Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vertical alignment distribution of data fix #25

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

jakubjezek001
Copy link
Member

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 commented Nov 6, 2024

Changelog Description

Adjusted vertical alignment and distribution of data in the code to ensure proper handling and organization of clip metadata.

Testing notes:

  1. Set your testing project timeline to have multiple tracks
  2. rename those track to be P01, P02, P02
  3. add some clip to P01
  4. add other shorter clips to other tracks above and make sure their duration is not longer than clip in P01 and its full framerange is between IN and OUT of P01
  5. select all clips and open Creator,
  6. Set vertical alignment to active
  7. Set hero track to P01
  8. Create and notice all clips were renamed to the same name and all instances are having the same clip name.

Closes #28

- Adjusted vertical alignment and distribution of data in the code to ensure proper handling and organization of clip metadata.
@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 added sponsored This is directly sponsored by a client or community member type: bug Something isn't working labels Nov 6, 2024
@robin-ynput
Copy link
Contributor

robin-ynput commented Nov 6, 2024

Just to be sure, is this one related to #12 or is it something else ?

- Refactored condition to handle clip boundaries.
- Added formation of a unique key for each used clip.
Simplify product name creation by using the 'variant' attribute instead of 'base_product_variant'. Update comparison to use 'variant' for consistency.
@jakubjezek001
Copy link
Member Author

jakubjezek001 commented Nov 12, 2024

Just to be sure, is this one related to #12 or is it something else ?

yes, only partly. I have added sub-issues and this is the related one #28

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 merged commit 62fc7d9 into develop Nov 12, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sponsored This is directly sponsored by a client or community member type: bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Vertical alignment workflow is broken
4 participants