Introduce mono repo #361
Introduce mono repo #361
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a transition from Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
1-3: Consider adding comments for better documentation.While the current structure is clear, it would be beneficial to add comments explaining the purpose of this file and the significance of each package. This can help future developers understand the project structure more quickly.
Here's a suggested modification:
# pnpm workspace configuration for CodePair mono repo packages: # React frontend application - "frontend" # NestJS backend application - "backend"frontend/tsconfig.json (1)
23-23: LGTM! Consider using a wildcard pattern for config files.The inclusion of "vite.config.ts" in the TypeScript compilation is a good practice. It ensures type checking and better IDE support for the Vite configuration file.
Consider using a wildcard pattern to automatically include all configuration files:
- "include": ["src", "vite.config.ts"], + "include": ["src", "*.config.ts"],This change would automatically include any future configuration files (e.g., "jest.config.ts" if you add Jest for testing) without requiring manual updates to tsconfig.json.
backend/eslint.config.mjs (2)
9-17: LGTM: Parser configuration is correct, with a suggestion for improvement.The parser configuration is well set up for a TypeScript project, including the correct reference to
tsconfig.jsonand enabling JSX features. This suggests the project might include React components.Consider moving the
ecmaFeaturesobject to the root oflanguageOptionsfor better clarity:languageOptions: { parser: typescriptParser, parserOptions: { project: "./tsconfig.json", - ecmaFeatures: { - jsx: true, - }, }, + ecmaFeatures: { + jsx: true, + }, },
18-21: LGTM: Plugins are correctly configured, with a suggestion for enhancement.The TypeScript ESLint and Prettier plugins are correctly configured, which will ensure proper linting and formatting for TypeScript files.
Consider adding the
eslint-plugin-importplugin to help manage imports and exports in your TypeScript files. This can be particularly useful in a monorepo structure. You can add it like this:plugins: { "@typescript-eslint": typescriptPlugin, prettier: prettierPlugin, + import: importPlugin, },Don't forget to install the plugin (
npm install --save-dev eslint-plugin-import) and import it at the top of the file:import importPlugin from "eslint-plugin-import";package.json (2)
1-7: Consider adding relevant keywords to improve discoverability.The project metadata looks good overall. However, the
keywordsarray is currently empty. Adding relevant keywords can improve the discoverability of your project, especially if you plan to publish it to a package registry.Consider adding keywords such as:
- "keywords": [ ], + "keywords": ["monorepo", "react", "nestjs", "collaborative-editor", "ai", "markdown"],
8-17: Scripts are well-organized, consider adding a concurrent run script.The scripts section is well-structured for a monorepo, utilizing pnpm workspace features effectively. The use of parallel execution for linting and formatting is a good practice for efficiency.
Consider adding a script to run both frontend and backend concurrently, which can be useful for local development:
"scripts": { "prepare": "husky .husky", "preinstall": "npx only-allow pnpm", "frontend": "pnpm --filter=frontend", "backend": "pnpm --filter=backend", "lint": "pnpm run --parallel lint", "lint:check": "pnpm run --parallel lint:check", "format": "pnpm run --parallel format", - "format:check": "pnpm run --parallel format:check" + "format:check": "pnpm run --parallel format:check", + "dev": "pnpm run --parallel frontend backend" },frontend/eslint.config.mjs (1)
26-36: LGTM with suggestions: Consider adding more TypeScript-specific rules.The current rules and settings are good:
- The React Refresh rule helps prevent issues with Fast Refresh in development.
- Enforcing Prettier formatting ensures consistent code style.
- Automatic React version detection is good for maintainability.
However, to enhance the linting process, consider adding more TypeScript-specific rules from the
@typescript-eslintplugin. This will help catch common TypeScript-related issues and enforce best practices.Here's an example of additional rules you might want to add:
rules: { "react-refresh/only-export-components": ["warn", { allowConstantExport: true }], "prettier/prettier": "error", + "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "warn", + "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "warn", + "@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": ["error", { "argsIgnorePattern": "^_" }], },These rules will warn about using
any, encourage explicit return types, and error on unused variables (ignoring those prefixed with underscore).backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (1)
19-19: LGTM: Method signature update improves type safety.The updated
canActivatemethod signature now explicitly defines its return types, includingboolean,Promise<boolean>, andObservable<boolean>. This change enhances type safety and makes the method's behavior more predictable, aligning with TypeScript and NestJS best practices.For consistency with NestJS conventions, consider using the
CanActivateinterface from@nestjs/common. You can update the class declaration as follows:import { CanActivate } from '@nestjs/common'; @Injectable() export class JwtAuthGuard extends AuthGuard('jwt') implements CanActivate { // ... rest of the class }This change would make the guard's interface more explicit and align it more closely with NestJS patterns.
.github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (1)
27-30: LGTM: pnpm setup added.Adding the pnpm setup step is consistent with the PR objective of transitioning to a monorepo structure. Using the
pnpm/action-setupaction is an efficient way to set up pnpm in the CI environment.Consider using a more specific version of pnpm (e.g.,
9.x.x) or the latest version (latest) depending on your versioning strategy. This can help balance consistency with staying up-to-date..github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (1)
25-30: LGTM! Consider using a more specific pnpm version.The changes look good. Renaming the checkout step improves clarity, and adding a dedicated step to install pnpm is a good practice.
Consider using a more specific version of pnpm (e.g., 9.x.x) to ensure even greater consistency across environments. For example:
- version: 9 + version: 9.8.1.github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-45: Summary: GitHub Actions workflow updated for pnpm, but further monorepo adjustments may be needed.The workflow has been successfully updated to use pnpm instead of npm, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, there are a few points to consider:
- Verify if the working directory (
./frontend) is still correct in the new monorepo structure.- Review other parts of the workflow (Sentry setup, deployment steps) to ensure they are compatible with the monorepo structure.
- Consider adding steps to handle potential monorepo-specific tasks, such as building multiple packages or running tests across all projects.
To fully implement the monorepo structure, you might need to:
- Update the working directory if the frontend is now in a different location.
- Adjust the build and deployment steps to handle multiple projects if necessary.
- Ensure that the GitHub Pages deployment correctly includes all required built assets from the monorepo structure.
backend/Dockerfile (1)
30-30: Consider using--frozen-lockfilefor consistent behaviorWhile
pnpm icorrectly installs dependencies, it's more analogous tonpm installthannpm ci. For closer parity with the previousnpm cibehavior, consider using:-RUN pnpm i +RUN pnpm install --frozen-lockfileThis ensures a clean, reproducible install from the lockfile without any automatic updates.
backend/package.json (1)
70-70: Approve typescript move and suggest dependency reviewMoving "typescript" to devDependencies is a good practice for a backend project. This change, while not directly related to the monorepo implementation, improves the overall project structure.
Given the transition to a monorepo, it might be beneficial to review the remaining dependencies and devDependencies. Consider if any of these could be shared across the monorepo or if there are opportunities for further optimization in the new structure.
frontend/package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-121: Summary: Package.json updates for monorepo structureThe changes to
frontend/package.jsongenerally align with the transition to a monorepo structure. Key points to address:
- Ensure that removed dependencies (TypeScript, ESLint, etc.) are properly configured at the root level of the monorepo.
- Verify that type checking is still performed, either in other scripts or in the CI/CD pipeline.
- Consider the impact of removing the "prepare" script on the setup process.
These changes contribute to the PR objectives of implementing a mono repo structure for the CodePair project. However, it's crucial to maintain proper tooling and type safety across the entire project.
backend/README.md (2)
47-47: Enhance markdown formatting: Wrap URL in angle bracketsTo improve the markdown formatting and address the linter warning:
Wrap the URL in angle brackets to avoid using a bare URL. Update the line as follows:
-6. Visit http://localhost:3000 to enjoy your CodePair. +6. Visit <http://localhost:3000> to enjoy your CodePair.This change will resolve the MD034 (no-bare-urls) warning from the markdown linter.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
58-82: LGTM: Updated commands and minor formatting suggestionThe updates to use
pnpmfor building, linting, testing, and running in production are consistent with the monorepo structure implementation. These changes will help maintain consistency across the project.To address the markdown linter warnings (MD026), consider removing the trailing colons from the following headings:
-### Building the Project: +### Building the Project -### Linting the Code: +### Linting the Code -### Testing: +### Testing -### Running in Production: +### Running in ProductionThis minor change will improve the markdown formatting and resolve the linter warnings.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
README.md (2)
71-75: LGTM: Frontend run command updated for monorepo structureThe change to use
pnpm frontend devsimplifies the process of running the frontend application and is consistent with the monorepo structure. This approach is more developer-friendly.Consider adding a brief explanation of what this command does, especially if it's a custom script. For example:
4. Run the Frontend application: ```bash pnpm frontend devThis command starts the frontend development server.
--- `104-108`: **LGTM: Backend and Frontend run commands updated for monorepo structure** The changes to use `pnpm backend start:dev` and `pnpm frontend dev` simplify the process of running both the backend and frontend applications. This is consistent with the monorepo structure and improves developer experience. Consider adding brief explanations for each command, especially if they're custom scripts. For example: ```markdown 4. Run the Backend application and the Frontend application: ```bash pnpm backend start:dev # Starts the backend development server pnpm frontend dev # Starts the frontend development server</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>frontend/README.md (4)</summary><blockquote> `30-34`: **LGTM! Consider adding a note about monorepo structure.** The change to use `pnpm` for dependency installation aligns well with the monorepo structure implementation. It's good that you've specified to run the command from the root directory. Consider adding a brief note explaining why the installation is done from the root, to help developers understand the monorepo concept. For example: ```diff 4. Install dependencies from the root. + # Note: We install dependencies from the root due to our monorepo structure. ```bash pnpm install ```
36-44: LGTM! Consider clarifying the workspace command.The updated instructions for running the frontend application are clear and provide flexibility for different developer preferences.
To make the monorepo workspace concept more explicit, consider adding a brief explanation:
5. Run the Frontend application: ```bash - # In the root directory of the repository and run. + # From the root directory (using pnpm workspace): pnpm frontend dev - # Navigate to the 'frontend' directory and run application. + # Or, navigate to the 'frontend' directory and run: cd frontend pnpm dev ```
86-94: LGTM! Formatting commands updated. Consider addressing heading punctuation.The commands for formatting the code and checking code formatting have been correctly updated to use
pnpm, maintaining consistency with the monorepo structure.The static analysis tool flagged trailing punctuation in headings. Consider removing the colons from the command headings throughout the README for consistency with Markdown best practices. For example:
-### Formatting the Code: +### Formatting the Code -### Checking Code Formatting: +### Checking Code Formatting🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
91-91: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
Line range hint
1-1: Consider adding a section explaining the monorepo structure.The README has been successfully updated to reflect the use of
pnpmand the new monorepo structure. To further improve the documentation, consider adding a brief section at the beginning of the README explaining the monorepo structure. This would help new contributors understand the project organization. For example:## Project Structure This frontend is part of a monorepo structure for the CodePair project. The monorepo includes both the React frontend and NestJS backend, managed using `pnpm` workspaces. This structure allows for easier dependency management and cross-project collaboration. For more information on working with this monorepo, please refer to the root-level README.This addition would provide valuable context for developers working on the project.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
51-51: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
83-83: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
91-91: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
backend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonfrontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (2 hunks)
- MAINTAINING.md (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/.eslintrc.js (0 hunks)
- backend/Dockerfile (3 hunks)
- backend/README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (3 hunks)
- backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/workspaces/workspaces.service.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/.eslintrc.cjs (0 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
- frontend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- backend/.eslintrc.js
- frontend/.eslintrc.cjs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/src/workspaces/workspaces.service.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
MAINTAINING.md
[style] ~8-~8: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...3fbb292078f/backend/package.json#L3). - Updateversioninpnpm-lock.yamlwill be a...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
backend/README.md
47-47: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md
51-51: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
83-83: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
91-91: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (48)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (3)
1-3: LGTM! The workspace configuration aligns with the PR objectives.The
pnpm-workspace.yamlfile correctly defines the mono repo structure for the CodePair project, including both the frontend and backend packages as specified in the PR objectives. This structure will facilitate better collaboration and consistency across the codebase.
1-3: Check for any missing packages or shared components.The current configuration includes only the frontend and backend packages. Verify if there are any shared components or additional packages that should be included in the workspace.
To check for potential missing packages, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential missing packages in the workspace # Search for package.json files outside of frontend and backend directories echo "Searching for additional package.json files:" find . -name "package.json" -not -path "./frontend/*" -not -path "./backend/*" -not -path "./node_modules/*" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" # Search for potential shared component directories echo "Searching for potential shared component directories:" find . -type d -name "shared" -o -name "common" -o -name "lib" -not -path "*/node_modules/*"If the script reveals any additional
package.jsonfiles or potential shared component directories, consider including them in thepnpm-workspace.yamlfile.
2-3: Verify directory structure and consider using more precise paths.The current configuration assumes that the frontend and backend packages are located in directories named exactly "frontend" and "backend" at the root of the repository. If this is not the case, or if the structure is more complex, consider using more precise paths.
To verify the directory structure, please run the following script:
If the script reveals a different structure, consider updating the
pnpm-workspace.yamlfile with more precise paths.✅ Verification successful
Directory Structure Verified Successfully
The
frontendandbackenddirectories are correctly located at the root of the repository, and both contain their respectivepackage.jsonfiles. The current configuration inpnpm-workspace.yamlis accurate and does not require more precise paths.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and structure of frontend and backend directories # Check if frontend and backend directories exist if [ -d "frontend" ] && [ -d "backend" ]; then echo "Frontend and backend directories found at the root level." else echo "Warning: frontend and/or backend directories not found at the root level." echo "Current directory structure:" tree -L 2 -d fi # Check for package.json files in frontend and backend if [ -f "frontend/package.json" ] && [ -f "backend/package.json" ]; then echo "package.json files found in both frontend and backend directories." else echo "Warning: package.json files not found in frontend and/or backend directories." echo "Files in frontend directory:" ls -la frontend echo "Files in backend directory:" ls -la backend fiLength of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and structure of frontend and backend directories # Check if frontend and backend directories exist if [ -d "frontend" ] && [ -d "backend" ]; then echo "Frontend and backend directories found at the root level." else echo "Warning: frontend and/or backend directories not found at the root level." echo "Current directory structure:" tree -L 2 -d fi # Check for package.json files in frontend and backend if [ -f "frontend/package.json" ] && [ -f "backend/package.json" ]; then echo "package.json files found in both frontend and backend directories." else echo "Warning: package.json files not found in frontend and/or backend directories." echo "Files in frontend directory:" ls -la frontend echo "Files in backend directory:" ls -la backend fiLength of output: 379
frontend/tsconfig.json (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Verify mono repo structure implementationWhile this change improves the frontend configuration, it doesn't directly contribute to the mono repo structure mentioned in the PR objectives.
To ensure the PR meets its objectives, please run the following script to verify the mono repo structure implementation:
This script will help verify if the mono repo structure has been properly implemented, including the presence of necessary configuration files and the correct directory structure.
✅ Verification successful
Mono repo structure is properly implemented
The repository is correctly set up as a mono repo with separate
frontend,backend, anddocspackages. All necessary configuration files are present, and the directory structure aligns with mono repo standards.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the mono repo structure implementation # Test 1: Check for a root package.json file echo "Checking for root package.json:" cat package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "Root package.json not found" # Test 2: Check for pnpm-workspace.yaml or similar workspace configuration echo -e "\nChecking for workspace configuration:" cat pnpm-workspace.yaml 2>/dev/null || echo "pnpm-workspace.yaml not found" # Test 3: List directories to verify frontend and backend are in the same repo echo -e "\nListing root directories:" ls -d */ # Test 4: Check for backend tsconfig.json echo -e "\nChecking for backend tsconfig.json:" cat backend/tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null || echo "Backend tsconfig.json not found" # Test 5: Check for any scripts in root package.json that manage both frontend and backend echo -e "\nChecking for scripts in root package.json that manage both frontend and backend:" jq '.scripts | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("frontend") and contains("backend"))' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No scripts found that manage both frontend and backend"Length of output: 2166
backend/eslint.config.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are correct and follow best practices.The import statements are correctly importing the necessary plugins and parser for TypeScript and Prettier integration with ESLint. Using named imports is a good practice for clarity and potential tree-shaking.
5-6: LGTM: Configuration structure is appropriate and extensible.The use of
export defaultwith an array structure is correct for an ESLint flat config. This approach allows for easy extension with additional configuration objects if needed in the future.Also applies to: 28-29
7-8: LGTM: File patterns and ignores are well-defined.The configuration correctly targets all TypeScript files while appropriately ignoring the
distdirectory (likely containing compiled files) and the ESLint config file itself. This setup follows best practices for TypeScript projects.
1-29: Overall, the ESLint configuration is well-structured with room for enhancement.The configuration correctly sets up ESLint for a TypeScript project with Prettier integration. However, consider the suggested improvements for better type safety and import management.
After making any changes, please verify that the ESLint configuration works as expected across your codebase. You can run the following command to check:
This will help ensure that the new configuration is applied correctly and doesn't introduce any unexpected issues.
package.json (2)
1-28: Overall, the package.json file aligns well with the monorepo objectives.This package.json file successfully implements the foundation for a monorepo structure, addressing the main objectives outlined in the PR:
- It consolidates the frontend and backend into a single project, facilitating collaborative work.
- The use of pnpm and workspace features streamlines the development process and ensures consistency across the codebase.
- The scripts section provides commands for managing both frontend and backend tasks efficiently.
The suggested improvements (adding keywords, including a concurrent run script, and verifying dependency versions) will further enhance the project's organization and maintainability.
18-27: Verify ESLint and @typescript-eslint versions.The devDependencies section includes appropriate tools for a TypeScript project with linting and formatting. However, there seems to be a discrepancy in the versions of ESLint and related packages:
- ESLint is specified as version ^9.11.1, which is unusually high. The current stable version of ESLint is in the 8.x range.
- The @typescript-eslint packages are specified as ^8.7.0, which is also higher than expected. These packages typically align with the ESLint version.
Please verify these versions and update them if necessary. You can check the latest stable versions using the following script:
After verifying, update the versions in the package.json file if needed.
frontend/eslint.config.mjs (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The import statements are well-structured and include all the necessary plugins for TypeScript and React linting. The use of named imports is consistent and follows best practices.
7-10: LGTM: Configuration object is well-structured.The ESLint configuration correctly targets TypeScript files and appropriately ignores the 'dist' directory and the configuration file itself. This setup follows best practices for linting TypeScript projects.
11-25: LGTM: Language options and plugins are well-configured.The configuration correctly sets up the TypeScript parser with appropriate options, including JSX support. The inclusion of necessary plugins for TypeScript, React Hooks, React Refresh, and Prettier ensures comprehensive linting and formatting for a TypeScript React project.
backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM: Import of Observable is correctly added.The import of
Observablefrom 'rxjs' is necessary and consistent with the changes made to thecanActivatemethod signature. It's also properly placed among other imports.
Line range hint
1-41: Overall assessment: Changes improve type safety without altering functionality.The modifications to this file, including the addition of the
Observableimport and the updatedcanActivatemethod signature, enhance type safety and code clarity. These changes align well with the PR objectives of improving code quality and consistency. The core functionality of theJwtAuthGuardremains intact, and no security issues or breaking changes were introduced. These updates contribute positively to the maintainability of the codebase in the context of the monorepo structure..github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (3)
25-26: LGTM: Checkout step updated.The checkout step has been renamed for clarity and the
actions/checkoutaction has been updated to v4. This is a good practice to ensure you're using the latest features and security updates.
38-38: LGTM: npm commands replaced with pnpm.The replacement of npm commands with their pnpm equivalents is consistent with the PR objective of transitioning to a monorepo structure using pnpm. The working directory is correctly and consistently set for all steps, which is a good practice.
Also applies to: 41-41, 44-44, 47-47
Line range hint
1-48: Overall LGTM with minor improvements needed.The workflow has been successfully updated to use pnpm, aligning with the PR objectives of implementing a monorepo structure. The changes are generally well-implemented, with consistent use of pnpm commands and proper working directory settings.
To further improve the workflow:
- Remove the redundant pnpm installation step (lines 35-36) as mentioned earlier.
- Consider adding pnpm-specific optimizations, such as using pnpm's built-in caching capabilities to speed up CI runs.
- Verify if any additional pnpm configurations (like pnpm-workspace.yaml) need to be added or referenced in the workflow.
To ensure all necessary pnpm configurations are in place, run the following script:
This script will help verify the presence of necessary pnpm configurations for the monorepo setup.
✅ Verification successful
Remove Redundant pnpm Installation Step
The workflow currently includes two steps for installing pnpm:
- Using
pnpm/action-setup@v4.- Running
npm install -g pnpm.Since
pnpm/action-setup@v4already installs pnpm, the second installation step is redundant and can be safely removed to streamline the workflow.Additionally, consider adding an
.npmrcfile withuse-pnpm=trueto ensure consistent pnpm usage across all environments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for pnpm configuration files and workspace setup # Test 1: Check for pnpm-workspace.yaml if [ -f "pnpm-workspace.yaml" ]; then echo "pnpm-workspace.yaml found" cat pnpm-workspace.yaml else echo "pnpm-workspace.yaml not found. Consider adding it for proper monorepo setup." fi # Test 2: Check for .npmrc with pnpm settings if [ -f ".npmrc" ]; then echo ".npmrc found" grep "^use-pnpm" .npmrc || echo "Consider adding 'use-pnpm=true' to .npmrc" else echo ".npmrc not found. Consider adding it with 'use-pnpm=true'" fi # Test 3: Check package.json for pnpm-specific scripts if [ -f "package.json" ]; then echo "Checking package.json for pnpm scripts" jq '.scripts | keys[] | select(startswith("pnpm:"))' package.json else echo "package.json not found in the root. Ensure it's properly set up for the monorepo." fiLength of output: 490
.github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (3)
41-42: LGTM! Correct update to use pnpm for Prettier check.The change from
npm run format:checktopnpm run format:checkis correct and aligns with the transition to pnpm. The command itself remains unchanged, maintaining consistency in the project scripts.
44-47: LGTM! Correct updates to use pnpm for Lint and Build steps.The changes from
npm run linttopnpm run lintandnpm run buildtopnpm run buildare correct and align with the transition to pnpm. The commands themselves remain unchanged, maintaining consistency in the project scripts.
Line range hint
1-48: Overall, good transition to pnpm with minor improvements needed.The changes in this file successfully implement the transition from npm to pnpm, aligning with the PR objectives. A few minor improvements have been suggested:
- Using a more specific pnpm version
- Removing the redundant pnpm installation step
- Using
pnpm install --frozen-lockfilefor CI environmentsAfter addressing these points, the workflow should be well-optimized for the new mono repo structure.
To ensure consistency across the entire project, please run the following script to verify pnpm usage:
This script will help identify any remaining npm usage that needs to be updated to pnpm.
.github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (4)
15-18: LGTM: pnpm installation step added.The addition of the pnpm installation step aligns well with the PR objectives to implement a monorepo structure. Using a specific version (9) ensures consistency across different environments.
23-24: LGTM: Node.js setup updated for pnpm.The cache type and dependency path have been correctly updated to use pnpm instead of npm. This change is consistent with the switch to a pnpm-based monorepo structure and should improve caching efficiency.
38-39: LGTM: Install and build commands updated for pnpm.The install and build commands have been correctly updated to use pnpm instead of npm. The use of
pnpm iis appropriate for CI environments and equivalent tonpm ci.
Line range hint
11-11: Verify working directory for monorepo structure.The working directory is still set to "./frontend", which might not be consistent with a monorepo structure. Please verify if this path is still correct in the new project structure.
Additionally, consider reviewing other parts of the workflow (e.g., Sentry setup, deployment steps) to ensure they are compatible with the new monorepo structure.
To verify the project structure, you can run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Verified working directory for monorepo structure.
The working directory is correctly set to
./frontendand is consistent with the monorepo setup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the project structure to verify monorepo setup # Test: List directories at the root level echo "Root level directories:" ls -d */ # Test: Check if 'frontend' directory exists and its contents echo -e "\nContents of 'frontend' directory (if it exists):" ls -la frontend 2>/dev/null || echo "frontend directory not found" # Test: Look for pnpm-workspace.yaml file echo -e "\nChecking for pnpm-workspace.yaml:" ls pnpm-workspace.yaml 2>/dev/null || echo "pnpm-workspace.yaml not found"Length of output: 1372
backend/Dockerfile (4)
4-7: LGTM: Proper setup for pnpmThe addition of pnpm setup looks good. Setting
PNPM_HOMEand updatingPATHensures pnpm is accessible. Enabling corepack is a best practice for managing package manager versions consistently.
33-33: LGTM: Correct usage of pnpm for buildingThe change from
npm run buildtopnpm run buildis correct and consistent with the switch to pnpm.
Line range hint
1-77: Overall: Good implementation of pnpm in the DockerfileThe changes to implement pnpm in the Dockerfile are consistent and well-executed. They align perfectly with the PR objective of transitioning to a monorepo structure using pnpm. The modifications maintain the existing multi-stage build process while successfully replacing npm with pnpm for dependency management and script execution.
A few points to note:
- The pnpm setup is correctly implemented in both build stages.
- The change from
npm citopnpm iworks, but consider usingpnpm install --frozen-lockfilefor closer parity withnpm ci.- Ensure that the
start:prodscript in the package.json file is compatible with the new pnpm setup.These changes should contribute to improved consistency in dependency versions and streamlined development workflow, as intended by the monorepo transition.
37-40: LGTM: Consistent pnpm setup and usageThe pnpm setup in the second stage and the change to use pnpm for starting the production server are correct and consistent with the switch to pnpm.
Let's verify that the
start:prodscript exists in the package.json file:This command will return the value of the
start:prodscript if it exists, ornullif it doesn't. Please ensure the script exists and contains the correct command.Also applies to: 77-77
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Consistent pnpm setup and usage
The pnpm setup in the second stage and the change to use pnpm for starting the production server are correct and consistent with the switch to pnpm.
Also applies to: 77-77
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the start:prod script in package.json # Test: Search for the start:prod script in package.json jq '.scripts["start:prod"]' backend/package.jsonLength of output: 67
MAINTAINING.md (1)
Line range hint
1-40: Update deployment instructions for mono repo structureThe deployment instructions in this file don't reflect the changes to a mono repo structure. Consider updating the deployment section to include any new steps or changes required for deploying a mono repo.
Add a new section or update the existing deployment section to include mono repo-specific instructions. For example:
### 5. Deploy #### 1) Build the mono repo Before deploying, ensure all packages in the mono repo are built: ```bash pnpm run build2) Docker
When you publish the release in step 3, GitHub Action will deploy CodePair to Docker Hub.
3) GitHub Pages
When you publish the release in step 3, GitHub Action will deploy the frontend to GitHub Pages.
Let's verify if the GitHub Actions workflows have been updated to support the mono repo structure: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check GitHub Actions workflows for mono repo support # Test 1: Check docker-publish.yaml echo "Checking docker-publish.yaml:" rg --type yaml 'pnpm' .github/workflows/docker-publish.yaml # Test 2: Check gh_pages.yaml echo "Checking gh_pages.yaml:" rg --type yaml 'pnpm' .github/workflows/gh_pages.yamlThis script will help us confirm if the GitHub Actions workflows have been updated to use pnpm and support the mono repo structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~8-~8: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...3fbb292078f/backend/package.json#L3). - Updateversioninpnpm-lock.yamlwill be a...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Markdownlint
5-5: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
10-10: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
backend/package.json (5)
2-2: Approve package name change to "@codepair/backend"The package name change to "@codepair/backend" is a good step towards implementing the monorepo structure. Using a scoped package name (@codepair) helps organize related packages within the monorepo and prevents naming conflicts with external packages.
18-20: Clarify changes to scriptsI noticed the following changes to the scripts:
- The "prepare" script has been removed.
- The "lint", "format", and "format:check" scripts have been reordered.
Could you please explain the reasoning behind these changes? Specifically:
- How will the removal of the "prepare" script affect the project setup process?
- Is there a specific reason for reordering the scripts?
These changes don't seem directly related to the monorepo implementation. It would be helpful to understand their purpose in the context of this PR.
24-25: Approve update to lint-staged configurationThe change from "npm" to "pnpm" in the lint-staged configuration is a positive step towards implementing the monorepo structure. This aligns with the PR objectives and is consistent with the reference to the Yorkie-JS-SDK project, which uses pnpm for managing its monorepo.
Using pnpm across the project will help ensure consistent dependency management and improve build performance in the monorepo structure.
34-34: Clarify dependency changesI noticed significant changes to the dependencies:
- Addition of "@langchain/openai": "^0.3.2"
- Removal of several ESLint, Prettier, and Husky related dependencies
Could you please provide more context for these changes?
- How does the addition of "@langchain/openai" relate to the monorepo implementation?
- With the removal of ESLint, Prettier, and Husky dependencies, how will code quality checks and git hooks be managed in the new monorepo structure?
These changes seem to go beyond the scope of implementing a monorepo structure. It would be helpful to understand their purpose and how they fit into the overall project goals.
Line range hint
1-94: Summary of package.json changesThe changes to
backend/package.jsonpartially align with the PR objectives of implementing a monorepo structure. Here's a summary of the key points:
- The package name change to "@codepair/backend" supports the monorepo structure.
- Updating lint-staged to use pnpm is consistent with the monorepo management approach.
- Some changes, such as script modifications and dependency updates, require further clarification as they don't directly relate to the monorepo implementation.
To ensure that all changes in this file contribute to the monorepo structure or overall project improvement, please provide additional context for the points raised in the previous comments. This will help validate that the changes align with the PR objectives and best practices for monorepo structures.
frontend/package.json (5)
2-2: LGTM: Package name updated to follow monorepo convention.The package name change from "codepair-frontend" to "@codepair/frontend" aligns with the monorepo structure and follows the convention for scoped packages. This change will help in organizing and identifying packages within the monorepo.
4-4: LGTM: Description field repositioned.The description field has been moved after the version field, which follows a common convention in package.json files. This change improves readability and consistency.
18-19: LGTM: Updated lint-staged to use pnpm.The lint-staged configuration has been updated to use pnpm instead of npm, which aligns with the monorepo structure and ensures consistency across the project.
Line range hint
2-119: Verify location of removed dependencies in monorepo structure.Several important dependencies have been removed from this package.json, including TypeScript, ESLint, and related plugins. In a monorepo structure, these dependencies are typically moved to the root package.json. Please ensure that these dependencies are properly configured at the root level of the monorepo.
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies correctly moved to the root package.json.
All previously removed dependencies, including TypeScript, ESLint, Prettier, and Husky, are present in the root package.json, ensuring the monorepo structure maintains the necessary configurations for development.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if removed dependencies are present in the root package.json # Test: Search for TypeScript, ESLint, and related plugins in the root package.json rg --type json -e typescript -e eslint -e prettier -e husky package.jsonLength of output: 379
12-12: Verify impact of removing type checking from lint script.The lint script has been modified to remove type checking. While this may speed up the linting process, it could potentially miss type-related errors. Consider the trade-offs and ensure that type checking is performed elsewhere in the development process.
✅ Verification successful
Type checking is still performed during the build process through the
tsccommand infrontend/package.json.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if type checking is performed in other scripts or CI/CD pipeline. # Test: Search for TypeScript compilation or type checking in other scripts rg --type json '"(tsc|typecheck)"' package.jsonLength of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for type checking commands in CI/CD pipeline configurations. # Search in GitHub Actions workflows rg --type yml 'tsc|typecheck' .github/workflows/ # Search in other CI configuration files rg 'tsc|typecheck' .circleci/ .gitlab-ci.yml travis.ymlLength of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for type checking commands in CI/CD pipeline configurations without relying on file type recognition. # Search in GitHub Actions workflows (including .yaml and .yml extensions) rg 'tsc|typecheck' .github/workflows/*.yml .github/workflows/*.yaml # Search in other CI configuration files rg 'tsc|typecheck' .circleci/*.yml .circleci/*.yaml .gitlab-ci.yml .gitlab-ci.yaml travis.yaml travis.yml # If specific CI directories/files do not exist, perform a repository-wide search for type checking commands if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then rg 'tsc|typecheck' fiLength of output: 2910
backend/README.md (2)
30-34: LGTM: Updated dependency installation stepThe change to use
pnpm installfrom the root directory aligns well with the monorepo structure implementation. This update ensures consistency across the project and simplifies the setup process.
Line range hint
1-146: Overall: Well-aligned with monorepo implementationThe changes to the
backend/README.mdfile are well-aligned with the PR objectives of implementing a monorepo structure for the CodePair project. The updates to usepnpmand adjust the installation and running instructions are appropriate and consistent.A few minor suggestions have been provided to further improve the documentation:
- Simplify the backend application run instructions by removing the redundant option.
- Enhance markdown formatting by wrapping the bare URL in angle brackets.
- Remove trailing colons from headings to address linter warnings.
These changes will help maintain a clear and consistent README that reflects the new monorepo structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
README.md (4)
65-68: LGTM: Dependency installation updated for monorepo structureThe change to use
pnpm installfrom the root directory aligns well with the monorepo structure implementation. This approach simplifies the installation process and ensures consistency across the project.
98-101: LGTM: Dependency installation updated consistentlyThe change to use
pnpm installfrom the root directory in the Full Stack Development Mode is consistent with the earlier update in the Frontend Development Only Mode. This ensures a uniform approach across different development scenarios.
77-77: Ignore Markdownlint MD034 for localhost URLThe Markdownlint tool flagged the use of a bare URL (http://localhost:5173) on this line. However, in this context, using a bare URL for a localhost address is acceptable and common in development instructions. No change is necessary.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Line range hint
1-140: Overall: README successfully updated for monorepo structureThe changes to the README.md file successfully reflect the new monorepo structure of the CodePair project. The updates consistently use
pnpmfor dependency management and running applications, which aligns with the PR objectives. The instructions for both Frontend Only and Full Stack development modes have been clearly updated, simplifying the setup process for developers.A few minor suggestions were made to improve clarity, but overall, the changes are well-implemented and maintain a good balance of detail and conciseness.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~79-~79: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...:5173 to enjoy your CodePair. ### 3-2. Full Stack Development Mode 1. Update your `GITHU...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
🪛 Markdownlint
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
frontend/README.md (2)
54-62: LGTM! Commands updated consistently.The commands for running the development server and building the project have been correctly updated to use
pnpm. This change is consistent with the overall transition to a monorepo structure usingpnpm.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
70-78: LGTM! Linting and preview commands updated.The commands for linting the code and previewing the production build have been correctly updated to use
pnpm. This change maintains consistency with the monorepo structure and the use ofpnpmas the package manager.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
backend/README.md (1)
59-59: Minor: Remove trailing punctuation from headingsFor better markdown consistency, consider removing the trailing colons from the following headings:
- "Building the Project:"
- "Linting the Code:"
- "Running in Production:"
This change will align with markdown best practices and resolve the Markdownlint warnings.
Also applies to: 67-67, 75-75
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md (4)
36-41: LGTM: Frontend run instructions updated for monorepoThe updated instructions for running the frontend application are well-aligned with the mono repo structure. Using
pnpm frontend devfrom the root directory is an excellent practice for managing multiple workspaces in a monorepo.For added clarity, consider specifying the exact command to run:
# In the root directory of the repository and run. -pnpm frontend dev +pnpm run frontend:devThis assumes that you have a script named
frontend:devin your rootpackage.jsonthat runs the frontend development server.
50-50: LGTM: Commands updated to use pnpmThe update of all commands to use
pnpminstead ofnpmis consistent with the mono repo structure and aligns with the PR objectives. This change ensures consistency across the project and simplifies the development workflow.Consider adding a command for running all workspaces simultaneously, which is a common practice in monorepos. For example:
pnpm run devThis command could start both the frontend and backend services, making it easier for developers to work on the entire project.
Also applies to: 58-58, 66-66, 74-74, 82-82, 90-90
Line range hint
93-124: LGTM: Directory structure updated for pnpmThe removal of
package-lock.jsonfrom the directory structure is consistent with the switch topnpmand the mono repo approach. This change helps prevent confusion and ensures that developers are aware of the correct lock file being used.Consider adding the
pnpm-lock.yamlfile to the directory structure to accurately represent the new setup:├── package.json # Project metadata and dependencies definition +├── pnpm-lock.yaml # pnpm lock file for consistent dependency versions ├── README.md # Project description file (this file) ├── tsconfig.json # TypeScript configuration fileThis addition will help developers understand the complete project structure in the context of the new mono repo setup.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
47-47: Minor: Consider removing trailing punctuation from headingsThe static analysis tool Markdownlint has flagged several instances of trailing punctuation (colons) in headings. While this doesn't affect the functionality of the README, removing these would improve adherence to Markdown best practices. Consider updating the following headings:
-### Running the Development Server: +### Running the Development Server -### Building the Project: +### Building the Project -### Linting the Code: +### Linting the Code -### Previewing the Production Build: +### Previewing the Production Build -### Formatting the Code: +### Formatting the Code -### Checking Code Formatting: +### Checking Code FormattingThese changes will improve the overall consistency and style of the README.
Also applies to: 55-55, 63-63, 71-71, 79-79, 87-87
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (1 hunks)
- MAINTAINING.md (1 hunks)
- backend/README.md (2 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml
- MAINTAINING.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
backend/README.md
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
backend/README.md (4)
30-33: LGTM: Updated dependency installation instructionsThe changes to the dependency installation instructions are clear and align well with the new monorepo structure. Installing dependencies from the root directory using
pnpmis the correct approach for a monorepo setup.
36-41: LGTM: Updated backend application run instructionsThe changes to the backend application run instructions are appropriate for the monorepo structure. Running the backend using
pnpm backend start:devfrom the root directory is the correct approach.The previous suggestion to remove redundant instructions for running from the backend directory has been implemented, which simplifies the instructions and encourages consistent usage of the monorepo structure.
54-54: LGTM: Updated commands to use pnpmThe changes to use
pnpminstead ofnpmfor building, linting, testing, and running the project in production are correct and consistent with the monorepo structure and chosen package manager.Also applies to: 62-62, 70-70, 78-78
43-43: FYI: Bare URL in READMEThe Markdownlint tool flagged the use of a bare URL on line 43. While it's generally recommended to use formatted links in markdown, in this case, the bare URL (http://localhost:3000) is acceptable as it's a common practice for local development server addresses in documentation.
No action is required, but if you prefer strict adherence to markdown best practices, you could format the URL like this:
Visit [http://localhost:3000](http://localhost:3000) to enjoy your CodePair.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
frontend/README.md (2)
30-33: LGTM: Installation instructions updated for monorepo structureThe changes to the installation instructions align well with the PR objective of introducing a mono repo structure. Installing dependencies from the root directory using
pnpmis a common and efficient practice in monorepos. This update will help streamline the development process and ensure consistency across the project.
Line range hint
1-124: Overall: README successfully updated for mono repo structureThe changes made to the
frontend/README.mdfile successfully align with the PR objectives of introducing a mono repo structure for the CodePair project. Key improvements include:
- Updated installation and run instructions to work from the root directory.
- Consistent use of
pnpminstead ofnpmfor all package management commands.- Removal of
package-lock.jsonfrom the directory structure, reflecting the switch topnpm.These changes will help streamline the development process, improve consistency across the project, and facilitate better collaboration among teams. The README now provides clear guidance for developers working within the new mono repo structure.
To further enhance the documentation:
- Consider adding instructions for running all workspaces simultaneously.
- Include the
pnpm-lock.yamlfile in the directory structure.- Address minor Markdown style issues for improved consistency.
Overall, these updates significantly contribute to achieving the goals outlined in the PR objectives and linked issue #351.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After this PR is merged, we can discuss unifying the lint rules for the frontend and backend.
And, I checked about the disk saving.
Disk Savings
npm
- Frontend: 409M
- Backend: 693M
pnpm
- Global: 983M
- Frontend: 28K
- Backend: 76K
We saved approximately 10% of disk space.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
MAINTAINING.md (1)
9-9: LGTM! Consider adding clarification onimport.meta.env.PACKAGE_VERSION.The updated instruction correctly reflects the global version management in the monorepo structure. This change aligns well with the PR objectives and addresses the concerns raised in previous comments.
Consider adding a note about the
import.meta.env.PACKAGE_VERSIONissue mentioned in the past comments. For example:- CodePair uses global version management. Update the `version` field only in the root `package.json` file when making a release. Note: If you're using `import.meta.env.PACKAGE_VERSION` in your code, you may need to configure your build tool to inject this value from the root `package.json`.This additional information could help prevent potential confusion for developers working on the project.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (3 hunks)
- MAINTAINING.md (1 hunks)
- backend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (2 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml
- backend/eslint.config.mjs
- frontend/package.json
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
MAINTAINING.md
7-7: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
MAINTAINING.md (1)
Line range hint
1-41: Overall, the changes effectively update the maintenance instructions for the monorepo structure.The modifications to the version update process in this file align well with the PR objectives of introducing a monorepo structure. The instructions have been simplified and clarified, which should help maintain consistency across the project.
These changes, combined with the monorepo structure, should streamline the development process and improve version management for the CodePair project.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
7-7: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
11-11: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
backend/package.json (6)
22-27: LGTM on lint-staged configuration update.The update to use pnpm in the lint-staged configuration aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of using pnpm for managing the monorepo. This change ensures consistency in package management across the project.
34-34: Please provide context for adding @langchain/openai dependency.The addition of "@langchain/openai" suggests integration with OpenAI's language models. Could you please provide more context on how this aligns with the PR objectives or if it's part of a separate feature implementation?
To help understand the usage of this new dependency:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of @langchain/openai in the codebase if grep -r "@langchain/openai" . --exclude="package.json" --exclude-dir="node_modules"; then echo "Found references to @langchain/openai in the codebase." else echo "No references to @langchain/openai found outside package.json." fi
8-8: LGTM on script changes, but verifypreparescript removal.The addition of the "db:generate" script and reordering of lint and format scripts are positive changes that align with the monorepo structure and improve maintainability.
However, the removal of the
preparescript (as mentioned in the AI summary) needs verification:#!/bin/bash # Check for any references to the prepare script in the project if grep -r "prepare" . --exclude="package.json" --exclude-dir="node_modules"; then echo "Found references to the 'prepare' script. Please ensure its removal doesn't break any setup processes." else echo "No references to the 'prepare' script found outside package.json." fiAlso applies to: 18-20
55-71:⚠️ Potential issueConcern: Removal of ESLint dependencies.
The AI summary mentions the removal of several ESLint-related dependencies. This change wasn't mentioned in the PR objectives and could significantly impact the project's linting capabilities and code quality checks. Could you please provide the rationale behind this decision?
To verify the impact of removing these dependencies:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining ESLint configuration files if find . -name ".eslintrc*" -not -path "*/node_modules/*"; then echo "Found ESLint configuration files. Please ensure they are updated or removed if ESLint is no longer used." else echo "No ESLint configuration files found." fi # Check for any remaining usage of ESLint in scripts if grep -r "eslint" . --exclude="package.json" --exclude-dir="node_modules"; then echo "Found references to ESLint in the project. Please update or remove these references." else echo "No references to ESLint found outside package.json." fi
55-71:⚠️ Potential issueConcern: Removal of Prettier dependency.
The AI summary indicates that the Prettier dependency has been removed. This change wasn't mentioned in the PR objectives and could impact the project's code formatting consistency. Could you please explain the reasoning behind this decision and how code formatting will be managed going forward?
To verify the impact of removing Prettier:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining Prettier configuration files if find . -name ".prettierrc*" -not -path "*/node_modules/*"; then echo "Found Prettier configuration files. Please ensure they are updated or removed if Prettier is no longer used." else echo "No Prettier configuration files found." fi # Check for any remaining usage of Prettier in scripts if grep -r "prettier" . --exclude="package.json" --exclude-dir="node_modules"; then echo "Found references to Prettier in the project. Please update or remove these references." else echo "No references to Prettier found outside package.json." fi
2-2: LGTM on package name change, but verifyprivatefield removal.The package name change to "@codepair/backend" aligns well with the monorepo structure. It follows the scoped package naming convention, which is appropriate for organizing related packages.
