chore: updated labels on syncing issues to include "bug"

[CharlieMc0]

Description

Adding "bug" label to any issue created using the syncing issue template.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Improved issue categorization by adding the "bug" label to the node setup or syncing issue template, facilitating better triaging and prioritization of issues.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent modification to the issue template for node setup or syncing difficulties enhances the categorization of reported issues. By adding the "bug" label alongside "infra," this change allows for more effective triaging and prioritization of issues that may contain bugs. This adjustment aims to improve the workflow for maintainers, ensuring that critical issues receive the attention they require in a timely manner.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/syncing.yaml	Updated labels from ["infra"] to ["infra", "bug"] to enhance issue categorization.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant IssueTracker
    participant Maintainer

    User->>IssueTracker: Report an issue (syncing)
    IssueTracker->>Maintainer: Notify of a new issue with labels
    Maintainer->>IssueTracker: Review issue with "infra" and "bug" labels
    Maintainer->>Maintainer: Prioritize issue based on labels

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[gartnera]

But sync issues are not always bugs? Sometimes it's user error or unsupported configurations?

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d5cee1 and f3aab2b.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/syncing.yaml (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/syncing.yaml (1)

3-3: Change approved: Addition of "bug" label.

The addition of the "bug" label to the existing "infra" label enhances the categorization of issues related to node setup or syncing difficulties. This change aligns with the PR objectives and improves the triaging process for maintainers.

[CharlieMc0]

But sync issues are not always bugs? Sometimes it's user error or unsupported configurations?

We need some way to organize them in the project view and I wanted to avoid adding a new label for it. Infra + Bug = Something the SRE team needs to pay attention to

[gartnera]

I think just the infra label is a good enough filter?

[gartnera]

Infra + Bug = Something the SRE team needs to pay attention to

It seems to me that just the "infra" label is enough.

I think a action that autolabels community issues would be more useful

[lumtis]

Should we close this one for now? @CharlieMc0 @gartnera

[lumtis]

Closing for now as it seems agreement was not reached