-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: derive Bitcoin TSS address by chain ID; added more Signet static info in 'chains' package #2907
feat: derive Bitcoin TSS address by chain ID; added more Signet static info in 'chains' package #2907
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request enhance the ZetaClient's support for multiple Bitcoin chains, specifically by adding functionality for deriving Bitcoin TSS addresses based on chain IDs. The updates include modifications across various files to streamline address retrieval, validation, and testing processes, ensuring better handling of Bitcoin Signet and other chains. Additionally, the configuration management has been adjusted to accommodate multiple Bitcoin chains, aligning with ongoing efforts to future-proof the system. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ZetaClient
participant Observer
participant TSS
User->>ZetaClient: Request Bitcoin TSS Address
ZetaClient->>Observer: Retrieve Outbound ID
Observer->>TSS: Get BTC Address with Chain ID
TSS-->>Observer: Return BTC Address
Observer-->>ZetaClient: Return Outbound ID
ZetaClient-->>User: Provide Bitcoin TSS Address
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2907 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 67.27% 67.49% +0.21%
===========================================
Files 380 380
Lines 21175 21169 -6
===========================================
+ Hits 14245 14287 +42
+ Misses 6264 6213 -51
- Partials 666 669 +3
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 14
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go (1)
32-32
: Approve change with recommendation for test coverage.The modification to derive the Bitcoin TSS address using the chain ID aligns with the PR objectives and enhances the flexibility of the system. This change allows for support of multiple Bitcoin-based chains, as outlined in issue #1397.
However, it is imperative to ensure that this critical change is adequately covered by unit tests to maintain the robustness and reliability of the system.
To address the lack of test coverage flagged by the static analysis tool, I can assist in crafting a unit test for the
checkRPCStatus
function. Would you like me to provide a sample test case?Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 32-32: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by testspkg/chains/bitcoin.go (1)
Line range hint
1-58
: Overall, the changes effectively add Signet support while maintaining code consistency.The additions and modifications in this file successfully implement support for the Bitcoin Signet network, aligning with the PR objectives. The code maintains consistency with existing patterns and naming conventions.
To further enhance maintainability and potentially improve performance, consider a comprehensive refactoring of the Bitcoin network parameter handling. This could involve:
- Creating a single map that associates chain IDs with their respective network parameters and names.
- Refactoring both
BitcoinNetParamsFromChainID
andBitcoinChainIDFromNetworkName
to use this map.- Implementing helper functions for adding new networks, ensuring consistency across all related data structures.
This approach would centralize the network information, reduce duplication, and simplify future additions or modifications to supported Bitcoin networks.
pkg/chains/bitcoin_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-77
: Suggestion: Enhance test coverage for comprehensive network validation.The test file demonstrates good coverage for various Bitcoin networks. To further improve the robustness of the test suite, consider adding the following:
- Implement and test
IsBitcoinTestnet
function.- Implement and test
IsBitcoinSignet
function.These additions would ensure consistent validation across all supported Bitcoin networks, aligning with the PR's objective of enhancing multi-chain support.
Example implementation:
func TestIsBitcoinTestnet(t *testing.T) { require.True(t, IsBitcoinTestnet(BitcoinTestnet.ChainId)) require.False(t, IsBitcoinTestnet(BitcoinMainnet.ChainId)) require.False(t, IsBitcoinTestnet(BitcoinRegtest.ChainId)) require.False(t, IsBitcoinTestnet(BitcoinSignetTestnet.ChainId)) } func TestIsBitcoinSignet(t *testing.T) { require.True(t, IsBitcoinSignet(BitcoinSignetTestnet.ChainId)) require.False(t, IsBitcoinSignet(BitcoinMainnet.ChainId)) require.False(t, IsBitcoinSignet(BitcoinRegtest.ChainId)) require.False(t, IsBitcoinSignet(BitcoinTestnet.ChainId)) }Ensure to implement the corresponding
IsBitcoinTestnet
andIsBitcoinSignet
functions in the main package if they don't already exist.zetaclient/testutils/constant.go (1)
20-21
: Approve addition of TSSPubkeyAthens3 constant with suggestions for improvementThe addition of the
TSSPubkeyAthens3
constant is appropriate and consistent with the existing code structure. However, to enhance code maintainability and security, please consider the following recommendations:
Add a comment explaining the purpose and usage of this constant, similar to the comments provided for other constants in this file.
Regarding the static analysis tool's flag for a potential API key exposure:
While this appears to be a false positive as the value represents a public key rather than a sensitive API key, it's crucial to ensure that this is indeed a public key and not inadvertently exposing any sensitive information.To address these points, consider modifying the code as follows:
// TSSPubkeyAthens3 is the TSS public key for Athens3 network used in testing // This key is used for [brief explanation of its purpose] TSSPubkeyAthens3 = "zetapub1addwnpepq28c57cvcs0a2htsem5zxr6qnlvq9mzhmm76z3jncsnzz32rclangr2g35p"Tools
Gitleaks
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
zetaclient/testutils/mocks/tss_signer.go (2)
Line range hint
128-163
: Address inconsistencies inBTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
implementation.The method signature has been updated with an unused
int64
parameter, while the implementation usess.chain.ChainId
. This inconsistency may lead to confusion and potential bugs.Consider the following improvements:
Utilize the parameter in the implementation:
func (s *TSS) BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash(chainID int64) *btcutil.AddressWitnessPubKeyHash { // ... (existing implementation) net, err := chains.GetBTCChainParams(chainID) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("error getting btc chain params: %v", err) return nil } tssAddress := s.BTCAddress(chainID) // ... (rest of the implementation) }If the parameter is not needed, remove it and use
s.chain.ChainId
consistently:func (s *TSS) BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash() *btcutil.AddressWitnessPubKeyHash { // ... (keep the current implementation) }Ensure that all callers of this method are updated accordingly, and that the usage of
chainID
is consistent across related methods.
Line range hint
1-200
: Comprehensive review of changes and suggestions for improvement.The modifications to
BTCAddress
andBTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
methods introduce inconsistencies and don't fully address the objective of supporting multiple Bitcoin chains based on chain ID.To align with the PR objectives and improve the implementation:
Implement a consistent approach for handling chain IDs across all relevant methods.
Consider introducing a
chainConfig
map or similar structure to store chain-specific information:type ChainConfig struct { Network *chaincfg.Params // Add other chain-specific fields as needed } var chainConfigs = map[int64]ChainConfig{ chains.BitcoinMainnet.ChainId: {Network: &chaincfg.MainNetParams}, chains.BitcoinTestnet3.ChainId: {Network: &chaincfg.TestNet3Params}, // Add other supported chains }Update the
TSS
struct to support multiple chains:type TSS struct { // ... (existing fields) chainConfigs map[int64]ChainConfig }Refactor methods to utilize the
chainConfig
:func (s *TSS) BTCAddress(chainID int64) string { config, ok := s.chainConfigs[chainID] if !ok { return "" // or handle error } // Use config.Network for chain-specific logic // ... } func (s *TSS) BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash(chainID int64) *btcutil.AddressWitnessPubKeyHash { config, ok := s.chainConfigs[chainID] if !ok { return nil // or handle error } // Use config.Network instead of s.chain.ChainId // ... }These changes will provide a more robust and flexible implementation for supporting multiple Bitcoin chains, aligning with the PR objectives and improving overall code quality.
zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go (1)
260-261
: Approve changes with documentation suggestionThe modifications to the
BTCAddress
andBTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
method signatures in theTSSSigner
interface are appropriate and align with the objective of supporting multiple Bitcoin chains. The addition of thechainID
parameter enables the derivation of chain-specific Bitcoin addresses, which is crucial for multi-chain functionality.To enhance code clarity and maintainability, I recommend adding documentation comments to these methods, explaining the purpose of the
chainID
parameter and any constraints or expectations regarding its values.Consider adding documentation comments as follows:
// BTCAddress returns the Bitcoin address for the specified chain ID. // chainID: The ID of the Bitcoin chain (e.g., mainnet, testnet, signet). BTCAddress(chainID int64) string // BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash returns the Bitcoin witness public key hash address for the specified chain ID. // chainID: The ID of the Bitcoin chain (e.g., mainnet, testnet, signet). BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash(chainID int64) *btcutil.AddressWitnessPubKeyHashzetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer.go (1)
Line range hint
1-524
: Suggestions for code improvementsWhile reviewing the changes, I noticed some areas in the existing code that could benefit from refactoring or improvement:
The
TODO
comments (e.g., lines 78-79, 293) should be addressed or converted into GitHub issues for better tracking.The
SignWithdrawTx
function (starting at line 293) is quite long and complex. Consider refactoring it into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability.Error handling in the
TryProcessOutbound
function (starting at line 421) could be improved by using a more structured approach, such as returning errors instead of logging them directly.The retry logic in the
TryProcessOutbound
function (lines 508-530) could be extracted into a separate helper function for better reusability.Consider using constants for magic numbers throughout the code (e.g.,
1e8
,1e-8
) to improve clarity and maintainability.These suggestions are not directly related to the current changes but could be considered for future improvements to enhance the overall code quality.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (1)
372-374
: Enhance test coverage for TSS address retrieval and usageThe static analysis hints indicate that the newly added lines for TSS address retrieval and its usage in
ListUnspentMinMaxAddresses
are not covered by tests.To improve the robustness of the codebase, it is crucial to add unit tests covering these new changes. Would you like me to generate a unit test skeleton for the
FetchUTXOs
method, focusing on the TSS address retrieval and its usage? This can be implemented as a new GitHub issue to track the task.Also applies to: 376-376
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 372-374: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go#L372-L374
Added lines #L372 - L374 were not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (1)
64-65
: Clarify test environment and chain selectionThe use of
chains.BitcoinTestnet.ChainId
in a function namedcreateObserverWithUTXOs
may lead to confusion. Consider renaming the function to explicitly indicate that it's creating a testnet observer, or add a comment explaining the choice of testnet for this particular test setup.-func createObserverWithUTXOs(t *testing.T) *Observer { +func createTestnetObserverWithUTXOs(t *testing.T) *Observer { // Create Bitcoin observer ob := createObserverWithPrivateKey(t) tssAddress := ob.TSS().BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash(chains.BitcoinTestnet.ChainId).EncodeAddress() + // Using testnet for this test setupchangelog.md (2)
Line range hint
3-15
: Consider enhancing changelog entries with more detailsWhile the changelog provides a good overview of recent changes, some entries could benefit from more detailed descriptions. For instance:
[2907] - "derive Bitcoin tss address by chain id and added more Signet static info" - It would be helpful to briefly explain the impact of this change on the system's functionality or performance.
[2870] - "support for multiple Bitcoin chains in the zetaclient" - Consider elaborating on which specific Bitcoin chains are now supported and any limitations or considerations users should be aware of.
Adding these details would make the changelog more informative for users and developers alike.
Line range hint
17-24
: Ensure backwards compatibility and update documentation for refactorsThe refactoring efforts appear substantial and may have significant implications:
[2890] - The refactoring of
MsgUpdateChainInfo
and addition ofMsgRemoveChainInfo
likely changes the API. Ensure that these changes are well-documented and that any breaking changes are clearly communicated to users.[2899] - The removal of btc deposit fee v1 might affect existing integrations. Consider providing migration guidelines if necessary.
[2826] - The removal of unused code from the emissions module and addition of a new parameter for fixed block reward amount is a significant change. Ensure that this is thoroughly tested and that any dependent systems are updated accordingly.
It's crucial to update all relevant documentation, including API references and integration guides, to reflect these changes.
zetaclient/tss/tss_signer.go (2)
Line range hint
463-470
: RefactorBTCAddress
to return an error for improved robustnessCurrently, the
BTCAddress
function returns an empty string when an error occurs, which can make error handling less explicit for callers. Consider modifying the function signature to return(string, error)
to allow callers to handle errors more effectively and enhance code robustness.
Line range hint
473-480
: RefactorBTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
to return an error for better error propagationThe function presently returns
nil
upon encountering an error, which might obscure the underlying issue for the caller. By adjusting the function to return(*btcutil.AddressWitnessPubKeyHash, error)
, callers can handle errors explicitly, leading to clearer and more maintainable code.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (19)
- changelog.md (1 hunks)
- cmd/zetaclientd/start.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/chains/bitcoin.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/chains/bitcoin_test.go (2 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (3 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (2 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer_keysign_test.go (2 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer_test.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/testutils/constant.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/testutils/mocks/tss_signer.go (3 hunks)
- zetaclient/tss/tss_signer.go (3 hunks)
- zetaclient/tss/tss_signer_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (18)
cmd/zetaclientd/start.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.pkg/chains/bitcoin.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.pkg/chains/bitcoin_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer_keysign_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/testutils/constant.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/testutils/mocks/tss_signer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/tss/tss_signer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.zetaclient/tss/tss_signer_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Learnings (1)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (1)
Learnt from: ws4charlie PR: zeta-chain/node#2899 File: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go:131-132 Timestamp: 2024-09-19T18:25:57.534Z Learning: ObserveInbound coverage will be improved in future refactor.
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go
[warning] 149-149: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L149
Added line #L149 was not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go
[warning] 372-374: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go#L372-L374
Added lines #L372 - L374 were not covered by tests
[warning] 376-376: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go#L376
Added line #L376 was not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go
[warning] 32-32: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests
Gitleaks
zetaclient/testutils/constant.go
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
zetaclient/tss/tss_signer_test.go
125-125: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (14)
pkg/chains/bitcoin.go (1)
13-13
: Addition of BitcoinSignetParams is appropriate and consistent.The introduction of
BitcoinSignetParams
aligns with the existing pattern for other Bitcoin network parameters. This addition effectively supports the Bitcoin Signet network, which is in line with the PR objectives.pkg/chains/bitcoin_test.go (1)
20-20
: Approval: Signet test case added successfully.The inclusion of the Signet network test case enhances the coverage of the
BitcoinNetParamsFromChainID
function. This addition aligns with the PR objectives of supporting multiple Bitcoin chains and is consistent with the existing test structure.zetaclient/tss/tss_signer_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-190
: Commendable test suite with opportunities for enhancement.The
zetaclient/tss/tss_signer_test.go
file presents a well-structured and comprehensive test suite for EVM and BTC address generation and validation. The use of table-driven tests facilitates easy extension and maintenance of test cases. To further elevate the quality and robustness of this test suite, consider implementing the following general improvements:
- Expand test coverage by adding more edge cases and error scenarios across all test functions.
- Implement consistent use of constants for chain IDs, error messages, and other static values to improve maintainability.
- Ensure that all test data, including public keys, are non-sensitive and specifically designated for testing purposes.
- Consider implementing helper functions for common setup tasks to reduce code duplication across test functions.
- Add comments explaining the purpose and expected behavior of each test case, especially for complex scenarios.
These enhancements will contribute to a more robust, maintainable, and comprehensive test suite, further ensuring the reliability of the TSS signer implementation.
Tools
Gitleaks
125-125: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer.go (1)
157-157
: Approve change with verificationThe modification to include the chain ID when deriving the Bitcoin TSS address is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. This change enhances the flexibility of the system to support multiple Bitcoin-based chains.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification:
Please review the results to ensure that all calls to
BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
include theChainId
parameter. If any inconsistencies are found, they should be addressed to maintain uniformity across the codebase.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (1)
149-149
: Approval: Chain-specific TSS address retrieval implemented.The modification to include
ob.Chain().ChainId
as a parameter when retrieving the TSS Bitcoin address is a judicious enhancement. This change aligns seamlessly with the pull request's primary objective of supporting multiple Bitcoin chains, allowing for chain-specific TSS addresses.To ensure the robustness of this modification, it is imperative to augment the test coverage. Please execute the following command to verify the current test coverage for this file:
Should the results indicate insufficient coverage, kindly consider expanding the test suite to encompass this critical change.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 149-149: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L149
Added line #L149 was not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (4)
417-417
: Improvement in TSS address derivationThe modification to include
ob.Chain().ChainId
in theBTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
method call is a commendable enhancement. This change aligns with the PR objectives by enabling the derivation of Bitcoin TSS addresses based on the chain ID, thus facilitating support for multiple Bitcoin chains.
602-602
: Consistent improvement in TSS address usageThe addition of
ob.Chain().ChainId
to theBTCAddress
method call is a logical extension of the previous modification. This change maintains consistency in deriving chain-specific TSS addresses throughout the codebase, further supporting the PR's objective of accommodating multiple Bitcoin chains.
661-661
: Comprehensive implementation of chain-specific TSS addressesThe inclusion of
ob.Chain().ChainId
in theBTCAddress
method call completes the set of modifications required to support chain-specific TSS addresses. This change, along with the previous two, ensures a consistent and comprehensive implementation across all relevant functions, fully realizing the PR's objective of supporting multiple Bitcoin chains.
Line range hint
417-661
: Successful implementation of chain-specific TSS addressesThe modifications in this file effectively implement the PR objective of deriving Bitcoin TSS addresses based on chain ID. The changes are consistently applied across all relevant functions (
findNonceMarkUTXO
,checkTSSVout
, andcheckTSSVoutCancelled
), ensuring a comprehensive and coherent implementation. This enhancement significantly improves the codebase's ability to support multiple Bitcoin chains, as intended.The minimal and focused nature of these changes reduces the risk of introducing new issues while achieving the desired functionality. The implementation demonstrates a thorough understanding of the codebase and the requirements of the task at hand.
changelog.md (3)
Line range hint
26-33
: Commendable test suite improvementsThe additions to the test suite are comprehensive and cover various aspects of the system:
- The inclusion of e2e tests for TON blockchain and Bitcoin deposit and call scenarios enhances the robustness of the test suite.
- The extension of staking precompile tests and support for multiple runs for precompile tests improves the reliability of the test results.
- The addition of chain header tests in E2E tests is crucial for ensuring the integrity of chain-related functionalities.
To further enhance the test suite, consider:
- Adding performance benchmarks for critical operations, especially those affected by recent refactors.
- Implementing fuzz testing for complex input scenarios, particularly for cross-chain operations.
- Ensuring that all new features mentioned in the "Features" section have corresponding test coverage.
Line range hint
56-62
: CI improvements and chores enhance development workflowThe CI improvements and chores contribute to a more robust development and release process:
- The adjustment to the release pipeline, including manual execution and approval steps, adds an extra layer of control and verification to the release process.
- The addition of docker-compose and make commands for launching full nodes simplifies the deployment process for developers and operators.
- The update to build and push docker images for both Ubuntu and macOS increases platform coverage.
To further enhance the development workflow, consider:
- Implementing automated performance regression tests in the CI pipeline to catch any performance degradations early.
- Adding static code analysis tools to the CI process to maintain code quality and catch potential issues before they reach the review stage.
- Implementing automated dependency vulnerability scanning to ensure the security of third-party dependencies.
Line range hint
35-54
: Verify critical fixes and consider additional security measuresThe fixes address a wide range of issues, some of which are critical:
[2674] - The fix for operator voting on discarded keygen ballots is crucial. Ensure that this change doesn't introduce any new vulnerabilities in the voting process.
[2735] - The fix for the outbound tracker blocking confirmation is significant. Verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the system's overall performance or introduce race conditions.
[2853] - The fix for calling precompile through sc with sc state update is important. Ensure that this change is thoroughly tested, especially for edge cases and potential security implications.
[2844] - The addition of tsspubkey to the index for tss keygen voting is a critical change. Verify that this doesn't introduce any potential for key compromise or unauthorized access.
Consider implementing additional logging and monitoring for these critical areas to quickly identify any potential issues in production. Also, it may be beneficial to conduct a security audit focusing on these changes to ensure no new vulnerabilities have been introduced.
cmd/zetaclientd/start.go (2)
271-277
: Approved: Filtering and Collecting Bitcoin Chain IDsThe code effectively filters the supported Bitcoin chains and collects their IDs into the
btcChainIDs
slice. This approach is efficient and aligns with clean code principles.
279-284
: Approved: Validating TSS Addresses with Proper Error HandlingThe assignment of
tss.CurrentPubkey
fromcurrentTss.TssPubkey
is appropriate. The subsequent validation of TSS addresses against the Bitcoin chain IDs is correctly implemented with proper error handling.
Description
chain id
.chains
package.BTCAddressWitnessPubkeyHash
andBTCAddress
into one single methodBTCAddress(chainID int64)
for simplicity.Closes: #1397
How Has This Been Tested?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation