Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #3928

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update README.md #3928

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

NT-Soft
Copy link

@NT-Soft NT-Soft commented Nov 15, 2024

Make it more readable for users.

Make it more read.
@pyrates999
Copy link

That removes a link, and the link has instructions for if you are running windows defender antivirus. So this is not a good idea.

adding link to the previous commit
@NT-Soft
Copy link
Author

NT-Soft commented Nov 16, 2024

There is the link. I added again.

@Dimava
Copy link

Dimava commented Nov 16, 2024

@NT-Soft is a new account created in Nov 8, 2024 and is not even a developer (has <1000 own LOC)

ExplorerPatcher repo is a high-security environment and people with <10 accepted open-source PRs and <3 years of experience should be considered malicious by default

I recommend closing this issue as SPAM and banning @NT-Soft from opening further issues

@NT-Soft
Copy link
Author

NT-Soft commented Nov 16, 2024

@NT-Soft is a new account created in Nov 8, 2024 and is not even a developer (has <1000 own LOC)

ExplorerPatcher repo is a high-security environment and people with <10 accepted open-source PRs and <3 years of experience should be considered malicious by default

I recommend closing this issue as SPAM and banning @NT-Soft from opening further issues

I just started. And i wss testing C# code ans sometime dont work

@NT-Soft
Copy link
Author

NT-Soft commented Nov 16, 2024

.btw i comprehend the arguments related to safety, particularly in highly secured places such as the explorerPatcher repository. I have just created this GitHub account but have been in development for several years, dating back from VBScript, C#, and other projects like unity ect... In all of my development approaches, I have always strived to do responsible development with an aim of giving back to the open-source culture.

As for explorerpatcher. I want also to improve the program files sometimes because i am still learning C basics and stuck in C# basic things.

I am certainly not a spam account. I am an individual software developer willing to just do myself. My description is not writed by bot. In case there is anything you want me to prove regarding my previous experience or any work done, goodbye .

@Dimava
Copy link

Dimava commented Nov 16, 2024

If you are a human, watch the Don't Contribute to Open Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nY_cy8zcO4

Not understanding where does the link links means PR is clearly made by LLM
Mentioning "highly secured places such as the explorerPatcher" means the comment was clearly written by LLM as that was never the point
Talking about C and C# when the PR is in MD means it's clearly not a developer
Having typos and inconsistent casing in names means clearly it's a spam
Okay buy

@NT-Soft
Copy link
Author

NT-Soft commented Nov 16, 2024

Thx for the video.

@NT-Soft
Copy link
Author

NT-Soft commented Nov 16, 2024

If you are a human, watch the Don't Contribute to Open Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nY_cy8zcO4

Not understanding where does the link links means PR is clearly made by LLM
Mentioning "highly secured places such as the explorerPatcher" means the comment was clearly written by LLM as that was never the point
Talking about C and C# when the PR is in MD means it's clearly not a developer
Having typos and inconsistent casing in names means clearly it's a spam
Okay buy

I have typos because i am using bad keyboard very damaged a lot. But realy. The vid that you said i watched some mins and knowed. Thank for advice

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants