Add minter and mint #64
Conversation
Merge sprint to main
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
WalkthroughThis pull request includes extensive updates across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
client/src/dojo/useDojo.tsx (1)
11-16: Consider adding TypeScript type annotations.While the destructuring pattern is good, adding type annotations would improve code maintainability and provide better IDE support.
- const { account, ...setup } = context; + const { account, ...setup }: { account: Account; setup: DojoSetup } = context;client/src/hooks/useFreeMint.tsx (3)
8-12: Improve type definition and add documentation.The type definition could be more specific and documented:
- Consider using a more specific type for
player_id(e.g.,EntityIDif available).- Document why
player_idcan be undefined and how the hook behaves in that case.+/** + * Hook to manage free minting functionality for a player + * @param player_id - The ID of the player. If undefined, defaults to -1 + * @returns The mint instance or null if no component exists + */ export const useFreeMint = ({ player_id, }: { - player_id: string | undefined; + player_id: EntityID | undefined; // Assuming EntityID type exists }) => {
13-20: Simplify the destructuring pattern.The deep destructuring pattern could be simplified for better readability.
- const { - setup: { - clientModels: { - models: { Mint }, - classes: { Mint: MintClass }, - }, - }, - } = useDojo(); + const { + setup: { clientModels }, + } = useDojo(); + const { Mint } = clientModels.models; + const { Mint: MintClass } = clientModels.classes;
32-33: Add return type annotation.Consider adding explicit return type annotation for better type safety and documentation.
-export const useFreeMint = ({ +export const useFreeMint = ({ player_id, }: { player_id: string | undefined; -}) => { +}): MintClass | null => {client/src/dojo/context.tsx (1)
48-49: Consider adding explicit type for burnerManagerData spread.While the code works correctly, explicitly typing the spread properties would improve type safety and make the contract between components clearer.
- account: { - ...burnerManagerData, - account: burnerManagerData.account || masterAccount, - }, + account: { + ...burnerManagerData as Omit<typeof burnerManagerData, 'account'>, + account: burnerManagerData.account || masterAccount, + },contracts/dojo_sepolia.toml (1)
29-37: LGTM! Consider adding permission documentationThe writers configuration appears well-structured with clear permission mappings. Each component has appropriate access scopes.
Consider adding comments to document the purpose of each permission group, for example:
[writers] # Admin permissions for managing global settings "zkube-Admin" = ["zkube-settings"] # Chest operations and gameplay interactions "zkube-Chest" = ["zkube-chest", "zkube-play"]contracts/dojo_slotdev.toml (1)
29-37: LGTM! Consider documenting the permission model.The writers configuration provides a clear separation of concerns with appropriate access control for each component. The addition of "zkube-Mint" aligns with the PR objectives.
Consider adding inline comments or documentation explaining the permission model and the relationships between components for better maintainability.
contracts/Scarb.toml (1)
19-22: Consider consistent dependency versioning strategyWhile Dojo and Origami use tagged versions, Alexandria and stark_vrf use specific commit hashes. Consider:
- Using tagged versions for all dependencies to improve maintainability
- Document why specific commits are needed for Alexandria and stark_vrf
client/src/ui/actions/Rename.tsx (2)
Line range hint
27-34: Consider enhancing error handling.The try-catch block silently catches errors. Consider adding error feedback to improve user experience.
const handleClick = useCallback(async () => { setIsLoading(true); try { await rename({ account: account as Account, name: playerName }); + // Consider using a toast or notification system + // toast.success('Player renamed successfully'); } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to rename player:', error); + // toast.error('Failed to rename player. Please try again.'); } finally { setIsLoading(false); } }, [account, playerName, rename]);
Line range hint
1-89: Consider adding input sanitization.While the code limits the name length using MAX_CHAR_PSEUDO, it might be worth adding character validation to prevent malicious or inappropriate names.
<Input className="w-full" placeholder="Player Name" type="text" value={playerName} onChange={(e) => { - if (e.target.value.length <= MAX_CHAR_PSEUDO) { + const sanitizedValue = e.target.value.trim(); + if (sanitizedValue.length <= MAX_CHAR_PSEUDO && /^[a-zA-Z0-9\s-_]+$/.test(sanitizedValue)) { - setPlayerName(e.target.value); + setPlayerName(sanitizedValue); } }} />client/src/ui/actions/Create.tsx (3)
Line range hint
19-21: Consider enhancing dialog state management.The dialog state could be improved by:
- Resetting the playerName when dialog closes
- Adding error state for user feedback
Consider applying this enhancement:
const [playerName, setPlayerName] = useState(""); const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); const [open, setOpen] = useState(true); +const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null); + +const handleOpenChange = (newOpen: boolean) => { + setOpen(newOpen); + if (!newOpen) { + setPlayerName(""); + setError(null); + } +};
Line range hint
28-37: Enhance error handling with user feedback.The try-catch block should provide feedback to users when errors occur.
Consider applying this enhancement:
const handleClick = useCallback(async () => { setIsLoading(true); + setError(null); try { await create({ account: account as Account, name: playerName }); setOpen(false); // Close the dialog after successful creation + } catch (err) { + setError(err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'Failed to create player'); } finally { setIsLoading(false); } }, [account, playerName, create]);
Line range hint
71-77: Strengthen input validation.The current validation only checks length. Consider adding more robust validation for the player name.
Consider applying this enhancement:
+const isValidPlayerName = (name: string) => { + return /^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(name) && + name.length <= MAX_CHAR_PSEUDO && + name.length >= 3; +}; + onChange={(e) => { - if (e.target.value.length <= MAX_CHAR_PSEUDO) { + if (isValidPlayerName(e.target.value)) { setPlayerName(e.target.value); } }}client/src/dojo/setup.ts (2)
47-59: Consider enhancing error handling in burner manager initialization.While the switch to dojoProvider.provider is correct, the error handling could be more robust.
Consider this enhancement:
const burnerManager = new BurnerManager({ + // Validate configuration before initialization + if (!config.masterAddress || !config.masterPrivateKey) { + throw new Error('Missing required master account configuration'); + } masterAccount: new Account( { nodeUrl: config.rpcUrl, }, config.masterAddress, config.masterPrivateKey, ), feeTokenAddress: config.feeTokenAddress, accountClassHash: config.accountClassHash, rpcProvider: dojoProvider.provider, });
Line range hint
1-85: Document architectural changes.The shift from direct RPC provider to DojoProvider, along with the removal of Credits in favor of Mint functionality, represents a significant architectural change. Consider adding documentation to explain:
- The rationale behind these changes
- The new architecture's benefits
- Migration guidelines for existing implementations
client/src/ui/actions/Start.tsx (1)
71-83: Consider extracting balance checking logic.Since this PR introduces minting functionality, consider extracting the balance checking and faucet claiming logic into a reusable hook (e.g.,
useTokenBalance) or utility function. This would:
- Make the code more maintainable
- Allow reuse across other components that need to interact with the token
- Centralize token-related error handling
client/src/ui/components/GameModeCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-186: Consider adding documentation for game mode costs.With the removal of the credits system and the simplification of cost calculations, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining how costs are determined for different game modes.
Consider adding a comment block above the
costuseMemo explaining the cost calculation logic for each mode.+ // Cost calculation: + // - Free mode: Always free + // - Daily mode: Uses settings.daily_mode_price + // - Normal mode: Uses settings.normal_mode_price const cost = useMemo(() => { if (!settings) return ""; const weiCost =client/src/dojo/contractModels.ts (1)
154-171: LGTM! The Mint component implementation follows the established patterns.The component structure and field types are appropriate for blockchain context. The implementation aligns well with other components in the codebase.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the component's purpose and field descriptions:
+/** + * Represents a minting operation in the zkube system. + * @property {felt252} id - Unique identifier for the mint operation + * @property {bool} is_set - Indicates if the mint operation is active + * @property {u64} amount - The amount to be minted + */ Mint: (() => {client/src/dojo/contractSystems.ts (1)
77-81: Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the interface parameters.The interface is well-structured, but adding documentation would improve maintainability by clarifying:
- The expected format and unit for
expiration_timestamp- The constraints on
amount- The format requirements for
toaddressExample documentation:
/** * Interface for adding free mints to a player * @property {bigint} to - The recipient's address * @property {number} amount - Number of free mints to add * @property {number} expiration_timestamp - Unix timestamp when the free mints expire */contracts/manifest_sepolia.json (2)
1-7: Consider enhancing the world configuration with additional metadata.While the basic configuration is present, consider adding:
- Version information for tracking changes
- Deployment timestamp
- Network identifier
- Documentation URL
{ "world": { "class_hash": "0x139239a99d627697b19b9856beaef7896fc75375caf3d750dd76982a7afeb78", "address": "0x3a9691d21683cf64a56fcb3297c3d67e5b9e687df5569565d8128d2b98b7a7d", "seed": "zKube6", "name": "zKube", + "version": "1.0.0", + "network": "sepolia", + "deployed_at": "2024-11-14T00:00:00Z", + "documentation": "https://docs.zkube.com"
2171-2251: Review access control mechanisms in settings contract.The settings contract has critical admin functions that require proper access control:
update_zkorp_addressupdate_daily_mode_priceupdate_normal_mode_priceset_admindelete_adminEnsure that:
- Only authorized addresses can call these functions
- Events are emitted for all admin actions
- There are proper checks for address validity
Consider implementing:
- Multi-signature requirements for critical operations
- Timelock mechanisms for sensitive parameter changes
- Emergency pause functionality
contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json (1)
2-7: Consider making the world seed configurable.The world configuration has a hardcoded seed value "zKube6". Consider making this configurable through environment variables or deployment parameters to support different environments (e.g., development, staging, production).
contracts/manifest_sepoliadev2.json (2)
2-6: Document the seed value's significance.The world configuration includes a seed value "zKube6" which seems arbitrary. Consider adding documentation to explain its purpose and how it's used in the system.
1562-1564: Review hardcoded token addresses in initialization data.Multiple contracts (Chest, Settings, ZKorp) are initialized with hardcoded token addresses:
0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c510x0589d37adc1e5cf9ef58da510ee904aa9428d6e9a1c0d5c822392664d063796bThis could make contract upgrades or network changes more difficult.
Consider:
- Making token addresses configurable post-deployment
- Adding documentation about these addresses
- Implementing an admin function to update token addresses if needed
Also applies to: 2362-2364, 2836-2837
contracts/manifest_slot.json (1)
2884-2885: Consider defining global eventsThe root events array is empty while contract-specific events are defined within their respective ABIs. Consider:
- Defining global events for system-wide operations
- Standardizing event handling across contracts
- Adding events for critical operations like upgrades and admin changes
contracts/manifest_slotdev.json (1)
1-2885: Consider adding manifest documentationThe manifest defines a well-structured system but would benefit from:
- Documentation explaining the relationship between contracts
- Description of upgrade paths and procedures
- Model schema documentation
- Event handling documentation
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
client/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlcontracts/Scarb.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (44)
client/package.json(4 hunks)client/src/config/manifest.ts(1 hunks)client/src/dojo/context.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/dojo/contractModels.ts(1 hunks)client/src/dojo/contractSystems.ts(9 hunks)client/src/dojo/game/models/credits.ts(0 hunks)client/src/dojo/game/models/mint.ts(1 hunks)client/src/dojo/game/models/settings.ts(0 hunks)client/src/dojo/models.ts(2 hunks)client/src/dojo/setup.ts(2 hunks)client/src/dojo/systems.ts(2 hunks)client/src/dojo/useDojo.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/hooks/useCredits.tsx(0 hunks)client/src/hooks/useFreeMint.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/actions/Create.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/actions/Rename.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/actions/Start.tsx(4 hunks)client/src/ui/actions/Surrender.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/components/DailyGameStatus.tsx(0 hunks)client/src/ui/components/DesktopHeader.tsx(0 hunks)client/src/ui/components/GameModeCard.tsx(1 hunks)contracts/Scarb.toml(2 hunks)contracts/dojo_dev.toml(1 hunks)contracts/dojo_playground.toml(1 hunks)contracts/dojo_sepolia.toml(1 hunks)contracts/dojo_sepoliadev1.toml(2 hunks)contracts/dojo_sepoliadev2.toml(1 hunks)contracts/dojo_slot.toml(1 hunks)contracts/dojo_slotdev.toml(2 hunks)contracts/manifest_sepolia.json(1 hunks)contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json(1 hunks)contracts/manifest_sepoliadev2.json(1 hunks)contracts/manifest_slot.json(1 hunks)contracts/manifest_slotdev.json(1 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-account-6d28004d.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-chest-5d3b3ea3.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-play-19ee70b3.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-settings-3b7c4918.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-tournament-2101600e.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-zkorp-6cdc1046.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/dojo-base.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/dojo-world.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/models/zkube-Admin-3feb084f.json(0 hunks)contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/models/zkube-Chest-4d11a491.json(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (15)
- client/src/dojo/game/models/credits.ts
- client/src/dojo/game/models/settings.ts
- client/src/hooks/useCredits.tsx
- client/src/ui/components/DailyGameStatus.tsx
- client/src/ui/components/DesktopHeader.tsx
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-account-6d28004d.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-chest-5d3b3ea3.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-play-19ee70b3.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-settings-3b7c4918.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-tournament-2101600e.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/contracts/zkube-zkorp-6cdc1046.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/dojo-base.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/dojo-world.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/models/zkube-Admin-3feb084f.json
- contracts/manifests/dev/base/abis/models/zkube-Chest-4d11a491.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
contracts/dojo_playground.toml
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
contracts/dojo_sepolia.toml
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
contracts/dojo_sepoliadev1.toml
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
contracts/dojo_sepoliadev2.toml
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
contracts/dojo_slotdev.toml
21-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (62)
client/src/dojo/useDojo.tsx (1)
7-9: LGTM! Good error handling practice.
The added error handling ensures proper usage of the hook within a DojoProvider context, with a clear and actionable error message.
client/src/dojo/game/models/mint.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM!
The import statement correctly imports the required type from the Dojo engine package.
client/src/config/manifest.ts (3)
1-6: LGTM! Consistent import path naming convention.
The simplified import paths follow a clear and consistent naming pattern, making the manifest file structure more maintainable.
1-6: Verify manifest structure consistency.
Let's ensure all manifest files follow the same structure to prevent runtime issues.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all manifest files have consistent structure
# Test: Check if all manifest files have the same structure
echo "Analyzing manifest structure consistency..."
for manifest in contracts/manifest_{dev,slot,slotdev,sepolia,sepoliadev1,sepoliadev2}.json; do
echo "Checking $manifest:"
# Extract and display the top-level keys to verify structure
jq -r 'keys | .[]' "$manifest" 2>/dev/null | sort
echo "---"
done1-6: Verify manifest files existence.
Let's ensure all referenced manifest files exist at their new locations.
✅ Verification successful
All manifest files are present and correctly located ✓
All six manifest files referenced in the imports exist in the contracts directory:
- manifest_dev.json
- manifest_slot.json
- manifest_slotdev.json
- manifest_sepolia.json
- manifest_sepoliadev1.json
- manifest_sepoliadev2.json
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of all manifest files referenced in the imports
# Test: Check if all manifest files exist
echo "Checking manifest files existence..."
for manifest in manifest_dev.json manifest_slot.json manifest_slotdev.json manifest_sepolia.json manifest_sepoliadev1.json manifest_sepoliadev2.json; do
if fd -p "contracts/${manifest}$"; then
echo "✓ Found: ${manifest}"
else
echo "✗ Missing: ${manifest}"
fi
done
Length of output: 1940
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to verify the existence of manifest files
echo "Checking manifest files in contracts directory:"
fd -p "manifest_.+\.json$" contracts/
Length of output: 337
client/src/dojo/models.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Import changes align with new functionality.
The addition of the Mint import is consistent with the PR's objective of adding minting capabilities.
Let's verify the Mint model implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Mint model structure and its integration
# Check the Mint model implementation
cat client/src/dojo/game/models/mint.ts
# Check for any remaining references to Credits that might need cleanup
rg -g '!package-lock.json' -g '!*.lock' "Credits" 22-28: LGTM! Class registration looks correct.
The Mint class is properly registered in the classes object, maintaining consistency with other model registrations.
Let's verify the complete removal of Credits:
✅ Verification successful
Credits class has been successfully removed and replaced with Mint
Based on the verification results:
- No references to "Credits" found in the TypeScript files
- The Settings model now only contains zkorp-related pricing properties
- The Mint component is properly registered with the expected properties (id, is_set, amount)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Credits removal and Mint integration
# Check for any remaining Credits class references in contract components
cat client/src/dojo/contractModels.ts
# Verify the Settings model no longer contains credits-related properties
cat client/src/dojo/game/models/settings.ts
Length of output: 6267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any remaining references to Credits in the codebase
rg -i "credits" --type ts
# Also check for any imports or references to a Credits class
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$Credits$$$ }'
Length of output: 73
client/src/hooks/useFreeMint.tsx (1)
1-7: Consider if deep memoization is necessary.
The use of useDeepMemo might be overkill since the component value appears to be a simple object. Regular useMemo might be sufficient unless the component contains nested objects that need deep comparison.
Let's check the structure of the Mint component:
contracts/dojo_dev.toml (2)
29-37: Review the component dependencies.
The writers configuration shows clear separation of concerns. However, let's verify a few aspects:
- The new "zkube-Mint" component only depends on "zkube-minter"
- Components with multiple dependencies like Chest and Participation have consistent access patterns
The dependency structure looks reasonable, but please ensure:
- The minter component has appropriate access controls
- The play system properly handles interactions between chest and participation components
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis from the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Dependencies are correctly configured and implemented
The codebase implementation aligns perfectly with the writers configuration in dojo_dev.toml:
-
The "zkube-Mint" component only depends on "zkube-minter" as configured:
- The minter implementation shows proper access controls with admin checks
- The minting functionality is self-contained with no external dependencies
-
Components with multiple dependencies (Chest and Participation) demonstrate consistent access patterns:
- Chest system properly integrates with both chest and play components through well-defined interfaces
- Participation system correctly handles the interaction between chest and play components with proper state management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze component dependencies across the codebase
# Expected: Consistent usage of permissions in the actual implementation
# Check for minter-related files and their interactions
echo "=== Checking minter implementation ==="
fd -t f ".*mint.*\.cairo$" -X cat
# Check chest and participation implementations for permission usage
echo "=== Checking chest and participation implementations ==="
fd -t f "(chest|participation).*\.cairo$" -X cat
Length of output: 33994
23-27: Verify the initialization addresses.
The same address is used for multiple components (chest, tournament, zkorp). While this might be intentional for development purposes, please ensure this is the desired configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the address usage in the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
The address usage is appropriate for the development environment.
The address 0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7 is consistently used in development and playground configurations (dojo_dev.toml and dojo_playground.toml), while other environments (like sepolia) use different addresses. This is a common practice where development environments use a shared, well-known address for testing purposes.
- Development/Playground environments use the mentioned address
- Production-like environments (sepolia) use different addresses:
0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51 - Settings consistently uses
0x0in development environments, which is appropriate for initialization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the same address is used consistently across other environment configs
# Expected: Different addresses in production-like environments
echo "Checking address usage across different environment configs..."
for file in contracts/dojo_*.toml; do
if [ "$file" != "contracts/dojo_dev.toml" ]; then
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7" "$file" || echo "Address not found"
fi
done
Length of output: 33994
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the address in all files to understand its usage
echo "=== Searching for address usage ==="
rg -A 2 "0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7"
# Check if there are any other addresses used in TOML files
echo -e "\n=== Checking other addresses in TOML files ==="
fd -e toml -X cat
Length of output: 12876
contracts/dojo_playground.toml (1)
29-37: LGTM: Well-structured permission system
The writers configuration follows a clear and logical structure:
- Consistent naming convention with "zkube-" prefix
- Appropriate permission grouping (e.g., Chest component has access to chest and play)
- Clear separation of concerns between different components
client/src/dojo/context.tsx (1)
41-41: LGTM! Clean refactoring of burnerManager usage.
The consolidation of burnerManager properties into a single object improves code organization and maintainability.
contracts/dojo_slot.toml (2)
29-37: Verify writer dependencies configuration.
The writers configuration appears well-structured, with the new zkube-Mint component properly integrated. However, please verify:
- That all required dependencies are included for each component
- That there are no unused dependencies
- That the dependency chain is complete (e.g., if A depends on B, ensure B is also configured)
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify component dependencies and their configurations
# Test 1: Find all component references in the codebase
echo "Checking component usage..."
for component in "zkube-minter" "zkube-play" "zkube-chest" "zkube-settings" "zkube-tournament" "zkube-account"; do
echo "=== Checking $component ==="
rg -l "$component" --type cairo
done
# Test 2: Check for potential missing dependencies by looking for direct component interactions
echo "Checking for potential missing dependencies..."
ast-grep --pattern 'contract_address_const!($component, $_)' --lang cairo23-27: Verify initialization addresses.
Three components (zkube-chest, zkube-tournament, zkube-zkorp) share the same initialization address. Please verify that this is intentional and not a copy-paste error.
✅ Verification successful
Shared initialization addresses are intentionally configured
The shared address pattern is consistent across multiple environment configurations:
- In
dojo_slot.tomlanddojo_slotdev.toml:zkube-chest,zkube-tournament, andzkube-zkorpshare the same address - Similar patterns exist in other environment files (
dojo_sepolia.toml,dojo_playground.toml, etc.) - The
zkube-settingscomponent consistently has a different address across all configurations
This appears to be an intentional design pattern rather than a copy-paste error, as it's systematically implemented across different environment configurations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for address usage across the codebase to verify initialization patterns
# Test: Search for these addresses in other configuration files
echo "Checking address usage patterns across configuration files..."
rg -A 1 "0x0730b8077dc0db1ac0138b2474a85b70b833a3ad6318059f60671ebb09195e67" contracts/
rg -A 1 "0x01a988f1faf473743f144dd6d7c04026d363fe72e697a35292eeb18be2ca8717" contracts/
Length of output: 1842
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for these addresses and components
# Search for the addresses in all files without file type restriction
echo "=== Searching for addresses across all files ==="
rg "0x0730b8077dc0db1ac0138b2474a85b70b833a3ad6318059f60671ebb09195e67"
rg "0x01a988f1faf473743f144dd6d7c04026d363fe72e697a35292eeb18be2ca8717"
# Search for component references to understand their usage
echo -e "\n=== Searching for component references ==="
rg "zkube-(chest|tournament|zkorp|settings)" --type toml
# List all TOML files to understand configuration structure
echo -e "\n=== Listing all TOML files ==="
fd -e toml
Length of output: 7331
contracts/dojo_sepoliadev2.toml (2)
29-37: Verify writer permissions and dependencies
The writer permissions define component dependencies. Please ensure:
- All referenced dependencies (e.g., "zkube-play", "zkube-minter") exist in the system
- There are no circular dependencies that could cause issues
- The permissions follow the principle of least privilege
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify dependencies and check for potential issues
# Test 1: Extract all unique dependencies
echo "Unique dependencies referenced:"
rg -o 'zkube-[a-zA-Z]+' contracts/dojo_sepoliadev2.toml | sort -u
# Test 2: Check if all dependencies are defined in other configuration files
echo -e "\nSearching for dependency definitions:"
for dep in $(rg -o '"zkube-[^"]+' contracts/dojo_sepoliadev2.toml | tr -d '"'); do
echo "=== Searching for $dep ==="
rg "$dep" --type toml
done23-27: Verify initialization parameters
Multiple components are initialized with identical hexadecimal values. Please verify if this is intentional, as it could potentially indicate:
- A deliberate design choice where components share initialization parameters
- Unintended duplication of values
✅ Verification successful
Initialization parameters are consistent with environment patterns
After analyzing the initialization parameters across different environment configurations, the repeated hexadecimal values in dojo_sepoliadev2.toml follow a deliberate pattern:
- The value
0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51is consistently used for chest/tournament/zkorp components across all Sepolia environments (sepolia, sepoliadev1, sepoliadev2) - The value
0x0589d37adc1e5cf9ef58da510ee904aa9428d6e9a1c0d5c822392664d063796bis consistently used for settings across all Sepolia environments - Different environments (dev, playground, slot) use their own consistent sets of initialization parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar initialization patterns across different environments
# Test: Compare init_call_args across different environment configurations
echo "Checking init_call_args across different environments..."
for file in contracts/dojo_*.toml; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 5 '^\[init_call_args\]' "$file"
done
Length of output: 37499
contracts/dojo_sepolia.toml (1)
23-27: Verify the repeated contract addresses
Multiple contracts (chest, tournament, and zkorp) are initialized with the same address: 0x021d1.... This could indicate a potential configuration error.
Please verify if this is intentional. If not, each contract should have its unique address.
✅ Verification successful
The previous output shows the same configuration repeated multiple times, which might be due to multiple TOML files or different environments. Let's examine all TOML files to understand the context better and verify if this is a consistent pattern across different environments or configurations.
Shared contract addresses are intentional across different environments
After analyzing the TOML configurations, the shared contract addresses pattern is consistent across different deployment environments (local, sepolia, slot, etc.). Each environment maintains its own set of contract addresses where chest, tournament, and zkorp components share the same address, while settings has a different one. This appears to be an intentional design pattern rather than a configuration error.
Examples from different environments:
- Sepolia: chest/tournament/zkorp share
0x021d1aa0... - Slot: chest/tournament/zkorp share
0x0730b807... - Local: chest/tournament/zkorp share
0x49d3657...
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for duplicate contract addresses across all configuration files
# Test: Look for this address pattern in other configuration files
echo "Checking for address usage across configuration files:"
fd -e toml -x rg -A 1 "0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51" {}
Length of output: 1285
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of all TOML files to understand if this is a pattern across different environments
fd -e toml -x cat {}
Length of output: 11517
contracts/dojo_sepoliadev1.toml (3)
7-7: Verify the impact of seed value change.
The seed value has been updated from "zKube2" to "zKube6". This change could affect deterministic operations in the world.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other seed references to ensure consistency
rg -l "zKube[0-9]" --type toml29-37: Verify permission mappings and component existence.
The writers section defines access control, but there are a few points to verify:
- The "zkube-minter" component is referenced in Mint permissions but isn't defined elsewhere in this file
- Some components have multiple writers (e.g., Chest, Player) - confirm if all these access paths are necessary
#!/bin/bash
# Search for minter component definition
echo "Checking for minter component definition:"
rg "zkube-minter" --type-add 'cairo:*.cairo' --type cairo23-27: Verify initialization argument values.
Multiple components (chest, tournament, zkorp) are using identical initialization values. Please confirm if this is intentional.
✅ Verification successful
This will help us understand:
- The content of all TOML configuration files
- All hex values used in configurations
- All zkube component references
to verify if the initialization values are correctly configured.
Identical initialization values are intentional across environments
After analyzing the configuration files across different environments (dev, playground, sepolia, slot), I can confirm that having identical initialization values for chest, tournament, and zkorp components within the same environment is intentional. Each environment uses its own consistent set of initialization values:
- Sepolia environments use:
0x021d1aa0...for chest/tournament/zkorp - Slot environments use:
0x0730b807...for chest/tournament/zkorp - Dev/Playground environments use:
0x49d3657...for chest/tournament/zkorp
The settings component consistently uses a different value in each environment, which is also expected as it's the configuration component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for these hex values in other configuration files
echo "Checking for initialization values across config files:"
rg "0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51" --type toml
Length of output: 244
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all TOML files for these initialization values and related patterns
echo "Searching all TOML files:"
fd -e toml -x cat {}
echo -e "\nSearching for any hex values in TOML files:"
rg "0x[0-9a-fA-F]+" --type toml
echo -e "\nSearching for zkube components in the codebase:"
rg "zkube-" --type toml
Length of output: 23891
contracts/dojo_slotdev.toml (2)
23-27: Verify intentional address reuse across components.
Several components (chest, tournament, zkorp) are initialized with the same address: 0x0730b.... Please confirm this is intentional and not a copy-paste error.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for address reuse patterns across configuration files
echo "Checking address usage patterns:"
rg -A 3 '\[init_call_args\]' contracts/dojo_*.toml7-7: Verify seed value update impact.
The seed value has been incremented from "zKube16" to "zKube17". Please ensure this change is intentional and coordinated across all environments to maintain consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Seed value inconsistency detected across environments
The seed values vary significantly across different environment configurations:
- dojo_slotdev.toml: "zKube17"
- Other environments: "zKube1", "zKube2", "zKube6", "zKube", "zKube13"
This variation appears intentional as different environments may require different initialization states. The increment to "zKube17" in slotdev environment is likely a deliberate change for development purposes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check seed values across all environment configurations
# to ensure consistency or identify intentional differences
echo "Checking seed values across environment configurations:"
rg -A 1 'seed = "zKube' contracts/dojo_*.toml
Length of output: 3088
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find seed values
echo "Checking seed values across configuration files:"
fd -e toml -x cat {} \; -p contracts/dojo_ | grep -A 1 '^seed ='
Length of output: 314
contracts/Scarb.toml (4)
10-16: Verify migration command changes
The migration commands have been modified differently across environments:
- Dev/slot environments no longer use the 'apply' command
- Sepolia and playground environments retain it and add the '--walnut' flag
Please confirm:
- The intentional distinction between environment configurations
- The purpose and necessity of the '--walnut' flag in specific environments
24-25: Verify external contracts configuration
The configuration specifies building the Dojo world contract. Please confirm:
- If this is the complete list of required external contracts
- Whether any other contracts from dependencies need to be included
27-28: LGTM! Good practice with test dependency versioning
The dojo_cairo_test dependency version matches the main dojo dependency, which is good practice for maintaining testing consistency.
3-4: Verify compatibility with Cairo 2.8.4
The Cairo version has been updated to 2.8.4, and the package version suggests this is approaching a release candidate. Please ensure all dependencies are compatible with this Cairo version.
✅ Verification successful
Cairo 2.8.4 compatibility looks well-aligned with dependencies
The version compatibility appears to be well-maintained:
- Dojo is pinned to v1.0.0-rc.1, which matches the project's version
- Alexandria and stark-vrf are pinned to specific commits
- Origami is using a stable alpha release
The version constraints are explicit and the dependencies are properly locked to specific versions/commits, which reduces the risk of compatibility issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any dependencies specify incompatible Cairo versions
# Look for version constraints in dependency repositories
# Check Dojo's supported Cairo version
gh api repos/dojoengine/dojo/contents/Scarb.toml -q '.content' | base64 -d | grep "cairo-version"
# Check Alexandria's supported Cairo version
gh api repos/keep-starknet-strange/alexandria/contents/Scarb.toml -q '.content' | base64 -d | grep "cairo-version"
# Check Origami's supported Cairo version
gh api repos/dojoengine/origami/contents/Scarb.toml -q '.content' | base64 -d | grep "cairo-version"
Length of output: 530
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the dependencies directly from the local Scarb.toml file
cat contracts/Scarb.toml
Length of output: 1647
client/src/ui/actions/Rename.tsx (1)
42-43: Verify the removal of master check is intentional.
The disabled state has been simplified to only check for account and player existence. While this change aligns with the broader effort to remove master variable dependencies, we should ensure this doesn't bypass any necessary authorization checks.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of master check is intentional and safe
The git history shows this change was part of a broader update to dojojs alpha.24 where the master variable was intentionally removed. The previous check !account || !master || account === master || !player was preventing the master account from renaming, which is no longer needed in the new architecture. The simplified check !account || !player maintains the essential validation that a connected account and player exist.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might still use master variable for authorization
rg -l "master.*disabled" "client/src/ui"
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for master variable usage in UI components
rg "master" "client/src/ui" -B 2 -A 2
# Also search for disabled state patterns to understand authorization patterns
rg "disabled.*=.*\[" "client/src/ui" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2677
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the history of this file to understand the master variable removal
git log -p client/src/ui/actions/Rename.tsx
# Also search for any authorization or permission patterns in the codebase
rg "isAuthorized|canRename|hasPermission" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 6926
client/src/ui/actions/Create.tsx (1)
43-44: Verify authorization implications after master check removal.
While the simplified condition improves readability, we should verify that removing the master check doesn't impact authorization requirements.
Let's check if other components follow the same pattern:
client/src/dojo/setup.ts (3)
80-84: LGTM: Return statement updates are consistent.
The changes properly expose the necessary provider, sync state, and client instances.
34-42: Verify the increased sync timeout necessity.
The sync timeout has been significantly increased from 1000ms to 30000ms. While this ensures more reliable synchronization, it might indicate underlying performance concerns.
Questions to consider:
- Are there specific scenarios requiring such a long timeout?
- Could this mask potential performance issues?
Let's check for sync timeout related issues:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for sync timeout related issues or discussions
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,tsx,md,txt}' -i '(timeout|sync.*fail|sync.*error)' 30-32: LGTM: DojoProvider initialization is correct.
The switch to DojoProvider from RpcProvider is a good architectural choice as it provides Dojo-specific functionality.
Let's verify the manifest structure expected by DojoProvider:
✅ Verification successful
DojoProvider initialization is properly configured
The manifest structure and DojoProvider usage is correct. The manifest file contains all the necessary components including world configuration, contracts, models and events that DojoProvider expects. The initialization with config.manifest and config.rpcUrl matches the expected interface from @dojoengine/core.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify manifest structure matches DojoProvider requirements
# Look for manifest type definition and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'type Config = {
$$$
manifest: {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the Config type and manifest usage
rg -A 10 "type Config = "
# Also search for DojoProvider usage to understand the expected manifest structure
rg -A 5 "DojoProvider"
# Look for manifest-related types or interfaces
rg -A 10 "manifest.*interface|interface.*manifest|type.*manifest"
Length of output: 5003
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the manifest structure and its usage
cat client/src/config/manifest.ts
# Also check the manifest import in setup.ts
rg -p "import.*manifest" client/src/dojo/setup.ts
# Look for getContractByName usage to understand manifest structure
rg -A 5 "getContractByName"
Length of output: 2554
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine one of the manifest files to understand its structure
cat contracts/manifest_dev.json
# Also check the DojoProvider import to understand its requirements
rg -p "import.*DojoProvider" client/src/dojo/setup.ts
Length of output: 81338
client/src/ui/actions/Surrender.tsx (1)
62-63: LGTM! Simplified disabled state logic.
The simplified logic appropriately checks all essential conditions for enabling/disabling the surrender action.
Let's verify that this pattern is consistent across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Consistent disabled state pattern across action components
The simplified disabled state logic in Surrender.tsx aligns perfectly with the pattern used in other action components:
- Create.tsx:
!account || !!player - Rename.tsx:
!account || !player - Start.tsx:
!account || !player || (!!game && !game.isOver()) - Surrender.tsx:
!account || !player || !game || game.over
Each component appropriately checks only the essential conditions needed for its specific action, and there are no remaining references to the master variable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar disabled state patterns in other game action components
# Expected: Similar simplified checks without master variable
# Search for disabled state logic in other action components
ast-grep --pattern 'return !account || !player || !game || game.over'
# Look for any remaining uses of master variable that might need similar cleanup
rg 'master.*=.*setup\.systemCalls'
Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for similar patterns in other action components more broadly
# First, find all action components
fd "\.tsx$" client/src/ui/actions
# Then, let's look for similar disabled state patterns with more flexibility
rg -A 2 "const disabled = useMemo" client/src/ui/actions
# Also check for any remaining references to master in these files
rg "master" client/src/ui/actions
Length of output: 1106
client/src/ui/actions/Start.tsx (2)
53-54: LGTM! Clean simplification of the disabled state logic.
The disabled state now focuses on essential conditions (account, player, and game state), making the code more maintainable.
116-116: LGTM! Dependencies are correctly specified.
The dependency array properly includes all required variables used within the callback.
client/package.json (3)
40-41: Verify @latticexyz updates impact.
The update from ^2.0.12 to ^2.2.8 for @latticexyz packages could include breaking changes.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check @latticexyz usage patterns
# Test: Search for @latticexyz imports and usage
echo "Checking @latticexyz usage patterns..."
rg '@latticexyz' -A 3100-115: Review TypeScript and build tooling updates.
The updates to TypeScript (5.6.2) and build-related packages are significant but appear to be minor version bumps that should be backward compatible.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript compatibility
# Test: Look for any TypeScript errors that might need attention
echo "Checking for TypeScript-specific comments or potential issues..."
rg -i "ts-ignore|ts-expect-error|fixme.*typescript|todo.*typescript"27-33: Verify compatibility with @dojoengine ecosystem updates.
The coordinated update of @dojoengine packages from alpha.12 to alpha.24 includes a major version bump for @dojoengine/recs (0.1.35 → 2.0.13). This significant version jump warrants careful verification.
Consider:
- Reviewing the changelog for breaking changes in @dojoengine/recs v2.0
- Testing the mint functionality thoroughly as it's likely dependent on these packages
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
@dojoengine/recs update appears safe to proceed
The major version bump of @dojoengine/recs from 0.1.35 to 2.0.13 appears compatible with the codebase:
- All component definitions use the current API patterns (defineComponent, Has, HasValue)
- The codebase follows consistent patterns for entity queries and component access
- No deprecated API usage was found in the imports or usage patterns
- The update is part of a coordinated ecosystem update with other @dojoengine packages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in @dojoengine usage
# Test 1: Search for @dojoengine/recs usage patterns that might need updates
echo "Checking @dojoengine/recs usage patterns..."
rg -l '@dojoengine/recs'
# Test 2: Look for any TODO/FIXME comments related to @dojoengine
echo "Checking for TODO/FIXME comments related to @dojoengine..."
rg -i "todo|fixme|hack|xxx" -A 3 "@dojoengine"
Length of output: 560
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive analysis
# Check for @dojoengine/recs imports and usage
echo "=== Checking @dojoengine/recs usage ==="
rg -l "@dojoengine/recs"
# Look for specific component patterns from recs
echo "=== Checking component patterns ==="
rg -A 3 "defineComponent|setComponent|removeComponent|Has|Not"
# Check for any migration guides or breaking changes documentation
echo "=== Checking for migration/upgrade docs ==="
fd -t f "MIGRATION|BREAKING|CHANGELOG|UPGRADE" -X cat {}
# Look for @dojoengine related imports and their usage patterns
echo "=== Checking @dojoengine imports ==="
rg -A 2 "from ['\"]\@dojoengine/"
Length of output: 68008
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for @dojoengine/recs usage and imports specifically
# Check for @dojoengine/recs imports and their patterns
echo "=== Checking @dojoengine/recs imports and usage patterns ==="
rg -A 3 "from ['\"]@dojoengine/recs['\"]"
# Look for specific recs component patterns
echo "=== Checking recs component patterns ==="
rg -A 3 "defineComponent|setComponent|removeComponent|Has|HasValue|useEntityQuery" client/src/
# Check for any breaking changes documentation in node_modules
echo "=== Checking for breaking changes in node_modules ==="
fd -t f "CHANGELOG|BREAKING" client/node_modules/@dojoengine/recs -x cat {}
# Look for specific version imports
echo "=== Checking version imports ==="
rg "@dojoengine/recs.*[0-9]+" client/package.json client/pnpm-lock.yaml
Length of output: 18302
client/src/ui/components/GameModeCard.tsx (2)
62-62: Verify Free mode handling consistency.
The code still checks for mode === ModeType.Free to display "Free" cost, but the credits system has been removed. Please verify if this is still the intended behavior for Free mode.
Let's check the Free mode implementation across the codebase:
Also applies to: 133-135
✅ Verification successful
Free mode implementation is consistent and correct
The Free mode implementation is correctly handled in the codebase:
- In
GameModeCard.tsx, the "Free" cost display forModeType.Freeis intentional and consistent with the game's design - The mode is properly defined in the
ModeTypeenum as "Freeplay Arena" - Free mode shares the same "Escalation Mode" difficulty rules as Normal mode
- Unlike paid modes (Daily and Normal), Free mode correctly omits tournament-related features (prize pool, end time)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Free mode handling
rg -A 5 "ModeType.Free" --type tsx --type ts
# Search for any remaining credit checks related to Free mode
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($mode === ModeType.Free) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Free mode handling with correct file extensions
rg -A 5 "ModeType.Free"
# Look for the ModeType enum definition
rg "enum.*ModeType" -A 5
# Check GameModeCard component for Free mode logic
fd "GameModeCard" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 10299
62-62: Verify the cost calculation dependencies.
The dependency array for the cost calculation has been updated to remove credits. While this aligns with the removal of the credit system, please ensure that the cost calculation still works correctly for all game modes, especially the Free mode.
Let's verify the cost calculation implementation across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Cost calculation is correctly implemented after credits removal
The cost calculation logic in GameModeCard.tsx is properly implemented and the dependency array is correct. Here's why:
- The cost calculation only depends on
settings(for price values) andmode(to determine which price to use) - The
playerdependency in the array appears unnecessary as it's not used in the calculation - All credit-related code has been properly removed, and the cost is now purely based on token prices from settings
- The implementation correctly handles all modes, including Free mode which bypasses the cost calculation entirely
The code is consistent with the removal of the credit system, and the cost display works as expected for all game modes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining credit-related logic that might affect cost calculations
rg -A 5 "credits|Credits" --type tsx --type ts
# Search for other cost calculation implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'cost = useMemo(() => { $$$ }, [$$]);'
Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining credit-related logic that might affect cost calculations
rg -A 5 "credits|Credits"
# Search for cost calculation implementations in GameModeCard
rg -A 10 "const cost = useMemo"
# Look for the complete GameModeCard implementation to understand the context
fd "GameModeCard.tsx" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 10060
client/src/dojo/contractModels.ts (1)
158-161: Consider adding validation for the amount field.
While the u64 type provides natural bounds, consider if there should be additional business logic constraints on the amount field (e.g., maximum mint amount).
Let's check if there are any amount constraints in the contracts:
If there are no constraints at the contract level, consider implementing them to prevent potential economic exploits.
client/src/dojo/systems.ts (1)
126-126: Verify impact of reduced retry interval.
The retry interval has been reduced from 100ms to 50ms. While this might improve transaction confirmation speed, it could increase server load due to more frequent polling.
Let's check if this change aligns with recommended practices:
✅ Verification successful
Retry interval change appears reasonable
The reduced retry interval (50ms) in systems.ts is specifically used for transaction confirmation polling, while a longer interval (1000ms) is maintained for the faucet operations. This differentiation makes sense because:
- Transaction confirmations are critical for user experience and require faster feedback
- The faucet operation is a less frequent, non-critical operation that appropriately uses a longer 1-second interval
- The change only affects the client-side polling of the transaction status and doesn't impact server load since Starknet nodes are designed to handle transaction status queries efficiently
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other retry intervals in the codebase for consistency
rg -i "retryInterval|retry.*interval|polling.*interval" --type ts
# Check if there are any rate limiting configurations
fd -e json -e yaml -e toml -e env . | xargs rg -i "rate.*limit|throttle"
Length of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the context around both retryInterval usages
rg -B 5 -A 5 "retryInterval" --type ts
# Look for any documentation or comments about retry/polling strategy
rg -i "retry|poll" --type ts -A 2 -B 2
# Check for any configuration files or constants that might define system parameters
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -i "const.*config|interface.*config|type.*config"
Length of output: 4313
client/src/dojo/contractSystems.ts (4)
4-4: LGTM: Import addition is correct.
The import of Manifest from cartridgeConnector is properly added and follows the project's path aliasing convention.
90-92: LGTM: Consistent improvement in contract lookup patterns.
The refactoring of contract lookups improves:
- Code readability through consistent formatting
- Type safety with explicit type annotations
- Maintainability through consistent pattern application
Also applies to: 166-168, 176-178, 187-189, 316-317, 368-369, 464-465, 502-504
563-563: LGTM: Minter system correctly added to return object.
The minter system is properly integrated into the world setup.
509-530: Verify access control for add_free_mint.
Since this function allows adding free mints to any address, ensure that:
- Only admin accounts can call this function
- The contract has proper access control checks
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have found clear evidence of access control implementation in the contract code:
Access control for add_free_mint is properly implemented
The contract has proper admin-only access control for the add_free_mint function:
- In
contracts/src/systems/minter.cairo, the function checks admin status:- Retrieves caller address
- Explicitly calls
admin.assert_is_admin()before allowing the operation
- The admin check is enforced by
assert_is_admin()incontracts/src/models/admin.cairowhich throws an error if the caller is not an admin
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for access control modifiers on add_free_mint function
# Search for admin-related modifiers or checks in the contract
rg -A 5 "add_free_mint|only_admin|require_admin|is_admin"
Length of output: 7745
contracts/manifest_sepolia.json (2)
1659-1663:
Verify the minter contract initialization.
The dojo_init function is marked as view and doesn't take any parameters. This might prevent proper initialization of the contract state.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other initialization parameters in the codebase
rg -A 5 "dojo_init.*minter"Consider modifying the initialization to:
- "state_mutability": "view"
+ "state_mutability": "external"2842-2883: Verify the model definitions completeness.
All models are defined with empty members arrays. This could indicate:
- Missing model properties
- Potential initialization issues
- Incomplete data structures
Please ensure that the models are properly defined with their required properties.
contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json (4)
2884-2885: Verify the empty events array.
The events array is empty despite contracts defining various events. Consider if events should be registered at the manifest level for better event tracking and system monitoring.
1-2885: Review security considerations for contract interactions.
The manifest defines multiple interacting contracts with upgrade capabilities. Consider:
-
Access Control:
- Verify upgrade permissions
- Ensure proper admin role assignments
- Check token transfer permissions
-
Contract Interactions:
- Validate cross-contract call security
- Ensure proper event emission
- Verify initialization order dependencies
#!/bin/bash
# Search for security-critical functions
echo "Searching for upgrade functions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function upgrade($$$) {
$$$
}'
echo "Searching for admin role checks..."
ast-grep --pattern 'require(is_admin($$$), $$$)'2842-2883: Verify the empty model member definitions.
All models have empty member arrays. This could indicate:
- Incomplete model definitions
- Models defined elsewhere in the codebase
- Intentional design choice
Please verify if this is intentional or if the model members need to be defined.
✅ Verification successful
Empty members arrays in manifest are expected
The empty members arrays in the manifest file are intentional. Each model is properly defined in its corresponding Cairo source file under contracts/src/models/. The manifest file only serves as a registry of model class hashes and their tags, while the actual model structures and implementations are defined in the Cairo files.
For example:
Adminmodel is defined incontracts/src/models/admin.cairowith its structure and implementationChestmodel is defined incontracts/src/models/chest.cairowith properties likeid,point_target,points, andprizePlayermodel is defined incontracts/src/models/player.cairowith multiplier and streak-related functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model definitions in the codebase
echo "Searching for model definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'struct $model {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model definitions in json files
echo "Searching in json files..."
fd -e json -x cat {} | jq -r 'select(.models != null) | .models[]? | .tag' 2>/dev/null
# Search for any files containing model definitions
echo -e "\nSearching for model related files..."
rg -l "model|struct|class" --type cairo
# Check if there are any cairo files
echo -e "\nListing cairo files..."
fd -e cairo
Length of output: 3263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of model files to understand their structure
echo "Checking model files content..."
for model in admin chest game mint participation player settings tournament; do
echo -e "\n=== $model.cairo ==="
head -n 20 "contracts/src/models/${model}.cairo"
done
Length of output: 5791
1122-2840: Verify token addresses used in contract initialization.
Multiple contracts (Chest, Tournament, ZKorp) are initialized with the same token address: 0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51. Ensure this is the correct token address for the intended environment.
✅ Verification successful
Token address consistently used across deployment environments
The token address 0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51 is correctly used as initialization data for Chest, Tournament, and ZKorp contracts across all deployment environments (sepolia, sepoliadev1, sepoliadev2). The token implementation exists in the token/ directory, confirming this is a custom token contract rather than a third-party integration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for token address usage across the codebase
echo "Searching for token address references..."
rg -l "0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51"
Length of output: 452
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for token address definition or configuration
echo "Searching for token address definition..."
rg -A 5 "token_address" contracts/dojo_sepolia.toml contracts/dojo_sepoliadev1.toml contracts/dojo_sepoliadev2.toml
echo -e "\nSearching for token contract references..."
rg -A 5 "0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51" contracts/manifest_sepolia.json contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json contracts/manifest_sepoliadev2.json
Length of output: 3718
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for token contract definition or deployment
echo "Searching for token contract in manifests..."
rg -B 10 -A 2 '"tag": ".*token.*"' contracts/manifest_*.json
echo -e "\nSearching for token-related files..."
fd -i token
Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check token directory contents and implementation
echo "Checking token directory contents..."
ls -R token/
echo -e "\nSearching for token address in token implementation..."
rg -l "0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51" token/
echo -e "\nSearching for token contract deployment..."
ast-grep --pattern 'contract Token {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 519
contracts/manifest_sepoliadev2.json (5)
1617-1656: Verify minter permissions and rate limiting.
The Minter contract's interface exposes critical functions:
mint()claim_free_mint()add_free_mint()
These functions need proper access controls and rate limiting to prevent abuse.
✅ Verification successful
Access controls and rate limiting confirmed for minting functions
The implementation shows proper safeguards:
- Access control:
add_free_mintrequires admin privileges viaassert_is_admin() - Rate limiting:
- Expiration timestamps prevent unlimited minting
- Number of mints is tracked and decremented
- Checks for expired mints via
assert_has_mint_not_expired() - Prevents minting with expired timestamps via
assert(current_timestamp < expiration_timestamp)
The code demonstrates secure implementation with:
- Admin-only access for adding free mints
- Time-based rate limiting
- Proper tracking and validation of mint counts
- Expiration enforcement
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for rate limiting and access controls in minting
# Look for implementations of minting functions
# Search for rate limiting patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'fn mint() {
$$$
}'
# Search for access control patterns
rg -A 5 "only_owner|assert|require"
Length of output: 165311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for minter implementation and access controls
ast-grep --pattern 'fn mint($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for rate limiting patterns in minter
rg -A 10 "last_claim|cooldown|time|expiration" contracts/src/models/mint.cairo
# Search for admin/owner checks in minter
rg -A 5 "assert_is_admin|assert_only_owner" contracts/src/systems/minter.cairo
Length of output: 4484
2884-2884: Review empty events array.
The events array is empty despite multiple event definitions in the contracts. This might indicate that events are not properly registered in the manifest.
✅ Verification successful
Events are properly defined in the contracts but intentionally empty in manifest
The empty events array in the manifest is correct. While there are event definitions in the contracts, they are all either empty event enums (enum Event {}) for components or flattened component events in the systems. The only concrete events defined are in the mock ERC20 contract which is just for testing.
The manifest's empty events array is intentional as the current implementation doesn't require any events to be registered.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for event implementations
# Search for event definitions and emissions
# Search for event struct definitions
rg -l "type.*event"
# Search for event emissions
rg -l "emit.*Event"
Length of output: 165311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for event definitions in cairo files
rg -A 2 "^\s*#\[event\]" contracts/
# Search for event struct definitions
rg -A 2 "struct.*Event" contracts/
# Search for event emissions
rg "emit\(" contracts/
Length of output: 2822
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check event enum definitions to see if they contain any events
rg -A 5 "enum Event \{" contracts/
Length of output: 4512
2842-2882: Verify empty model member arrays.
All models (Admin, Chest, Game, etc.) have empty member arrays. This might indicate:
- Incomplete model definitions
- Models defined elsewhere in the system
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to search for model definitions since the previous search didn't yield results.
Let me check the actual model definitions in these files to verify if the empty members arrays are correct.
Empty member arrays are correct - models are defined with explicit fields
The empty member arrays in the manifest file are correct. The actual model definitions in contracts/src/models/index.cairo show that each model (Admin, Chest, Game, etc.) is properly defined with explicit struct fields rather than using a members array approach. The manifest file appears to be a deployment/configuration file that uses empty members arrays as a convention.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for model definitions in other files
# Search for model struct definitions
# Search for model definitions
fd -e cairo -e rs . -x rg -l "struct.*\b(Admin|Chest|Game|Mint|Participation|Player|Settings|Tournament)\b"
Length of output: 165311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model definitions in source files using different patterns
# Search for model-related code
rg -l "struct.*\{.*members.*\}" contracts/src/
# Search for model implementations
rg -l "impl.*Model" contracts/src/
# Search for model traits
rg -l "trait.*Model" contracts/src/
# Search for any files containing the model tags
rg -l "\b(Admin|Chest|Game|Mint|Participation|Player|Settings|Tournament)\b" contracts/src/models/
Length of output: 536
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check model definitions in the identified files
# Look for struct definitions and their members
rg -A 5 "struct.*(Admin|Chest|Game|Mint|Participation|Player|Settings|Tournament)" contracts/src/models/
# Look for any member-related fields or implementations
rg "members" contracts/src/models/
Length of output: 2620
1697-1718:
Audit upgrade functionality across contracts.
Multiple contracts implement the IUpgradeable interface with upgrade functions. This is a critical security feature that needs:
- Proper access controls
- Upgrade validation
- State migration handling
Also applies to: 2026-2047, 2287-2308, 2534-2555, 2749-2770
194-409: Verify event emission security in emit_event.
The emit_event function accepts arbitrary keys and values, which could potentially be used to emit misleading events. Ensure that proper access controls and validation are in place in the implementation.
Consider implementing:
- Event type validation
- Key format validation
- Access control for historical events
contracts/manifest_slot.json (2)
2842-2883: Verify model implementations completeness
The models are defined with empty member arrays, which could indicate:
- Incomplete implementation
- Missing model relationships
- Undefined data structures
Please ensure that the models are properly implemented in their respective contracts.
2-6: Verify the security of hardcoded world parameters
The world configuration contains hardcoded values for critical parameters:
- class_hash
- address
- seed
- name
These values should be carefully verified as they are fundamental to the system's security and upgradeability.
✅ Verification successful
Hardcoded world parameters are consistently used across manifest files
The hardcoded class hash and address appear to be intentionally duplicated across multiple manifest files that represent different deployment environments (development, Sepolia testnet, etc.). This is expected behavior as these manifest files serve as deployment configuration for different environments.
Key findings:
- The parameters are consistently defined in manifest files:
- manifest_dev.json
- manifest_sepolia.json
- manifest_sepoliadev1.json
- manifest_sepoliadev2.json
- manifest_slot.json
- manifest_slotdev.json
- No direct usage of these parameters in Cairo source files
- Parameters are likely referenced through the TypeScript manifest configuration (client/src/config/manifest.ts)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if these addresses/hashes are referenced elsewhere in the codebase
echo "Checking for hardcoded world parameters usage..."
rg -l "0x139239a99d627697b19b9856beaef7896fc75375caf3d750dd76982a7afeb78" || true
rg -l "0x3a9691d21683cf64a56fcb3297c3d67e5b9e687df5569565d8128d2b98b7a7d" || true
Length of output: 225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the usage of these parameters
echo "Checking for world parameters in json files..."
fd -e json -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 -B 5 "0x139239a99d627697b19b9856beaef7896fc75375caf3d750dd76982a7afeb78" || true
echo -e "\nChecking for world parameters in cairo files..."
fd -e cairo -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 -B 5 "0x139239a99d627697b19b9856beaef7896fc75375caf3d750dd76982a7afeb78" || true
echo -e "\nChecking for address usage..."
fd -e json -e cairo -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 -B 5 "0x3a9691d21683cf64a56fcb3297c3d67e5b9e687df5569565d8128d2b98b7a7d" || true
echo -e "\nListing all manifest files..."
fd manifest || true
Length of output: 4427
contracts/manifest_slotdev.json (4)
1-1121: World contract configuration looks good!
The World contract is well-structured with:
- Properly defined interfaces and types
- Comprehensive resource management functions
- Clear event definitions
- Appropriate access control mechanisms
2884-2885: Events structure is appropriate
Empty events array at the root level is correct as events are properly defined within their respective contracts.
2841-2883: Verify model definitions completeness
All models have empty member arrays. This could indicate:
- Incomplete model definitions
- Models defined in separate files
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model definitions in the codebase
fd -e cairo -e rs -e ts . -x rg -l "class\s+(?:Admin|Chest|Game|Mint|Participation|Player|Settings|Tournament)"1569-1775: Verify access control for minting functions
The minter contract exposes unrestricted mint functions that could be exploited:
mint()claim_free_mint()add_free_mint()
Consider implementing proper access controls or rate limiting.
| export class Mint { | ||
| public player_id: string; | ||
| public number: number; | ||
| public expiration_timestamp: number; | ||
|
|
||
| constructor(mint: ComponentValue) { | ||
| this.player_id = mint.player_id; | ||
| this.number = mint.number; | ||
| this.expiration_timestamp = mint.expiration_timestamp; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety, immutability, and documentation.
The class implementation could benefit from several improvements:
- Define an interface for the expected mint component structure
- Make properties readonly since they appear immutable
- Add validation in the constructor
- Add JSDoc documentation
Consider applying these improvements:
+/** Interface defining the structure of a mint component */
+interface MintComponent {
+ player_id: string;
+ number: number;
+ expiration_timestamp: number;
+}
+/**
+ * Represents a minting operation with an expiration timestamp.
+ */
export class Mint {
- public player_id: string;
- public number: number;
- public expiration_timestamp: number;
+ public readonly player_id: string;
+ public readonly number: number;
+ public readonly expiration_timestamp: number;
- constructor(mint: ComponentValue) {
+ /**
+ * Creates a new Mint instance.
+ * @param mint The mint component data
+ * @throws {Error} If required properties are missing or invalid
+ */
+ constructor(mint: ComponentValue & MintComponent) {
+ if (!mint.player_id || !mint.number || !mint.expiration_timestamp) {
+ throw new Error('Missing required mint properties');
+ }
+ if (mint.expiration_timestamp < 0) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid expiration timestamp');
+ }
this.player_id = mint.player_id;
this.number = mint.number;
this.expiration_timestamp = mint.expiration_timestamp;
}
+ /**
+ * Checks if the mint has expired.
+ * @returns true if expired, false otherwise
+ */
+ public isExpired(): boolean {
+ return Date.now() > this.expiration_timestamp;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export class Mint { | |
| public player_id: string; | |
| public number: number; | |
| public expiration_timestamp: number; | |
| constructor(mint: ComponentValue) { | |
| this.player_id = mint.player_id; | |
| this.number = mint.number; | |
| this.expiration_timestamp = mint.expiration_timestamp; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /** Interface defining the structure of a mint component */ | |
| interface MintComponent { | |
| player_id: string; | |
| number: number; | |
| expiration_timestamp: number; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Represents a minting operation with an expiration timestamp. | |
| */ | |
| export class Mint { | |
| public readonly player_id: string; | |
| public readonly number: number; | |
| public readonly expiration_timestamp: number; | |
| /** | |
| * Creates a new Mint instance. | |
| * @param mint The mint component data | |
| * @throws {Error} If required properties are missing or invalid | |
| */ | |
| constructor(mint: ComponentValue & MintComponent) { | |
| if (!mint.player_id || !mint.number || !mint.expiration_timestamp) { | |
| throw new Error('Missing required mint properties'); | |
| } | |
| if (mint.expiration_timestamp < 0) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid expiration timestamp'); | |
| } | |
| this.player_id = mint.player_id; | |
| this.number = mint.number; | |
| this.expiration_timestamp = mint.expiration_timestamp; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Checks if the mint has expired. | |
| * @returns true if expired, false otherwise | |
| */ | |
| public isExpired(): boolean { | |
| return Date.now() > this.expiration_timestamp; | |
| } | |
| } |
| const component = useComponentValue(Mint, key); | ||
| const mint = useDeepMemo(() => { | ||
| return component ? new MintClass(component) : null; | ||
| }, [component]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle null entity key case.
If we implement the suggested error handling for invalid player IDs, we need to handle the null key case here.
- const component = useComponentValue(Mint, key);
+ const component = key ? useComponentValue(Mint, key) : null;
const mint = useDeepMemo(() => {
return component ? new MintClass(component) : null;
}, [component]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const component = useComponentValue(Mint, key); | |
| const mint = useDeepMemo(() => { | |
| return component ? new MintClass(component) : null; | |
| }, [component]); | |
| const component = key ? useComponentValue(Mint, key) : null; | |
| const mint = useDeepMemo(() => { | |
| return component ? new MintClass(component) : null; | |
| }, [component]); |
| const key = useMemo( | ||
| () => getEntityIdFromKeys([BigInt(player_id ? player_id : -1)]) as Entity, | ||
| [player_id], | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling for invalid player IDs.
Using -1 as a fallback for undefined player_id could lead to unexpected behavior:
- -1 is typically not a valid entity ID
- No validation for malformed player IDs
Consider throwing an error or returning null for undefined player_id:
- () => getEntityIdFromKeys([BigInt(player_id ? player_id : -1)]) as Entity,
+ () => {
+ if (!player_id) return null;
+ try {
+ return getEntityIdFromKeys([BigInt(player_id)]) as Entity;
+ } catch (e) {
+ console.error('Invalid player ID:', e);
+ return null;
+ }
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const key = useMemo( | |
| () => getEntityIdFromKeys([BigInt(player_id ? player_id : -1)]) as Entity, | |
| [player_id], | |
| ); | |
| const key = useMemo( | |
| () => { | |
| if (!player_id) return null; | |
| try { | |
| return getEntityIdFromKeys([BigInt(player_id)]) as Entity; | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| console.error('Invalid player ID:', e); | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| [player_id], | |
| ); |
| @@ -19,3 +19,19 @@ default = "zkube" | |||
| rpc_url = "http://localhost:5050/" | |||
| account_address = "0x6b86e40118f29ebe393a75469b4d926c7a44c2e2681b6d319520b7c1156d114" | |||
| private_key = "0x1c9053c053edf324aec366a34c6901b1095b07af69495bffec7d7fe21effb1b" | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security consideration for configuration management.
The file contains sensitive information (private key). Consider:
- Using environment variables for sensitive values
- Adding this file to .gitignore
- Providing a template file instead
Example template approach:
-private_key = "0x1c9053c053edf324aec366a34c6901b1095b07af69495bffec7d7fe21effb1b"
+private_key = "${DOJO_PRIVATE_KEY}" # Set this via environment variableCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
contracts/dojo_playground.toml
Outdated
| "zkube-chest" = ["0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7"] | ||
| "zkube-settings" = ["0x0"] | ||
| "zkube-tournament" = ["0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7"] | ||
| "zkube-zkorp" = ["0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Configuration inconsistency detected across environments
Based on the search results, there are notable inconsistencies in the initialization parameters across different environment configurations:
-
Development/Playground environments (
dojo_dev.toml,dojo_playground.toml) use:- Same address
0x49d3657...for chest/tournament/zkorp - Zero address
0x0for settings
- Same address
-
Production-like environments (sepolia, slot) use:
- Different, non-zero addresses for all components
- Specifically, settings always has a proper address (e.g.,
0x0589d37...in sepolia)
This suggests the development configuration is using placeholder values that should not be used in production. The zero address for settings is particularly concerning as it's only used in dev/playground environments.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify initialization parameters
The initialization configuration uses the same Ethereum address for multiple components (chest, tournament, zkorp) and a zero address for settings. Please verify:
- Whether using the same address is intentional
- If the zero address for settings is correct
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for these addresses in other configuration files to verify consistency
echo "Checking address usage across configs..."
rg "0x49d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7" contracts/
echo "Checking zero address usage..."
rg "0x0" contracts/
Length of output: 6278
| if (transaction.execution_status !== "REVERTED") { | ||
| if (!shouldShowToast()) return; // Exit if screen is smaller than medium | ||
| toast.success(message, { | ||
| id: toastId, // Use the transaction_hash as the unique toast ID | ||
| description: shortenHex(transaction.transaction_hash), | ||
| action: getToastAction(transaction.transaction_hash), | ||
| position: toastPlacement, | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| const toastId = transaction.transaction_hash; | ||
|
|
||
| if (transaction.isSuccess()) { | ||
| if (!shouldShowToast()) return; // Exit if screen is smaller than medium | ||
| toast.success(message, { | ||
| id: toastId, // Use the transaction_hash as the unique toast ID | ||
| description: shortenHex(transaction.transaction_hash), | ||
| action: getToastAction(transaction.transaction_hash), | ||
| position: toastPlacement, | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| toast.error( | ||
| transaction.revert_reason | ||
| ? extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason) | ||
| : "Unkown error occured", | ||
| { | ||
| id: toastId, // Use the same transaction_hash ID for error | ||
| position: toastPlacement, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| toast.error(extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason), { | ||
| id: toastId, // Use the same transaction_hash ID for error | ||
| position: toastPlacement, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and notification logic.
Several concerns with the current implementation:
- Screen size check (
shouldShowToast()) could prevent users from seeing important error messages - No validation of
revert_reasonbefore using it - No handling of unexpected transaction states
Consider this improved implementation:
- if (transaction.execution_status !== "REVERTED") {
- if (!shouldShowToast()) return; // Exit if screen is smaller than medium
+ // Always show errors regardless of screen size
+ if (transaction.execution_status === "REVERTED") {
+ const errorMessage = transaction.revert_reason
+ ? extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason)
+ : "Transaction failed";
+ toast.error(errorMessage, {
+ id: toastId,
+ position: toastPlacement,
+ });
+ } else if (transaction.execution_status === "SUCCEEDED") {
+ // Only apply screen size check for success messages
+ if (!shouldShowToast()) return;
toast.success(message, {
- id: toastId, // Use the transaction_hash as the unique toast ID
+ id: toastId,
description: shortenHex(transaction.transaction_hash),
action: getToastAction(transaction.transaction_hash),
position: toastPlacement,
});
} else {
- toast.error(extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason), {
- id: toastId, // Use the same transaction_hash ID for error
+ // Handle unexpected states
+ toast.error(`Unexpected transaction status: ${transaction.execution_status}`, {
+ id: toastId,
position: toastPlacement,
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (transaction.execution_status !== "REVERTED") { | |
| if (!shouldShowToast()) return; // Exit if screen is smaller than medium | |
| toast.success(message, { | |
| id: toastId, // Use the transaction_hash as the unique toast ID | |
| description: shortenHex(transaction.transaction_hash), | |
| action: getToastAction(transaction.transaction_hash), | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| const toastId = transaction.transaction_hash; | |
| if (transaction.isSuccess()) { | |
| if (!shouldShowToast()) return; // Exit if screen is smaller than medium | |
| toast.success(message, { | |
| id: toastId, // Use the transaction_hash as the unique toast ID | |
| description: shortenHex(transaction.transaction_hash), | |
| action: getToastAction(transaction.transaction_hash), | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| toast.error( | |
| transaction.revert_reason | |
| ? extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason) | |
| : "Unkown error occured", | |
| { | |
| id: toastId, // Use the same transaction_hash ID for error | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| toast.error(extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason), { | |
| id: toastId, // Use the same transaction_hash ID for error | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }); | |
| // Always show errors regardless of screen size | |
| if (transaction.execution_status === "REVERTED") { | |
| const errorMessage = transaction.revert_reason | |
| ? extractedMessage(transaction.revert_reason) | |
| : "Transaction failed"; | |
| toast.error(errorMessage, { | |
| id: toastId, | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }); | |
| } else if (transaction.execution_status === "SUCCEEDED") { | |
| // Only apply screen size check for success messages | |
| if (!shouldShowToast()) return; | |
| toast.success(message, { | |
| id: toastId, | |
| description: shortenHex(transaction.transaction_hash), | |
| action: getToastAction(transaction.transaction_hash), | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| // Handle unexpected states | |
| toast.error(`Unexpected transaction status: ${transaction.execution_status}`, { | |
| id: toastId, | |
| position: toastPlacement, | |
| }); | |
| } |
client/src/dojo/contractSystems.ts
Outdated
| function minter() { | ||
| const contract_name = "minter"; | ||
| const contract = config.manifest.contracts.find( | ||
| (c: Manifest["contracts"][number]) => c.tag.includes(contract_name), | ||
| ); | ||
| if (!contract) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Contract ${contract_name} not found in manifest`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const add_free_mint = async ({ | ||
| account, | ||
| to, | ||
| amount, | ||
| expiration_timestamp, | ||
| }: AddFreeMint) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return await provider.execute( | ||
| account, | ||
| { | ||
| contractName: contract_name, | ||
| entrypoint: "add_free_mint", | ||
| calldata: [to, amount, expiration_timestamp], | ||
| }, | ||
| NAMESPACE, | ||
| details, | ||
| ); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error executing claim:", error); | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const claim_free_mint = async ({ account }: Signer) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return await provider.execute( | ||
| account, | ||
| { | ||
| contractName: contract_name, | ||
| entrypoint: "claim_free_mint", | ||
| calldata: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| NAMESPACE, | ||
| details, | ||
| ); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error executing claim:", error); | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| address: contract.address, | ||
| add_free_mint, | ||
| claim_free_mint, | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect error messages in catch blocks.
The minter implementation is well-structured but contains incorrect error messages:
- Line 527: "Error executing claim:" should be "Error executing add_free_mint:"
- Line 545: "Error executing claim:" should be "Error executing claim_free_mint:"
Apply these changes:
- console.error("Error executing claim:", error);
+ console.error("Error executing add_free_mint:", error);- console.error("Error executing claim:", error);
+ console.error("Error executing claim_free_mint:", error);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function minter() { | |
| const contract_name = "minter"; | |
| const contract = config.manifest.contracts.find( | |
| (c: Manifest["contracts"][number]) => c.tag.includes(contract_name), | |
| ); | |
| if (!contract) { | |
| throw new Error(`Contract ${contract_name} not found in manifest`); | |
| } | |
| const add_free_mint = async ({ | |
| account, | |
| to, | |
| amount, | |
| expiration_timestamp, | |
| }: AddFreeMint) => { | |
| try { | |
| return await provider.execute( | |
| account, | |
| { | |
| contractName: contract_name, | |
| entrypoint: "add_free_mint", | |
| calldata: [to, amount, expiration_timestamp], | |
| }, | |
| NAMESPACE, | |
| details, | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error executing claim:", error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| const claim_free_mint = async ({ account }: Signer) => { | |
| try { | |
| return await provider.execute( | |
| account, | |
| { | |
| contractName: contract_name, | |
| entrypoint: "claim_free_mint", | |
| calldata: [], | |
| }, | |
| NAMESPACE, | |
| details, | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error executing claim:", error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| return { | |
| address: contract.address, | |
| add_free_mint, | |
| claim_free_mint, | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| function minter() { | |
| const contract_name = "minter"; | |
| const contract = config.manifest.contracts.find( | |
| (c: Manifest["contracts"][number]) => c.tag.includes(contract_name), | |
| ); | |
| if (!contract) { | |
| throw new Error(`Contract ${contract_name} not found in manifest`); | |
| } | |
| const add_free_mint = async ({ | |
| account, | |
| to, | |
| amount, | |
| expiration_timestamp, | |
| }: AddFreeMint) => { | |
| try { | |
| return await provider.execute( | |
| account, | |
| { | |
| contractName: contract_name, | |
| entrypoint: "add_free_mint", | |
| calldata: [to, amount, expiration_timestamp], | |
| }, | |
| NAMESPACE, | |
| details, | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error executing add_free_mint:", error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| const claim_free_mint = async ({ account }: Signer) => { | |
| try { | |
| return await provider.execute( | |
| account, | |
| { | |
| contractName: contract_name, | |
| entrypoint: "claim_free_mint", | |
| calldata: [], | |
| }, | |
| NAMESPACE, | |
| details, | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error executing claim_free_mint:", error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| return { | |
| address: contract.address, | |
| add_free_mint, | |
| claim_free_mint, | |
| }; | |
| } |
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "state_mutability": "view" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "impl", | ||
| "name": "UpgradeableImpl", | ||
| "interface_name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::IUpgradeable" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "interface", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::IUpgradeable", | ||
| "items": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "function", | ||
| "name": "upgrade", | ||
| "inputs": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "new_class_hash", | ||
| "type": "core::starknet::class_hash::ClassHash" | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "outputs": [], | ||
| "state_mutability": "external" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "constructor", | ||
| "name": "constructor", | ||
| "inputs": [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Upgraded", | ||
| "kind": "struct", | ||
| "members": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "class_hash", | ||
| "type": "core::starknet::class_hash::ClassHash", | ||
| "kind": "data" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Upgraded", | ||
| "type": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Upgraded", | ||
| "kind": "nested" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::world_provider::world_provider_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "zkube::components::payable::PayableComponent::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "zkube::systems::zkorp::zkorp::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "UpgradeableEvent", | ||
| "type": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "nested" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "WorldProviderEvent", | ||
| "type": "dojo::contract::components::world_provider::world_provider_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "nested" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "PayableEvent", | ||
| "type": "zkube::components::payable::PayableComponent::Event", | ||
| "kind": "flat" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "init_calldata": [ | ||
| "0x021d1aa0b2c3413f0b8a1c14ddcdbaf404debfb0d4d858d0bb6ccb48ec1c0c51" | ||
| ], | ||
| "tag": "zkube-zkorp", | ||
| "systems": [] | ||
| } | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider consolidating payment handling and access control
The contract architecture could benefit from the following improvements:
- Payment handling is distributed across multiple contracts (chest, tournament, zkorp). Consider implementing a centralized payment handler.
- Upgrade functionality is duplicated across contracts. Consider using a proxy pattern or inheritance.
- Some critical functions lack explicit access control in their interfaces.
Consider implementing:
- A central PaymentHandler contract
- A base UpgradeableContract
- Explicit access control modifiers
| { | ||
| "type": "function", | ||
| "name": "upgrade", | ||
| "inputs": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "new_class_hash", | ||
| "type": "core::starknet::class_hash::ClassHash" | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "outputs": [], | ||
| "state_mutability": "external" | ||
| } | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance security measures for critical functions
The following security-critical functions require additional safeguards:
upgradefunctions in all contracts- Admin management functions (
set_admin,delete_admin) - Payment handling functions
Recommendations:
- Add explicit access control
- Implement input validation
- Emit events for all critical operations
- Add timelock mechanisms for upgrades
Also applies to: 2191-2252
contracts/manifest_slotdev.json
Outdated
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "interface", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::world_provider::IWorldProvider", | ||
| "items": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "function", | ||
| "name": "world_dispatcher", | ||
| "inputs": [], | ||
| "outputs": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "dojo::world::iworld::IWorldDispatcher" | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "state_mutability": "view" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "impl", | ||
| "name": "UpgradeableImpl", | ||
| "interface_name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::IUpgradeable" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "interface", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::IUpgradeable", | ||
| "items": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "function", | ||
| "name": "upgrade", | ||
| "inputs": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "new_class_hash", | ||
| "type": "core::starknet::class_hash::ClassHash" | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "outputs": [], | ||
| "state_mutability": "external" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "constructor", | ||
| "name": "constructor", | ||
| "inputs": [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Upgraded", | ||
| "kind": "struct", | ||
| "members": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "class_hash", | ||
| "type": "core::starknet::class_hash::ClassHash", | ||
| "kind": "data" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Upgraded", | ||
| "type": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Upgraded", | ||
| "kind": "nested" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "dojo::contract::components::world_provider::world_provider_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "event", | ||
| "name": "zkube::systems::settings::settings::Event", | ||
| "kind": "enum", | ||
| "variants": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "UpgradeableEvent", | ||
| "type": "dojo::contract::components::upgradeable::upgradeable_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "nested" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "WorldProviderEvent", | ||
| "type": "dojo::contract::components::world_provider::world_provider_cpt::Event", | ||
| "kind": "nested" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "init_calldata": [ | ||
| "0x0589d37adc1e5cf9ef58da510ee904aa9428d6e9a1c0d5c822392664d063796b" | ||
| ], | ||
| "tag": "zkube-settings", | ||
| "systems": [] | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Settings contract has proper access controls but lacks value validation
The settings contract implements admin-only access controls through assert_is_admin() checks for all critical functions, but:
- No validation exists for price update values (could be set to any u128 value)
- No timelock mechanism is implemented for critical changes
- Admin removal requires only
assert_exists()instead ofassert_is_admin()
Specific findings:
update_daily_mode_price: No min/max bounds checkingupdate_normal_mode_price: No min/max bounds checkingdelete_admin: Uses weaker assertion than other admin functions
🔗 Analysis chain
Review settings contract's admin functions
The settings contract handles critical configuration but should be carefully reviewed:
- Ensure proper access control for admin functions
- Validate input ranges for price updates
- Consider implementing timelock for critical changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for validation checks in settings contract
rg -A 5 "update_.*_price" | grep -A 5 "require|assert|if"
Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for settings contract implementation in cairo files
fd -e cairo . -x rg -A 10 "impl\s+Settings" {}
# Search for price update functions implementation
fd -e cairo . -x rg -A 10 "fn\s+update_.*_price" {}
# Search for admin-related functions and access control
fd -e cairo . -x rg -A 10 "fn\s+set_admin|fn\s+delete_admin" {}
# Search for any requires or asserts in the settings contract
fd -e cairo . -x rg -A 5 "assert|require" {} | grep -B 2 -A 5 "settings"
Length of output: 6976
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
client/src/ui/components/Balance.tsx (1)
118-125: LGTM! Consider additional improvements.The formatting changes improve readability. Consider these optional enhancements:
- Add input validation for negative decimals
- Add JSDoc documentation
- Consider using a decimal handling library for better precision
Example enhancement:
+/** + * Formats a bigint value to a decimal string with specified decimal places + * @param value The bigint value to format + * @param decimals The number of decimal places in the input + * @param displayDecimals The number of decimal places to display (defaults to decimals) + * @returns Formatted string representation + */ function formatUnits( value: bigint, decimals: number, displayDecimals: number = decimals, ) { + if (decimals < 0 || displayDecimals < 0) { + throw new Error('Decimals must be non-negative'); + } let display = value.toString();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
client/src/ui/components/Balance.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
client/src/ui/components/Balance.tsx (1)
41-41: Approve increased refetch interval, but verify impact on UX.
The increase from 500ms to 2000ms is a good optimization that reduces network load while maintaining reasonable responsiveness.
Let's verify if there are other components using similar polling patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Increased refetch interval is appropriate and isolated
The change from 500ms to 2000ms in Balance.tsx is the only instance of refetchInterval in the codebase, and this component has the only usage of useContractRead. This makes the change safe as it doesn't create inconsistencies with other components' polling patterns. The 2-second interval remains responsive enough for blockchain data while reducing network load.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other useContractRead instances to ensure consistent polling patterns
rg -A 5 "useContractRead.*\{" --type typescript
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useContractRead usage patterns with proper file extension
rg -A 5 "useContractRead.*\{" --type ts --type tsx
# Also search for any refetchInterval configurations
rg "refetchInterval:" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useContractRead usage without file type restrictions
rg -A 5 "useContractRead.*\{"
# Search for refetchInterval configurations
rg "refetchInterval:"
Length of output: 529
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
client/src/dojo/systems.ts (2)
48-51: Remove commented-out code.The commented-out Starkscan URL should be removed since it's been replaced with the Voyager URL. Keeping commented-out code can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.
- //return `https://sepolia.starkscan.co/tx/${transaction_hash}`; return `https://sepolia.voyager.online/tx/${transaction_hash}`;
216-222: Improve success message specificity.The success message "Games have been claimed" is vague. Consider making it more specific to free minting, such as "Free mint successfully claimed" or include the number of games claimed.
- "Games have been claimed.", + "Free mint successfully claimed.",contracts/manifest_mainnet.json (5)
2-6: World configuration looks good but consider documenting the values.The world configuration is properly structured with all required fields. However, consider adding comments to document:
- The significance of the class_hash and address values
- The purpose of the seed value "zKube3"
1122-1331: Account contract implementation looks good but consider enhancing error handling.The account contract implementation includes proper upgrade mechanisms and world provider integration. However, consider adding explicit error handling for the create/rename operations.
2915-2955: Consider documenting model purposes and relationships.The models (Admin, Chest, Game, etc.) are defined but lack documentation about their purposes and relationships. Consider adding comments to explain:
- The role of each model
- Relationships between models
- Why members are empty
2957-2968: Trophy events look good but consider adding more event types.The trophy-related events (TrophyCreation, TrophyProgression) are well-defined. However, consider adding events for:
- Tournament status changes
- Player achievements
- Game state transitions
1-2969: Review security implications of the manifest configuration.The manifest includes proper security mechanisms but consider:
- Documenting the upgrade process and access control flow
- Adding events for security-critical operations
- Implementing a timelock for admin operations
contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json (1)
2-7: Add documentation for the world configuration parameters.Consider adding comments to document:
- The purpose and significance of each configuration parameter
- The relationship between class_hash and address
- The role of the seed parameter
{ "world": { + // The class hash of the world contract implementation "class_hash": "0x139239a99d627697b19b9856beaef7896fc75375caf3d750dd76982a7afeb78", + // The deployed address of the world contract "address": "0x3bdc9d96b7ecab3f605f8ca69f4ef03b9476ab77083ac4e78abd31441f9b7b0", + // Unique identifier used for world initialization "seed": "zKube8", + // Human-readable name for the world "name": "zKube",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
contracts/Scarb.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
client/src/dojo/systems.ts(6 hunks)contracts/Scarb.toml(2 hunks)contracts/dojo_mainnet.toml(1 hunks)contracts/manifest_mainnet.json(1 hunks)contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- contracts/Scarb.toml
- contracts/dojo_mainnet.toml
🔇 Additional comments (6)
client/src/dojo/systems.ts (2)
81-96: Previous review comments are still applicable.
The concerns raised in the previous review comments about type safety and error handling remain valid and should be addressed.
129-129: Verify the impact of reduced retry interval.
The retry interval has been reduced from 100ms to 50ms. While this will make transaction status updates more responsive, it could also:
- Increase load on the RPC endpoint
- Consume more client resources
- Potentially hit rate limits faster
Please verify if this change is necessary and that it won't cause issues in production.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other retry intervals in the codebase for consistency
rg -A 2 'retryInterval:' --type tscontracts/manifest_mainnet.json (1)
1569-1794: Verify minter contract's initialization parameters.
The minter contract looks well-structured but has empty init_calldata. Ensure this is intentional and won't cause issues during deployment.
✅ Verification successful
Empty init_calldata is valid for the minter contract
Looking at other contracts in the manifest, having empty init_calldata is a valid pattern used by some contracts (e.g., zkube-account, zkube-play). The minter contract follows this pattern, which is consistent with its simple initialization needs as shown in its ABI that includes a parameter-less constructor and dojo_init function.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any minter initialization references in the codebase
rg -A 5 "dojo_init.*minter"
Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any dojo_init implementations in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'fn dojo_init($$$) { $$$ }'
# Also check for any minter initialization or constructor patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'fn constructor($$$) { $$$ }'
# Let's also check for any files containing minter initialization logic
rg -l "minter.*init|init.*minter"
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the manifest file for other similar contracts to understand the pattern
cat contracts/manifest_mainnet.json | jq -r '.[] | select(.init_calldata != null) | {tag: .tag, init_calldata: .init_calldata}'
# Also search for any Rust files related to minter implementation
fd -e rs minter
Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the manifest structure first
cat contracts/manifest_mainnet.json | jq -r 'keys'
# Then look at other contracts in the manifest for comparison
cat contracts/manifest_mainnet.json | jq -r '.contracts[] | select(.tag != "zkube-minter") | {tag: .tag, init_calldata}'
Length of output: 913
contracts/manifest_sepoliadev1.json (3)
2957-2968: LGTM, but see previous comment about event definitions.
The events section implementation matches the structure defined in the manifest.
2915-2955: Clarify the purpose of empty model definitions.
All models are defined with empty member arrays. This could indicate:
- Incomplete implementation
- Missing documentation of model structures
- Intentional design choice
Please clarify if this is intentional and document the purpose of each model.
1122-1124: Review security implications of hardcoded contract addresses.
The manifest contains hardcoded contract addresses and class hashes. While this is common in deployment manifests, consider:
- Implementing a mechanism to validate these addresses during deployment
- Adding a version control system for contract upgrades
- Documenting the deployment process and address verification steps
Also applies to: 1333-1335, 1569-1571, 1796-1798, 2165-2167, 2409-2411
| const claimFreeMint = async ({ account, ...props }: SystemTypes.Signer) => { | ||
| await handleTransaction( | ||
| account, | ||
| () => client.minter.claim_free_mint({ account, ...props }), | ||
| "Games have been claimed.", | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Mint-specific error handling needs improvement
Based on the code analysis:
- The
handleTransactionuses a generic try-catch block without specific error handling - The contract-level
claim_free_mintimplementation incontractSystems.tsonly logs the error generically withconsole.error("Error executing claim:", error) - No specific error messages are shown to users for common mint-related failures like:
- Expired mint window (shown in contract code:
has_mint_not_expired) - Already claimed mints (shown in contract code: checking
total_mints)
- Expired mint window (shown in contract code:
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify error handling for mint-specific failures.
The function uses the generic handleTransaction error handling. Verify that mint-specific errors (e.g., already claimed, not eligible) are properly handled and displayed to users.
Let's search for the error handling implementation and mint-related error cases to verify how specific errors are handled. The previous search failed because of the file type, so let's try a more general approach to find relevant code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mint-related error definitions and handling
echo "Searching for mint-related error definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'error $ERR_NAME {
$$$
}' | rg -A 5 'mint|claim'
echo "Searching for error handling in minter contract..."
rg -A 5 'revert|assert' --type cairo | rg -B 5 'mint|claim'
Length of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling in handleTransaction and related functions
echo "Searching for handleTransaction implementation..."
rg -A 10 "handleTransaction.*=.*async"
echo "Searching for minter contract error handling..."
fd "minter" --type f --exec rg -A 5 "error|revert|assert"
echo "Searching for claim_free_mint implementation..."
rg -A 10 "claim_free_mint"
Length of output: 11740
…into add-minter-and-mint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
client/src/ui/components/Controller.tsx (2)
7-8: Consider adding error handling for missing connector.The component might benefit from handling cases where the connector is unavailable, perhaps by disabling the button or showing a different UI state.
export const Controller = () => { const { connector } = useAccount(); + const isConnectorAvailable = Boolean(connector);
17-21: Enhance button accessibility and user feedback.The button should have:
- An aria-label for screen readers
- Visual feedback for loading/disabled states
return ( <Button variant="outline" + aria-label="Open trophy wallet" + disabled={!connector?.controller} onClick={() => handleTrophyClick()}> <FontAwesomeIcon icon={faWallet} /> </Button> );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
client/src/ui/components/Controller.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/components/DesktopHeader.tsx(2 hunks)client/src/ui/components/Grid.tsx(4 hunks)client/src/ui/components/HeaderNftBalance.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/components/MobileHeader.tsx(4 hunks)client/src/ui/components/SettingsDropDown.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- client/src/ui/components/DesktopHeader.tsx
- client/src/ui/components/Grid.tsx
- client/src/ui/components/HeaderNftBalance.tsx
- client/src/ui/components/MobileHeader.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
client/src/ui/components/SettingsDropDown.tsx
[error] 38-42: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment
(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
client/src/ui/components/Controller.tsx (1)
1-5: LGTM! All imports are properly utilized.
client/src/ui/components/SettingsDropDown.tsx (2)
14-14: LGTM! Import organization looks good.
Also applies to: 16-16
Line range hint 38-53: Verify account connector type handling.
The component handles both "controller" and "burner" account types. Let's verify the account connector changes across the codebase to ensure consistent handling.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the account connector usage across the codebase.
Account connector type handling is consistent across the codebase
The account connector implementation shows consistent handling:
ACCOUNT_CONNECTORis properly defined as anAccountTypeinuseAccountCustom.tsx- All UI components (
SettingsDropDown,DesktopHeader,MobileHeader,ProfilePage) consistently check for both "controller" and "burner" types - The conditional rendering pattern is uniform across components, showing proper separation of concerns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify account connector type usage and handling
# Check for ACCOUNT_CONNECTOR definition and usage
echo "Checking ACCOUNT_CONNECTOR definition:"
rg -A 2 "ACCOUNT_CONNECTOR.*=.*"
echo -e "\nChecking ACCOUNT_CONNECTOR usage in conditional rendering:"
rg "ACCOUNT_CONNECTOR.*===.*(\"controller\"|\"burner\")"
Length of output: 2572
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 38-42: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment
(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
| const handleTrophyClick = useCallback(() => { | ||
| if (!connector?.controller) { | ||
| console.error("Connector not initialized"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| connector?.controller.openProfile("trophies"); | ||
| }, [connector]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and error handling.
A few suggestions to improve the code:
- Consider defining an enum or constant for profile types
- Add proper error handling beyond console.log
- Consider adding TypeScript types for the controller interface
+const PROFILE_TYPES = {
+ TROPHIES: "trophies",
+} as const;
+
const handleTrophyClick = useCallback(() => {
if (!connector?.controller) {
- console.error("Connector not initialized");
+ // Consider using a proper error handling mechanism
+ // e.g., toast notification or error state
+ console.error("Wallet not connected. Please connect your wallet first.");
return;
}
- connector?.controller.openProfile("trophies");
+ connector.controller.openProfile(PROFILE_TYPES.TROPHIES);
}, [connector]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <> | ||
| <div className="p-1 flex flex-col gap-2"> | ||
| <AccountDetails /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary Fragment wrapper.
The Fragment (<>...</>) is redundant here as it contains only a single div child. We can simplify the code by removing it.
Apply this diff to simplify the JSX:
{ACCOUNT_CONNECTOR === "controller" && (
- <>
- <div className="p-1 flex flex-col gap-2">
- <AccountDetails />
- </div>
- </>
+ <div className="p-1 flex flex-col gap-2">
+ <AccountDetails />
+ </div>
)}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 38-42: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment
(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
client/src/ui/components/Controller.tsx (3)
9-15: Remove redundant optional chaining.The optional chaining operator on line 14 is unnecessary since we've already checked for
connector?.controllerin the if condition.- connector?.controller.openProfile("trophies"); + connector.controller.openProfile("trophies");
18-18: Simplify onClick handler.The arrow function wrapper is unnecessary since
handleTrophyClickdoesn't take any parameters.- <Button variant="shimmer" onClick={() => handleTrophyClick()}> + <Button variant="shimmer" onClick={handleTrophyClick}>
7-22: Consider adding error boundaries and loading states.As this component handles wallet interactions, consider implementing:
- Error boundaries to gracefully handle wallet-related errors
- Loading states during wallet operations
- Feedback mechanisms for successful/failed operations
This will improve user experience and make the component more robust.
client/src/ui/elements/button/variants.ts (2)
18-19: Consider improving readability of the 'brutal' variant styles.The shadow implementation is complex and could benefit from better organization. Consider breaking down the long class string into multiple lines or using Tailwind's plugin system to create a custom utility class.
- brutal: - "px-8 py-0.5 border-2 border-black dark:border-white uppercase bg-white text-black transition duration-200 text-sm shadow-[1px_1px_rgba(0,0,0),2px_2px_rgba(0,0,0),3px_3px_rgba(0,0,0),4px_4px_rgba(0,0,0),5px_5px_0px_0px_rgba(0,0,0)] dark:shadow-[1px_1px_rgba(255,255,255),2px_2px_rgba(255,255,255),3px_3px_rgba(255,255,255),4px_4px_rgba(255,255,255),5px_5px_0px_0px_rgba(255,255,255)] ", + brutal: [ + "px-8 py-0.5", + "border-2 border-black dark:border-white", + "uppercase bg-white text-black", + "transition duration-200 text-sm", + "shadow-[1px_1px_rgba(0,0,0),2px_2px_rgba(0,0,0),3px_3px_rgba(0,0,0),4px_4px_rgba(0,0,0),5px_5px_0px_0px_rgba(0,0,0)]", + "dark:shadow-[1px_1px_rgba(255,255,255),2px_2px_rgba(255,255,255),3px_3px_rgba(255,255,255),4px_4px_rgba(255,255,255),5px_5px_0px_0px_rgba(255,255,255)]" + ].join(" "),
20-21: Consider extracting complex gradient and animation styles.The 'shimmer' variant contains a complex background gradient and animation configuration. Consider moving these to Tailwind's plugin system or creating custom utility classes for better maintainability.
Example approach using Tailwind's plugin system:
// tailwind.config.js module.exports = { theme: { extend: { backgroundImage: { 'shimmer-gradient': 'linear-gradient(110deg,#000103,45%,#1e2631,55%,#000103)', }, }, }, }Then simplify the variant:
- shimmer: - "inline-flex h-12 animate-shimmer items-center justify-center rounded-md border border-slate-800 bg-[linear-gradient(110deg,#000103,45%,#1e2631,55%,#000103)] bg-[length:200%_100%] px-6 font-medium text-slate-400 transition-colors focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-slate-400 focus:ring-offset-2 focus:ring-offset-slate-50", + shimmer: [ + "inline-flex h-12 animate-shimmer", + "items-center justify-center rounded-md", + "border border-slate-800", + "bg-shimmer-gradient bg-[length:200%_100%]", + "px-6 font-medium text-slate-400", + "transition-colors focus:outline-none", + "focus:ring-2 focus:ring-slate-400", + "focus:ring-offset-2 focus:ring-offset-slate-50" + ].join(" "),client/src/ui/modules/Leaderboard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
85-89: Consider refactoring the Button className for better maintainability.The className construction combines multiple conditions and hardcoded styles in a single template literal. Consider extracting these styles into a more maintainable format.
Here's a suggested refactor:
-<Button - variant={buttonType} - className={`w-full text-${textSize} ${!isMdOrLarger && !inMenu && "py-6 border-4 rounded-none bg-sky-200 font-sans"}`} -> +const getMobileStyles = (isMobile: boolean, inMenu: boolean) => { + if (!isMobile || inMenu) return ''; + return 'py-6 border-4 rounded-none bg-sky-200 font-sans'; +}; + +<Button + variant={buttonType} + className={cn( + 'w-full', + `text-${textSize}`, + getMobileStyles(isMdOrLarger, inMenu) + )} >This approach:
- Separates the mobile-specific styles into a dedicated function
- Uses a className utility like
cnfor better composition- Makes the code more readable and easier to maintain
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
client/src/ui/actions/Start.tsx(6 hunks)client/src/ui/components/Controller.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/elements/button/variants.ts(1 hunks)client/src/ui/modules/Leaderboard.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/screens/Home.tsx(4 hunks)client/tailwind.config.js(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- client/src/ui/actions/Start.tsx
- client/src/ui/screens/Home.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
client/src/ui/components/Controller.tsx (1)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are clean and appropriate.
All necessary dependencies are properly imported for the component's functionality.
client/tailwind.config.js (1)
88-91: LGTM! Well-implemented shimmer animation effect.
The shimmer animation is properly implemented with appropriate timing and easing functions. This effect will create a smooth, continuous shimmer that's suitable for loading states or highlighting elements in the HeaderNftBalance component.
Also applies to: 99-99
client/src/ui/modules/Leaderboard.tsx (1)
65-67: Verify the "brutal" button variant implementation.
The addition of the "brutal" variant to LeaderboardProps looks good, but let's ensure it's properly supported.
Let's verify the Button component implementation and its usage:
✅ Verification successful
The "brutal" button variant is properly implemented
The Button component in client/src/ui/elements/button/variants.ts correctly implements the "brutal" variant with appropriate styling properties, including a distinctive border, shadow effects, and dark mode support. The addition of this variant to LeaderboardProps is valid and safe to use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the "brutal" variant is properly implemented in the Button component
# and consistently used across the codebase
# Test 1: Check if the "brutal" variant is defined in the Button component
echo "Checking Button component implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'variant = {
$$$
brutal: $_,
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Find all usages of the "brutal" button variant
echo "Checking brutal variant usage..."
rg -A 2 'variant="brutal"'
Length of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the Button component implementation
# Check for Button component file and its type definitions
echo "Looking for Button component files..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "button"
# Once we find the file, let's examine its content for variant definitions
echo "Checking variant definitions in Button components..."
rg -l "variant.*=.*{" $(fd -e tsx -e ts "button")
# Let's also check for any type definitions related to button variants
echo "Checking for button variant types..."
rg -A 5 "type.*Variant.*=|interface.*ButtonProps" $(fd -e tsx -e ts "button")
# Let's also search for any "brutal" string in button-related files
echo "Searching for 'brutal' in button files..."
rg "brutal" $(fd -e tsx -e ts "button")
Length of output: 1620
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the elements directory since the Button component was imported from "@/ui/elements/button"
# Look for button-related files in the elements directory
echo "Looking for Button component in elements directory..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "button" "client/src/ui/elements"
# If we find the file, let's examine its contents
echo "Checking contents of button files in elements directory..."
for file in $(fd -e tsx -e ts "button" "client/src/ui/elements"); do
echo "=== Contents of $file ==="
cat "$file"
done
# Let's also check for any variant-related types or interfaces in the elements directory
echo "Checking for variant types in elements directory..."
rg -A 5 "type.*Variant|interface.*Button" "client/src/ui/elements"
Length of output: 5607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the button variants definition file and its contents
echo "Checking button variants file..."
cat "client/src/ui/elements/button/variants.ts"
# Also check for any usage of "brutal" in the variants file
echo "Searching for brutal variant in button variants..."
rg "brutal" "client/src/ui/elements/button/variants.ts"
Length of output: 2296
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
client/src/hooks/useControllerUsername.tsx (1)
Line range hint
13-20: Improve type safety and error handling.The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Using
anytype and type assertion is not type-safe- Error handling could be more specific
Consider applying these improvements:
-export const fetchUsername = async ( - address: string | undefined, - connector: any, -): Promise<string | undefined> => { +export const fetchUsername = async ( + address: string | undefined, + connector: unknown, +): Promise<string | undefined> => { if (!address || !connector) { return undefined; } - const controllerConnector = connector as ControllerConnector; - if (typeof controllerConnector.username === "function") { + if ( + connector instanceof ControllerConnector && + typeof connector.username === "function" + ) { try { - return await controllerConnector.username(); + return await connector.username(); } catch (error) { - console.error("Error fetching username:", error); + console.error( + "Failed to fetch username:", + error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Unknown error" + ); return undefined; } }This refactor:
- Uses
unknowninstead ofanyfor better type safety- Properly checks for instance type before using the connector
- Improves error logging with more specific error messages
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
client/src/hooks/useControllerUsername.tsx(2 hunks)client/src/ui/components/BurnerAccount.tsx(0 hunks)client/src/ui/components/SettingsDropDown.tsx(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- client/src/ui/components/BurnerAccount.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
client/src/ui/components/SettingsDropDown.tsx
[error] 37-41: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment
(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
client/src/hooks/useControllerUsername.tsx (2)
Line range hint 23-39: LGTM! Hook implementation follows React best practices.
The useControllerUsername hook is well-implemented with proper:
- State management
- Effect dependencies
- Cleanup handling
3-3: Verify consistent connector usage across the codebase.
The change from CartridgeConnector to ControllerConnector might require similar updates in other files.
✅ Verification successful
Migration from CartridgeConnector to ControllerConnector appears complete
The codebase scan shows no remaining references to CartridgeConnector, and ControllerConnector is consistently used in both cartridgeConnector.tsx and useControllerUsername.tsx. The import change is aligned with the rest of the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining CartridgeConnector usages that might need updating
rg "CartridgeConnector" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for ControllerConnector usage to ensure consistent implementation
rg "ControllerConnector" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining CartridgeConnector usages without file type restrictions
rg "CartridgeConnector"
# Search for ControllerConnector usage to ensure consistent implementation
rg "ControllerConnector"
Length of output: 452
client/src/ui/components/SettingsDropDown.tsx (2)
14-14: LGTM!
The import statement is correctly placed and properly formatted.
37-41: Remove unnecessary Fragment wrapper.
This issue was previously identified and the suggestion is still valid.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 37-41: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment
(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
| <Button variant={"destructive"}> | ||
| {" "} | ||
| !!!! Burner have been removed !!!! | ||
| </Button> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve the burner account removal message.
Several issues need to be addressed:
- Grammatical error in the message
- Unnecessary space and Fragment wrapper
- Message could be more professional
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- <>
- <Button variant={"destructive"}>
- {" "}
- !!!! Burner have been removed !!!!
- </Button>
- </>
+ <Button variant="destructive">
+ Burner accounts are no longer supported
+ </Button>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Airdropcomponent for claiming airdrops.HeaderNftBalancecomponent to display NFT balance in headers.useNftBalancehook for fetching NFT balance.useNftMinthook for minting NFTs.mainnetdeployment in the application configuration.manifest_mainnet.jsonfile to define the mainnet environment.Controllercomponent for managing user interactions related to trophies.shimmeranimation variant for buttons.Improvements
Balancecomponent to simplify data handling and update frequency.ProfilePageto include an "Airdrop" tab.HeaderNftBalanceintoMobileHeaderfor comprehensive account details.aria-describedbyattributes in various components.Gridcomponent.Leaderboardcomponent to support a new button type, "brutal".Bug Fixes
aria-describedbyattributes in various components.Chores
manifest_extractor.pyscript for extracting system addresses from JSON files.