized section hierarchy.
…rk with bookdown. Changed references to "beta" to "v1".
@dlebauer dlebauer merged commit 945afd7 into master Aug 22, 2019
@dlebauer dlebauer deleted the bookdown-conversion branch August 22, 2019 22:29
@dlebauer
Copy link
Member

Looks great - thank you for doing such a thorough job of migrating the content and updating the links!

@robkooper
Copy link
Member

@dlebauer to fast on teh merge button, this did not have the .travis.yml file yet.

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member

Sorry ... I created #2 to address the Travis.yml

And #3 for a few additional updates

@gsrohde
Copy link
Contributor Author

gsrohde commented Aug 23, 2019

@dlebauer @robkooper This brings up the question: Is there a way to require more than one reviewer to sign off on a PR?

@robkooper
Copy link
Member

Not sure you want this, since what if you only add 1 reviewer. I think the trick is next time to have {WIP} in the title. That will prevent it from being merged.

Also I'd suggest in the body next time add checkboxes so we can make sure that all boxes are checked before it gets merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants