-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[viostor] Backport vioscsi SendSRB fixes and improvements #1174
[viostor] Backport vioscsi SendSRB fixes and improvements #1174
Conversation
Backports fixes and improvements from vioscsi PRs virtio-win#1150 and virtio-win#1162 virtqueue struct vq was also removed in favour of adaptExt->vq[QueueNumber], which results in a minor performance increase. Signed-off-by: benyamin-codez <[email protected]>
I'm taking a punt that you're the person to ask the following. Please let me know if I should ask someone else. |
We have an upstream bug for vioscsi. Viostor is unexpected behavior, we need to investigate the reason. |
From a quick look it appears to be the same issue, i.e. an unexpected 0x80070002 on a file copy... |
If I'm not mistaken, this one should be good to go too, per #1181 (comment). Best regards, cc: @vrozenfe, @kostyanf14 |
Thanks! |
Can anyone advise if these fixes to viostor have made it into the binary downloads available from https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/direct-downloads/ yet? |
Backports fixes and improvements from vioscsi PRs #1150 and #1162
virtqueue struct vq was also removed in favour of adaptExt->vq[QueueNumber], which results in a minor performance increase.