Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add exactBandMatch as default false in searchAdvancedBand #15

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

giacomocamerano
Copy link
Collaborator

@giacomocamerano giacomocamerano commented Nov 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an option for exact band name matching in search functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced handling of optional parameters in search requests, ensuring flexibility and accuracy.
  • Tests

    • Added new test cases to validate the updated search functionality, including scenarios for exact matching.
  • Documentation

    • Updated usage instructions to clarify the method of passing parameters in search queries.
    • Updated schema to reflect the addition of the exactBandMatch parameter in search queries.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the searchBand functionality across multiple files in the codebase. The key change is the addition of an exactBandMatch boolean parameter to the searchBand method, affecting how band searches are conducted. This parameter is propagated through various functions, including searchBandAdvanced, and is reflected in the corresponding test cases and schema definitions. The changes enhance the flexibility of the search functionality by allowing for more precise band name matching.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/clients/metalArchives/index.ts Updated searchBand method signature to include exactBandMatch. Adjusted call to searchBandAdvanced.
src/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts Modified searchBandAdvanced to conditionally include exactBandMatch in conditionalParameters.
src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts Updated tests to reflect changes in parameter handling for searchBandAdvanced.
src/routes/bands/handlers/search.ts Updated searchBand function to include exactBandMatch parameter, with a default value of false.
src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts Added new test case for searchBand with exactBandMatch parameter.
src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts Added exactBandMatch as an optional property in searchBandQuerySchema.
src/tests/fixtures/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts Removed exactBandMatch property from searchBandAdvancedQueryFixture.
src/routes/bands/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts Updated themes, location, and bandLabelName to remove default values. Restructured searchBandAdvancedEntrySchema.
src/shared/schema.ts Removed location, themes, label, and year from bandSearchResultSchema.
src/tests/fixtures/routes/bands/searchBand.ts Removed location, themes, label, and year from searchBandResponseFixture.
README.md Updated usage instructions for the Metal API to reflect query parameter format for searching bands.

Possibly related PRs

  • Complete refactor #7: The changes in this PR include modifications to the searchBand function in src/routes/bands/handlers/search.ts, which now accepts the exactBandMatch parameter, directly relating to the changes made in the main PR where exactBandMatch was added to the searchBand method.
  • Feat/use advanced endpoint search #10: This PR implements an advanced search feature that utilizes exactBandMatch in search queries, directly connecting to the changes made in the main PR where the searchBand method was updated to include this parameter.

🐰 In the meadow where bands play,
A new search feature brightens the day.
With exactBandMatch now in the mix,
Finding the right tunes is a clever fix!
So hop along, let’s sing and cheer,
For precise searches are finally here! 🎶


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/clients/metalArchives/index.ts (1)

5-9: Add default value and documentation for exactBandMatch parameter

Consider adding:

  1. A default value of false to align with PR objectives
  2. JSDoc documentation explaining the parameter's purpose
+/**
+ * Search for a band in Metal Archives
+ * @param band - The band name to search for
+ * @param exactBandMatch - When true, only exact matches are returned
+ * @param offset - The offset for pagination (default: 0)
+ */
 searchBand: async (
     band: string,
-    exactBandMatch: boolean,
+    exactBandMatch: boolean = false,
     offset: number = 0
 ) => {
src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts (1)

6-7: Add JSDoc comments to document the query parameters.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose and behavior of each query parameter, especially the new exactBandMatch parameter.

 export const searchBandQuerySchema = Type.Object({
+    /** Band name to search for */
     band: Type.String({ minLength: 1 }),
+    /** Pagination offset (optional) */
     offset: Type.Optional(Type.Number({ minimum: 0 })),
+    /** When true, performs an exact match on the band name (optional) */
     exactBandMatch: Type.Optional(Type.Boolean())
 })
src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts (1)

52-65: Add validation test for exactBandMatch parameter

The test suite covers validation for offset but lacks validation for the new exactBandMatch parameter.

Add this test case:

it('Should return validation error for invalid exactBandMatch value', async () => {
    const response = await server.inject({
        method: 'GET',
        url: '/bands/search/?band=immortal&exactBandMatch=invalid'
    })

    expect(response.statusCode).toEqual(400)
    expect(response.json().message).toContain('exactBandMatch')
})
src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-250: Add explicit test case for exactBandMatch=false

While the test suite covers exactBandMatch=true and undefined cases, given that this PR specifically introduces exactBandMatch with a default false value, we should add an explicit test case for false.

Consider adding a new test case:

it('should handle exactBandMatch=false explicitly', async () => {
    jest.spyOn(
        searchBandAdvancedModule,
        'searchBandAdvancedClient'
    ).mockResolvedValueOnce(returnFixture)

    await searchBandAdvancedModule.searchBandAdvanced(
        'Test Band',
        0,
        false,
        {}
    )

    expect(
        searchBandAdvancedModule.searchBandAdvancedClient
    ).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
        method: HttpMethod.GET,
        url: config.metalArchives.searchBandAdvancedUrl,
        params: expect.objectContaining({
            bandName: 'Test Band',
            exactBandMatch: false
        })
    })
})
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 596ce17 and a7d0410.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/routes/bands/handlers/search.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/tests/fixtures/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/tests/fixtures/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/clients/metalArchives/index.ts (1)

10-10: LGTM!

The implementation correctly propagates all parameters to searchBandAdvanced.

src/routes/bands/handlers/search.ts (2)

7-7: LGTM: Clean parameter destructuring

The addition of exactBandMatch to the parameter destructuring is clean and follows the existing pattern.


10-14: LGTM: Well-structured function call with appropriate defaults

The modification to include exactBandMatch is well implemented with proper default handling via nullish coalescing.

Let's verify the parameter consistency with the metalArchives client:

✅ Verification successful

Parameter order matches implementation but with improved type safety

Looking at the implementation in src/clients/metalArchives/index.ts, the searchBand method is defined with the exact same parameter order and types:

searchBand: async (
    band: string,
    exactBandMatch: boolean,
    offset: number = 0
)

The function call in the review is consistent with this implementation, and the nullish coalescing for exactBandMatch adds extra type safety while maintaining the same default behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the metalArchives.searchBand implementation matches this usage
# Expected: Should find the implementation with matching parameters

ast-grep --pattern 'searchBand(band: string, exactBandMatch: boolean, offset?: number)'

Length of output: 89


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the implementation with a broader pattern and analyze the results
ast-grep --pattern 'searchBand($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Also search for interface/type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
  searchBand($_): $_
}'

# Backup search using ripgrep
rg "searchBand" -A 3

Length of output: 24079

src/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts (2)

45-45: Clean implementation of conditional parameter.

The spread operator usage to conditionally include exactBandMatch only when true is an elegant solution that:

  • Reduces request payload size by omitting false values
  • Maintains clean code without explicit conditionals
  • Follows the pattern used by other conditional parameters

Line range hint 1-120: Verify the impact on existing API consumers.

The implementation looks good overall. However, since this modifies search behavior, we should ensure existing consumers are aware of the change.

Let's check for direct usages of this function:

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual usage in the test files and the index.ts to understand if there are any compatibility concerns.


No breaking changes detected in the API contract

The implementation in index.ts shows that the searchBandAdvanced function is only used internally through a wrapper function searchBand that maintains backward compatibility by passing empty advanced search parameters. The test files confirm that the existing functionality remains unchanged, with proper test coverage for both the basic and advanced search scenarios.

  • The wrapper in index.ts ensures the public API remains stable: searchBand(band, exactBandMatch, offset)
  • All test cases pass with both minimal and full parameter sets
  • The changes only add optional advanced search capabilities without modifying existing behavior
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find direct usages of searchBandAdvanced to verify impact
# Expected: List of files that need to be reviewed for potential updates

# Search for direct function calls
rg "searchBandAdvanced\(" --type ts

# Search for tests to ensure they're updated
rg -l "searchBandAdvanced" --glob "*test.ts"

Length of output: 904


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in index.ts to see how it's being used
cat src/clients/metalArchives/index.ts

# Check the test files to understand test coverage and usage patterns
cat src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts
cat src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts

Length of output: 11416

src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-250: Overall test implementation looks good!

The test suite is well-structured with comprehensive coverage of the searchBandAdvanced functionality. It includes proper mocking, clear test cases, and good error handling. The implementation follows testing best practices and maintains good code quality.

src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts (1)

105-138: Add documentation for tuple positions

The restructuring to a union of tuples is well done and maintains compatibility with Metal Archives' response format. However, it would be helpful to document what each position in the tuples represents.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the meaning of each tuple position. For example:

/**
 * Represents a band entry from Metal Archives with varying levels of detail.
 * Tuple positions:
 * 1. Band information (name, link, id)
 * 2. Genre
 * 3. Country
 * 4. [Optional] Additional field (specify what this represents)
 * 5. [Optional] Additional field (specify what this represents)
 * ...
 */
export const searchBandAdvancedEntrySchema = Type.Union([
  // ... existing code
])
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab39b2e and aa9b1b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/shared/schema.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/tests/fixtures/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/tests/fixtures/routes/bands/searchBand.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/tests/fixtures/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • src/clients/metalArchives/searchBandAdvanced.ts
  • src/clients/metalArchives/test/searchBandAdvanced.test.ts
  • src/routes/bands/handlers/test/search.test.ts
  • src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts (2)
Learnt from: giacomocamerano
PR: Metalheads-it/metal-api#10
File: src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts:65-67
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T18:16:55.750Z
Learning: In `src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts`, setting the default value of `themes` to `'*'` in the `searchBandAdvancedQuerySchema` is necessary because if it is empty, themes won't be returned in the response from Metal Archives.
Learnt from: giacomocamerano
PR: Metalheads-it/metal-api#10
File: src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts:91-101
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T18:16:55.750Z
Learning: In `src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts`, the `searchBandAdvancedEntrySchema` should remain as a tuple schema because Metal Archives returns data in that format.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/shared/schema.ts (2)

Line range hint 3-13: Verify schema consistency with implementation

Let's ensure the schema matches the actual implementation of the search functionality.

