Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: enable parsing Bitcoin deposit memo with inscription; deposit fee improvement #2768

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

ws4charlie
Copy link
Contributor

@ws4charlie ws4charlie commented Aug 23, 2024

Description

  • Allow parsing Bitcoin deposit memo with inscription. Cherry picked from the original PR 2727
  • Bitcoin depositor fee improvement to achieve better dev experience. Backport from the original PR 2765
  • Replaced Solana deprecated RPC GetRecentBlockhash with GetLatestBlockhash to fix RPC error

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested CCTX in localnet
  • Tested in development environment
  • Go unit tests
  • Go integration tests
  • Tested via GitHub Actions

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Base branches to auto review (1)
  • develop

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

!!!WARNING!!!
nosec detected in the following files: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/fee.go, zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go

Be very careful about using #nosec in code. It can be a quick way to suppress security warnings and move forward with development, it should be employed with caution. Suppressing warnings with #nosec can hide potentially serious vulnerabilities. Only use #nosec when you're absolutely certain that the security issue is either a false positive or has been mitigated in another way.

Only suppress a single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code, while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within the #nosec annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */ or //#nosec G201 G202 G203
Broad #nosec annotations should be avoided, as they can hide other vulnerabilities. The CI will block you from merging this PR until you remove #nosec annotations that do not target specific rules.

Pay extra attention to the way #nosec is being used in the files listed above.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the nosec label Aug 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 3.24324% with 179 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.96%. Comparing base (9d6d0ec) to head (fedf6d5).
Report is 2 commits behind head on release/v19.

Files Patch % Lines
e2e/runner/inscription.go 0.00% 47 Missing ⚠️
.../e2etests/test_extract_bitcoin_inscription_memo.go 0.00% 33 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/fee.go 0.00% 30 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% 29 Missing ⚠️
e2e/runner/bitcoin.go 0.00% 25 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go 14.28% 5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/witness.go 50.00% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/solana/signer/withdraw.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
e2e/runner/solana.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release/v19    #2768      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        47.19%   46.96%   -0.23%     
===============================================
  Files              482      484       +2     
  Lines            31585    31740     +155     
===============================================
+ Hits             14905    14908       +3     
- Misses           15792    15942     +150     
- Partials           888      890       +2     
Files Coverage Δ
e2e/runner/solana.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go 33.22% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/solana/signer/withdraw.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/witness.go 68.42% <50.00%> (-2.37%) ⬇️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go 14.39% <14.28%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
e2e/runner/bitcoin.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/fee.go 37.98% <0.00%> (-11.52%) ⬇️
.../e2etests/test_extract_bitcoin_inscription_memo.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
e2e/runner/inscription.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@skosito skosito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, just some minor comments

EDIT: now i see this is PR for backports, so please discard comments if they dont make sense

changelog.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/fee.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/fee.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/witness.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lumtis lumtis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Included the E2E test for the inscription please review #2769

changelog.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lumtis lumtis merged commit bc9f419 into release/v19 Aug 27, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@lumtis lumtis deleted the feat-v19.1.2-impl branch August 27, 2024 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants