Python: Remove one of three filesystem structures #2971
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Downstream of #2920.
Follows discussion in #2964.
Currently on
dev
:cmd/cmdname.cpp
python/mrtrix3/commands/cmdname.py
.python/mrtrix3/commands/cmdname/cmdname.py
, to facilitate inclusion of other files within a sub-directory specific to that command.python/mrtrix3/commands/cmdname/usage.py
andpython/mrtrix3/commands/cmdname/execute.py
, which define the relevant entry points.It is being proposed in Allow splitting C++ commands into separate files #2964 that:
cmd/cmdname.cpp
.cmd/cmdname/cmdname.cpp
, to facilitate inclusion of other files within a sub-directory specific to that command.My proposal here is: especially if #2964 is implemented, providing support for 2.i.b., then it makes sense to remove support for 1.ii.c..
That way the supported filesystem structure per command will be consistent between the two languages. As shown by the content of this PR, there is little to no sacrifice in doing so; conversely there's the benefit of any communication around permissible filesystem structures likely being simpler.