#!/bin/bash
# Find and check the implementation files
echo "Checking implementation files..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function searchBandAdvanced' 

# Check test files for updated expectations
echo "Checking test files..."
rg -A 5 "bandSearchResultSchema" --type=test

Line range hint 3-13: ⚠️ Breaking Change: Document the removal of fields from bandSearchResultSchema

The removal of location, themes, label, and year fields from bandSearchResultSchema constitutes a breaking change that could affect API consumers. Please ensure this is properly documented and consider:

  • Updating API documentation
  • Adding migration guides if necessary
  • Bumping the major version number following semver

Let's verify if these changes are documented:

src/tests/fixtures/routes/bands/searchBand.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-39: Verify alignment with SearchBandResponse schema

The test fixture has been simplified to include only essential fields. Let's verify that this aligns with the actual schema definition.

✅ Verification successful

Test fixture perfectly aligns with the schema definition

The test fixture in searchBand.ts exactly matches the schema definition. The bandSearchResultSchema in src/shared/schema.ts defines exactly the same fields that are present in the fixture: band, genre, country, link, and id. The SearchBandResponse type also correctly includes the metadata fields: search, offset, countTotal, countCurrent, and results. No discrepancy exists between the schema and the test fixture.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SearchBandResponse schema matches the test fixture structure

# Find and display the SearchBandResponse schema definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface SearchBandResponse {
  $$$
}'

# Alternative: Search for the type definition
rg -A 10 'type SearchBandResponse = {' 

Length of output: 220


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the schema definition
# First, let's locate the schema file mentioned in the import
fd "search.ts" --type f

# Then let's examine its contents
rg -l "SearchBandResponse" --type ts

# Let's also try to find type/interface definitions without the equals sign
ast-grep --pattern 'type SearchBandResponse'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface SearchBandResponse'

# Additionally, let's check the actual structure in the schema directory
fd "schema" --type d

Length of output: 476


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual schema definition in the identified file
cat src/routes/bands/schema/search.ts

# Also check the metal archives schema for comparison
cat src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBand.ts

Length of output: 2766


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the shared schema that defines the band search result structure
cat src/shared/schema.ts

# Also check if there are any other files that might define or extend the band search result schema
rg "bandSearchResultSchema" --type ts

Length of output: 1424

src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts (2)

97-104: Well-structured schema definitions

Good job on breaking down the schema components into reusable parts with clear descriptions. This improves code maintainability and readability.


Line range hint 75-138: Verify the impact of schema changes

The removal of default values and restructuring of the entry schema might affect existing code.

Let's verify the usage and impact:

✅ Verification successful

Schema changes are safe and intentional

The changes are part of an intentional feature update to "only base info from searchBandAdvanced" as shown in the git history. The modifications are safe because:

  1. The removal of default values ('*') from themes, location, and bandLabelName is compensated by making these fields optional
  2. The searchBandAdvancedEntrySchema change from a fixed 7-tuple to a union of tuples is a deliberate enhancement to handle variable response lengths
  3. The schema is only imported in test files and the client implementation, with no other dependencies affected
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for direct usage of removed default values
echo "Checking for direct usage of removed default values..."
rg -l "themes: ['\"]\*['\"]" 

# Check for code that might be affected by the schema changes
echo "Checking for files importing and using these schemas..."
rg -l "searchBandAdvancedEntrySchema|searchBandAdvancedQuerySchema" 

# Check for tests that might need updates
echo "Checking for affected tests..."
fd -e test.ts -x rg -l "themes|location|bandLabelName" {}

Length of output: 532


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for imports of the file containing these schemas
echo "Checking for imports of searchBandAdvanced..."
rg -l "from ['\"].*searchBandAdvanced['\"]"

# Check for usage of the schema types
echo "Checking for usage of SearchBandAdvancedQuery type..."
rg "SearchBandAdvancedQuery" -A 2

# Let's look at the git history of this file to understand the changes
echo "Checking git history..."
git log -p src/clients/metalArchives/schema/searchBandAdvanced.ts

# Check for any tests specifically for this functionality
echo "Looking for related test files..."
fd "searchBandAdvanced.*test" 

Length of output: 9664

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@giacomocamerano giacomocamerano merged commit e936a0f into main Nov 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@giacomocamerano giacomocamerano deleted the feat/add-exactbandmatch-param branch November 12, 2024 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant