Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix:ready_settings #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

fix:ready_settings #25

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Oct 28, 2024

only wait for "skills" like default config used to do

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Streamlined device readiness checks by modifying default settings, focusing only on "skills".
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved conditions under which the device is considered ready, enhancing overall performance.

only wait for "skills" like default config used to do
@JarbasAl JarbasAl requested a review from goldyfruit October 28, 2024 22:39
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the BootFinishedSkill class in the __init__.py file, specifically updating the is_device_ready method. The default settings for ready_settings have been changed to only include "skills," reducing the number of services checked for device readiness. Other methods and event handlers remain unchanged, maintaining their original functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
__init__.py Modified is_device_ready method to change ready_settings from ["skills", "speech", "audio"] to ["skills"]. Other methods and event handlers remain unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat:are_you_ready #17: The changes in this PR also modify the BootFinishedSkill class in __init__.py, specifically enhancing the is_device_ready method and related readiness checks, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR regarding the ready_settings.
  • fix:ready check exceptions #19: This PR modifies the is_device_ready method in the BootFinishedSkill class, simplifying its logic and changing how readiness is checked, which is closely related to the adjustments made in the main PR regarding the readiness conditions.

Suggested labels

fix

Poem

In the burrow where devices dwell,
A change was made, oh can you tell?
From "speech" and "audio," we've moved away,
Now "skills" alone will lead the way.
A simpler path for readiness found,
Hopping forth with joy, we bound! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Oct 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added fix and removed fix labels Oct 28, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
__init__.py (1)

Line range hint 63-76: Update comments to reflect current default behavior.

The comments above list various possible services that can be included in ready_settings, but don't indicate which ones are included by default. Consider updating the documentation to clearly state that only "skills" is included by default, while other services can be optionally enabled through configuration.

         # Different setups will have different needs
         # eg, a server does not care about audio
         # internet -> device is connected to the internet
         # network -> device is connected to the internet
         # gui_connected -> a gui client connected to the gui socket

         # any service using ProcessStatus class can also be added to ready_settings
-        # skills -> skills reported ready
-        # speech -> stt reported ready
-        # audio -> audio playback reported ready
-        # gui -> gui websocket reported ready
-        # PHAL -> enclosure/HAL reported ready
+        # Default: only waits for skills to be ready
+        # Additional optional services:
+        #   - speech -> stt reported ready
+        #   - audio -> audio playback reported ready
+        #   - gui -> gui websocket reported ready
+        #   - PHAL -> enclosure/HAL reported ready
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f0b1c58 and e37af6c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • init.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
__init__.py (1)

77-77: LGTM! Verify configuration override still works.

The change to only wait for "skills" by default aligns with the PR objective and simplifies the boot process. However, let's verify that users can still override this setting if needed.

✅ Verification successful

Change to ready_settings default value is safe to proceed

The codebase analysis shows that:

  • ready_settings is only used in this specific file
  • The configuration is loaded via self.settings.get() which allows runtime overrides
  • No other files in the codebase depend on or configure this setting
  • The comments properly document that this is an extensible setting that can include any service using ProcessStatus class

The change to default to ["skills"] maintains backward compatibility since:

  1. The get() method allows for configuration override
  2. The code is designed to handle variable number of services in the ready check
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any existing configurations that might be affected
# by this change in default behavior

# Look for any skill settings files that might override ready_settings
rg -l "ready_settings" -g "*.json"

Length of output: 34


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand configuration patterns
# 1. Search for any mentions of ready_settings in Python files
rg "ready_settings" -A 2 -B 2

# 2. Look for configuration loading patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'self.settings.get("ready_settings"'

Length of output: 655

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit ab859bc into dev Oct 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the JarbasAl-patch-1 branch October 28, 2024 22:59
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants