fix: Use hygiene_with_config instead of hygiene (#8848)

### Description

<!--
  ✍️ Write a short summary of your work.
  If necessary, include relevant screenshots.
-->

### Testing Instructions

<!--
  Give a quick description of steps to test your changes.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: 강동윤 (Donny) <[email protected]>

crates/turbopack-ecmascript/src/lib.rs

@@ -803,7 +803,14 @@ async fn gen_content_with_visitors(
                 for visitor in root_visitors {
                     program.visit_mut_with(&mut visitor.create());
                 }
-                program.visit_mut_with(&mut swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::hygiene::hygiene());
+                program.visit_mut_with(
+                    &mut swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::hygiene::hygiene_with_config(
+                        swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::hygiene::Config {
+                            top_level_mark: eval_context.top_level_mark,
+                            ..Default::default()
+                        },
+                    ),
+                );
                 program.visit_mut_with(&mut swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::fixer::fixer(None));
 
                 // we need to remove any shebang before bundling as it's only valid as the first

crates/turbopack-tests/tests/execution/turbopack/renaming/eval/input/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+module; // <- This is important!
+
+it("should not rename variables when eval is used", () => {
+  const modules = {
+    x: (module) => {
+      "use strict";
+      return eval("module");
+    },
+  };
+  const moduleArrowFunction = (module) => {
+    "use strict";
+    return eval("module");
+  };
+  function moduleFunciton(module) {
+    "use strict";
+    return eval("module");
+  }
+  expect(modules.x(42)).toBe(42);
+  expect(moduleArrowFunction(42)).toBe(42);
+  expect(moduleFunciton(42)).toBe(42);
+});