semgrep app - pr comment test

[jkan2]

Description

clean PR to test if the semgrep app bot actually generates a comment, this is not meant to be merged or be reviewed by any means

How Has This Been Tested?

• Tested CCTX in localnet
• Tested in development environment
• Go unit tests
• Go integration tests
• Tested via GitHub Actions

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[semgrep-code-zeta-chain]

Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code.

_{Ignore this finding from dangerous-exec-command.}

[semgrep-code-zeta-chain]

Semgrep Assistant suggests the following fix: Use exec.CommandContext with static commands and separate arguments to prevent command injection.

View step-by-step instructions

1. Avoid using fmt.Sprintf to construct the command string. Instead, split the command and its arguments into separate strings to prevent injection.
2. Use exec.CommandContext with a static command and pass arguments separately. For example, replace command := fmt.Sprintf("sh -c %s", input) with command := "sh" and args := []string{"-c", input}.
3. Update the exec.CommandContext call to include the arguments: cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, command, args...).
4. Validate or sanitize the input to ensure it does not contain malicious content. For example, you can use a whitelist of allowed commands or patterns.
5. Consider using the golang.org/x/net/context package for more advanced context handling if needed.

This code change should be a good starting point:

Suggested change

	cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, command)
	package main
	import (
	"context"
	"fmt"
	"os/exec"
	)
	func main() {
	// Another example of untrusted input
	input := "ping -c 7 google.com; echo hacked"
	ctx := context.Background()
	// Fix: Use static command and separate arguments
	command := "sh"
	args := []string{"-c", input}
	cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, command, args...)
	// Execute and print the output
	output, err := cmd.CombinedOutput()
	if err != nil {
	fmt.Println("Error:", err)
	}
	fmt.Println("Output:", string(output))
	}

_{Leave feedback with a 👍 / 👎. Save a memory with /semgrep remember <your custom instructions>.}