Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix challenge mode #6

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix challenge mode #6

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

cron2
Copy link

@cron2 cron2 commented Aug 7, 2018

challenge mode, like: entering an SMS pin, and getting back a challenge + text string, does not work due to two fairly obvious bugs.

If it works, the log looks like this:

Aug 7 17:39:20 openvpn-tcp pam_linotp[42195]: linotp:DEBUG: "result :-( 72399207995415978 sms submitted"
Aug 7 17:39:20 openvpn-tcp pam_linotp[42195]: linotp:DEBUG: "Challenge authentication for 'gert':::-( 723992"
Aug 7 17:39:20 openvpn-tcp pam_linotp[42195]: linotp:INFO: "Challenge authentication:'sms subm...' '72399207...'"
Aug 7 17:39:20 openvpn-tcp pam_linotp[42195]: linotp:DEBUG: "we are in challenge mode: 99"
Aug 7 17:39:20 openvpn-tcp pam_linotp[42195]: linotp:DEBUG: "challenge >sms submit< >7239920799< "

and, for example, OpenSSH will then nicely present "sms submitted" as next challenge, instead of just asking for "Your OTP:" again.

cron2 added 2 commits August 7, 2018 17:24
The existing check had wrong logic (don't do a NULL check with
"if (pointer)") plus it was checking the wrong variable.

Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]>
When handling a server challenge, pam_linotp_validate_password()
will call pam_linotp_get_authtok() with "token_length" set to 0
(unconditionally).  pam_linotp_get_authtok() passes this on to
pam_linotp_get_authtok_no_use_first_pass(), which will just
error out in that case, doing nothing.

Change pam_linotp_get_authtok_no_use_first_pass() to always do its
job, and only check token_length when deciding whether or not to
write back the token length to the caller (which is the only way
this is used in the other caller, pam_sm_authenticate()).

The whole purpose of the integer use of "token_len" in this
context remains unclear (as the value written back is never used), but
passing in always-0 and then always erroring-out is never useful.

Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant