Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add protocol statements related to pub/sub of status lists. #107

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2024

Conversation

msporny
Copy link
Member

@msporny msporny commented Dec 28, 2023

This PR is being raised to address issue #44 by stating that HTTPS should be used to publish status lists and protocols like OHTTP should be used to retrieve status lists.

These normative statements are untestable, so we might want to downgrade this language to advisement in the privacy considerations sections.


Preview | Diff

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@dlongley dlongley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving w/Ted's suggestions.

Copy link
Contributor

@David-Chadwick David-Chadwick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using the latest JOSE/COSE draft spec

secured with SD-JWT might have content-type `application/sd-jwt`.
For example, a verifiable credential secured with Data Integrity Proofs might
have media type `application/vc+ld+json`, while a verifiable credential
secured with SD-JWT might have media type `application/sd-jwt`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
secured with SD-JWT might have media type `application/sd-jwt`.
secured with SD-JWT might have media type `application/vc+ld+json+sd-jwt`.

Copy link
Member Author

@msporny msporny Jan 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There doesn't seem to be consensus on this media type in the latest JOSE COSE spec.

@msporny
Copy link
Member Author

msporny commented Jan 13, 2024

Normative, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, remaining change not applied with an explanation, no objections, merging.

@msporny msporny merged commit d7d4a47 into main Jan 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@msporny msporny deleted the msporny-sl-protocol branch January 13, 2024 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants