fix(ci): correct slack conditional comparison

[gartnera]

It's failure not failed: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#needs-context

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Improvements
  • Enhanced the notification system for workflow failures, ensuring more accurate alerts based on specific failure states.
• Bug Fixes
  • Corrected the condition for sending Slack notifications to better reflect the job's actual failure status.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent change in the GitHub Actions workflow enhances the notification process by refining the condition for sending Slack messages. The condition now specifically checks for a 'failure' result, rather than the broader 'failed' state. This adjustment aims to improve the accuracy of notifications, ensuring they are triggered by precise failure states and thus enhancing the monitoring and response capabilities of the CI/CD pipeline.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/e2e.yml	Updated the condition for sending Slack notifications from checking for 'failed' to 'failure' to improve precision.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant Slack

    User->>GitHub: Trigger Workflow (push/schedule)
    GitHub->>GitHub: Execute e2e Job
    alt Job Result
        GitHub->>GitHub: Check Result
        condition Result is Failure
            GitHub->>Slack: Send Notification
        else Result is Success
            GitHub->>Slack: No Notification
        end
    end

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22c7395 and c18a1d2.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/e2e.yml (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

.github/workflows/e2e.yml (1)

182-182: LGTM! The conditional expression change is correct.

The change from 'failed' to 'failure' aligns with the official GitHub documentation, ensuring accurate Slack notifications based on job statuses.

[morde08]

LGTM