fix:ready check exceptions

[JarbasAl]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced device readiness checks through an event-driven approach, improving responsiveness and efficiency.

• Bug Fixes

  • Simplified the logic for determining device readiness, eliminating unnecessary timeout errors.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the BootFinishedSkill class within the __init__.py file. The initialize method now emits an event for device readiness checks instead of directly calling a method, transitioning to an event-driven model. Additionally, the is_device_ready method has been simplified to eliminate explicit timeout handling, allowing it to return the readiness status without raising a TimeoutError. These modifications streamline the device readiness checking process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
__init__.py	- Modified initialize method to emit event mycroft.ready.check instead of direct method call. - Simplified is_device_ready method to remove explicit timeout handling and return readiness status without raising an error.

Possibly related PRs

• feat:are_you_ready #17: The changes in the __init__.py file of this PR also modify the BootFinishedSkill class, specifically enhancing the logic for checking device readiness, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the is_device_ready method and the overall readiness handling.

Suggested labels

feature

Poem

🐰 In the world of code, a change so bright,
Events now dance, bringing new delight.
Device readiness checks, no more a chore,
With a hop and a skip, we’re ready for more!
So let’s celebrate this code’s new song,
In the land of rabbits, where we all belong! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

__init__.py (1)

81-84: Approve simplification with a suggestion

The simplification of the loop exit condition is a good improvement. However, with the removal of explicit timeout handling, it might be beneficial to add a log message when the 60-second timeout is reached. This would help in debugging scenarios where the device doesn't become ready within the expected timeframe.

Consider adding a log message like this:

if monotonic() - start >= 60:
    LOG.warning("Device readiness check timed out after 60 seconds")

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0f5b43 and 7c6e990.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• init.py (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (2)

__init__.py (2)

48-49: Approve transition to event-driven model

The change from directly calling self.handle_check_device_readiness() to emitting a "mycroft.ready.check" event is a good improvement. This transition to an event-driven model enhances decoupling and flexibility in the system's initialization process.

---

Line range hint 1-214: Approve overall changes

The modifications in this PR successfully address the objective of fixing ready check exceptions. The transition to an event-driven model in the initialize method and the simplification of the is_device_ready method work together to streamline the device readiness process. These changes enhance the flexibility and robustness of the system without introducing breaking changes.

The code is now more maintainable and aligns well with event-driven programming principles. Good job on improving the BootFinishedSkill class!