reviewdog: Too many results (annotations) in diff. You may miss some annotations due to GitHub limitation for annotation created by logging command. Please check GitHub Actions log console to see all results. Limitation: - 10 warning annotations and 10 error annotations per step - 50 annotations per job (sum of annotations from all the steps) - 50 annotations per run (separate from the job annotations, these annotations aren't created by users) Source: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/26680#discussioncomment-3252835

The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Comment has incorrect indentation level 12, expected is 20, indentation should be the same level as line 139. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/robot/RobotContainer.java:143:13: warning: Comment has incorrect indentation level 12, expected is 20, indentation should be the same level as line 139. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.indentation.CommentsIndentationCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Missing a Javadoc comment. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/SimulatedMotor.java:5:1: warning: Missing a Javadoc comment. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.javadoc.MissingJavadocTypeCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Missing a Javadoc comment. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/MotorLayout.java:12:5: warning: Missing a Javadoc comment. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.javadoc.MissingJavadocMethodCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Missing a Javadoc comment. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/SimulatedNeo.java:5:1: warning: Missing a Javadoc comment. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.javadoc.MissingJavadocTypeCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Missing a Javadoc comment. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/ctre/phoenix6/unmanaged/jni/UnmanagedJNI.java:3:1: warning: Missing a Javadoc comment. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.javadoc.MissingJavadocTypeCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Method name 'JNI_FeedEnable' must match pattern '^[_a-z][_a-zA-Z0-9_]*$'. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/ctre/phoenix6/unmanaged/jni/UnmanagedJNI.java:4:24: warning: Method name 'JNI_FeedEnable' must match pattern '^[_a-z][_a-zA-Z0-9_]*$'. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.naming.MethodNameCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 'METHOD_DEF' should be separated from previous line. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/ctre/phoenix6/unmanaged/jni/UnmanagedJNI.java:7:5: warning: 'METHOD_DEF' should be separated from previous line. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.whitespace.EmptyLineSeparatorCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Method name 'JNI_GetEnableState' must match pattern '^[_a-z][_a-zA-Z0-9_]*$'. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/ctre/phoenix6/unmanaged/jni/UnmanagedJNI.java:7:27: warning: Method name 'JNI_GetEnableState' must match pattern '^[_a-z][_a-zA-Z0-9_]*$'. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.naming.MethodNameCheck)

[checkstyle] reported by reviewdog 🐶 'METHOD_DEF' should be separated from previous line. Raw Output: /github/workspace/./src/main/java/frc/lib/sim/ctre/phoenix6/unmanaged/jni/UnmanagedJNI.java:10:5: warning: 'METHOD_DEF' should be separated from previous line. (com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.whitespace.EmptyLineSeparatorCheck)