Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type-safe package scan for ConfigurationServiceScan #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

lukasniemeier-zalando
Copy link
Collaborator

  • add type-safe alternative for the "basePackage" attributes of ConfigurationServiceScan
  • add tests covering all three scanning attributes

* add type-safe alternative for the "basePackage" attributes of ConfigurationServiceScan
* add tests covering all three scanning attributes
@lukas-c-wilhelm
Copy link
Collaborator

Could you elaborate in the PR description what motivates this change?

@lukasniemeier-zalando
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It's the type-safe alternative to basePackage 😄

Right now library users have to provide a String value which hopefully points to an actual package: besides typos on the initial setup, we have also seen refactorings, which missed out on changing the non-type-safe basePackage property, creating friction. See also others who are using type-safe properties.

@lukas-c-wilhelm
Copy link
Collaborator

👍

@lukasniemeier-zalando lukasniemeier-zalando merged commit 0d5b9d2 into main Dec 5, 2023
4 checks passed
@lukasniemeier-zalando lukasniemeier-zalando deleted the package-scan branch December 5, 2023 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants