-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(e2e): move block production monitor before any transactions #3132
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new line in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (2)
185-189
: Strategic placement of block production monitor.The placement of the monitor before any transactions is well-thought-out, allowing for quick detection of consensus failures during genesis. The comment clearly explains why it's not part of the error group.
Consider enhancing the monitoring setup with:
- Error logging strategy
- Graceful shutdown handling
- go monitorBlockProductionExit(ctx, conf) + go func() { + if err := monitorBlockProductionExit(ctx, conf); err != nil { + logger.Error("Block production monitor failed: %v", err) + cancel() // Trigger graceful shutdown + } + }()
185-189
: Well-architected placement for resource optimization.The monitor's placement before resource-intensive operations (emissions pool funding, keygen, TSS setup) ensures optimal resource utilization by failing fast on consensus issues. This prevents partial or inconsistent state in the test environment.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1)
185-189
: Verify monitor implementation details.
Please ensure that monitorBlockProductionExit
properly:
- Respects context cancellation
- Has appropriate timeout mechanisms
- Implements robust error handling
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the monitor implementation to verify its robustness.
Monitor implementation is robust and well-structured
The implementation demonstrates production-grade practices with:
- Proper context cancellation handling via
<-ctx.Done()
- Clear timeout mechanism using
time.After(4 * time.Second)
- Comprehensive error handling for RPC client setup, WebSocket events, and block monitoring
- Clean shutdown through context cancellation
- Appropriate error propagation with detailed error messages
The monitor successfully fulfills its role of detecting consensus failures by exiting when blocks aren't produced within the expected timeframe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the monitor implementation to verify its robustness
echo "Searching for monitor implementation..."
rg -A 10 "func monitorBlockProductionExit"
# Check for context handling patterns
echo "Verifying context handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'select {
case $_ = <-ctx.Done():
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of monitorBlockProduction
echo "Checking monitorBlockProduction implementation..."
rg -A 30 "func monitorBlockProduction"
# Check for timeout/ticker patterns
echo "Checking timeout patterns..."
rg -A 5 "time.NewTicker|time.After" "cmd/zetae2e/local/monitor_block_production.go"
# Check error handling patterns
echo "Checking error handling..."
rg "if err .= .+" "cmd/zetae2e/local/monitor_block_production.go"
Length of output: 3807
Description
The block production monitor should cause the e2e tests to fail fast even if consensus fails immediately at genesis.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes