Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "at risk" marker noting bitstring format might change in CR. #119

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2024

Conversation

msporny
Copy link
Member

@msporny msporny commented Dec 29, 2023

This PR is an attempt to address issue #93 by adding an at risk issue marker to note that the bitstring format might change during the Candidate Recommendation phase if there is implementer interest to align more closely with the IETF Token Status List specification.


Preview | Diff

@@ -662,6 +662,19 @@ <h2>Algorithms</h2>
and validate status lists as described by this document.
</p>

<p class="issue atrisk"
title="Attempting alignment with IETF Token Status List specification">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Attempting alignment with IETF OAuth Status List specification"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like they're going to change the name to "Token Status List" based on their issue tracker oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list#77 (comment)

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jan 10, 2024

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-01-10

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

3.5. Add "at risk" marker noting bitstring format might change in CR. (pr vc-bitstring-status-list#119)

See github pull request vc-bitstring-status-list#119.

Manu Sporny: adds an at risk marker to the bitstring format.
… because there is parallel work in the IETF, so we might wish to align.

Brent Zundel: IETF work https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/.

@msporny
Copy link
Member Author

msporny commented Jan 13, 2024

Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.

@msporny msporny merged commit d498313 into main Jan 13, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@msporny msporny deleted the msporny-ietf-alignment branch January 13, 2024 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants