Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

performance test -- not rfwen #3997

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

performance test -- not rfwen #3997

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Anzooooo
Copy link
Member

@Anzooooo Anzooooo commented Dec 7, 2024

not rfwen

@Anzooooo
feat(LoadPipe): let 128bitReq be accessed at 128-bit aligned granularity
0502d09
@Anzooooo
feat(Zicclsm): minor refactoring misalign and support for vector misa…
63095de 
…lign
@Anzooooo
fix(Sbuffer): remove address assert for 'io.dcache.req'
da6af81 
This is a false assertion, and we should not prohibit 0 address requests
@Anzooooo
fix(LoadQueueReplay): use more precise conditions for unblocking `for…
80147fa 
…warding fault`

It is not necessary to check whether the storequeue entry pointed to by sqidx is complete, because this entry is the store that follows this load.
@XiangShanRobot
Copy link

[Generated by IPC robot]
commit: 80147fa

commit astar copy_and_run coremark gcc gromacs lbm linux mcf microbench milc namd povray wrf xalancbmk
80147fa 1.914 0.450 2.701 1.226 2.833 2.461 2.395 0.919 1.423 1.998 3.431 2.715 2.368 3.219

master branch:

commit astar copy_and_run coremark gcc gromacs lbm linux mcf microbench milc namd povray wrf xalancbmk
7d20eb3 1.959 0.450 2.686 1.226 2.832 2.461 2.393 0.919 1.407 1.992 3.435 2.709 2.383 3.261
35477a7
493f6e1 1.959 0.450 2.686 1.224 2.832 2.461 2.393 0.919 1.407 1.992 3.435 2.709 2.383 3.261
a60d667
7876e67

@Anzooooo Anzooooo changed the title Feat misalign per 00 performance test -- not rfwen Dec 8, 2024
@Anzooooo Anzooooo closed this Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@weidingliu weidingliu Awaiting requested review from weidingliu weidingliu will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review weidingliu is a code owner

@good-circle good-circle Awaiting requested review from good-circle good-circle will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review good-circle is a code owner

@linjuanZ linjuanZ Awaiting requested review from linjuanZ linjuanZ will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review linjuanZ is a code owner

@cz4e cz4e Awaiting requested review from cz4e cz4e will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review cz4e is a code owner

@happy-lx happy-lx Awaiting requested review from happy-lx happy-lx will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review happy-lx is a code owner

@cebarobot cebarobot Awaiting requested review from cebarobot cebarobot will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review cebarobot is a code owner

@Lemover Lemover Awaiting requested review from Lemover Lemover will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Lemover is a code owner

@bosscharlie bosscharlie Awaiting requested review from bosscharlie bosscharlie will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review bosscharlie is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Anzooooo @XiangShanRobot