Update yorkie-js-sdk to v0.5.4

[devleejb]

What this PR does / why we need it:

• Update yorkie-js-sdk to v0.5.4

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Additional documentation:

Checklist:

• Added relevant tests or not required
• Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Updated the Yorkie service to version 0.5.4, which may include new features and improvements.

• Bug Fixes

  • Upgraded the yorkie-js-sdk dependency to version 0.5.4, potentially addressing previous issues.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the Docker configuration files for backend services and the frontend package file. Specifically, the yorkie service image version is upgraded from 0.5.0 to 0.5.4 in both docker-compose-full.yml and docker-compose.yml. Additionally, the yorkie-js-sdk dependency version is updated from 0.5.3 to 0.5.4 in the package.json of the frontend project. No other service configurations or dependencies have been modified.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
backend/docker/docker-compose-full.yml	Updated yorkie service image from 0.5.0 to 0.5.4.
backend/docker/docker-compose.yml	Updated yorkie service image from 0.5.0 to 0.5.4.
frontend/package.json	Updated yorkie-js-sdk dependency from 0.5.3 to 0.5.4.

Possibly related PRs

• Bump up yorkie-js-sdk to v0.4.31 #307: Updates the yorkie service image version in both docker-compose-full.yml and docker-compose.yml files, directly related to this PR.
• Bump up yorkie-js-sdk to 0.5.0 #334: Updates the yorkie service image version from 0.4.31 to 0.5.0, relevant for similar updates to the yorkie service.
• Update yorkie-js-sdk to v0.5.1 #369: Updates the yorkie-js-sdk version in frontend/package.json from 0.5.0 to 0.5.1, related to overall versioning of Yorkie services and SDKs.

🐇 In the garden, we hop with glee,
Yorkie's new version, oh so free!
From 0.5.0 to 0.5.4,
Bugs and fixes, we adore!
With every leap, our code will thrive,
Hooray for updates, we come alive! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7b927f and a03c185.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• backend/docker/docker-compose-full.yml (1 hunks)
• backend/docker/docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
• frontend/package.json (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• backend/docker/docker-compose-full.yml
• frontend/package.json

🔇 Additional comments (1)

backend/docker/docker-compose.yml (1)

5-5: LGTM! Version update looks correct.

The update of the Yorkie service image to v0.5.4 aligns with the frontend SDK version.

Let's verify the compatibility of all components:

✅ Verification successful

Version update is safe and compatible

Based on the evidence from the codebase:

1. The frontend is using yorkie-js-sdk v0.5.4 (from pnpm-lock.yaml)
2. The backend Yorkie service is being updated to v0.5.4 (from docker-compose.yml)
3. The CHANGELOG.md shows a gradual version progression from v0.5.0 to v0.5.4 with no breaking changes reported

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility requirements or breaking changes
# between the old and new versions of Yorkie

# Check the changelog or release notes for breaking changes
gh release view yorkieteam/yorkie v0.5.4 2>/dev/null || true

# Look for any compatibility-related comments in the codebase
rg -i "compatibility|breaking.?change" --type yaml

Length of output: 102

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify compatibility:

# 1. Check for any version-specific configurations or dependencies
rg -i "yorkie" --type yaml -A 3 -B 3

# 2. Look for any version constraints or requirements
fd "package.json|package-lock.json" --exec grep -i "yorkie" {} \;

# 3. Check for any documentation about version requirements
fd "README|CHANGELOG" --exec grep -i "yorkie" -A 3 -B 3 {} \;

Length of output: 26152