However, the removal of the
privatefield (as mentioned in the AI summary) needs verification:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
34-34:⚠️ Potential issueConfirm the usage of
pnpm deploycommandThe
pnpm deploycommand is experimental and may not be stable for production use. Additionally, the--prodflag in this context might not be valid. Verify that this command behaves as intended and produces the desired output at/prod/backend.Run the following script to check the
pnpm deploycommand:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of 'pnpm deploy' command. # Test: Check if 'pnpm deploy' is recognized and functions as expected. Expect: Command executes without errors. pnpm help deploy && echo "'pnpm deploy' is available" || echo "'pnpm deploy' is not recognized"
31-31: Ensure BuildKit is enabled for cache mountsThe
--mountoption in theRUNcommand requires Docker BuildKit to be enabled. Without BuildKit, the build will fail. Make sure that the build environment has BuildKit enabled.Run the following script to verify if BuildKit is enabled:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if Docker BuildKit is enabled. # Test: Build a simple Dockerfile using BuildKit features. Expect: Build succeeds. echo -e 'FROM alpine\nRUN --mount=type=cache,target=/tmp cache test' > Dockerfile.test DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1 docker build -f Dockerfile.test . && echo "BuildKit is enabled" || echo "BuildKit is not enabled" rm Dockerfile.test
choidabom
force-pushed
the
introdcue-mono-repo
branch
from
c9d9e65 to
705d825
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
MAINTAINING.md (1)
7-7: Minor: Remove trailing period from headingTo maintain consistent markdown formatting, consider removing the trailing period from the heading.
Apply this change:
-### 1. Update the version number. +### 1. Update the version number🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
7-7: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
backend/design/auth-webhook.md (2)
Line range hint
1-11: Improved webhook definition, but consider retaining the documentation link.The updated introduction provides a clearer and more comprehensive explanation of the Yorkie Auth Webhook's purpose and functionality. This improvement enhances the reader's understanding of the concept.
However, consider retaining the removed link to the Yorkie Auth Webhook documentation (previously on line 9). While the current explanation is more detailed, the link could still be valuable for users seeking additional information or official documentation.
Line range hint
34-41: Setup instructions improved, consider adding a troubleshooting section.The rephrasing of the setup instructions enhances clarity, making it easier for developers to configure the Auth Webhook. Retaining the note about potential issues with localhost is crucial for those working in local development environments.
To further improve this section, consider adding a brief troubleshooting guide or linking to one. This could help developers quickly resolve common setup issues, especially those related to local development environments.
backend/README.md (3)
36-41: LGTM with suggestion: Simplify backend application run instructionsThe updated instructions for running the backend application are clear and consistent with the monorepo structure. However, to further improve clarity and encourage consistent usage of the monorepo setup, consider removing the option to run from the backend directory, as suggested in a previous review.
You can update the section as follows:
5. Run the Backend application: ```bash # In the root directory of the repository and run. pnpm backend start:dev ``` - - # Navigate to the 'backend' directory and run application. - cd backend - pnpm run start:devThis change maintains clarity while promoting the use of the monorepo structure.
59-59: Suggestion: Remove trailing punctuation from headingsTo improve consistency and adhere to common Markdown style guidelines, consider removing the trailing colons from the following headings:
- ### Building the Project: + ### Building the Project - ### Linting the Code: + ### Linting the Code - ### Running in Production: + ### Running in ProductionThis change will resolve the MD026 (no-trailing-punctuation) warnings from the Markdownlint static analysis tool.
Also applies to: 67-67, 75-75
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
43-43: Suggestion: Use proper link formatting for the URLTo improve the markdown formatting and resolve the MD034 (no-bare-urls) warning, consider wrapping the URL in angle brackets:
- 6. Visit http://localhost:3000 to enjoy your CodePair. + 6. Visit <http://localhost:3000> to enjoy your CodePair.This change will make the URL clickable in most Markdown renderers while adhering to common Markdown best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
README.md (2)
71-75: LGTM: Frontend run command updated for monorepoThe updated command
pnpm frontend devis consistent with the monorepo structure and simplifies the process for developers. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider adding a brief comment explaining that this command uses workspace-aware scripts, which might be helpful for developers new to monorepos:
4. Run the Frontend application. ```bash + # This command uses workspace-aware scripts defined in the root package.json pnpm frontend dev ```
104-108: LGTM: Backend and Frontend run commands updated for monorepoThe updated commands
pnpm backend start:devandpnpm frontend devare consistent with the monorepo structure and simplify the process for developers working on both frontend and backend. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider adding a brief comment explaining that these commands use workspace-aware scripts, which might be helpful for developers new to monorepos:
4. Run the Backend application and the Frontend application: ```bash + # These commands use workspace-aware scripts defined in the root package.json pnpm backend start:dev pnpm frontend dev ```frontend/README.md (4)
30-33: LGTM! Updated package manager and instructions for monorepo structure.The changes to use
pnpmand run commands from the root directory align well with the PR objective of introducing a monorepo structure. This is consistent with the approach mentioned in the Yorkie-JS-SDK project.For added clarity, consider adding a note about the monorepo structure at the beginning of the "Getting Started" section. For example:
## Getting Started > Note: This project now uses a monorepo structure. All commands should be run from the root directory of the repository. 1. Set Up GitHub OAuth Key ...Also applies to: 36-41
50-50: LGTM! Consistently updated all commands to use pnpm.The changes to use
pnpmfor all commands are consistent with the switch to a monorepo structure and align with the PR objectives.For consistency with the previous instructions about running commands from the root directory, consider updating each command to include this information. For example:
# Run this command from the root directory pnpm frontend devThis change would make it clear that these commands should also be run from the root of the monorepo.
Also applies to: 58-58, 66-66, 74-74, 82-82, 90-90
Line range hint
90-138: LGTM! Removed package-lock.json from directory structure.The removal of
package-lock.jsonfrom the directory structure is consistent with the switch topnpm, which uses a different lock file format (pnpm-lock.yaml).For completeness, consider adding the
pnpm-lock.yamlfile to the directory structure. This would accurately reflect the new package management approach. For example:├── pnpm-lock.yaml # pnpm lock file for dependency versioning🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
47-47: Consider removing trailing colons from headings for consistent style.The static analysis tool Markdownlint has flagged several headings with trailing colons. While this doesn't affect functionality, removing these colons would improve the consistency of the document style.
Here are the affected headings:
- Line 47: "Running the Development Server:"
- Line 55: "Building the Project:"
- Line 63: "Linting the Code:"
- Line 71: "Previewing the Production Build:"
- Line 79: "Formatting the Code:"
- Line 87: "Checking Code Formatting:"
Consider removing the colon (:) from the end of each of these headings.
Also applies to: 55-55, 63-63, 71-71, 79-79, 87-87
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
backend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonfrontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (3 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- MAINTAINING.md (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/.eslintrc.js (0 hunks)
- backend/Dockerfile (0 hunks)
- backend/README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/design/README.md (1 hunks)
- backend/design/architecture.md (1 hunks)
- backend/design/auth-webhook.md (3 hunks)
- backend/docker/docker-compose-full.yml (1 hunks)
- backend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- backend/nest-cli.json (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/test/jest-e2e.json (1 hunks)
- backend/tsconfig.build.json (1 hunks)
- backend/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/.eslintrc.cjs (0 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
- frontend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (2 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- backend/.eslintrc.js
- backend/Dockerfile
- frontend/.eslintrc.cjs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- backend/design/README.md
- backend/design/architecture.md
- backend/nest-cli.json
- backend/test/jest-e2e.json
- backend/tsconfig.build.json
- backend/tsconfig.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml
- Dockerfile
- backend/eslint.config.mjs
- backend/package.json
- backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts
- frontend/eslint.config.mjs
- frontend/package.json
- package.json
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
MAINTAINING.md
7-7: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
README.md
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
backend/README.md
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
MAINTAINING.md (1)
9-9: LGTM! Consider addressingimport.meta.env.PACKAGE_VERSIONissue.The update to use global version management in the root
package.jsonaligns well with the monorepo structure. This change simplifies version management and is consistent with the PR objectives.However, based on the past comments, there's a concern about
import.meta.env.PACKAGE_VERSIONbeing undefined when using global version management. This might affect the frontend, which usesvite-plugin-package-version.To address this, let's verify the current setup:
Based on the results, we may need to update the vite config or consider alternative ways to inject the version into the frontend. Would you like assistance in resolving this issue?
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
import.meta.env.PACKAGE_VERSIONis correctly configured usingvite-plugin-package-version.The
vite-plugin-package-versionis present infrontend/vite.config.ts, and both the root and frontendpackage.jsonfiles have synchronized version fields. This confirms that global version management is properly implemented andPACKAGE_VERSIONshould be correctly injected into the frontend.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the vite config and package.json files # Check if vite config exists and contains vite-plugin-package-version if [ -f "frontend/vite.config.ts" ]; then echo "Content of frontend/vite.config.ts:" cat frontend/vite.config.ts else echo "frontend/vite.config.ts not found" fi # Check root package.json if [ -f "package.json" ]; then echo "Content of root package.json:" cat package.json else echo "Root package.json not found" fi # Check frontend package.json if [ -f "frontend/package.json" ]; then echo "Content of frontend/package.json:" cat frontend/package.json else echo "frontend/package.json not found" fiLength of output: 5245
backend/design/auth-webhook.md (2)
30-32: Excellent addition of webhook URL and token format details.The inclusion of the specific webhook URL format and token structure is a valuable addition to the document. This information is crucial for developers implementing the webhook and helps prevent potential errors in configuration.
Line range hint
1-41: Overall, significant improvements to the Auth Webhook documentation.The changes made to this document have enhanced its clarity and usefulness. The introduction now provides a more comprehensive explanation of the Auth Webhook, the addition of specific URL and token formats is valuable for implementation, and the setup instructions are clearer. These improvements will help developers better understand and implement the Auth Webhook in their projects.
While there are minor suggestions for further enhancements (such as retaining the documentation link and adding a troubleshooting section), the overall changes are positive and contribute to a more informative and user-friendly document.
backend/docker/docker-compose-full.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-73: Summary of docker-compose-full.yml reviewThe changes made to this file appear to be minimal but significant in the context of transitioning to a mono repo structure. The primary modification involves adjusting the build context for the codepair-backend service, which is likely to accommodate the new project layout.
Key points and recommendations:
- The change in build context needs to be verified to ensure it correctly points to the backend service root in the new structure.
- While other configurations remain unchanged, it's crucial to validate that all services and their respective configurations are still valid and functional within the mono repo setup.
- Consider implementing a more centralized approach to environment variable management, such as using .env files or Docker Compose's
env_filedirective, to streamline configuration across services in the mono repo.- Update any related documentation to reflect the new project structure and any changes in how to run or deploy the services.
The changes appear to be in line with the objectives of introducing a mono repo structure. However, thorough testing of the entire system setup is recommended to ensure all services interact correctly in the new configuration.
Line range hint
7-73: Verify environment variables and service configurations in the mono repo structureWhile the change in build context is the only modification in this file, it's crucial to ensure that the transition to a mono repo structure doesn't inadvertently affect the configuration of services or management of environment variables.
Please verify the following:
- All environment variables for the codepair-backend service are still valid and accessible in the new project structure.
- The configurations for yorkie, yorkie-intelligence, and mongo services remain appropriate in the context of the mono repo.
Consider the following suggestions to enhance configuration management in the mono repo:
- Implement a centralized .env file management system for easier maintenance across services.
- Use Docker Compose's
env_filedirective to load environment variables from files, which can be version-controlled and environment-specific.#!/bin/bash # Check for potential .env files in the new structure # Check for .env files in the root and backend directories echo "Checking for .env files:" find ../../ -maxdepth 2 -name ".env*" # Verify if docker-compose.yml files exist in other directories echo "Checking for other docker-compose files:" find ../../ -name "docker-compose*.yml" # List directories that might contain service-specific configurations echo "Potential service configuration directories:" ls -d ../../*/This script will help identify any existing .env files and other docker-compose configurations that might need to be consolidated or updated in the new mono repo structure.
backend/README.md (2)
30-33: LGTM: Updated dependency installation instructionsThe changes to the dependency installation instructions are appropriate for the new monorepo structure. Using
pnpmand installing from the root directory are correct practices for a monorepo setup.
54-54: LGTM: Updated commands to use pnpmThe changes to use
pnpminstead ofnpmfor building, linting, testing, and running the application in production are correct and consistent with the monorepo structure.Also applies to: 62-62, 70-70, 78-78
README.md (3)
65-68: LGTM: Dependency installation aligned with monorepo structureThe change to use
pnpm installfrom the root directory aligns well with the PR objective of introducing a mono repo structure. This approach simplifies the development workflow and is consistent with the mentioned Yorkie-JS-SDK project's practices.
98-101: LGTM: Consistent dependency installation for Full Stack modeThe update to use
pnpm installfrom the root directory in the Full Stack Development Mode is consistent with the earlier change in the Frontend Development Only Mode. This consistency across different development modes aligns well with the PR objectives and simplifies the overall development process.
77-77: No action needed: Bare URL acceptable for local developmentThe static analysis tool flagged a bare URL (http://localhost:5173) on this line. While it's generally good practice to use formatted links in Markdown, for local development instructions, using a bare URL is acceptable and common practice. In this context, formatting the URL would provide minimal benefit and might reduce readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
frontend/README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Great job updating the README for the new monorepo structure!The changes in this file effectively communicate the switch to a monorepo structure using
pnpm. All updates are consistent and align well with the PR objectives of streamlining the development process and ensuring consistency across the codebase. The README now accurately reflects the new development workflow, which will facilitate better collaboration among teams.Some minor suggestions have been made to further improve clarity and consistency, but overall, this is a solid update that supports the goals of the PR.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
choidabom
force-pushed
the
introdcue-mono-repo
branch
from
4873db1 to
a53ee47
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
frontend/eslint.config.mjs (2)
9-10: Consider lintingvite.config.tsThe file patterns and ignores are generally appropriate. However, you might want to consider linting
vite.config.tsfor consistency across your TypeScript files. This can help catch potential issues in your Vite configuration.If you decide to lint
vite.config.ts, you can modify line 10 as follows:- ignores: ["dist", "eslint.config.mjs", "vite.config.ts"], + ignores: ["dist", "eslint.config.mjs"],
26-34: Consider adding more TypeScript and React specific rulesThe current rules and settings are good, but they might be insufficient for a comprehensive TypeScript React project. While treating Prettier issues as errors and optimizing for Fast Refresh are good practices, consider adding more TypeScript and React specific rules.
Here are some suggestions:
- Add rules for React Hooks:
"react-hooks/rules-of-hooks": "error", "react-hooks/exhaustive-deps": "warn",
- Add some TypeScript specific rules:
"@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "warn", "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "warn", "@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": ["error", { "argsIgnorePattern": "^_" }],
- Consider adding some general best practices:
"no-console": "warn", "eqeqeq": "error",These are just suggestions and should be tailored to your team's coding standards and preferences.
backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (2)
19-19: LGTM: Method signature update enhances flexibility.The updated
canActivatemethod signaturecanActivate(context: ExecutionContext): boolean | Promise<boolean> | Observable<boolean>improves flexibility by allowing synchronous, promise-based, and observable-based return types. This change aligns well with NestJS guard patterns and doesn't affect the existing logic.For consistency with NestJS best practices, consider using the
CanActivateinterface from@nestjs/common. You can update the class declaration as follows:import { CanActivate } from '@nestjs/common'; @Injectable() export class JwtAuthGuard extends AuthGuard('jwt') implements CanActivate { // ... rest of the class }This change would make the intent of the class clearer and ensure it adheres to the expected interface.
Line range hint
1-41: Overall, these changes enhance the guard's flexibility and type safety.The modifications to
JwtAuthGuardare well-aligned with the PR objectives of improving codebase structure and consistency. The updated method signature and new import enhance the guard's flexibility without affecting its core functionality. These changes make the guard more robust and compatible with various NestJS patterns, which is beneficial for a monorepo structure where consistency across components is crucial.As you continue with the monorepo transition, consider applying similar updates to other guards and services to maintain consistency across the codebase. This will help in achieving the goal of improved maintainability and collaboration mentioned in the PR objectives.
package.json (2)
8-17: LGTM: Well-structured scripts with room for enhancement.The scripts are well-organized and make good use of pnpm features for monorepo management. The parallel execution of lint and format scripts is efficient.
Consider adding a
buildscript that runs both frontend and backend builds in parallel:"build": "pnpm run --parallel frontend:build backend:build"This would streamline the build process for the entire project.
18-27: LGTM: Comprehensive devDependencies with potential for version updates.The devDependencies cover essential tools for maintaining code quality, including linting, formatting, and type checking.
Consider updating the following packages to their latest stable versions:
- Update
@typescript-eslint/eslint-pluginand@typescript-eslint/parserto version 6.x.x (current latest is 6.21.0).- Update
eslintto version 8.x.x (current latest is 8.56.0).Ensure that the versions of related packages are compatible with each other after updating.
backend/package.json (2)
10-10: LGTM! Script updates align with project changes.The script changes look good:
- The new "db:generate" script is helpful for managing Prisma schema changes.
- The updated lint and format scripts now cover the entire project directory, improving consistency.
- The switch to pnpm in lint-staged aligns with the project's move to pnpm.
Consider adding a "db:push" script for convenience:
"scripts": { "db:generate": "prisma generate --schema=prisma/schema.prisma", + "db:push": "prisma db push --schema=prisma/schema.prisma", // ... other scripts }This addition would make it easier to push schema changes to the database during development.
Also applies to: 20-22, 26-27
36-36: LGTM! New dependency added for AI integration.The addition of "@langchain/openai" suggests integration of OpenAI's language models, which aligns with AI-powered features in CodePair.
Consider adding a brief comment in the project's documentation (e.g., README.md) about the purpose of this new dependency and any setup requirements for developers.
backend/README.md (2)
30-43: LGTM with suggestion: Simplify backend application run instructionsThe updated instructions for running the backend application are clear and consistent with the monorepo structure. However, to further simplify the instructions and encourage consistent usage, consider implementing the suggestion from the previous review:
Remove the option to run from the backend directory, as it's redundant in a monorepo setup. Update the section as follows:
5. Run the Backend application: ```bash # In the root directory of the repository and run. pnpm backend start:dev ```This change maintains clarity while promoting the use of the monorepo structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
43-43: Minor improvements for README formatting
- On line 43, consider wrapping the bare URL in angle brackets to improve markdown formatting:
-6. Visit http://localhost:3000 to enjoy your CodePair. +6. Visit <http://localhost:3000> to enjoy your CodePair.
- As a minor stylistic consideration, you may want to remove the trailing colons from the headings "Building the Project:", "Linting the Code:", and "Testing:". However, this is a matter of preference and doesn't affect the functionality of the README.
Also applies to: 59-59, 67-67, 75-75
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
README.md (2)
77-77: Consider using a proper Markdown link format for the URL.While adding the URL is helpful for users, it's better to use the proper Markdown link format for improved accessibility and maintainability.
Consider changing the line to:
5. Visit [http://localhost:5173](http://localhost:5173) to enjoy your CodePair.This format makes the link more clickable and adheres to Markdown best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Line range hint
1-150: Excellent updates to the README!The changes effectively communicate the new monorepo structure and provide clear instructions for both frontend-only and full-stack development. The document maintains a good balance of information and readability.
One suggestion for further improvement:
Consider adding a brief explanation of why the project has moved to a monorepo structure and the benefits it brings. This could be added just after the "Packages" section. For example:
## Monorepo Structure This project uses a monorepo structure to manage both frontend and backend code in a single repository. This approach offers several benefits: - Simplified dependency management - Easier code sharing between frontend and backend - Streamlined development workflow - Improved consistency across the project We use pnpm for package management to efficiently handle dependencies in this monorepo structure.This addition would provide context for the structural changes and align with the PR objectives.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~79-~79: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...:5173 to enjoy your CodePair. ### 3-2. Full Stack Development Mode 1. Update your `GITHU...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
🪛 Markdownlint
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
frontend/README.md (3)
30-33: LGTM! Consider adding a note about pnpm installation.The change from
npm installtopnpm installis correct and aligns with the transition to a monorepo structure using pnpm. The instruction to run the command from the root directory is crucial for the new setup.Consider adding a note about installing pnpm if it's not already installed, as some users might not be familiar with it. For example:
4. Install dependencies from the root. ```bash # If pnpm is not installed, you can install it globally using: # npm install -g pnpm pnpm install ```
36-41: LGTM! Consider clarifying the workspace structure.The updated instructions for running the Frontend application are correct and align with the monorepo structure using pnpm. The new command
pnpm frontend devindicates a workspace setup, which is appropriate for a monorepo.To provide more context for users unfamiliar with monorepo structures, consider adding a brief explanation of the workspace setup. For example:
5. Run the Frontend application: ```bash # In the root directory of the repository, run: pnpm frontend dev ``` Note: The `frontend` in the command refers to the workspace name in our monorepo structure.
Line range hint
1-140: Overall, the README updates align well with the monorepo transition.The changes in this README file successfully reflect the transition from npm to pnpm and the new monorepo structure. The instructions for installation and running the frontend application have been appropriately updated to use pnpm and reference the frontend workspace.
To further improve the README:
Consider adding a brief explanation of the monorepo structure at the beginning of the document. This will help users understand the context of the
frontendworkspace references in the commands.You might want to include a section about the benefits of the new monorepo structure and how it affects the development workflow. This could help team members and contributors understand the rationale behind the changes.
If there are any new scripts or commands specific to the monorepo setup (e.g., for running both frontend and backend simultaneously), consider adding them to the README.
These additions would provide a more comprehensive guide to working with the new project structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
backend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonfrontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (3 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- MAINTAINING.md (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/.eslintrc.js (0 hunks)
- backend/Dockerfile (0 hunks)
- backend/README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/design/README.md (1 hunks)
- backend/design/architecture.md (1 hunks)
- backend/design/auth-webhook.md (3 hunks)
- backend/docker/docker-compose-full.yml (1 hunks)
- backend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- backend/nest-cli.json (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (3 hunks)
- backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/test/jest-e2e.json (1 hunks)
- backend/tsconfig.build.json (1 hunks)
- backend/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/.eslintrc.cjs (0 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
- frontend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (2 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- backend/.eslintrc.js
- backend/Dockerfile
- frontend/.eslintrc.cjs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- backend/design/README.md
- backend/design/architecture.md
- backend/design/auth-webhook.md
- backend/nest-cli.json
- backend/test/jest-e2e.json
- backend/tsconfig.build.json
- backend/tsconfig.json
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
MAINTAINING.md
7-7: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
README.md
77-77: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
backend/README.md
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (42)
backend/eslint.config.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The imports for TypeScript ESLint plugin, parser, and Prettier plugin are correctly included and necessary for the configuration.
5-21: LGTM: Configuration setup is well-structured and follows best practices.The ESLint configuration is correctly exported and well-structured. It properly targets TypeScript files, ignores the
distdirectory and itself, sets up language options for TypeScript with JSX support, and includes the necessary plugins.
5-29: LGTM: Overall structure and exports are correct.The configuration is correctly exported as a default array with a single object, following the new flat config format for ESLint. This structure allows for easy extension in the future if additional configuration objects are needed.
22-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider enabling some of the disabled TypeScript rules for better type safety.
While the current configuration provides flexibility, it might compromise some of TypeScript's type safety benefits. Consider the following suggestions:
- Keep
@typescript-eslint/interface-name-prefixoff as it's a stylistic choice.- Enable
@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-typefor public APIs to improve type clarity.- Enable
@typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-typesto ensure proper type inference at module boundaries.- The
@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-anyrule is correctly set to "error", which is good for maintaining type safety.Here's a suggested modification:
rules: { "@typescript-eslint/interface-name-prefix": "off", - "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "off", - "@typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-types": "off", + "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": ["error", { "allowExpressions": true }], + "@typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-types": "error", "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "error", },These changes will enforce stricter type checking, aligning better with TypeScript best practices and helping prevent potential bugs.
frontend/eslint.config.mjs (4)
1-5: Imports look good and are appropriate for the project.The necessary plugins and parsers for TypeScript and React are correctly imported. The naming conventions are clear and consistent.
11-19: Language options are well-configured for TypeScript and React.The parser and parser options are correctly set up for a TypeScript React project. Referencing
tsconfig.jsonensures consistency with your TypeScript compiler options, and JSX features are properly enabled.
20-25: Plugins are correctly configured.All necessary plugins for a TypeScript React project are included and properly registered. This setup will enable effective linting for your project.
1-36: Overall, a solid ESLint configuration with room for enhancementThis ESLint configuration provides a good foundation for a TypeScript React project. It correctly sets up the necessary parsers, plugins, and basic rules. The use of the new flat config format is forward-thinking and will ease future updates.
However, there are opportunities to enhance this configuration:
- Consider linting
vite.config.tsfor consistency.- Add more TypeScript and React specific rules to catch common issues and enforce best practices.
These enhancements will lead to more robust linting, potentially catching more issues early in the development process and ensuring higher code quality across the project.
backend/src/auth/jwt.guard.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM: Import addition is correct and necessary.The addition of
import { Observable } from "rxjs";is appropriate and necessary for the updatedcanActivatemethod signature. This import is consistent with NestJS practices..github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (7)
1-1: LGTM: Formatting directive added.The addition of the formatting directive
# @formatis a good practice for maintaining consistent formatting across the project files.
27-30: LGTM: Improved step naming and pnpm setup.The changes in this segment are beneficial:
- Renaming the checkout step to "Checkout 🛎️" improves clarity.
- Adding the pnpm installation step using
pnpm/action-setup@v4is correct and necessary for the transition to pnpm.These changes align well with the PR objectives of transitioning to a monorepo structure using pnpm.
35-35: LGTM: Updated cache configuration for pnpm.The change to use
cache: "pnpm"in the Node.js setup step is correct and necessary for the transition to pnpm. This ensures that the pnpm cache is properly utilized in the CI process, which can significantly speed up subsequent runs.
37-37: LGTM: Correct pnpm installation command with frozen lockfile.The update to
pnpm install --frozen-lockfileis correct and addresses a previous concern. This command:
- Aligns with the transition to pnpm.
- Ensures reproducible installations in CI environments, equivalent to
npm ci.Great job on implementing this best practice for CI workflows!
40-40: LGTM: Updated Prettier check command for pnpm.The change to
pnpm run format:checkis correct and consistent with the transition to pnpm. This ensures that the Prettier formatting check is executed using the new package manager.
43-43: LGTM: Updated lint and build commands for pnpm.The changes to use
pnpm run lintandpnpm run buildare correct and consistent with the transition to pnpm. This ensures that both the linting and build processes are executed using the new package manager.Also applies to: 46-46
Line range hint
1-47: Great job on transitioning the CI workflow to pnpm!The changes in this file successfully implement the transition from npm to pnpm in the frontend CI workflow. Key improvements include:
- Proper setup of pnpm using the official GitHub Action.
- Correct usage of pnpm commands for installation, linting, formatting, and building.
- Implementation of best practices like using
--frozen-lockfilefor reproducible builds.These changes align well with the PR objectives of introducing a monorepo structure and streamlining the development process. The workflow is now consistent with the use of pnpm throughout the project, which should improve efficiency and maintainability.
package.json (1)
1-7: LGTM: Project metadata is well-defined.The project metadata is comprehensive and appropriate. The name, version, description, author, and license are all correctly specified.
.github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (5)
17-18: LGTM: Proper pnpm setupThe addition of the pnpm installation step using the official
pnpm/action-setup@v4action is correct and follows best practices for integrating pnpm into GitHub Actions workflows.
23-24: LGTM: Correct pnpm caching configurationThe changes to use "pnpm" as the cache type and
pnpm-lock.yamlas the cache dependency path are correct for a pnpm-based monorepo setup. This properly addresses the previous comment about not utilizingpnpm-lock.yaml.
38-38: LGTM: Correct pnpm install commandThe update to use
pnpm install --frozen-lockfileis correct and follows best practices for CI environments. This change properly addresses the previous comment suggesting this exact modification.
39-39: LGTM: Correct pnpm build commandThe update to use
pnpm run buildis correct and consistent with the transition to pnpm as the package manager for the project.
Line range hint
1-39: Overall: Successful transition to pnpm in GitHub Actions workflowThe changes in this file successfully transition the GitHub Pages publish workflow from npm to pnpm. All necessary updates have been made, including:
- Installing pnpm
- Updating cache configuration
- Modifying install and build commands
These changes are consistent with best practices for using pnpm in a monorepo structure and address all previous comments. The workflow is now properly configured to work with the new project structure.
.github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (6)
27-30: LGTM: Proper setup for pnpmThe update to
actions/checkout@v4and the addition ofpnpm/action-setup@v4are appropriate changes for transitioning to pnpm. This ensures that pnpm is correctly installed and available for subsequent steps.
35-35: LGTM: Correct cache configuration for pnpmThe cache strategy has been correctly updated to use "pnpm". This ensures that the correct dependencies are cached, improving workflow efficiency.
37-40: LGTM: Proper pnpm usage and Prisma setupThe changes here are appropriate:
- Using
pnpm install --frozen-lockfileensures consistent installations in CI, addressing the previous comment about utilizingpnpm-lock.yaml.- The addition of the Prisma generation step is crucial for database-related operations.
- Specifying the working directory ensures commands run in the correct location.
These changes align well with best practices for pnpm and Prisma in a CI environment.
43-46: LGTM: Consistent use of pnpm for Prettier and LintThe Prettier and Lint commands have been correctly updated to use pnpm, maintaining consistency with the overall transition. The working directory specification ensures these commands run in the correct location.
49-50: LGTM: Consistent use of pnpm for BuildThe Build command has been correctly updated to use pnpm, maintaining consistency with the overall transition. The working directory specification ensures this command runs in the correct location.
Line range hint
1-50: Overall LGTM: Successful transition to pnpm and monorepo structureThe changes in this workflow file successfully implement the transition from npm to pnpm, aligning with the PR objectives of introducing a monorepo structure. Key improvements include:
- Proper setup and usage of pnpm throughout the workflow.
- Addition of a Prisma generation step for database-related operations.
- Consistent specification of working directories for all commands.
- Use of
--frozen-lockfilefor deterministic installations in CI.These changes enhance the CI process, ensuring it's compatible with the new monorepo structure and pnpm package management. The workflow now provides a solid foundation for the backend CI in the new project structure.
backend/package.json (3)
Line range hint
74-96: Consider moving Jest configuration to a separate file.As previously suggested, it would be beneficial to move the Jest configuration to a separate file in a monorepo setup. This approach improves maintainability and makes it easier to share configurations across packages if needed.
Consider creating a
jest.config.jsfile in the backend directory with the following content:export default { moduleDirectories: ['node_modules', 'src'], moduleFileExtensions: ['js', 'json', 'ts'], roots: ['src'], testRegex: '.spec.ts$', transform: { '^.+\\.(t|j)s$': 'ts-jest', }, coverageDirectory: '../coverage', testEnvironment: 'node', moduleNameMapper: { 'src/(.*)': '<rootDir>/src/$1', }, };Then, update the "test" script in package.json to use this configuration:
"test": "jest --config jest.config.js"This change would make the Jest configuration more maintainable and aligned with monorepo best practices.
2-2: LGTM! Package name and module system updates.The package name change to "@codepair/backend" aligns well with the monorepo structure. The addition of "type": "module" indicates a shift to using ES modules, which is a modern approach.
To ensure compatibility with the new module system, please run the following script to check for any potential issues with import statements:
Also applies to: 5-5
72-72: Clarify the removal of devDependencies.I notice that several devDependencies have been removed, keeping only "tsconfig-paths". While this might be related to moving these to a root package.json in the monorepo structure, it's important to ensure that all necessary development tools are still accessible.
Could you please confirm:
- Are the removed devDependencies now managed at the root level of the monorepo?
- Have you verified that all necessary development scripts (build, test, etc.) still work correctly after this change?
To help verify this, you can run the following script:
frontend/package.json (5)
2-2: LGTM: Package name updated to use scoped format.The change from "codepair-frontend" to "@codepair/frontend" aligns well with the monorepo structure being introduced. This scoped package naming convention will help in organizing and identifying packages within the monorepo.
12-12: LGTM: Lint script updated for pnpm compatibility.The removal of the
runcommand in the lint script is correct for pnpm usage. This change aligns with the project's transition from npm to pnpm for package management.
18-19: LGTM: lint-staged configuration updated for pnpm.The lint-staged configuration has been correctly updated to use
pnpm runinstead ofnpm run. This change is consistent with the project's transition to pnpm for package management.
Line range hint
82-98: Clarify the removal of development dependencies.Several important devDependencies have been removed, including TypeScript-related packages, ESLint, and Prettier. While this might be part of the monorepo restructuring, it's crucial to ensure that these tools are still available and enforced at the project level.
Please run the following script to check if these dependencies are defined in a root package.json:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for linting and formatting dependencies in the root package.json # Test: Check for the presence of a root package.json if [ -f "./package.json" ]; then echo "Root package.json found. Checking for linting and formatting dependencies:" jq '.devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | test("typescript|eslint|prettier")))' ./package.json else echo "Root package.json not found. Please ensure linting and formatting are configured at the monorepo level." fiCould you please clarify:
- Where are the linting and formatting configurations now located in the monorepo structure?
- How will code style consistency be maintained across the frontend codebase?
- Are there any changes to the development workflow regarding TypeScript, ESLint, and Prettier usage?
25-25: LGTM: New dependencies added. Verify their usage.The addition of "@codemirror/state" and "react-router" dependencies looks good. These additions likely support code editing functionality and routing, respectively.
To ensure these new dependencies are being utilized effectively, please run the following script:
Also applies to: 67-67
backend/README.md (4)
54-54: LGTM: Updated build commandThe build command has been correctly updated to use
pnpm, which is consistent with the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm as the package manager.
62-62: LGTM: Updated lint commandThe lint command has been correctly updated to use
pnpm, which is consistent with the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm as the package manager.
70-70: LGTM: Updated test and production run commandsThe test and production run commands have been correctly updated to use
pnpm, which is consistent with the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm as the package manager.Also applies to: 78-78
Line range hint
1-120: Overall LGTM: README successfully updated for monorepo transitionThe changes to the
backend/README.mdfile successfully reflect the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm as the package manager. The updates to the installation, build, lint, test, and run commands are consistent and clear. These changes align well with the PR objectives of streamlining the development process and ensuring consistency across the codebase.A few minor suggestions have been made to further improve clarity and formatting, but overall, the README now provides accurate and up-to-date instructions for working with the backend in the new monorepo structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
51-51: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
README.md (2)
65-68: Excellent updates to the Frontend Development instructions!The changes in this section effectively reflect the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm. Specifically:
- Adding the step to install dependencies from the root (lines 65-68) ensures all necessary packages are installed before running the application.
- Simplifying the command to run the Frontend application (lines 71-75) makes it easier for developers to get started.
These updates align well with the PR objectives and should improve the developer experience.
Also applies to: 71-75
98-101: Great improvements to the Full Stack Development instructions!The changes in this section effectively support the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm:
- Adding the step to install dependencies from the root (lines 98-101) ensures all necessary packages are installed before running the applications.
- Simplifying the commands to run both Backend and Frontend applications (lines 104-108) streamlines the process for developers.
These updates are in line with the PR objectives and should enhance the development workflow.
Also applies to: 104-108
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
backend/README.md (3)
62-62: LGTM with suggestion: Updated lint command and heading styleThe lint command has been correctly updated to
pnpm backend lint, which is consistent with the monorepo structure and the transition to pnpm.Minor suggestion: Consider removing the trailing colon from the "Linting the Code:" heading for consistency with other headings in the document.
-### Linting the Code: +### Linting the CodeAlso applies to: 67-67
70-70: LGTM with suggestion: Updated test and production run commands, and heading styleThe commands have been correctly updated to use pnpm and the monorepo structure:
- Test command:
pnpm backend test- Production run command:
pnpm backend startThese changes are consistent with the project's new structure.
Minor suggestion: Consider removing the trailing colons from the "Testing:" and "Running in Production:" headings for consistency with other headings in the document.
-### Testing: +### Testing -### Running in Production: +### Running in ProductionAlso applies to: 75-75, 78-78
43-43: Minor: Wrap bare URL in angle bracketsTo improve compatibility with various Markdown processors and adhere to best practices, consider wrapping the bare URL in angle brackets.
-6. Visit http://localhost:3000 to enjoy your CodePair. +6. Visit <http://localhost:3000> to enjoy your CodePair.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
frontend/README.md (2)
30-41: LGTM! Minor suggestion for clarity.The updates to use
pnpmfor dependency installation and running the frontend application are correct and consistent with the monorepo structure. Great job on maintaining clear instructions!Consider adding a brief explanation about why the command is run from the root directory, to help users understand the monorepo structure. For example:
# In the root directory of the repository and run. +# This command uses the workspace configuration to run the frontend application. pnpm frontend dev
47-90: Great job updating commands. Minor formatting suggestion.The updates to use
pnpmwith the 'frontend' workspace prefix for all commands are correct and consistent with the monorepo structure. Well done!To improve formatting and address Markdownlint warnings, remove the trailing colons from the section headings:
-### Running the Development Server: +### Running the Development Server -### Building the Project: +### Building the Project -### Linting the Code: +### Linting the Code -### Previewing the Production Build: +### Previewing the Production Build -### Formatting the Code: +### Formatting the Code -### Checking Code Formatting: +### Checking Code Formatting🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- backend/README.md (2 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
backend/README.md
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
backend/README.md (3)
30-43: LGTM: Improved setup instructions for monorepo structureThe updated instructions for setting up and running the backend application are clear and consistent with the monorepo structure. The changes include:
- Using
pnpm installfrom the root directory for dependency installation.- Updating the command to run the backend application to
pnpm backend start:dev.These modifications streamline the setup process and promote consistent usage of the monorepo structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
43-43: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
54-54: LGTM: Updated build commandThe build command has been correctly updated to use
pnpm backend build, which is consistent with the monorepo structure and the transition to pnpm.
Line range hint
1-124: Overall: README successfully updated for monorepo structureThe README has been effectively updated to reflect the transition to a monorepo structure and the use of pnpm. The instructions for setup, building, testing, and running the project are clear and consistent with the new architecture. Minor suggestions have been made for heading style consistency and URL formatting, but these do not impact the overall quality and accuracy of the documentation.
Great job on maintaining comprehensive and up-to-date documentation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
51-51: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
59-59: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
67-67: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
75-75: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
frontend/README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-143: Excellent README structure and content.The overall structure and content of the README are well-organized, comprehensive, and provide clear guidance for working with the frontend project. The transition to pnpm is consistently reflected throughout the document, and all necessary aspects of the project are covered.
Great job on maintaining a high-quality README that will be valuable for developers working on this project!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks almost perfect! Thank you for your work.
I have a few comments:
- It seems that backend docker image isn't running properly.
- We should move
backend/.dockerignorefile to top directory. - Could you clarify what
# @formatmeans in the GitHub workflow files?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/README.md (1)
47-87: Minor: Remove trailing colons from headingsTo improve markdown formatting and address the Markdownlint warnings, consider removing the trailing colons from the section headings:
-### Running the Development Server: +### Running the Development Server -### Building the Project: +### Building the Project -### Linting the Code: +### Linting the Code -### Previewing the Production Build: +### Previewing the Production Build -### Formatting the Code: +### Formatting the Code -### Checking Code Formatting: +### Checking Code FormattingThis change will resolve the Markdownlint warnings and improve the overall formatting of the document.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml (2 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (4 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (2 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- .github/workflows/ci_backend.yaml
- .github/workflows/ci_frontend.yaml
- .github/workflows/gh_pages.yaml
- Dockerfile
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
frontend/README.md
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
backend/package.json (6)
2-2: LGTM: Package name updated to use scoped format.The change from "codepair-backend" to "@codepair/backend" aligns well with the monorepo structure being introduced. This scoped package naming convention will help in organizing and identifying packages within the monorepo.
9-9: LGTM: Added db:generate script for Prisma.The addition of the "db:generate" script is a good practice. It ensures that the Prisma client is generated based on the latest schema, which is crucial for maintaining type safety and keeping the ORM layer in sync with the database schema.
25-26: LGTM: Updated lint-staged to use pnpm.The change from npm to pnpm in the lint-staged configuration is consistent with the project's transition to pnpm. This ensures that the same package manager is used throughout the development process, including in pre-commit hooks.
35-35: LGTM: Added @langchain/openai dependency. Please provide usage context.The addition of the @langchain/openai dependency is noted. This aligns with the introduction of LangChain-related packages mentioned in the AI summary.
Could you provide more context on how this dependency will be used in the project? This information would help in understanding the purpose of this addition and ensure it aligns with the project's goals.
72-72: Clarify the removal of multiple devDependencies.The significant reduction in devDependencies, particularly the removal of essential tools like ESLint and Prettier, raises some concerns:
- These tools are crucial for maintaining code quality and consistency.
- Their removal might impact the development workflow.
Could you please provide more context on this change?
- If these dependencies have been moved to a shared configuration in the monorepo, please update the documentation to reflect this.
- If they've been removed unintentionally, consider restoring them.
- If there's another reason for their removal, please explain the new approach to maintaining code quality and consistency.
To verify the current setup, you can run:
This will show if these packages are available in the project, either directly or through workspace dependencies.
47-47: Verify the need for explicit express dependency.The addition of express as a direct dependency is noted. However, this might be redundant or potentially conflicting:
- NestJS typically includes Express through @nestjs/platform-express, which is already in the dependencies.
- Adding Express directly might lead to version conflicts with the one used by NestJS.
Could you clarify the reason for adding Express as a direct dependency? If it's not explicitly required, consider removing it to avoid potential conflicts. If it is needed, ensure that the version is compatible with the one used by NestJS.
To check the Express version used by NestJS, you can run:
This will show all instances of Express in the dependency tree, helping to identify any potential conflicts.
frontend/README.md (3)
30-41: LGTM: Updated instructions for monorepo structureThe changes in the "Getting Started" section accurately reflect the transition to a monorepo structure using
pnpm. The new instructions are clear and consistent with the project's new setup.
47-90: LGTM: Updated commands for monorepo structureThe commands in this section have been correctly updated to use the
pnpm frontendprefix, which is consistent with the monorepo structure. The change from.eslintrc.cjstoeslint.config.mjsis also accurately reflected.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
Line range hint
1-137: Overall: Excellent updates for monorepo transitionThe README has been successfully updated to reflect the transition to a monorepo structure using
pnpm. The changes are consistent throughout the document, providing clear instructions for setup, running the application, and various development commands. The updates improve the overall clarity and accuracy of the documentation for the new project structure.Great job on maintaining the document's organization while implementing these significant changes!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
47-47: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
55-55: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
63-63: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
71-71: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
87-87: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
| "lint": "eslint \"{src,apps,libs,test}/**/*.ts\" --fix", | ||
| "format": "prettier . --write", | ||
| "format:check": "prettier . --check" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve changes to lint and format scripts, but note indentation inconsistency.
The updates to the lint, format, and format:check scripts are good improvements:
- The lint script now covers more directories, enhancing code quality checks.
- The format scripts now apply to the entire project, ensuring consistent styling.
However, there's an indentation inconsistency:
The indentation in this file uses spaces, but according to a previous comment, the .prettierrc file sets useTabs to true. Please update the indentation in this file to use tabs for consistency with the project's Prettier configuration.
|
@devleejb Thank you for reviewing.
Additionally, I added The reason for adding this is because the image wasn't building properly, and removing the Husky setup helped resolve the issue. Additionally, since Git hooks aren't needed in the Docker environment, this change simplifies the build process. |
* Introduce Mono Repo structure using pnpm * Add setting for pnpm installation in docker * Change `pnpm ci` to `pnpm i` & `lint-staged` location * Fix README.md about full stack development mode * Change version in root package.json * Change formatting * Remove redundant pnpm installation step * Use `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` for CI environments * Clarify instruction in README.md * Fix instructions about package.json and version * Add generate prisma script * Fix frontend build error * Add dependency * Change off to error * Change into new pnpm-lock.yaml * Add cache "pnpm" in CI * Manage the version only in root `package.json` * Remove version pnpm * Add dockerfile * Delete ./backend/Dockerfile * Add package.json version * Add necessary setting in Dockerfile * Fix tab indentation and format script * Fix MAINTAINING.md * Fix format * Fix frontend, backend readme.md * Delete # @Format in yaml * Fix frontend readme.md * Fix Dockerfile and location of .dockerignore --------- Co-authored-by: blurfx <[email protected]>
What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR proposes the implementation of a mono repo structure for the CodePair project, which currently consists of a React frontend and a NestJS backend. Adopting a monorepo will not only streamline our development process but also ensure consistency across the codebase, making it easier for developers to work collaboratively.
Any background context you want to provide?
Adopting a mono repo structure is beneficial as it simplifies the development workflow, improves consistency in dependency versions, and facilitates better cross-team collaboration. By aligning both the frontend and backend under a single repository, we aim to increase the efficiency and maintainability of the codebase.
Our sibling project, Yorkie-JS-SDK, is currently utilizing pnpm to manage its monorepo, which allows us to maintain consistency across projects.
What are the relevant tickets?
Fixes #351
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
.prettierignorefile to exclude generated files from formatting.