Add security section about insecure hash algorithms. #159
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
peacekeeper
requested review from
gkellogg,
dlongley and
yamdan
as code owners
gkellogg
reviewed
Aug 18, 2023
gkellogg
requested changes
Aug 18, 2023
dlongley
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2023
Co-authored-by: Gregg Kellogg <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dan Yamamoto <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dan Yamamoto <[email protected]>
peacekeeper
changed the title
gkellogg
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An attempt to add a note about hashing algorithms becoming insecure, to address one of the comments in the TAG review in w3ctag/design-reviews#855 (comment).
Preview | Diff