Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: integrated base Observer structure into existing EVM/BTC observers #2359

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

ws4charlie
Copy link
Contributor

@ws4charlie ws4charlie commented Jun 20, 2024

Description

The PR integrated base Observer structures into existing EVM/BTC Signer structures.

Closes: 2022
Closes: 2126

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Include instructions and any relevant details so others can reproduce.

  • Tested CCTX in localnet
  • Tested in development environment
  • Go unit tests
  • Go integration tests
  • Tested via GitHub Actions

Checklist:

  • I have added unit tests that prove my fix feature works

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Integrated base Observer structure into EVM/Bitcoin Observer.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Simplified initialization of observers.
    • Enhanced error handling during observer creation.
  • Tests
    • Added tests for opening/closing the database, saving, and reading/writing the last block scanned.
  • Refactor
    • Updated observer method calls and property handling for consistency.
  • Documentation
    • Updated changelog to reflect integration changes in observers.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 20, 2024

!!!WARNING!!!
nosec detected in the following files: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go, zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go

Be very careful about using #nosec in code. It can be a quick way to suppress security warnings and move forward with development, it should be employed with caution. Suppressing warnings with #nosec can hide potentially serious vulnerabilities. Only use #nosec when you're absolutely certain that the security issue is either a false positive or has been mitigated in another way.

Only suppress a single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code, while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within the #nosec annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */ or //#nosec G201 G202 G203
Broad #nosec annotations should be avoided, as they can hide other vulnerabilities. The CI will block you from merging this PR until you remove #nosec annotations that do not target specific rules.

Pay extra attention to the way #nosec is being used in the files listed above.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the nosec label Jun 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.91525% with 325 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.43%. Comparing base (852897f) to head (5925d10).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2359      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    68.65%   69.43%   +0.78%     
===========================================
  Files          305      306       +1     
  Lines        19158    19046     -112     
===========================================
+ Hits         13152    13224      +72     
+ Misses        5357     5166     -191     
- Partials       649      656       +7     
Files Coverage Δ
zetaclient/supplychecker/zeta_supply_checker.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer.go 52.58% <87.50%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/base/signer.go 88.88% <0.00%> (-11.12%) ⬇️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer.go 18.07% <20.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go 91.13% <76.36%> (-4.39%) ⬇️
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound.go 59.16% <22.58%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go 35.75% <28.88%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go 45.41% <64.64%> (+13.37%) ⬆️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go 14.78% <0.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

@ws4charlie ws4charlie marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2024 18:36
Base automatically changed from refactor-integrate-base-signer to develop June 21, 2024 15:20
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Jun 21, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
11759679 Triggered Generic High Entropy Secret 5edd452 cmd/zetae2e/local/accounts.go View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

Files ignored due to path filters (16)
  • changelog.md is excluded by none and included by none
  • cmd/zetaclientd/debug.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/base/signer.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/base/signer_test.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer_test.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/signer/signer.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound_test.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/supplychecker/zeta_supply_checker.go is excluded by none and included by none
  • zetaclient/testutils/constant.go is excluded by none and included by none

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes integrate a base Observer structure into the EVM/Bitcoin Observer, streamline orchestrator validation, and group structs. They simplify sync.Mutex initialization in debug.go, enhance utils.go, and update test utilities. New Bitcoin RPC functions and refined BTC observer methods are introduced, with updated test packages. The base/observer functionality receives significant refinements, including new tests for database operations and observer properties.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
changelog.md Included details of integrating the base Observer structure into EVM/Bitcoin Observer in PR 2359.
cmd/zetaclientd/debug.go Simplified initialization of sync.Mutex{} in evmobserver.Observer and btcobserver.Observer.
cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go Added fmt, ethclient, and Bitcoin RPC imports. Updated chain observer creation with enhanced client setup and error handling.
testutil/sample/crypto.go Added BtcHash() function returning a sample BTC hash.
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Enhanced Observer struct with mu *sync.Mutex, updated NewObserver, added database handling and thread-safety methods.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go Added and refined methods for watching and processing inbounds, handling transactions. Added several logging and struct updates.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go Replaced direct field access with method calls and updated logging/error handling for outbound transactions.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go Updated test references to observer package, moved observer to observer_test.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go Introduced functions for Bitcoin RPC interactions.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go Moved tests from observer to rpc_test, updated Bitcoin observer instance creation.
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go, .../inbound_test.go Updated method calls and logging within Observer struct, included additional argument memDBPath in test cases.
zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go Refined tests for observer properties, cache sizes, database interactions, added new tests for block scanning and telemetry server.

Poem

In the code where chaos reigned,
Observers now unified, no longer strained,
Mutexes smoothed, the structs refined,
EVM and Bitcoin in harmony combined.
🐇✨ Hopping on through tests anew,
The blockchain hums, precise and true. 🌐💫


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 33

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (1)

Line range hint 23-40: Refactor suggestion: Consolidate common test setup code.

The createObserver function is repeated in multiple test cases. Consider moving common setup code to a helper function or using a setup function in the test suite to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.

zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)

Line range hint 96-129: Initialization of caches and error handling.

The initialization of blockCache and headerCache is handled well with appropriate error checks. However, consider adding more detailed logging in case of initialization failures to aid in debugging.

if err != nil {
-   return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error creating block cache")
+   ob.Logger().Chain.Error().Err(err).Msg("Failed to create block cache")
+   return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error creating block cache")
}
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 133-135: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L133-L135
Added lines #L133 - L135 were not covered by tests


[warning] 138-138: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L138
Added line #L138 was not covered by tests


[warning] 140-140: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests


[warning] 142-142: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L142
Added line #L142 was not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (3)

Line range hint 28-37: Add test coverage for the ticker setup in WatchInbound.

The setup of the dynamic ticker and the initial logging are critical parts of the function, yet they are not covered by tests. Ensuring that the ticker is correctly configured and that logging works as expected is crucial for the reliability of the inbound observation functionality.


Line range hint 87-164: Add test coverage for transaction processing in ObserveInbound.

The transaction processing logic is complex and involves several steps, including querying for transactions, posting to Zetacore, and handling errors. This critical functionality lacks test coverage, which is essential to ensure its reliability and correctness.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 108-108: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests


[warning] 111-111: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L111
Added line #L111 was not covered by tests


[warning] 119-119: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L119
Added line #L119 was not covered by tests


[warning] 122-122: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L122
Added line #L122 was not covered by tests


[warning] 126-126: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests


Line range hint 204-217: Ensure detailed logging and error handling in ProcessInboundTrackers.

The function logs detailed information about each tracker and handles errors effectively. However, consider adding more specific error messages to provide clearer context in the logs, which could aid in debugging and operational monitoring.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 185-185: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L185
Added line #L185 was not covered by tests


[warning] 192-192: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L192
Added line #L192 was not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (1)

216-216: Live Test Functions:

The live test functions (LiveTestNewRPCClient and LiveTestGetBlockHeightByHash) are well-structured and focus on specific functionalities. It's important to ensure these tests do not interact with live systems during regular test runs. Consider using environment flags or configuration settings to explicitly enable live tests to prevent accidental runs.

Consider using environment flags or configuration settings to explicitly enable live tests to prevent accidental runs.

Also applies to: 224-224

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer_test.go (1)

Line range hint 35-71: Context and Configuration Setup for Tests:

The function getZetacoreContext is well-structured to create a mock context for unit tests. It handles default values and setups necessary for isolated testing. However, consider adding error handling for the configuration setup to catch any misconfigurations that could affect test outcomes.

+ // Consider adding error handling for the configuration setup.
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (1)

Line range hint 187-220: ISSUE: Potential infinite loop risk.

The WatchRPCStatus method contains a loop that could potentially run indefinitely if the StopChannel is not properly triggered. Ensure that there are adequate safeguards to prevent this from becoming an issue, especially in error scenarios where continuous failures might prevent the exit condition from being reached.

Consider adding more robust error handling or a maximum retry limit to mitigate potential infinite looping.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (3)

Line range hint 228-253: RPC Status Monitoring Logic

The method WatchRPCStatus effectively monitors the RPC status by checking various metrics. However, consider refactoring to reduce the nested depth of conditionals and loops for better readability and potentially extracting some logic into separate methods or helpers.

+ // Refactor to improve readability and reduce complexity
+ // Consider extracting repeated error handling into a helper function

Line range hint 335-372: Gas Price Posting Logic

The method PostGasPrice handles different scenarios for gas price calculation and posting. The hardcoded values for regnet should be documented to clarify their purpose. Additionally, error handling is robust, but adding more specific error messages could help in identifying issues more quickly.

+ // Add comments to explain hardcoded values for regnet
+ // Improve error messages for better clarity and troubleshooting

Line range hint 450-509: UTXO Monitoring and Refresh Logic

The method FetchUTXOs is comprehensive in its approach to fetching and filtering UTXOs. The use of a deferred panic recovery is a good safety measure. However, the method is quite long and does multiple things; consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods.

+ // Consider breaking down the method to improve modularity and readability
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go (4)

Line range hint 105-149: Improve error handling in ProcessInboundTrackers.

The function ProcessInboundTrackers handles errors locally but could be improved by adding more specific error messages and possibly a retry mechanism for transient errors, especially when dealing with network requests or blockchain interactions.

Consider enhancing error resilience by implementing a retry mechanism or more granular error handling to distinguish between transient and permanent errors.


Line range hint 229-255: Optimize event processing in ObserveZetaSent.

The method ObserveZetaSent processes events in a loop but sorts them each time an event is added. This could be inefficient especially with a large number of events.

Consider collecting all events first and then sorting them once before processing. This change would reduce the computational complexity from O(n log n) per event to O(n log n) overall.

- for iter.Next() {
-     ...
-     sort.SliceStable(events, ...)
- }
+ for iter.Next() {
+     ...
+ }
+ sort.SliceStable(events, ...)

Line range hint 308-361: Enhance error handling in ObserveERC20Deposited.

Similar to ObserveZetaSent, the ObserveERC20Deposited function could benefit from more robust error handling and logging. Additionally, consider abstracting the repeated logic of transaction fetching and event processing into a shared function to reduce duplication.

Consider creating a generic function to handle the fetching and processing of events which could be reused in both ObserveZetaSent and ObserveERC20Deposited.


[!TIP]
Codebase Verification

Check logical consistency in block number handling.

The current implementation does not handle legitimate cases of block number decrease due to chain reorganizations. It is recommended to add specific handling for such scenarios to ensure robustness.

  • Consider adding logic to detect and handle block reorganizations gracefully.
  • Enhance logging around block number handling for better debugging and traceability.
Analysis chain

Line range hint 161-217: Check logical consistency in block number handling.

The check for block number not decreasing is good, but there might be edge cases where this could happen legitimately (e.g., chain reorganizations). It might be beneficial to handle this scenario more gracefully.

Additionally, consider adding more detailed logging around this area to aid in debugging such situations.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for handling of block reorganizations.

# Test: Search for logic handling reorganizations. Expect: Specific handling or comments addressing reorganizations.
rg --type py 'reorganization' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go

Length of output: 71



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for implicit handling of block reorganizations.

# Search for related terms that might indicate reorganization handling.
rg 'rollback|reorg|block number|error handling' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go

# Additionally, search for function definitions in the file to identify related methods.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func $_($_) $_' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go

Length of output: 536

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bae5b6a and 72061f3.

Files selected for processing (26)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
  • cmd/zetaclientd/debug.go (3 hunks)
  • cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go (2 hunks)
  • testutil/sample/crypto.go (2 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (10 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (10 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (13 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go (25 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (17 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer_test.go (4 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (22 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (15 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (8 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go (33 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go (18 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (11 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer_test.go (6 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound.go (9 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound_test.go (7 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/outbound_data_test.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer.go (4 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer_test.go (11 hunks)
  • zetaclient/supplychecker/zeta_supply_checker.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/testutils/mocks/btc_rpc.go (3 hunks)
  • zetaclient/testutils/mocks/evm_rpc.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go

[warning] 133-135: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L133-L135
Added lines #L133 - L135 were not covered by tests


[warning] 138-138: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L138
Added line #L138 was not covered by tests


[warning] 140-140: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests


[warning] 142-142: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L142
Added line #L142 was not covered by tests


[warning] 282-283: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L282-L283
Added lines #L282 - L283 were not covered by tests


[warning] 287-287: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L287
Added line #L287 was not covered by tests


[warning] 315-315: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L315
Added line #L315 was not covered by tests


[warning] 321-321: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L321
Added line #L321 was not covered by tests


[warning] 332-332: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L332
Added line #L332 was not covered by tests


[warning] 336-336: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L336
Added line #L336 was not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go

[warning] 37-37: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L37
Added line #L37 was not covered by tests


[warning] 43-43: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L43
Added line #L43 was not covered by tests


[warning] 45-45: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L45
Added line #L45 was not covered by tests


[warning] 53-54: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests


[warning] 63-63: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L63
Added line #L63 was not covered by tests


[warning] 71-72: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L71-L72
Added lines #L71 - L72 were not covered by tests


[warning] 76-76: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests


[warning] 79-79: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L79
Added line #L79 was not covered by tests


[warning] 82-82: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests


[warning] 87-88: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L87-L88
Added lines #L87 - L88 were not covered by tests


[warning] 95-95: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L95
Added line #L95 was not covered by tests


[warning] 108-108: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests


[warning] 111-111: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L111
Added line #L111 was not covered by tests


[warning] 119-119: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L119
Added line #L119 was not covered by tests


[warning] 122-122: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L122
Added line #L122 was not covered by tests


[warning] 126-126: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests


[warning] 145-145: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L145
Added line #L145 was not covered by tests


[warning] 164-164: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L164
Added line #L164 was not covered by tests


[warning] 185-185: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L185
Added line #L185 was not covered by tests


[warning] 192-192: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L192
Added line #L192 was not covered by tests

Gitleaks
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go

130-130: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)


148-148: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)


166-166: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)


210-210: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)


235-235: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go

446-446: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)

LanguageTool
changelog.md

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_A)
Context: ...## Unreleased ### Breaking Changes * [List of the breaking changes can be found in...


[grammar] ~65-~65: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the plural noun “to-dos”? (TO_DO_HYPHEN)
Context: ...ub.com//pull/2329) - fix TODOs in rpc unit tests * [2342](https://gith...


[misspelling] ~80-~80: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICKED)
Context: ...//pull/2327) - partially cherry picked the fix to Bitcoin outbound dust amount...


[uncategorized] ~89-~89: When ‘mac-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen. (SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
Context: ...me which should be the version. Removed mac specific build as the arm build should handle th...


[style] ~90-~90: Consider changing the order of words to improve your wording. (TO_NOT_VB)
Context: ...ocker build step for non release builds to not overwrite the github tag * [2192](https...


[grammar] ~106-~106: Did you mean “sending”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘require’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ... * Updating admin policies now requires to send a governance proposal executing the `Up...


[uncategorized] ~178-~178: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Context: ...n/node/pull/1899) - add empty test files so packages are included in coverage * [19...


[uncategorized] ~229-~229: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ... Breaking Changes * zetaclientd start: now requires 2 inputs from stdin: hotke...


[grammar] ~266-~266: Did you mean “running”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ....com//pull/1584) - allow to run E2E tests on any networks * [1746](http...


[grammar] ~275-~275: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ...nto dockerhub on release for ubuntu and macos * Adjusted the pipeline for building an...


[grammar] ~276-~276: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ... building and pushing docker images for MacOS to install and run docker * Added docke...


[uncategorized] ~282-~282: When ‘start-up’ is used as a noun or modifier, it needs to be hyphenated. (VERB_NOUN_CONFUSION)
Context: ...he new docker image that facilitate the start up automation * Adjusted the docker pipeli...


[grammar] ~303-~303: Before the countable noun ‘to’ an article or a possessive pronoun is necessary. (IN_NN_CC_VBG)
Context: ...ssues/1610) - add pending outtx hash to tracker after monitoring for 10 minutes * [1656...


[uncategorized] ~368-~368: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...er params data have been moved to chain params described below. * GetCoreParams: Ren...


[uncategorized] ~369-~369: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...arams described below. * GetCoreParams: Renamed into GetChainParams. `/zeta-c...


[uncategorized] ~373-~373: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_AN)
Context: ...ver/getTssAddress/{bitcoin_chain_id}` . Optional bitcoin chain id can now be passed as a...


[uncategorized] ~373-~373: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
Context: ... parameter to fetch the correct tss for required BTC chain. This parameter only affects ...


[uncategorized] ~453-~453: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
Context: ... update an observer, this can be either be run a tombstoned observer/validator or ...


[grammar] ~493-~493: Did you mean “testing”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ...pgrade name, and allow download. allows to test release * [1153](https://github.com/zet...


[misspelling] ~501-~501: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICK)
Context: ...github.com//pull/1235) - cherry pick all hotfix from v10.0.x (zero-amount, p...

Markdownlint
changelog.md

223-223: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash (MD004, ul-style)
Unordered list style


474-474: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces


514-514: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces


218-218: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines


240-240: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


287-287: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


343-343: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


219-219: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


359-359: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


364-364: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


368-368: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


373-373: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


242-242: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used


532-532: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character

Additional comments not posted (79)
zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/outbound_data_test.go (1)

73-73: Ensure correct implementation and usage of getNewEvmChainObserver.

The addition of getNewEvmChainObserver in the test scenarios is critical for ensuring the functionality of outbound data handling with the observer. Please verify that this function is correctly implemented and integrates well with the rest of the test suite.

Verification successful

Ensure correct implementation and usage of getNewEvmChainObserver.

The getNewEvmChainObserver function is implemented correctly and used appropriately in multiple test scenarios, including the one in outbound_data_test.go. This integration ensures that the mock observer is consistently utilized across various tests.

  • zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer_test.go: Lines 160, 181, 215, 253, 291, 327, 372, 410, 460, 503
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/outbound_data_test.go: Line 73
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `getNewEvmChainObserver`.

# Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Function should be well-defined and used appropriately.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func getNewEvmChainObserver($_, $_) $_ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2315



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the usage of `getNewEvmChainObserver` within the test files.

# Search for the function calls to `getNewEvmChainObserver` to ensure it is used correctly.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'getNewEvmChainObserver($_, $_)' 

Length of output: 1202

testutil/sample/crypto.go (1)

64-67: Approve the addition of the BtcHash function.

The BtcHash function is a useful addition for generating sample Bitcoin hashes in tests. It correctly utilizes chainhash.Hash to create hashes, which is standard practice in Bitcoin applications.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (2)

15-35: Review the implementation of NewRPCClient.

The NewRPCClient function is crucial for establishing a connection to the Bitcoin RPC server. Ensure that the connection parameters (connCfg) are correctly set and that error handling is robust, especially for the ping test to the server.

Verification successful

Error Handling in NewRPCClient Usage

The instances of NewRPCClient usage in the following files have proper error handling:

  • rpc_live_test.go: The test function LiveTestNewRPCClient uses require.NoError(t, err) to handle errors.
  • utils.go: The error from NewRPCClient is logged using logger.Std.Error().Err(err).Msgf.

Thus, the error handling in the NewRPCClient function usage is correctly implemented.

  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go
  • cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in `NewRPCClient`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `NewRPCClient`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRPCClient($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 508



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in `NewRPCClient`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `NewRPCClient`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'NewRPCClient($_)'

Length of output: 49



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in `NewRPCClient`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `NewRPCClient`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage.
rg 'NewRPCClient\('

Length of output: 464



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines around usage of `NewRPCClient` in the identified files for review.

# Extract relevant lines from `rpc_live_test.go`
rg -A 5 -B 5 'NewRPCClient\(' zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go

# Extract relevant lines from `utils.go`
rg -A 5 -B 5 'NewRPCClient\(' cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go

Length of output: 1368


38-54: Ensure robust error handling in GetTxResultByHash.

The function GetTxResultByHash retrieves transaction details based on a hash. It is essential that the error handling is robust, particularly the handling of potential issues with NewHashFromStr and GetTransaction.

Verification successful

Ensure robust error handling in GetTxResultByHash.

The function GetTxResultByHash is used in outbound.go with appropriate error handling. Errors returned by GetTxResultByHash are logged and wrapped with additional context.

  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go, line 5: The error is wrapped with additional context and returned.
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go, line 15: The error is logged with additional context.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in `GetTxResultByHash`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `GetTxResultByHash`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'GetTxResultByHash($_, $_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 526



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in `GetTxResultByHash`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `GetTxResultByHash`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'GetTxResultByHash($_, $_)'

Length of output: 58



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition and usage of `GetTxResultByHash`.

# Step 1: Search for the definition of `GetTxResultByHash`.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetTxResultByHash($_, $_) { $$$ }'

# Step 2: Search for the usage of `GetTxResultByHash` in the codebase.
rg 'GetTxResultByHash'

Length of output: 889



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling around the usage of `GetTxResultByHash` in `outbound.go`.

# Step 1: Display lines around the usage of `GetTxResultByHash` in `outbound.go`.
rg -A 5 -B 5 'GetTxResultByHash' zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go

Length of output: 1022

zetaclient/testutils/mocks/evm_rpc.go (1)

193-196: Approve the addition of the WithHeader method.

The WithHeader method is a useful addition to the MockEvmClient, allowing for the setting of custom headers in test scenarios. This enhances the flexibility and utility of the mock client in testing different blockchain interactions.

zetaclient/testutils/mocks/btc_rpc.go (3)

20-25: Initialization of MockBTCRPCClient struct

The fields err, blockCount, blockHash, blockHeader, blockVerboseTx, and Txs are initialized as zero values. This is standard practice for struct initialization in Go. However, consider documenting the purpose of each field, especially for complex structures like blockHash and blockVerboseTx, to improve code readability.


114-117: Error handling in GetBlockHash, GetBlockVerboseTx, and GetBlockHeader methods

The methods correctly check for an existing error before proceeding. This is a good practice as it prevents further operations if the client is already in an error state. However, consider adding a specific error message that indicates the operation being attempted, which can aid in debugging.

Also applies to: 125-128, 132-135


152-165: Fluent API design in MockBTCRPCClient

Using fluent design by returning the instance itself in WithError, WithBlockCount, WithBlockHash, WithBlockHeader, and WithBlockVerboseTx methods is a good practice for setting up test scenarios. This makes the test setup more readable and easier to understand.

cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go (2)

4-5: Addition of imports in utils.go

The new imports (fmt, ethclient, and btcrpc) are necessary for the updated functionalities in CreateChainObserverMap. Ensure that these imports are used optimally and check if there are any unused imports that could be cleaned up to maintain code hygiene.

Also applies to: 8-8, 13-13


123-191: Extensive updates to CreateChainObserverMap function

Significant enhancements have been made to handle the creation of EVM and BTC observers with more detailed configurations and error handling. This is crucial for the scalability and robustness of the observer implementations. Ensure that all new error paths are adequately tested to handle potential runtime issues effectively.

cmd/zetaclientd/debug.go (1)

Line range hint 88-164: Integration of Observer structures in debug command

The new integration of evmObserver and btcObserver within the debug command is a crucial update. It allows for enhanced debugging capabilities directly from the command line. Ensure that the error handling and the flow of data between these components are thoroughly tested, especially since they interact with external systems (EVM and BTC networks).

zetaclient/supplychecker/zeta_supply_checker.go (1)

126-126: Implementation of FetchZetaTokenContract in ZetaSupplyChecker

The method FetchZetaTokenContract is crucial for fetching contract details from non-Ethereum chains. This function needs to handle various edge cases, such as contract not found or network issues. Ensure comprehensive error handling and possibly include retries or fallback mechanisms.

zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (3)

Line range hint 243-352: Enhance database handling tests.

The tests for database operations such as OpenDB, CloseDB, and LoadLastBlockScanned are crucial. Consider adding tests that simulate database failures and verify that the observer handles these gracefully.


57-105: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for new observer configurations.

The tests for NewObserver function cover basic success and failure scenarios. It would be beneficial to add more edge cases, particularly testing the interaction with external dependencies like blockCache and headerCache.


Line range hint 137-228: Add tests for observer modification methods.

The test cases for observer modification methods like WithChain, WithChainParams, etc., are good. However, ensure that changes made by these methods do not unintentionally affect other properties of the observer due to shared references.

zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)

82-82: Proper use of mutex for thread safety.

The mutex mu is correctly initialized. Ensure that it is used appropriately in all methods that modify shared resources to maintain thread safety.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer_test.go (2)

104-192: Ensure comprehensive testing of observer initialization.

The tests cover basic scenarios for observer creation. Expand these to include more complex setups and error conditions, particularly focusing on interactions with the Bitcoin client and database path validations.


195-242: Enhance cache handling tests.

The tests for block cache operations are good but consider adding scenarios where cache operations fail, such as cache full or eviction scenarios, to ensure robustness.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (3)

26-27: Imports Added:

The addition of imports for observer and rpc packages is appropriate given the context of the file which is focused on testing Bitcoin RPC functionalities. Ensure that these imports are used in the file to avoid any unused imports.


52-59: New Observer Initialization:

The observer is initialized with a mock BTC RPC client and other mock dependencies. This setup is crucial for isolating the unit tests from external dependencies and ensuring reproducibility. However, ensure that all dependencies (like base.TempSQLiteDBPath and base.DefaultLogger()) are appropriately mocked or set up to prevent unintended side effects or dependencies on the actual environment.


233-235: RPC Client Initialization:

The initialization of the Bitcoin RPC client using configuration settings is a critical operation. Ensure that the configuration (btcConfig) contains all necessary parameters and that they are sourced securely, especially credentials like RPCUsername and RPCPassword.

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer_test.go (3)

27-27: Metrics Import Added:

The addition of the metrics package is noted. Ensure this import is utilized within the test cases, possibly for performance monitoring or metric assertions, which would be a good practice in testing scenarios that involve resource-intensive operations.


207-250: Database Loading and Error Handling Tests:

The tests for loading the database are crucial for ensuring data integrity and proper startup behavior. The tests cover various failure scenarios, which is excellent. Ensure that these tests are isolated and do not interact with a real database or environment variables without proper cleanup.


298-364: Block Cache Management Tests:

These tests verify the caching mechanism for blocks, which is vital for performance in blockchain observers. The tests check both positive and negative scenarios, including type mismatches in the cache. This thorough testing is crucial for ensuring the reliability and efficiency of the caching mechanism.

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound.go (7)

32-33: Refactor to use method chaining for TSS and Chain ID retrieval.

The code here has been refactored to use method chaining (ob.TSS().EVMAddress().String() and ob.Chain().ChainId) which is a more modular approach, enhancing readability and maintainability.


39-43: Error handling added for ticker creation and logging updates.

The addition of error handling after the ticker creation is a good practice, ensuring that the function exits early in case of errors, preventing potential runtime panics. The logging has been enhanced to provide more context about the operation, which is crucial for debugging and monitoring.

Also applies to: 47-48


53-58: Enhanced logging and error handling in the outbound tracking loop.

  • The conditional block at lines 53-58 gracefully handles the scenario where outbound observation is disabled, logging this state and continuing the loop.
  • Lines 78-79 and 86 handle cases where multiple transactions are confirmed for the same nonce, which should not happen. Logging such cases is essential for debugging and indicates robust error handling.

Also applies to: 78-79, 86-86


89-91: Dynamic ticker update and clean shutdown logic.

The ticker's interval is now dynamically updated, which allows for more flexible control over the process timing based on external configurations. The clean shutdown process on receiving a stop signal is correctly implemented, ensuring resources are freed and the process is terminated gracefully.


Line range hint 108-118: Complex transaction posting logic with detailed error handling.

This function handles the posting of votes for outbound transactions. The detailed error logging and the conditional check for the transaction hash being non-empty are good practices, ensuring that only meaningful data is processed.


140-150: Improved error handling and logging in transaction processing.

The use of errors.Wrapf to add context to the error messages helps in diagnosing issues faster. The detailed logging at line 184 is crucial for understanding issues related to parsing outbound events.

Also applies to: 184-184


349-349: Refined error handling and logging in transaction confirmation checks.

  • The method checkConfirmedTx has been enhanced with comprehensive error handling and logging. These changes are crucial for debugging and ensure that each failure point is logged with enough detail to diagnose issues effectively.
  • The check for sufficient confirmations before considering a transaction confirmed is a critical addition for ensuring data integrity.

Also applies to: 363-363, 368-368, 397-400

zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer_test.go (2)

62-89: Refactored test setup to include EVM chain observer.

The test setup functions now include the creation of an EVM chain observer, which is essential for testing the integration with the observer structure. The use of mock components and configuration setups is appropriate for unit testing. The detailed setup ensures that the environment is correctly configured before each test.


160-160: Consistent use of the observer in test scenarios.

In each test function, a new EVM chain observer is instantiated and used as part of the test setup. This change is consistent across the file and is crucial for ensuring that the tests accurately reflect the new system architecture with the observer integrated.

Also applies to: 181-181, 215-215, 253-253, 291-291, 327-327, 372-372, 410-410, 460-460, 503-503

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (3)

32-32: APPROVED: Interface implementation explicitly stated.

Clearly stating that Observer implements interfaces.ChainObserver enhances readability and maintainability by making the intended design pattern explicit.


34-90: REFACTOR_SUGGESTION: Consider using constructor functions for maps.

It's good practice to encapsulate the initialization of complex structures like maps within constructor functions. This can improve code organization and testability.

- outboundPendingTransactions:   make(map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction),
- outboundConfirmedReceipts:     make(map[string]*ethtypes.Receipt),
- outboundConfirmedTransactions: make(map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction),
+ outboundPendingTransactions:   NewTransactionMap(),
+ outboundConfirmedReceipts:     NewReceiptMap(),
+ outboundConfirmedTransactions: NewTransactionMap(),

And define these functions in the same package:

func NewTransactionMap() map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction {
    return make(map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction)
}

func NewReceiptMap() map[string]*ethtypes.Receipt {
    return make(map[string]*ethtypes.Receipt)
}

[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]


Line range hint 295-322: VERIFY: Ensure dynamic ticker updates are handled correctly.

The dynamic ticker in WatchGasPrice is updated based on GasPriceTicker, but it's crucial to verify that this update mechanism works correctly under all expected operational scenarios, especially when rapid changes occur.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (3)

13-13: APPROVED: Import statement added.

The import statement for github.com/zeta-chain/zetacore/zetaclient/chains/base is correctly added to use functionalities from the base package.


18-19: APPROVED: Relative path defined for test data.

Defining the relative path to the test data directory enhances maintainability and makes the tests more adaptable to changes in the project structure.


22-33: APPROVED: Utility function for creating mock Bitcoin observer.

The utility function MockBTCObserverMainnet is well-implemented. It sets up a mock Bitcoin observer with necessary dependencies, which is crucial for isolating tests and ensuring they run under controlled conditions.

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go (7)

128-128: Consistency in test setup.

The setup for tests across different token types (Zeta, ERC20, Gas) should be consistent unless there is a specific reason for differences. Ensure that all setups are aligned or document the reasons for any discrepancies.


92-102: Parameter consistency check required.

The change of chainID to 56 for the BSC chain connector needs verification to ensure it's handled correctly across all relevant parts of the application, especially considering chain-specific behaviors or configurations.

Verification successful

Parameter consistency check required.

The search results indicate that the chainID set to 56 is correctly configured in multiple parts of the application, including tests and contract ABIs. This suggests that the chainID 56 for the BSC chain connector is consistently applied across different components.

  • Files with chainID: 56 configurations:
    • zetaclient/zetacore/tx_test.go
    • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go
    • testutil/contracts/Reverter.go
    • testutil/contracts/Example.go
    • e2e/contracts/zevmswap/ZEVMSwapApp.go
    • e2e/contracts/contextapp/ContextApp.go

These findings support the notion that the chainID is consistently used and configured for BSC-specific behavior.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that chainID 56 is correctly configured across all relevant parts of the application.

# Test: Search for chainID 56 usage and configurations. Expect: Correct and consistent configuration for BSC.
rg --type python $'chainID.*56'

Length of output: 63



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that chainID 56 is correctly configured across all relevant parts of the application.

# Test: Search for chainID 56 usage and configurations in relevant file types. Expect: Correct and consistent configuration for BSC.
rg 'chainID.*56' --type go --type json --type yaml --type sh

Length of output: 5661


255-255: Handling of special transaction types like donations.

Ensure that the handling of special transaction types, such as donations, is consistent and well-documented across the application.

Verification successful

Handling of special transaction types like donations is consistent and well-documented.

The search results indicate that donation transactions are handled in multiple locations across the codebase, including tests, utility functions, and core logic files. This suggests that the handling of donation transactions is both consistent and well-documented.

  • zetaclient/testutils/testdata_naming.go
  • zetaclient/testutils/testdata.go
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/tx_script_test.go
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/tx_script.go
  • e2e/e2etests/test_donation.go
  • pkg/constant/constant.go
  • cmd/zetatool/filterdeposit/evm.go
  • cmd/zetatool/filterdeposit/btc.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the handling of special transaction types like donations across the application.

# Test: Search for handling of donation transactions. Expect: Consistent and well-documented handling.
rg --type python $'donation transactions'

Length of output: 73



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the handling of special transaction types like donations across the application.

# Test: Search for handling of donation transactions. Expect: Consistent and well-documented handling.
rg --type go 'donation'

Length of output: 3995


75-75: Verify logic consistency in conditional checks.

The test "should not act if no ZetaSent event" removes the ZetaSent event and checks for no action. Ensure that the system's behavior aligns with this expectation in all similar scenarios, possibly adding more comprehensive checks or mock scenarios.

Verification successful

Verify logic consistency in conditional checks.

The search results indicate multiple tests and functions related to the "ZetaSent" event across the codebase. The specific test "should not act if no ZetaSent event" in zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go correctly handles the scenario where the event is missing. Other tests and functions also consistently handle the "ZetaSent" event, ensuring that the system's behavior aligns with the expectation of not acting when the event is missing.

  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go: The test explicitly removes the "ZetaSent" event and verifies no action is taken.
  • x/crosschain/keeper/evm_hooks_test.go: Contains multiple tests ensuring correct parsing and processing of "ZetaSent" events, including handling errors when the event is missing or invalid.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the system behaves consistently when ZetaSent events are missing across different tests.

# Test: Search for similar tests across the codebase. Expect: Consistent handling of missing ZetaSent events.
rg --type python $'ZetaSent.*missing'

Length of output: 69



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the system behaves consistently when ZetaSent events are missing across different tests.

# Test: Search for similar tests across the codebase. Expect: Consistent handling of missing ZetaSent events.
rg --type go 'ZetaSent'

Length of output: 26377


160-160: Check for event handling consistency.

The test "should not act if no Deposit event" removes the Deposit event and checks for no action. This should be consistent with how other similar scenarios are handled.


213-213: Consistency in test setup for Gas tokens.

Ensure that the test setup for Gas tokens aligns with setups for other token types, verifying consistency or documenting reasons for differences.

Verification successful

Consistency in test setup for Gas tokens.

The test setups for coin.CoinType_Gas appear consistent with those for other token types like coin.CoinType_Zeta and coin.CoinType_ERC20. The functions and patterns used for Gas tokens are similar to those used for other token types, indicating a consistent setup approach.

  • coin.CoinType_Zeta
  • coin.CoinType_ERC20
  • coin.CoinType_Gas

No significant differences or inconsistencies were found in the test setups.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types.

# Test: Compare setups across different token types. Expect: Consistent setups or documented reasons for differences.
rg --type python $'Test setup.*Gas'

Length of output: 67



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types in Go files.

# Locate test setups for Gas tokens in the Go test file.
rg 'Test setup.*Gas' --type go

# Locate test setups for other token types in the Go test file.
rg 'Test setup' --type go

Length of output: 60



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types in the Go test file.

# Locate any references to Gas tokens in the Go test file.
rg 'Gas' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go

# Locate general test setup patterns in the Go test file.
rg 'setup|init|initialize' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go

Length of output: 1364



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types in the Go test file.

# Locate references to other token types in the Go test file.
rg 'CoinType_' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go

Length of output: 1420


233-233: Verify address validation logic.

Ensure that the address validation logic for determining if a receiver is TSS is robust and consistently applied across the application.

Verification successful

Address Validation Logic for TSS Receivers Verified

The search results indicate that the address validation logic for determining if a receiver is TSS is robust and consistently applied across the application. Multiple instances of address validation checks related to TSS were found, confirming the implementation's thoroughness.

  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go: Tests ensuring that actions are taken only if the receiver is a TSS address.
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go: Functions handling TSS address observations and validations.
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/tx_script.go: Decoding and validation of TSS vouts.
  • x/crosschain/types/tx_body_verification.go: Verification of receiver addresses for different coin types, including TSS addresses.

These instances demonstrate that the address validation logic is both robust and consistently applied.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the robustness and consistency of address validation logic for TSS receivers.

# Test: Search for TSS address validation logic. Expect: Robust and consistent implementation.
rg --type python $'TSS address validation'

Length of output: 74



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the robustness and consistency of address validation logic for TSS receivers in Go files.

# Search for TSS address validation logic in Go files
rg --type go 'TSS address validation'

# Search for general address validation logic in Go files
rg --type go 'validate address'

# Search for TSS receiver validation logic in Go files
rg --type go 'isTSSReceiver'

Length of output: 102



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the robustness and consistency of address validation logic for TSS receivers in Go files.

# Search for address validation logic in Go files
rg --type go 'address validation'

# Search for functions related to address validation in Go files
rg --type go 'isValidAddress'

# Search for references to TSS in Go files
rg --type go 'TSS'

# Search for references to receivers in Go files
rg --type go 'receiver'

Length of output: 175648

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (6)

35-42: Constants and Variables Naming Convention

The constants BigValueSats and BigValueConfirmationCount are well-named, clearly indicating their purpose and use within the module. This is a good practice as it enhances code readability and maintainability.


49-53: Logger Structure Appropriateness

The Logger structure is appropriately designed to encapsulate logging functionalities specific to the Bitcoin observer. Including specialized loggers like UTXOs within this structure helps in segregating logs based on their context, which is beneficial for debugging and maintenance.


Line range hint 80-104: Observer Structure Review

The Observer struct is well-organized with fields logically grouped and clearly named. The use of embedding base.Observer simplifies the code and promotes reuse. However, ensure that the btcClient and other specialized fields are properly encapsulated and accessed through getter/setter methods to maintain encapsulation and modularity.


167-213: Method Implementations for BTC Client and Chain Params

Methods like BtcClient, WithBtcClient, SetChainParams, and GetChainParams demonstrate good practice by providing encapsulated access to the observer's properties. The use of mutex locks in SetChainParams and GetChainParams is appropriate for thread-safe modifications and access, adhering to best practices in concurrent programming.


278-291: Concurrency and Business Logic in GetPendingNonce and ConfirmationsThreshold

The use of mutex in GetPendingNonce is correctly implemented for thread-safe access. The method ConfirmationsThreshold uses logical comparisons to determine the confirmation threshold based on the transaction amount, which is a critical business logic correctly implemented.


Line range hint 304-329: Gas Price Monitoring and Posting

The methods related to gas price monitoring (WatchGasPrice and PostGasPrice) are crucial for cost management in blockchain operations. The error handling and dynamic ticker usage are commendable. However, ensure that the error messages are descriptive enough to aid in troubleshooting.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go (3)

21-21: Added imports are appropriate for the test context.

The imports added are necessary for the new functionalities tested in this file, such as interactions with the observer module and the bitcoin client. No issues found here.


202-202: Ensure consistent testing and robust error handling.

All the tests for GetSenderAddressByVin and GetBtcEvent are well-organized and cover a variety of scenarios including error states and edge cases. This is crucial for ensuring the robustness of the Bitcoin observer functionality. Good use of require statements for assertions helps in making the tests clear and maintainable.

Also applies to: 214-214, 226-226, 238-238, 250-250, 276-276, 292-292, 300-300, 309-309, 332-332, 351-351, 366-366, 381-381, 396-396, 411-411, 422-422, 433-433, 439-439, 450-450, 461-461, 472-472, 483-483, 506-506, 517-517, 527-527


Line range hint 446-446: Potential security risk identified by static analysis.

The static analysis has flagged a potential Generic API Key. This could be a false positive, especially in a test environment where dummy keys are often used. However, it's crucial to verify that no real credentials are exposed in the codebase.

Verification successful

No real credentials exposed, only dummy data used for testing purposes.

The flagged line in zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go is part of a test case and sets a dummy hex value for ScriptPubKey. The hex value is not found elsewhere in the codebase, indicating it is used solely for testing.

  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go: Line 446 sets a dummy Hex value in a test scenario.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the detected API key is a dummy or a real key.

# Test: Search for the detected API key pattern across the codebase to verify its usage.
rg --type py "generic-api-key"

Length of output: 30



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the specific hex value to check its usage in the codebase.

# Search for the hex value in all relevant files to determine its usage.
rg "001471dc3cd95bf4fe0fb7ffd6bb29b865ddf5581196"

Length of output: 179


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Provide more context around the flagged line in the test file.

# Display 10 lines before and after the flagged line for context.
rg -C 10 "001471dc3cd95bf4fe0fb7ffd6bb29b865ddf5581196" zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go

Length of output: 1212

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (18)

16-16: Refactor of imports to accommodate new RPC functionality.

The addition of bitcoin/rpc is crucial for the new methods that interact with Bitcoin's RPC client. This change aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing Bitcoin observer functionality.


25-26: Refactor of GetTxID method to use encapsulated methods.

The update from direct field access to method calls (TSS() and Chain()) is a good practice in object-oriented design, promoting encapsulation and reducing coupling.


45-47: Improved error handling and conditional checks in WatchOutbound.

The addition of a check for outbound observation settings before proceeding with the logic is a good safeguard. Additionally, the detailed error logging helps in troubleshooting potential issues in fetching outbound trackers.

Also applies to: 50-54


60-64: Enhanced error handling and logging in the outbound transaction processing.

The detailed error messages added in the logging will aid in debugging and maintaining the system, especially when transactions cannot be found.


90-93: Handling of multiple outbound transactions for a single nonce.

The handling of scenarios where multiple transactions are found for a single nonce is critical. The logs and error handling here are robust, although the potential issue of multiple inclusions needs careful monitoring and possibly further handling strategies.

Also applies to: 102-102


107-107: Proper handling of observer stop signal.

The handling of the stop signal with appropriate logging is a good practice, ensuring clean shutdowns and easier debugging.


123-126: Use of mutex lock for thread-safe access to shared resources.

The use of mutex to protect access to shared resources is crucial in a multi-threaded environment like this, preventing potential data races.


167-167: Error handling improvement in block height retrieval.

The use of errors.Wrapf for error handling enriches the error context, which is beneficial for debugging and maintenance.


Line range hint 177-187: Complex transaction confirmation logic with detailed logging and error handling.

The method handles multiple scenarios and edge cases with comprehensive error handling and logging, ensuring robustness in transaction processing.


226-227: Correct use of mutex lock to ensure thread safety.

Locking and unlocking around critical sections is done correctly to manage concurrent access, which is essential for data integrity.

Also applies to: 234-235, 324-325


304-312: Enhanced logging and error handling in nonce management.

Improvements in logging and error handling for nonce management help in maintaining the integrity and traceability of nonce values across transactions.


Line range hint 341-350: Comprehensive error handling in transaction ID retrieval.

The detailed error handling and checks ensure that transaction IDs are retrieved correctly, enhancing the reliability of the system.


368-368: Improved UTXO marking based on transaction specifics.

The method for finding nonce-mark UTXOs has been enhanced to ensure accuracy and reliability in marking UTXOs, which is critical for transaction integrity.


391-391: Refined error handling in transaction inclusion checks.

The detailed error handling provides better insights into transaction inclusion status, which is crucial for accurate transaction tracking.


421-422: Appropriate use of mutex for critical section protection.

The correct use of mutex locks around critical sections ensures thread safety and data consistency, which is crucial for the system's stability.

Also applies to: 447-448, 454-455


475-475: Enhanced error handling in transaction verification.

The method checkTssOutboundResult uses comprehensive error wrapping to provide detailed context for errors, which aids in troubleshooting and maintaining the system.


512-512: Validation of transaction inputs for compliance with expected structures.

The checks ensure that transaction inputs meet expected structures, enhancing security and compliance with transaction protocols.


552-552: Robust checks and error handling in transaction output validation.

The detailed checks and error handling for transaction outputs ensure that they meet the specified criteria, which is crucial for transaction integrity and compliance.

Also applies to: 560-560, 611-611, 614-614

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound_test.go (2)

24-25: Added constant for database path.

The addition of memDBPath as a constant is a good practice as it avoids hardcoding paths in multiple places, enhancing maintainability.


65-68: Ensure consistent observer initialization.

Multiple tests initialize the MockEVMObserver with varying parameters. Ensure that the parameters passed are consistently aligned with the expected behavior and structure changes made in the observer's initialization method.

Also applies to: 82-84, 100-102, 108-110, 156-158

zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer.go (4)

75-75: Add mutex field to the Signer struct.

Adding a mutex (mu) to the Signer struct is a good practice to ensure that the state of the Signer is thread-safe, particularly when modifying shared resources like outboundHashBeingReported.


119-119: Initialize mutex in the NewSigner constructor.

The initialization of the mutex in the constructor is correct and aligns with standard Go concurrency patterns. This ensures that the mutex is ready to use immediately after an instance of Signer is created.


535-536: Good use of goroutines and mutex for reporting transaction status.

The implementation uses goroutines effectively to handle potentially long-running I/O operations without blocking the main thread. The use of mutex to protect shared state is also correctly implemented.


535-536: Well-implemented RPC client setup with error handling and testing support.

The getEVMRPC function is well-designed with robust error handling and support for unit testing using a mock client. This makes the function both reliable in production and easy to test.

changelog.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72061f3 and 0ee1e60.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (10 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (10 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (no review received)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go

[warning] 141-141: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L141
Added line #L141 was not covered by tests


[warning] 284-285: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L284-L285
Added lines #L284 - L285 were not covered by tests


[warning] 289-289: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L289
Added line #L289 was not covered by tests


[warning] 317-317: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L317
Added line #L317 was not covered by tests


[warning] 323-323: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L323
Added line #L323 was not covered by tests


[warning] 334-334: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L334
Added line #L334 was not covered by tests


[warning] 338-338: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L338
Added line #L338 was not covered by tests

LanguageTool
changelog.md

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_A)
Context: ...## Unreleased ### Breaking Changes * [List of the breaking changes can be found in...


[grammar] ~65-~65: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the plural noun “to-dos”? (TO_DO_HYPHEN)
Context: ...ub.com//pull/2329) - fix TODOs in rpc unit tests * [2342](https://gith...


[misspelling] ~80-~80: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICKED)
Context: ...//pull/2327) - partially cherry picked the fix to Bitcoin outbound dust amount...


[uncategorized] ~89-~89: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ... to be the github event for the release name which should be the version. Removed ma...


[uncategorized] ~89-~89: When ‘mac-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen. (SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
Context: ...me which should be the version. Removed mac specific build as the arm build should handle th...


[style] ~90-~90: Consider changing the order of words to improve your wording. (TO_NOT_VB)
Context: ...ocker build step for non release builds to not overwrite the github tag * [2192](https...


[grammar] ~106-~106: Did you mean “sending”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘require’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ... * Updating admin policies now requires to send a governance proposal executing the `Up...


[uncategorized] ~178-~178: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Context: ...n/node/pull/1899) - add empty test files so packages are included in coverage * [19...


[uncategorized] ~229-~229: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ... Breaking Changes * zetaclientd start: now requires 2 inputs from stdin: hotke...


[grammar] ~266-~266: Did you mean “running”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ....com//pull/1584) - allow to run E2E tests on any networks * [1746](http...


[grammar] ~275-~275: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ...nto dockerhub on release for ubuntu and macos * Adjusted the pipeline for building an...


[grammar] ~276-~276: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ... building and pushing docker images for MacOS to install and run docker * Added docke...


[uncategorized] ~282-~282: When ‘start-up’ is used as a noun or modifier, it needs to be hyphenated. (VERB_NOUN_CONFUSION)
Context: ...he new docker image that facilitate the start up automation * Adjusted the docker pipeli...


[grammar] ~303-~303: Before the countable noun ‘to’ an article or a possessive pronoun is necessary. (IN_NN_CC_VBG)
Context: ...ssues/1610) - add pending outtx hash to tracker after monitoring for 10 minutes * [1656...


[uncategorized] ~368-~368: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...er params data have been moved to chain params described below. * GetCoreParams: Ren...


[uncategorized] ~369-~369: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...arams described below. * GetCoreParams: Renamed into GetChainParams. `/zeta-c...


[uncategorized] ~453-~453: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
Context: ... update an observer, this can be either be run a tombstoned observer/validator or ...


[grammar] ~493-~493: Did you mean “testing”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ...pgrade name, and allow download. allows to test release * [1153](https://github.com/zet...


[misspelling] ~501-~501: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICK)
Context: ...github.com//pull/1235) - cherry pick all hotfix from v10.0.x (zero-amount, p...

Markdownlint
changelog.md

223-223: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash (MD004, ul-style)
Unordered list style


474-474: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces


514-514: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces


218-218: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines


240-240: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


287-287: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


343-343: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


219-219: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


359-359: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


364-364: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


368-368: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


373-373: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


242-242: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used


532-532: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character

Additional comments not posted (2)
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)

80-83: Ensure mutex is utilized correctly.

The mutex mu is added to protect fields from concurrent access. It's essential to verify that all accesses to shared resources within the Observer struct are properly synchronized using this mutex to avoid race conditions.

changelog.md (1)

54-54: Integration of Base Observer Structure into EVM/Bitcoin Observer

This entry in the changelog correctly documents the integration of the base Observer structure into the EVM and Bitcoin observers as per PR #2359. This aligns with the PR objectives and AI-generated summary, confirming the integration's scope and impact.

zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lumtis lumtis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be good to walk through CodeRabbit comments. Seems like some are pertinent

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ee1e60 and e6111eb.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
changelog.md

[grammar] ~65-~65: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the plural noun “to-dos”? (TO_DO_HYPHEN)
Context: ...ub.com//pull/2329) - fix TODOs in rpc unit tests * [2342](https://gith...


[misspelling] ~82-~82: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICKED)
Context: ...//pull/2327) - partially cherry picked the fix to Bitcoin outbound dust amount...


[uncategorized] ~91-~91: When ‘mac-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen. (SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
Context: ...me which should be the version. Removed mac specific build as the arm build should handle th...


[style] ~92-~92: Consider changing the order of words to improve your wording. (TO_NOT_VB)
Context: ...ocker build step for non release builds to not overwrite the github tag * [2192](https...


[grammar] ~108-~108: Did you mean “sending”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘require’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ... * Updating admin policies now requires to send a governance proposal executing the `Up...


[uncategorized] ~124-~124: The preposition ‘as’ seems more likely in this position. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_TO_AS)
Context: ...ed to the observer module and renamed to MsgVoteTSS * The structure of the m...


[uncategorized] ~180-~180: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Context: ...n/node/pull/1899) - add empty test files so packages are included in coverage * [19...


[uncategorized] ~231-~231: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ... Breaking Changes * zetaclientd start: now requires 2 inputs from stdin: hotke...


[grammar] ~268-~268: Did you mean “running”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ....com//pull/1584) - allow to run E2E tests on any networks * [1746](http...


[grammar] ~277-~277: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ...nto dockerhub on release for ubuntu and macos * Adjusted the pipeline for building an...


[grammar] ~278-~278: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ... building and pushing docker images for MacOS to install and run docker * Added docke...


[uncategorized] ~284-~284: When ‘start-up’ is used as a noun or modifier, it needs to be hyphenated. (VERB_NOUN_CONFUSION)
Context: ...he new docker image that facilitate the start up automation * Adjusted the docker pipeli...


[grammar] ~305-~305: Before the countable noun ‘to’ an article or a possessive pronoun is necessary. (IN_NN_CC_VBG)
Context: ...ssues/1610) - add pending outtx hash to tracker after monitoring for 10 minutes * [1656...


[uncategorized] ~370-~370: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...er params data have been moved to chain params described below. * GetCoreParams: Ren...


[uncategorized] ~371-~371: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...arams described below. * GetCoreParams: Renamed into GetChainParams. `/zeta-c...


[uncategorized] ~455-~455: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
Context: ... update an observer, this can be either be run a tombstoned observer/validator or ...


[grammar] ~495-~495: Did you mean “testing”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ...pgrade name, and allow download. allows to test release * [1153](https://github.com/zet...


[misspelling] ~503-~503: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICK)
Context: ...github.com//pull/1235) - cherry pick all hotfix from v10.0.x (zero-amount, p...

Markdownlint
changelog.md

225-225: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash (MD004, ul-style)
Unordered list style


476-476: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces


516-516: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces


73-73: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines


220-220: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines


242-242: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


289-289: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


345-345: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


221-221: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


361-361: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


366-366: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


370-370: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


375-375: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines


244-244: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used


534-534: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character

changelog.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@ws4charlie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would be good to walk through CodeRabbit comments. Seems like some are pertinent
resolved a typo in change log and log print.

@lumtis
Copy link
Member

lumtis commented Jun 25, 2024

@ws4charlie can we resolve code rabbit non relevant review comments?

zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@swift1337 swift1337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ws4charlie ws4charlie merged commit 3f32bd0 into develop Jun 25, 2024
17 of 19 checks passed
@ws4charlie ws4charlie deleted the refactor-integrate-base-observer branch June 25, 2024 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants