-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Upgrade monitoring stack #1071
Conversation
This is awesome, but I'd like this to be a test on how we do cherry-picks, since I'd like to have this in |
/cherry-pick stable/zed |
@mnaser: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of stable/zed in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick stable/zed |
@mnaser: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of stable/zed in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
régate |
regate |
@mnaser: #1071 failed to apply on top of branch "stable/zed":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick stable/zed |
@mnaser: #1071 failed to apply on top of branch "stable/zed":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@mnaser: new issue created for failed cherrypick: #1075 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Loki 2.7.3 wasn't playing well with some queries from Grafana 10.3 and updating it to 2.9.6 fixed the issues.
While at it, I've updated Vector and Grafana/Prometheus as well.
Tested it in a live environment and also AIO. No new errors noticed in the logs.
Vector is a bit more noisy about issues but it doesn't prevent logs from being forwarded (especially, it complains when a log event is missing expected labels.. whereas before it would just ignore it).