fix(LoadQueueReplay): use more precise conditions for unblocking `for…

…warding fault`

It is not necessary to check whether the storequeue entry pointed to by sqidx is complete, because this entry is the store that follows this load.

src/main/scala/xiangshan/mem/lsqueue/LoadQueueReplay.scala

@@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ class LoadQueueReplay(implicit p: Parameters) extends XSModule
   for (i <- 0 until LoadQueueReplaySize) {
     // dequeue
     //  FIXME: store*Ptr is not accurate
-    dataNotBlockVec(i) := isAfter(io.stDataReadySqPtr, blockSqIdx(i)) || stDataReadyVec(blockSqIdx(i).value) || io.sqEmpty // for better timing
-    addrNotBlockVec(i) := isAfter(io.stAddrReadySqPtr, blockSqIdx(i)) || !strict(i) && stAddrReadyVec(blockSqIdx(i).value) || io.sqEmpty // for better timing
+    dataNotBlockVec(i) := isNotBefore(io.stDataReadySqPtr, blockSqIdx(i)) || stDataReadyVec(blockSqIdx(i).value) || io.sqEmpty // for better timing
+    addrNotBlockVec(i) := isNotBefore(io.stAddrReadySqPtr, blockSqIdx(i)) || !strict(i) && stAddrReadyVec(blockSqIdx(i).value) || io.sqEmpty // for better timing
     // store address execute
     storeAddrInSameCycleVec(i) := VecInit((0 until StorePipelineWidth).map(w => {
       io.storeAddrIn(w).valid &&